Full text of "Modern Psychical Phenomena"

See other formats

r \

Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2018 with funding from
Duke University Libraries

https ;//archive.org/details/modernpsychicalp01carr

MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

BOOKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR

Psychical Phenomena and the War
The Physical Phenomena of Spiritualism
The Coming Science
The Problems of Psychical Research
Personal Experiences in Spiritualism
Eusapia Palladino: and Her Phenomena
Death : Its Causes and Phenomena
Death Deferred
The Natural Food of Man
Vitality, Fasting and Nutrition
True Ghost Stories
Hindu Mag.ic
Psychic Development
Hindu Psychic Development (“Yoga”)
Etc, Etc.

TRANSLATIONS

Spiritism and Psychology

By Professor Theodore Flournoy

HUGE PIYPNOTIC WHEEL, AS USED IN THE "MYSTERIES
OF MYRa/' containing more than 50 REVOLVING
MIRRORS, REFLECTING LIGHT

MODERN

PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

RECENT RESEARCHES AND SPECULATIONS

HEREWARD ^RRINGTON, Ph.D.

Author of “Psychical Phenomena and the War,” “The Problems
of Psychical Research,” “The Physical Phenomena
of Spiritualism,” etc., etc.

ILLUSTRATED

125044

NEW YORK

DODD, MEAD AND COMPANY
1919

By bodd, mead and company, Ino.

'r/ '
I

MRS. REGINALD DeKOVEN

With Sincere Appreciation

125044

PREFACE

Two objections are frequently made to the study of Psy¬
chical Phenomena. The first of these is that this re¬
search leads nowhere: we run against a stone wall, in
our investigations, and that beyond this point we (seem¬
ingly) cannot pass. We have advanced, in other words,
into a hopeless cul-de-sac, from which there appears to be
no egress. The second is the Cui Bonof objection:
“ Even though these phenomena be true, of what use are
they? Even granting their actuality, of what practical
benefit are they to the world?”

Both these objections have been met and answered in
the past by pens far more competent than mine; but I may
perhaps add a few words, in this place, in order to repeat
once again our replies to such objections, which are by
no means new!

Many psychical researchers have felt the full force of
these arguments. Professor William James, for exam¬
ple, in his Memories and Studies (pp. 175—76), says: —

“ I confess that at times I have been tempted to believe
that the Creator has eternally intended this department
of nature to remain baffling, — to prompt our curiosities
and hopes and suspicions all in equal measure, so that,
although ghosts and clairvoyances, and raps and messages
from spirits, are always seeming to exist and can never be
fully explained away, they also can never be susceptible
of full corroboration.”

'‘But” Professor James goes on to say, “ it is hard to

vii

PREFACE

viii

believe that the Creator has really put any big array of
phenomena into the world merely to defy and mock our
scientific tendencies; so my deeper belief is that we psy¬
chical researchers have been too precipitate with our
hopes, and that we must expect to mark progress not by
quarter-centuries but by half-centuries or whole centu¬
ries.”

That is very true ! Yet, compared with other branches
of scientific investigation, it might almost be said that
Psychical Research in the past few decades has made
far more progress than any other branch of learning in a
similar period of time. When we take into consideration
the fact that scientific psychical research is yet less than
forty years “ old when we consider that, — in 1882, in
which year the Society for Psychical Research (S. P. R.)
was founded — hypnotism, dreams, telepathy, crystal
gazing, automatic writing, the vast powers of the sub¬
conscious mind, dissociation of personality, multiple per¬
sonality, and many other phenomena today recognized
and accepted by “ orthodox ” science, — were then still as
little understood and as little accepted as the more strik¬
ing phenomena are today: when we remember how these
phenomena have gradually gained acceptance — owing
chiefly to the indefatigable labours of the S. P. R. : when
we further take into consideration the fact that many
other phenomena (such as apparitions, “ ghosts,” haunted
houses, telekinesis, materialization, thought photography
— even spirit communication itself) are today gradually
but surely winning acceptance, we justly feel that enor¬
mous progress has been made in this field; and that,
doubtless, much more important and significant results
will be forthcoming within the next few decades, as the
result of better methods of investigation, and a better

PREFACE

comprehension of the necessary modes of research. Per¬
sonally, I have always liked to compare progress in psy¬
chical research with the early progress in electricity —
an important but at times a dangerous and ill-understood
power.* The electricity generated by rubbing the cat’s
back is a far cry from the enormous power generated by
the great dynamos which light our cities and run our rail¬
ways; but it is the same power, in a different degree.
Similarly with psychical phenomena. We are as yet only
in the “ back-scratching stage ” ; but a century or two
hence it will be a very different matter and we shall then
see the enormous value, importance and significance of
these phenomena which we are now groping among and
endeavouring to establish.

What I have just said is in a sense also a reply to the
second of the objections above raised, viz: Of what use
are these phenomena, even if true? We now know that
many of them are of the very greatest significance and
value — even from a practical standpoint — enabling us
to understand our own nature; while, when other phe¬
nomena become equally established, their importance will
very readily be seen. Is the proof of survival “ use¬
less”? Is the proof that we possess astounding and
'hitherto unsuspected powers within ourselves likewise
“useless”? Is the application of all this to our daily
lives also “useless”? It would be foolish indeed to
think so; and I have endeavoured, in Part I of this book,
to point out a few of the many significant influences upon

1 Dangerous, possibly, yes : but just as we only learned to control and
obtain the ultimate mastery of electricity by research and experiment, so
we can only learn to control and obviate the possible danger from psychic
experiments in the same manner. If men had applied the “ too-dangerous-
to-play-with ” policy to the study of electricity we should not by now
have arrived very far in our understanding of electrical phenomena !
Surely, it is the same with regard to “ Psychics ! ”

PREFACE

our science and our lives which would naturally flow from
our acceptance of these facts. We must always remem¬
ber that the last thing we know of any science is what it
is all about! Conic sections were studied for nearly two
thousand years before their utility was discovered; and
then, at the end of this long period of abstract study,
they were found to be the necessary key with which to
attain the knowledge of one of the most important laws
of Nature. “ The really profound changes in human
life all have their ultimate origin in knowledge pursued
for its own sake. The use of the compass was not in¬
troduced into Europe till the end of the twelfth century
A. D., more than 3000 years after its first use in China.
The importance which the science of electro-magnetism
has since assumed in every department of human life is
not due to the superior practical bias of Europeans, but
to the fact that in the West electrical and magnetic phe¬
nomena were studied by men who were dominated by
abstract theoretic interests.” {An Introduction to Math¬
ematics, by A. N. Whitehead, F. R. S., pp. 32—33.)
When Michael Faraday was asked (regarding induction) ,
“What is the use of this discovery?” he answered:
“ What is the use of a child — it grows to be a man! ”
Surely, nothing could be more a propos the case in point!
Let us see -to it that the Child of Psychical Research is not
still-born !

The general character and arrangement of the present
book will be sufficiently apparent to the reader from the
“ Contents ” page — Part I endeavouring to outline a
few of the many relationships and bearings of psychical
phenomena upon our science and our thought; Part II
detailing some of the newer researches and speculations

PREFACE

in this fascinating field; while Part III gives an account
of some experiments conducted by Dr. W. H. Bates and
myself in crystal gazing and crystal vision — in which an
entirely new technic was applied — inasmuch as our aim
was to study the actual physiological changes taking place
within the eyes, during the production of crystal visions.
This is, we believe, the first attempt so far made to arrive
at a definite understanding of the actual physiology of
crystal visions.

Several Chapters in this book have already appeared
in various psychical and other Journals — The Occult Re¬
view, Azoth, The Annals of Psychical Science, The Psy¬
chical Research Review, Munsey’s Magazine, etc. — ac¬
knowledgment to which is hereby made, as well as thanks
to their editors, for their courtesy in granting permission
to reproduce these articles in the present volume.

H. C.

CONTENTS

PART I

THE RELATION OF PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA TO
EVOLUTION, PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGY
AND ETHICS

CHAPTER PAGE

I The Destiny of Man: Physical and Spirit¬
ual . 3

II Abnormal vs. Supernormal Psychology . . 14

III Vitality and the Law of Conservation . . 36

IV The Origin of Evil; With a Discussion as to

Its Nature . 59

PART II

RECENT EXPERIMENTS AND THEORIES

V The Coming Science: Psychical Research , 79

VI Personal Reminiscences of Eusapia Palladino 96

VII What are Ghosts? . 115

VIII Psychic Photography . 125

IX Projecton of the “ Astral ” Body .... 146

X Instrumental Communication with the

“ Spirit World ” . 155

XI Mathematical Proofs of a “ Spirit World ” . 169

XII The Sexes Hereafter: Do They Continue to

Exist? . 185

XIII Psychic Healing: Shell Shock .... 192

XIV On “Obsession” . 214

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

XV The Talking Horses of Elberfeld .... 232

XVI Have Plants Souls? . 250

XVII The Psychology of “ Alice in Wonderland ”

AND “ Through the Looking-Glass ” . . 262

PART III

RECENT RESEARCHES IN CRYSTAL VISION
AND CRYSTAL GAZING

XVHI Recent Researches in Crystal Vision and
Crystal Gazing, by Hereward Carrington,
Ph.D., and W. H. Bates, M.D . 275

Reports . 309

Index to Names . . c, t.-, 329

ILLUSTRATIONS

H3T)notic Wheel .

Frontispiece

FIG.

PAGE

“ Thought Photographs ” .

Facing

130

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Following

130

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Following

130

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Facing

132

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Facing

132

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Facing

134

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Following

134

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Following

134

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Following

134

lO.

“ Psychic Photograph ” .

Following

134

1 1.

Photograph of a “ Ghost ” .

Facing

136

12.

Enlargement of the “ Head ” . . . .

Facing

136

13-

Photograph of a “ Ghost ” .

Facing

142

14.

“ Vital Radiations ” .

Facing

142

15-

“ Astral Body ” — Early Stages

Facing

146

16.

“ Astral Body ” — Later Stages

Facing

146

17-

“ Vital Radiations ” .

Facing

148

18.

Atomic Structure of the “ Astral Body ” .

Facing

148

19.

Apparatus for registering the “ Astral
Body ” .

Facing

160

20.

The “ Dynamistograph ” : Detail .

Facing

160

21.

The “ Dynamistograph ” : General View .

Following 160

22.

“ Obsessed ! ” .

Facing

216

PART I. THE RELATION OF PSYCHICAL
PHENOMENA TO EVOLUTION, PSY¬
CHOLOGY, BIOLOGY AND ETHICS

MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

CHAPTER I

THE DESTINY OF MAN: PHYSICAL AND SPIRITUAL

Of two facts modern science feels quite certain: (i)
That this earth, on which we dwell, was at one time in
the past Too hot to support life; and (2) that at some
time in the future it will be too cold to support animate
existence upon its surface. Somehow, at some time,
therefore, life must have come into being upon this earth
of ours; and it is equally certain that, at some distant date
in the future, it will be extinguished. We thus come into
contact with two terrific and as yet unsolved questions —
that of the origin of animate life, and its final destination.
Life in a physical organism can exist only within very
narrow limits — between the boiling and the freezing
points of water. Above and below these, life, as we
know it, is impossible. Is this all? Let us consider the
question a little more fully.

We know, for example, that for the “ thermo-dy¬
namic ” theory, the universe in its totality is but a vast ma¬
chine, in which all the changes are due to the differences
of temperature existing between its extreme limits —
namely, the incandescent nebulae on the one hand, and
on the other the absolute Zero of interstellar space (-273°
C). In the course of this cooling (the degradation of
energy) from one of these limits to the other the chemical
combinations are formed — so unstable — which consti¬
tute our living being. But this condition, favourable to

MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the unfoldment of life, would only have appeared very
late,^ and then only to last a short time, since a further
fall of some dozen degrees would suffice to congeal for
ever this protoplasm. So that one might conclude with
M. Henri Poincare that life is but a short episode be¬
tween two eternities of death, and that, in this episode
even, conscious thought has lasted and will last but a mo¬
ment. “ Thought is only a flash in the middle of a long
night! Yet it is this flash which is everything! ”

There are some of us who cannot believe that this
“ flash in the pan ” is everything. For us life is of more
value; it has more definite purpose. Yet, still, one must
accept facts, if he be a true scientist, no matter whither
they may point. This all may be true ! Let us consider
the end of our earth, from the purely physical or cosmic
point of view, — so that we may the more fully appreciate
the catastrophe awaiting us — or rather this earth on
which we dwell. Consider “ the end of the world ” for
a moment — a thought which should give pause even to
the most superficial among us, — if thought about at all.

The End of the World! How terrible the mental
picture which these words bring to the mind! How fear¬
ful the catastrophe that is invariably pictured when they
are spoken. The first idea that occurs to one is: “ What
could happen to end this world? What would be the de¬
tails of the catastrophe ? ”

Well, there are many theories. Scientific men have
pondered over this problem for many years, and without
coming to much agreement. Probably the first thought
that comes to the mind is that the world will crash into

1 Toward 40° C. ; i.e., quite near the final term of this gigantic fall of
temperature, when one thinks of the millions and millions of degrees
from its point of departure.

THE DESTINY OF MAN

a comet — such as Halley’s — and the two, colliding with
terrific force, will be shattered to pieces, — our earth, as
well as the comet, — which we don’t care much about,
anyway, — and so every living thing upon the earth would
be ground to powder or hurled off into space at an in¬
credible rate of speed.

Probably every one has had this bad dream at one time
or another in their lives — of being shot forth, like the
stone from a catapult, into the cold, limitless abysses of
space.

And the earth from which we fell? That would have
been ground to dust in the first terrific concussion. One
can imagine the tumbling of giant buildings, the mighty
rush of waters, the belch of fire and flame, the deafening
roar, and the human shrieks that testified to the greatest
tragedy that had ever happened since the creation of the
universe.

And yet it is now almost certain that nothing of the
sort will or could happen. Of course we cannot say that
it is impossible ; but it is at present considered to be next
to impossible — so much so that no one need ever fear
any such catastrophe happening to our earth. And why
not? For the following reasons:

The old notion was that a comet was a huge mass of
solid matter, dense and heavy, like our earth. But mod¬
ern astronomy has shown us that such an idea is false.
The modern conception of the comet is that it is chiefly a
cloud of scattered particles, shred-like remainders of
ancient nebulous matter, which somehow did not become
bound up with the rest of it in the construction of worlds.
They are “ left-overs ” — remnants as it were. The
probability of one of these bodies and the earth coming
into contact is infinitely less than the probability of a col-

6 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

lision between two peas, moving about in different direc¬
tions in Madison Square Garden. Even if such a col¬
lision did occur, however, what would happen? Prob¬
ably nothing more than a meteoric display of some
grandeur — of great interest to the astronomer. Our
peril from a comet, therefore, is scarcely what we had
conceived it to be !

A far greater danger to our earth consists in its col¬
lision with meteoric bodies, composed, as they are,
partly of iron and partly of stone. Every year num¬
bers of these bodies are seen to fall, some of them being
so small they can just be identified as meteors; others
weighing a ton or more. It is a rather remarkable
fact that practically not one of these larger bodies has
ever been seen to fall; but their position and composition
makes it certain that they are of celestial origin. So far
as we have any scientific record, however, there has
never been an instance reported in which these
meteorites have injured man or done more than insig¬
nificant damage. Even the larger bodies (weighing a
ton or more) have had no appreciable effect upon the
earth’s history. So far as the actual facts go, then, we
need have no fear of them. But the questions arise:
If bodies of this size and weight can come out of the
air, why should not an infinitely larger one do so — one
a mile or so in size, for instance, and weighing hun¬
dreds of tons? What would happen if such a body
came into collision with the earth? Would that not
smash it up very appreciably?

If we examine the smaller bodies that fall to the
earth — those weighing a ton or less, we find that the
greater part of their energy is used up before they reach
the earth by their passage through the thirty miles or

THE DESTINY OF MAN

more of air through which they have to travel. This
is proved by the fact that even the heavier bodies pene¬
trate but a slight distance into the ground. But in the
case of a body a mile or more in extent, it would be dif¬
ferent. Comparatively a small part of its energy would
be used up in its passage to the solid earth, so that the
shock to the earth would be considerable. It has been
calculated that if a body twenty miles or so in diameter
struck the earth squarely, and at the speed of thirty miles
a second, it would probably be sufficient — not to shat¬
ter the earth to pieces — but to jar it so considerably
that life upon its surface would become impossible.

Is the earth to end, then, by its collision with a giant
meteor? As we have seen, it would be conceivable, if
such a body came into contact with it; so the question
is: Will it?

No; it is next to impossible for it to do so, and for
the following reasons:

When meteorites are examined, their surfaces are
found to be rent and torn; they exhibit cracks and joints
of an extraordinary character; they are more or less per¬
fectly crystallized. What does all this show? That
these bodies have been cast up by volcanoes, have been
propelled great distances into space; so far, indeed, that
they have passed beyond the attractive power of the
world from which they sprang, and have flown off into
space. Meteorites are, therefore, of ’volcanic origin.
Now, it has been shown that bodies of more than 2,000
feet in cubic volume are invariably broken up by the
violent expulsive action, and are not cast up entire.
They are powdered more or less. This being so, it is
evident that meteorites can never be very much bigger
than those which have been found heretofore upon our

8 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

earth; and so this danger vanishes. The world will not
be destroyed in that manner.

But there are still other heavenly bodies with which
the earth might collide — strange bodies, of which little
is known as yet, either as to their origin or motions.
These are the asteroids. Between Mars and Jupiter
there are thousands of bodies all the way from a
hundred to a thousand miles in diameter, which have
recently been discovered. Close to our earth — be¬
tween us and Mars, — there is one, known as Vulcan.
It is of irregular shape, and — what is more impor¬
tant — moves in a somewhat irregular orbit. It is un¬
certain how these minute worlds originated. They are
too large to have been ejected by volcanic action; too
small to have become formed after the regular manner
of worlds. Astronomers have thought that they are
the fragments of worlds, dashed to pieces at some time
in the past — just as our world might be dashed to
pieces in the future; or which have exploded, by reason
of the Internal pressure within them. This view is
largely given up, however. But whatever their origin,
the fact remains that they exist, and there is, therefore,
the possibility that they may, at some time in the future,
collide with the earth. Might they do so?

It is almost certain that they could not. Briefly, the
evidence is this: We know that collisions of this char¬
acter occurred on the moon long ago — probably a
hundred million years or so. But none since ! There
is no evidence, geological or otherwise, that any similar
collisions have taken place since, — either on the moon
or on the earth. On the contrary, the unbroken line of
animal life seems to prove that such an event has never
occurred. It may be considered as mathematically

THE DESTINY OF MAN

certain, therefore (as certain as anything can well be),
that no collisions of the kind will occur In the future —
at least for hundreds of millions of years to come — In
which promise we can surely rest content!

If, then, the earth Is unlikely to be smashed to bits, as
the result of a collision with some foreign world, how
else might It end? It has been supposed that the
oxygen of the atmosphere — Its most Important con¬
stituent, and that which renders life possible — Is gradu¬
ally being used; the air Is being deprived of this gas, for
want of which all animals, including man, will eventu¬
ally die. Will this be the miserable end of our proud
world — to suffocate like rats in a trap?

Certain it is that oxygen is being constantly with¬
drawn from the atmosphere, and it is as yet uncertain
how the equilibrium is maintained. It is generally con¬
ceived that It is somehow fed into the atmosphere from
the vast spaces beyond. At all events, it is clear that
the mass of the atmosphere has not appreciably changed
for millions of years, as the history of fossil life on the
planet shows us. Even a slight increase in the mass of
the atmosphere would result in a tremendous gain In
the temperature; and this, in turn, would cause a change
in the heat of the sea and result In the formation of
great clouds of vapour, covering the Earth — something
like those on Jupiter — and this would alter or render
altogether impossible life on our planet. From all this
It will be seen that no great change in the mass of the
Earth’s atmosphere has been noticed for many thousands
of years in the past.

Nor has the chemical composition of the Earth’s at¬
mosphere been changed to any appreciable degree for
an equal length of time. Experiments have demon-

10 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

strated the fact that plants and animals will not tolerate
any great change in the composition of the atmosphere
which feeds them; and as there has been no great change
in the life history of our planet, it becomes obvious that
the chemical composition of the Earth’s atmosphere has
remained about the same for millions of years, and will
consequently continue to do so for an equal time to
come.

Our belief is that the “ end of the world ” will be when
it has become too cool to support life upon its surface.
The earth was supposed to have been a molten mass at
one time, which is gradually becoming cooled, and when
it has cooled sufficiently, so as to render no longer pos¬
sible the presence of life upon its surface, that will be
the real end of the world.

There are two sources of heat for our world — the
sun and the earth’s own internal warmth. Some scien¬
tists have computed that, at its present rate of emitting
heat, the sun can only continue to do so for from ten
to twenty million years longer. This calculation has,
however, recently been shown to be far less than the
truth, — partly for the reason that, as the sun shrinks in
size it also becomes hotter; partly because of the fact
that recent researches in radio-activity have rendered
it probable that this length of time may be increased
infinitely; so long, in fact, that no possible calculation
would serve to show us the immense length of time it
would require to cool the sun to the necessary extent.

The earth is hot in its interior, cool at its surface. As
the interior shrinks, the cool exterior is forced to shrink
to some extent to keep pace with its interior. The re¬
sult is that inequalities or “ wrinkles ” are formed on

THE DESTINY OF MAN

1 1

its surface. These wrinkles are, in reality, the
mountains and the depths of the oceans. If the earth
were to become cool inside, this “ wrinkling ” would
cease, and in a few million years the whole crust of the
earth would sink down beneath the waves. To the extent
that the heat at its centre is maintained, however, this
would be impossible. The heat is partially maintained
by the same process which keeps the sun hot — it becomes
hotter as it shrinks. Hence the heat at the centre is con¬
stantly increased, as well as decreased, though not in like
proportion.

As to the theory that the earth will ultimately cool
from its interior outwards, what has been said of the
sun holds good here also. Researches in radio-active
substances have rendered it certain that activity can be
maintained for a length of time so great that all ordi¬
nary mathematics are rendered powerless in their at¬
tempt to grasp the immensity of the figures reached.

Scientific men have also advanced the idea that a
certain amount of the world’s energy is constantly being
converted into a form of energy which will become no
longer available for practical use, and hence the quality
of available energy will some day be completely dissi¬
pated and lost. All organic life and movement will
cease when this condition has been reached; this will
be a real “ end of the world.”

Thus it stands: For science, there is but one ac¬
ceptable conclusion — namely, that the earth will con¬
tinue cooling, until that point is reached when physical
life can no longer be sustained; and at that point, the
human race, as we know it, will become extinct — will
perish, together with its thoughts, its arts and sciences.

12 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

its strivings, its ideals, Its sufferings. Its petty bickerings
and jealousies as well as its nobility, its courage and
heroism, its spiritual aspirations!

And is this the end? Of the physical man and the
earth on which he dwells, it assuredly is. There can be
no other conclusion. But is there nothing In man which
survives? Has all this been for naught? As John
Fiske has asked, in his little book upon this question:
“ Are man’s highest spiritual qualities, into the produc¬
tion of which all this creative energy has gone, to dis¬
appear with the rest? Has all this work been done for
nothing? Is it all ephemeral, all a bubble that bursts,
a vision that fades? For aught that science can tell
us, it may be so, but I can see no good reason for be¬
lieving any such thing. On such a view the riddle of
the universe becomes a riddle without a meaning.” Or,
as E. Walter Maunder, F. R. A. S. reminds us, {Are the
Worlds Inhabited? pp. 159-60): —

“ It seems impossible to believe that life, so rare a
fruit of the Universe, intelligent Life, conscious Life,
to which the long course of evolution has been so mani¬
festly leading up through all the long ages, should have
no better destiny than a final and hopeless extinction;
that this Earth and all the efforts and aspirations of the
long generations of men should have no worthier end
than to swing, throughout the eternal ages, an empty
frozen heap of dust, circling round the extinct cinder
that was once its sun! If we look backward, we seem
to discern clear signs of progress; If we look forward,
we discern nothing but the veil. Science is but or¬
ganized experience, and experience of the future we
have none. . . .”

All this does indeed seem incredible — and yet —

THE DESTINY OF MAN

and yet — it may be true ! If no spiritual world exists,
it is true. Life would be meaningless, this world without
a purpose. We must then penetrate this veil, and en¬
deavour to ascertain which of these two interpretations
is the correct one. For if we can prove, by our re¬
searches, that something in man survives the tomb; that
there is a real spiritual world, — of light, harmony, hap¬
piness and activity, — then indeed is another interpreta¬
tion of the facts possible. But again the only way in
which we can prove this is by psychical research — by
those very ridiculed and despised phenomena, which are
thus seen to be, not mere childish curiosities, but per¬
haps the greatest interpreters of cosmic truths that the
world has ever seen ! For by these means alone can
we peer into the future, — can we pierce the veil. By
these means alone can we prove the truth as to the
Nature of our Cosmos!

CHAPTER II

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY

“ It will be a great day when the subliminal psychology of Myers
and his followers and the abnormal psychology of Freud and his
school succeed in meeting, and will supplement and complete each
other. That will be a great forward step in science and in the
understanding of our nature.” — Flournoy, Spiritism and Psychol¬
ogy, p. vii.

Abnormal psychology deals with diseased or abnor¬
mal mental states and processes; supernormal psychol¬
ogy studies the psychical processes underlying certain
unusual phenomena formerly called “ supernatural ”
— such as telepathy, clairvoyance, premonitions, etc.
In a certain sense, it is true that where one ends, the
other begins. But — and this is a fact often over¬
looked — it is also true that these two sciences are to a
large extent inter-blended, and that abnormal and super¬
normal phenomena shade off one into the other, and
in fact are one and the same thing, to a very large ex¬
tent. They are not opposed or antagonistic, as psychi¬
atrists seem to imagine; on the contrary, they supple¬
ment one another to an astonishing degree, and in fact
are very often only different angles or aspects of the
same phenomena.

Let me give one example which illustrates in a beau¬
tiful manner the point here made. A girl of my ac¬
quaintance fell into Lake Minnetonka, sank three times,
and was rescued when unconscious. She was very ill
for several weeks thereafter, developed pneumonia, be¬
came delirious at times, and in short nearly died before

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

recovering. During her period of convalescence, she
became (apparently) clairvoyant; she would tell her
mother what letters were In the mall-box in the morn¬
ing, and often the approximate contents of these letters.
One morning, she awoke, feeling much better; coinci¬
dentally, her “ clairvoyance ” had entirely disappeared,
and never again did she display the least sign of being
“ psychic.” These facts were told me by the young lady
herself, and the main facts were also corroborated by
her mother.^

Now, here is a case where, coincidentally with illness
(an abnormal state) supernormal phenomena were
manifested. We cannot say that the abnormal condi¬
tion was per se the cause of the clairvoyance, — since
many thousands of persons have gone through similar
experiences, without manifesting any such remarkable
phenomena. And certainly we cannot say that the
clairvoyance was the cause of the pneumonia ! That is,
neither caused the other, but both were due, apparently,
to some one underlying cause, which rendered their co¬
incidence in time possible. Here, abnormal and super¬
normal phenomena seem to go hand in hand — associ¬
ated in the same case at the same time.

To take another Instance: Eusapia Palladino’s re¬
markable phenomena — her mediumship — dated from
an accident in which she fell and cut her head upon a
cart wheel. The famous ” cold breeze ” issued from
this scar, after a seance; and over it grew her famous
“ lock ” of white hair. In this case, also, abnormal and
supernormal phenomena appear to be strangely blended.

In the case of Molly Fancher, again, — her clair¬
voyant powers developed coincidentally with her illness;

^ Cf. Journat A. S. P. R., August, 1908, pp. 448-55.

1 6 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

and when she became well again (relatively) they dis¬
appeared. Charcot frequently insisted upon the con¬
nection between hypnosis and hysteria : and Lombroso
and other savants, as well as Hyslop, have all insisted
upon the connection between hysteria and mediiimship.
Such instances could be multiplied indefinitely, but it is
no longer necessary to labour the point. The fact of
this frequent coincidence is now well recognized; and
the only question in dispute is concerning the interpreta¬
tion of the facts. The psychiatrist would contend that
the abnormality of the subject explained the facts; while
the student of psychics would contend that it does noth¬
ing of the kind, but that the abnormal state or con¬
dition is only one of the coincidental conditions pres¬
ent, — apparently favourable for the production of the
phenomena. The phenomena themselves yet remain to
be explained. As I have pointed out before in this con¬
nection in speaking of the medium-trance : —

“ No matter what the condition of the medium’s
nerve centres may be, this would not account for the
supernormal information given during the trance state.
No matter how much nervous or mental ‘ instability ’
or ‘ disintegration ’ were postulated, it would not at all
explain or elucidate the primary question: How is the
supernormal information acquired? ” ( The Problems

of Psychical Research, p. 35.)

Take again a case such as that of Eusapia Palladino.
Dr. Hyslop and others have contended that the primary
point of importance, in such a case, is to study the condPr
tion of the medium, from the point-of-view of psycho¬
logical instability, and ascertain whether or not hysteria
be present in such a case. I should contend, on the
other hand, that the primary question to be settled

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

should be: Do physical objects move without contact?
after which — if that were once established — the sec¬
ondary or subsidiary question would be, the state of
the medium’s mind during the production of the mani¬
festations — together with many other facts, such as
any physiological peculiarities present at the time, —
and the physical changes, if any, in the atmosphere or
ether surrounding the medium, etc. But no amount
of proof of “ hysteria ” would serve to explain the
main facts, or solve the primary question: How do ma¬
terial objects move, when the medium merely wills them
to do so?

One of the latest attempts to “ explain ” psychic phe¬
nomena in this manner is by means of psycho-analysis!
Replying to a recent attempt of this character, in the
Journal of Abnormal Psychology (Vol. IX, No. 6),
I said: —

“ FREUDIAN PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHICAL RESEARCH ”
{A Rejoinder)

The evidence for the supernormal character of “ psy¬
chical ” phenomena may not be very strong — certainly
not so strong as desired — but it never appears stronger
than when some critic attempts to “ explain it away,”
and to show how normal causes might account for the
facts. This bears out Dr. Hodgson’s old statement,
that ” If we could only get the scientific men to attack
us, our case would be won.” It seems to me that this
is made evident by the paper of Dr. Leonard T. Tro-
land, in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol.
VIII, No 6.

Let us take up a few of his statements, one by one,
and see how far they represent the actual fact^:

1 8 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

1. “ Modern psychical research aims to prove per¬
sonal immortality by scientific methods. . .

Nothing of the sort is to be found in the original
“ Objects of the Society,” published in Vol. I of the
Proceedings. Immortality is not even mentioned, no
more is proof of spiritism. To many minds, “ immor¬
tality ” is only one of the subsidiary problems in¬
volved; odd facts form the bulk of the material to be
investigated — no matter what their interpretation.
The majority of the continental psychical investigators
do not accept the spiritistic hypothesis to account for the
facts. . . .

2. “ In the light of the principle of ‘ repression ’ we
are in duty bound not to accept the affidavit of that
person himself in this regard (whether or not he has
seen or heard some fact in the past), no matter how
honest he may be, for the fact in question and his sub¬
conscious record may never have been in his introspec¬
tive consciousness at all.”

This is merely saying again that cryptomnesia plays
a large part in our daily lives — which fact has been
pointed out over and over again by all psychical re¬
searches, and dwelt upon in particular by Professor
Flournoy {Spiritism and Psychology) and Mrs. Anna
Hude {Evidence for Survival). The whole question is
this: The subconscious mind, on a “naturalistic”
theory, is supposed to contain nothing which did not
enter through the five senses. If it does, then we have
the supernormal demonstrated. In order to prove that
the facts might have entered the subconscious mind
through the senses, it would be necessary to show that
it was physically possible for them to have done so — ■
assuming hyperaesthesia, etc. In many cases on record,

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

it might easily be shown that this was not possible.

3. In discussing the experiments in thought-transfer¬
ence, Dr. Troland calls attention to the possibility of the
“ number habit.” This has been thoroughly discussed
in the Proceedings, over and over again, and shown to
be unable to account for the facts — particularly those
cases where diagrams were employed, or the numbers or
cards were drawn at random.

4. Dr. Troland says that the motor theo.ry of con¬
sciousness accounts for some (if not many) of the ex¬
periments in thought-transference. It does not do so
at all, unless physical contact be allowed, — and in
nearly all the experiments, even at close range, this was
prohibited. Let the agent “ think with his muscles ” as
much as he pleases, and I will guarantee that no percipi¬
ent will ever get a thought. If situated six or eight feet
distant from the agent! Let those who think otherwise
produce their evidence 1

5. Dr. Troland thinks that slight sounds, uncon¬
sciously interpreted, or “air vibrations” would account
for those cases in which a screen had been placed
between the agent and percipient (in thought-trans¬
ference experiments).

In answer to this:

{a) Air vibrations would only affect the percipient If
actual motions with the arms or body were made: It is
expressly stated that these were not made.

{b) Where is the scientific evidence that air vibra¬
tions can do any such thing?

(c) Slight sounds, even if made, would have no
meaning to the percipient, unless they represented some
specific thing agreed upon beforehand between agent
and percipient. All language is based on arbitrary

20 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

agreements as to the meaning of signs — spoken, writ¬
ten or made. If no meaning be previously attached to
these signals, what do they mean?

(d) In many cases, the ears of the percipient were
muffled, so that any ordinary sounds could not be de¬
tected.

6. In discussing “ Phantasms of the Dead,” Dr. Tro-
land attempts to account for practically all the re¬
corded cases by the theory of paramnesia. Worked in
conjunction with Freud’s theory, it amounts to this:
We are all longing for the death of our relatives and
friends most of the time; when the news of their death
reaches us, we associate with It a phantasmal appear¬
ance, and then place the appearance back in time, to
coincide with the death, when, in fact. It did not do so.
We “read it back” and make it coincide that is, — be¬
cause we wanted to, owing to our habit of wishing for
their death!

This is merely an extension of Professor Royce’s
theory of “ Pseudo-presentiments,” formulated in the
Old American Proceedings, S. P. R., Vol I, page 366.
It is simply hitched on to Freud’s theory. At the time
this theory was first formulated, Mr. Gurney replied at
length, showing why it would not “hold water”; and
the interested reader is referred to his article in Mind,
July, 1888. In part he said:

“ . . . But as regards the third class of cases which
he (Professor Royce) mentions — cases of recent date
where we have no record of the percipient’s experience
put into writing before the arrival of the news of the
corresponding event — he seems to have ignored the
support which is afforded a large number of the accounts
by the testimony of other persons, to whom the per-

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

2 I

cipient’s experience was orally described before the ar¬
rival of the news. . . . He omits all mention of sensory
hallucinations , and it seems impossible that he can have
duly recognized their importance in the argu¬
ment. . .

Indeed, as Dr, Hodgson wrote, after a careful study
of the evidence both pro and con: “ I think . . . that
the considerations which Professor Royce has ad¬
duced ... do not appreciably affect our views of the
accounts of spontaneous experiences on which the proof
of telepathy depends.” {Proceedings, Old S. P. R., p.
54I-)

Dr. Troland’s theory has, therefore, been fully con¬
sidered before, by impartial experts, and rejected as in¬
sufficient to account for the facts.

7. Dr. Troland’s remarks concerning the “ medium
and her sitter ” have been met before — when it was
stated that nothing could come out of the medium’s sub¬
liminal which had not previously been put into it. He
assumes that hints and statements made by the sitters
gave clues to the medium, which the subconscious mind
quickly picked up and elaborated into “ communica¬
tions.” How grotesque a caricature of the evidence
this is may be seen by any serious student of the rec¬
ords.

8. The same remark applies to Dr. Troland’s crit¬
icism of the evidence for clairvoyance. Thus: “Sup¬
pose that the clairvoyant is told of the death of a cer¬
tain man with whom she had previously had a number
of sittings . . .”, etc. Whoever brought forward evi¬
dence of this -sort? Certainly not the S. P. R. Of
course, if you set up a straw man, it is easy to knock it
down 1

22 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Again, in speaking of “ communications,” Dr. Tro-
land says: “These (correct statements made by the
medium) may be supposed to correspond with chance in¬
formation picked up by the medium from time to time.
. . .” Let me quote one case, to show how far this
theory may be said to cover the facts ! In his first Piper
Report, Sir Oliver Lodge said: “Among sitters, I may
mention Gerald Randall, late of Trinity College, Cam¬
bridge, principal of University College, Liverpool.
He was introduced as ‘ Mr. Roberts,’ and a sitting was
immediately commenced. The names of his brothers
were all given correctly at this or at the evening sit¬
ting of the same day, with many specific details, which
were correct.” {Proceedings, S. P. R., Vol. VI, pp.
453-54-)

9. A word, finally, as to Dr. Troland’s exposition of
Freud’s theory of the subconscious, and his dwelling
upon this theory as an explanation of most of the facts
of psychical research. Without questioning the rest of
the doctrine, this fact remains : That, according to this
theory, the best people would be the worst, and vice
versa. We “repress” what we will not have in the
conscious mind; it goes into the subconscious. Good!
The purest minded man or woman, then — according to
this doctrine — is not the one who has the purest
conscious mind; but the purest subconscious mind — ■
that is, one who has let out all the “ bad ” it contains,
and retained none ! So that, the more vilely we act, the
more foul-mouthed we are, the purer we are as a matter
of fact. What a delightful doctrine 1 Does it not occur
to the Freudians that we are only responsible for the
content of our conscious minds? Unless we bring the con¬
tents of the subconscious mind to the light and gloat

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

over it, as the Freudians do, we should never know that
we had one — most of us. Yet, according to them, this
is the man — this muck heap — this is the real man !

In discussing Zola’s novels once with a clever and
clearsighted woman, she made the remark to me that
she could not help comparing Zola’s novels to the con¬
tents of a dirty clothes-basket. True, the scenes he de¬
picts probably exist — they are “ facts.” So are dirty
clothes! But there is no reason why we should pull
them all out of the basket, and brood and gloat over
them, saying, “See, these are real facts; here are the
realities of life!” We prefer (most of us) to think
of other, pleasanter things, which are also realities.

It is the same with the Freudian psychology, and the
soiled clothes of the subconscious mind. In some
cases — in a few isolated instances, probably, the
clothes may get so dirty that they call aloud to be
washed. But in the majority of cases, the advice of the
frog doorkeeper to Alice is quite sound enough —
“You let it alone, and it’ll let you alone! ”

To attempt to account for the supernormal phe¬
nomena of psychical research by means of Freudian an¬
alysis is, of course, sheer nonsense.

It is very evident, therefore, that any attempt to ac¬
count for the actual phenomena of psychical research by
means of psycho-analysis is doomed to failure; and the
same may be said of any attempt to “ explain away ”
the facts by means of abnormal psychology. By this
means, we can only show that a hysterical or abnormal
mental state is present; but how this state accounts for
the supernormal phenomena is another question — and
one which has never been answered by the exponents of

24 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

psychiatry, who are at the same time opponents of psy¬
chical research.

The only reply which can be made to this contention
is that the facts do not occur as represented — that ap¬
parent “ supernormal ” happenings are not, in reality, —
when analysed by an expert, — supernormal at all, but
are merely the delusions and extravagances of a disi-
ordered mind. Thus — it is contended — just as many
dreams were formerly thought to be due to some “ super¬
natural ” influence, but are now seen to be due to per¬
fectly understood workings of the subconscious (or un¬
conscious mind — so all these psychical phenomena can
similarly be shown to be due to fraud, delusion, illusion,
hallucination and mal-observation, when rightly an¬
alysed. And many odd phenomena and curious inci¬
dents in history are pointed to, in proof of this con¬
tention. Let us take, by way of example, one of the
most far-reaching and inexplicable psychical epidemics
which the world has ever seen, viz. —

THE DANCING MANIA OF THE MIDDLE AGES

In the case of the dancing mania which swept over
Europe in the Middle Ages, not only were the rules of
decency and common sense abandoned, but the dancing
took place in the streets, in the fields, in public squares,
and in fact in every available place of public gathering.
Whole countries were found dancing madly, to the
point of utter exhaustion. Some of the dancers became
quite wild, tore off their clothes, ran about the streets
naked, went into states of ecstasy, lashed themselves
with whips, and only came back to sober sense when too
utterly worn out and exhausted to dance and behave in
this extraordinary manner any longer!

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

Curiously enough, this madness afflicted primarily and
chiefly precisely those parts of the world where the
fiercest fighting lately took place — western Germany,
Flanders, and eastern France. By a peculiar coinci¬
dence, also, it may be pointed out that this madness first
started in Aix-la-Chapelle — for some time headquar¬
ters of the Kaiser, if reports speak true !

It was in the year 1374 that this mania first became
accentuated. The effects of the Black Death, which had
devastated Europe, had scarcely subsided and the graves
of millions of its victims had scarcely closed, when this
singular delusion swept over the country. Convulsions
of the most extraordinary character were seen to seize the
person so affected — causing him to leap and prance
about, often foaming at the mouth, and screaming and
shrieking like one possessed. This “ dance ” came to be
called the dance of St. John or St. Vitus (not to be con¬
fused with our present disease, known as St. Vitus’
Dance) on account of the Bacchantic leaps which the
dancer made. Those who saw one so possessed would
soon be afflicted likewise, and soon whole communities
could be found holding hands and dancing round and
round with irresistible fury, shouting and twitching; or
single individuals could be found in corners, shrieking and
foaming at the mouth — as they had seen others do a day
or so before. In church and out this singular perform¬
ance was kept up. Attempts to relieve their ravings al¬
most invariably failed; and the “dance” was only
brought to a conclusion by the depression and physical
exhaustion which terminated the orgy. Extreme debility
for some days usually followed these attacks.

Many of those thus afflicted beheld visions in their ab¬
normal condition. “ Spirits ” appeared to them, and

26 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

called them by name. Or the heavens would open and
the Virgin Mary, Christ, or God himself appear to the
frenzied dancer. Thousands saw such sights. One par¬
oxysm followed another — sometimes for hours — until
all were too exhausted to dance longer.

This remarkable delusion was not limited to one town
or to one locality — as many might think — but soon
spread all over Europe. From Aix-la-Chapelle, it
spread to Liege, Utrecht, Tongres and many other cities
in Flanders and the Netherlands. In Liege the priests
had recourse to exorcisms, and endeavoured, by every
means in their power, to allay the evil which threatened
so much danger to themselves — for the possessed, as¬
sembling in multitudes, frequently poured forth impre¬
cations against them, and menaced their destruction. It
also spread east and south — attacking Cologne, Metz,
and many another town and city made familiar to us by
the present war, including Strasburg, which was visited
by the “ dancing plague ” in 1418. Zabern was visited,
and soon all the towns along the Rhine were afflicted
by this peculiar, sympathetic malady. Throughout the
fourteenth, fifteenth, and even into the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries this dancing mania crept on — find¬
ing its soil, doubtless, in the credulous and superstitious
character of the folk then inhabiting these various centres.

Inasmuch as this dancing mania came to be known as
St. Vitus’ dance, a brief mention of the personal history
of St. Vitus may be of interest. He was a Sicilian youth,
who, together with Modestus and Crescentia, suffered
martyrdom at the time of the persecution of the Chris¬
tians, under Diocletian, in the year 303. The legends re¬
specting him are obscure, and would certainly have been
passed over without notice had not the transfer of his

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

body to St. Denis, and thence, In the year 836, to Corvey,
raised him to a higher rank. From this time forth, it
may be supposed that many miracles were manifested at
his sepulchre, and people from all parts of the country
flocked to his shrine. A legend was Invented that just
before St. Vitus had been slain, he prayed to God that
he might protect from the coming Mania all those who
should solemnize the day of his commemoration, and fast
upon its eve, and that thereupon a voice was heard from
Heaven, saying, “ Vitus, thy prayer is accepted! ” Thus
St. Vitus became the patron saint of those afflicted with
the dancing plague, just as St. Martin of Tours was at
one time the succourer of persons afflicted with small-pox.

It seems strange — almost incredible — to us living in
the present century that such an absurd mental contagion
could have spread over so wide an area, and continued
unabated for so long a time. Yet such was the case; and
the dancing mania — certainly mental in its inception or
origin — spread to France, Italy and was even found in
Abyssinia ! For three hundred years it held Europe in
its grip, and though it did not directly kill off the Inhab¬
itants, it left them de-energized, weak, ill and mentally
and physically unsound. In Italy, too, many died as the
result of the “ plague ” — for such it came to be.
Hundreds of persons in all walks of life left their occupa¬
tions — flocked to the towns, saw the dancers, and
became affected in turn. In Metz alone it is said
that eleven hundred dancers were in the streets
at one time. Peasants left their ploughs, house¬
wives their domestic duties, to join the wild revels,
and the cities became the centres of ruinous dis¬
orders. Secret desires were gratified; boys and girls
quitted their parents and servants their masters, to amuse

28 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

themselves at the dances of those possessed, and greedily
Imbibed the poison of mental infection. The dancers
formed circles hand in hand, apparently lost control over
their senses, and continued dancing, regardless of by¬
standers, for hours together in wild delirium, until at
length they fell to the ground in a state of exhaustion.
In most cases, it proved almost Impossible to cure them,
or relieve them in any way until the fury of the attack
had spent itself.

In Italy, the dancing mania took a slightly different
form, though in essentials it was the same as in Germany
and Holland. Throughout Italy, it was thought that
the dancing mania was induced by the bite of the taran¬
tula, a ground-spider common in Apulia, of which the
natives stood in great terror. No one at the time seemed
to have the least doubt as to Its origin — though It was
obviously not the true cause, since no tarantulas existed
in those countries where the dancing mania originated.
Those bitten by this insect jerked and started in spas¬
modic convulsions, and the similarity between these pa¬
roxysms and those manifested in the dancing mania
doubtless lead to the confusion. “ Tarantism ” thus
spread, with all the added characteristics of the Impas¬
sioned Italian nature.

It was soon found that music had a pronounced effect
upon those affected with the mania — some music more
so than others being received with pleasure, and seeming
to relieve the paroxysms of the patients. Thus the
tarantella came into being — music, i.e., which aimed to
soothe and quiet those afflicted with the dancing mania.
In various individual cases, different music was re¬
quired. Thus, there was one kind of Tarantella which
was called “ Panno rosso,” a very lively, impassioned

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

style of music, to which wild songs were adapted;
another, called “ Panno verte,” which was suited to the
milder excitement of the senses, suggesting green colours,
and set to Idyllian songs of verdant fields and shady
groves. A third was named “ Cinque Tempi a fourth
“ moresca,” which was played to a Moorish dance; a fifth
“ catena,” and a sixth, with a very appropriate designa¬
tion, “ Spallata,” as if it were only fit to be played to
dancers who were lame in the shoulder, etc.

This remarkable hysterical outbreak is not alone in
history. Dancing does not hold the position it does
unchallenged! In the seventeenth century other manias
of this kind began — though none of them on so vast a
scale as the dancing mania. Thus, a nun in one of the
large Convents in France began to mew like a cat; shortly
afterward, other nuns also began to mew. At last all
the nuns mewed together every day at a certain time for
several hours together. The whole surrounding Chris¬
tian neighbourhood heard, with equal chagrin and as¬
tonishment, this daily cat-concert, which did not cease un¬
til the nuns were informed that a company of soldiers had
been placed by the police before the entrance of the
convent, that they were provided with rods, and would
continue whipping them if it occurred again, until they
promised not to mew any more!

Another convent-epidemic was one which occurred in
the fifteenth century, in a German nunnery. A nun fell
to biting her companions. In the course of a short
time, all the nuns of this convent were biting each other!
The news of this infatuation among the nuns soon spread,
and it passed from convent to convent through the greater
part of Germany, principally Saxony and Brandenburg.
It afterward visited the nunneries of Holland, and at

30 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

last the nuns had the biting mania even as far as Rome.

These sympathetic manias did not end with the period
under review. We need only remind the reader of the
“ Shakers,” the “ Convulsionaries ” of France, the fanat¬
ical “ Dervishes,” the “ Jumpers,” many of the early
“ spiritualists,” the “ revivalists,” to see enacted again
before us some of these peculiar mental abnormalities to
which crowds are liable. Even In our own day, we see
such exhibitions, on a lesser and more subdued scale.
Every religious and emotional performance Is, In a sense,
a demonstration of this spirit — the psychology of the
crowd. Here we may still observe the workings of the
mind of the populace — may see the sympathetic con¬
tagion which thus affects whole areas of humanity —
when once the spark has been Ignited which sets the con¬
flagration afire. . . .

Such instances as the above serve to show us the curious
delusions which have gained wide prevalence in the
past; and, all this being so, (we are told) credence can
hardly be placed In these modern “ psychical epidemics,”
which closely resemble the older ones — being less ram¬
pant and prevalent only on account of the higher general
standard of education in our own times — a standard
which, nevertheless, permits all kinds of superstitions
and odd delusions to creep Into the people’s minds
and colour the thought of the times. Might not
the widespread belief In psychical phenomena be
similarly shown to be due to suggestibility, delusion, ig¬
norance and lack of understanding of the truly scientific
nature of the facts observed?

Such arguments, however — specious as they may
appear at first sight — may readily be shown to be

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

fallacious, when carefully examined. In the first place,
it may be well to remind the reader that a lengthy dis¬
cussion and examination of this subject was undertaken as
far back as 1851, by Dr. Herbert Mayo, who wrote a
book. Popular Superstitions, and the Truths Contained
Therein, in which he examined many of these beliefs and
delusions, and came to the deliberate conclusion that,
instead of science explaining such facts “ away,” a care¬
ful examination of the evidence had just the opposite
tendency, — and seemed to prove an undercurrent of truth
and reality in even the most absurd beliefs formerly held !
(I myself have also attempted to do much the same thing,
with regard to “Witchcraft” and “Fairy Stories:”
see The Problems of Psychical Research.) It is to be
noted, moreover, that some of these contagious delusions
are constructive in tone, and seem to merge into the super¬
normal. Thus, Bjornstrbm, in his Hypnotism, says: —

“ Such nervous conditions show great contagiousness.
In the beginning of the eighteenth century a single Cal¬
vinist priest, hailing from the village of Dauphine, was
sufficient to impart a prophetic spirit to the entire popula¬
tion. By a magnetic inspiration of this spirit through the
mouths of some persons, who afterwards communicated
it to others, no less than eight or ten thousand prophets
arose in Dauphine, Vivarais and the Cevennes. Men,
women, children, old men, all prophesied the future.
Children, three years old, who had never before spoken
anything but the patois of the province now, during
the trance, spoke the purest French with astonishing
ease. . , .”

This is extremely suggestive, since it seems to show us
that even in cases of wide-spread abnormal psychical con-

32 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

taglon, we have traces of the supernormal appearing —
just as we find it, individually, in certain so-called “ in¬
sane ” cases, or in cases of “ obsession,” — as will be
shown later on. A critical and historical examination of
the evidence, therefore, tends to confirm the underlying
reality of these phenomena, instead of disproving them!

And in the second place, modern psychic phenomena, —
as at present investigated, — bear almost no resemblance
to the older superstitions and beliefs; while the modern
method of studying these facts is purely scientific.
Psychical research consists merely in applying the cautious
and scientific spirit and method of research to the investi¬
gation of these curious and sporadic and ill-understood
phenomena, — which form the basis of our study.

Two facts, therefore, must never be lost sight of. The
first is that to call any phenomenon by a certain name
is not to explain it — we thereby only classify it. To
assert, — or even to prove, — that a given medium is
hysterical, or abnormal, or actually insane, will in no¬
wise serve to explain the supernormal facts. We may
grant that the medium is hysterical, neurotic, suffers from
“ nervous instability ” and “ psychical disintegration,” or
is even insane; but that does not in the least help us to
account for the central fact: How is the knowledge,
normally unknown to the medium, acquired?

In the second place, it must be emphasized that psy¬
chical researchers themselves have always been alive to
this connection between abnormal and supernormal phe¬
nomena, and the first to call attention to it. Myers dis¬
cussed the question at length in his Human Personality;
Mr. J. G. Piddington published a lengthy Review of

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

the similarities and dissimilarities between visceral and
veridical hallucinations; The Census of Hallucinations
dwelt at length upon the varied physiological concomi¬
tants of hallucinations, and the influence of suggestion,
expectancy, etc., in their production. Our observations
upon malobservation and lapse of memory, published in
the Proceedings, and elsewhere, are the very researches
which the “ anti-psychical researchers ” are always quot¬
ing — so that we have this curious, — really ludicrous, —
situation: the sceptic constantly quoting the psychical re¬
searchers themselves, in support of his arguments —
hoping to prove thereby that there are no supernormal
phenomena, — but of course only succeeding in proving
the care and caution of the psychical researchers !

It must be remembered that many psychical phe¬
nomena — perhaps all of them — manifest through the
subconscious, and for this reason are tinged and in¬
fluenced by the subconsciousness of the psychic or medium.
It is for this reason that it is often so difflcult to disen¬
tangle the genuine messages from the ramblings and dra¬
matic personifications of the medium herself — even
granting that genuine messages are obtained.^ A beauti¬
ful example of this is given by Dr. Frederick van Eeden,
who, in his report in the Proceedings S. P. R., says, re¬
garding his sittings with Mrs. Thompson: —

“. . . Being now well on my guard, I could, in this
most interesting few minutes, detect, as it were, where the
failures crept in. I could follow the process and perceive
when the genuine phenomena stopped and unconscious
play-acting began. In hardly perceptible gradations the

1 See our Death: Its Causes and Phenomena, pyo- ^35-39, for a detailed
discussion of this point.

34 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

medium takes upon herself the role of the spirit, com¬
pletes the Information, gives the required finish, and fills
in the gaps by emendation and arrangement. . . .

“ We see how recklessly the spirit-control, Nellie,
enters Into explanations about things of which she evi¬
dently understands nothing, — though she referred to
them spontaneously herself. And we see, moreover,
how easily and Imperceptibly the role of any spirit is
taken up by the medium, after the genuine information
has ceased. . . .”

It is very evident, from the above passage, how Inter¬
fused the purely subconscious and the genuinely super¬
normal phenomena are, and consequently how difficult a
matter it often is to disentangle the two, — to sift the
wheat from the chaff, — and discover what is genuine and
what is false, in such manifestations. This is the task
of the impartial psychical investigator; and in this work
he stands mid-way between the credulous spiritualist, who
accepts the whole message — and all messages — as
coming from “ spirits and the psychiatrist, who rejects
the evidence in toto, because there is evidence in it
of abnormal and subconscious phenomena. Both are
equally wrong; and it is because of this fact that the psy¬
chical student stands, as it were, between the two — and
consequently receives the dislike and abuse of both !

Even occultists and mystics freely acknowledge this
connection between the abnormal and the supernormal.
Any first-class mystical treatise will bear this out, and
lengthy discussions have been held as to the differences
between genuine and spurious “ ecstasy.” Rudolph
Steiner, again, in his Initiation and its Results, has
a chapter devoted to “ The Dissociation of Human Per¬
sonality During Initiation ” ; and though the “ dissocia-

ABNORMAL VS. SUPERNORMAL

tion ” here meant is somewhat different from that usually-
implied by the psychiatrist, it shows us, nevertheless, that
advanced occult and psychical students are keenly alive
to the possible connection between abnormal and super¬
normal mental and psychical states.

I could elaborate this theme at great length; but it is
hardly necessary. If I have succeeded in emphasizing
two points, and impressing them upon the reader, this
chapter will have served its purpose. The first is that
the psychical researcher is keenly aware of the fact that
there is this connection, between many abnormal and su¬
pernormal phenomena; and secondly, that, while ac¬
knowledging it, he at the same time contends that this
does not in the least serve to disprove or invalidate the
genuine character of the phenomena themselves — when
there is evidence that they really occur. No matter
what the state of the medium’s “ nerves ” or “ mind ”
may be, this does not at all affect the primary question,
with which the psychical student concerns himself, viz. :
How is the supernormal information acquired? Why
is it that the dream or vision is veridical? How does
this object move without contact? How explain
the evidence of personal identity obtained through the
medium, when in trance? Only when abnormal psy¬
chology succeeds in satisfactorily explaining such facts
will we grant that it has any right to criticize psychical
research, or to do aught than acknowledge it as a sister-
science.

CHAPTER III

VITALITY AND THE LAW OF CONSERVATION

At the present time the question of the nature or essence
of life and vitality seems to be assuming a large place in
scientific thought and interest; discussions are being
aroused and Issues brought to the surface which almost
every one thought had been dead for half a century; and
It is, perhaps, not so difficult to see why this has come
about, after all. On the one hand, we have the work of
men, like Haeckel and Loeb and Butler Burke and
Bastian, who are strenuously endeavouring to show that
what we have been tempted, In the past, to call “ vital
force ” is nothing more than the total functioning of the
body; that the vital phenomena we witness are in reality
nothing more than the resultants of such functioning —
which, of course, cease with that functioning, at the
moment of death. On the other hand, we have the
results of the Psychical Research Societies; and also of
the modern school of thought which is beginning to
question the very fundamental conceptions of our sci¬
ence, held for a number of years past, and to ask itself
whether matter and energy and life can be counted upon
and pigeon-holed with as great an amount of certainty
and assurance as they could be ten years ago. Then we
all knew very well what we meant by matter and energy
and by vitality! For practical science (of course, for
philosophy and metaphysics they were always enigmas)
these terms stood for perfectly definite things, and we
thought they were well enough understood. But now we
are beginning to find out that matter is not matter at all,

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

but something else entirely; that the dreams of the alche¬
mists are in truth beginning to be realized; that energy is
far less understood than we formerly believed, and that
life and vitality, while better understood in one sense, are
certainly less understood in another. In the present
chapter I propose to consider the latter series of argu¬
ments only. I propose to consider the questions of the
indestructibility of matter and the conservation of energy
from what is, perhaps, a novel standpoint. There are
certain questions of interest that may be treated in this
manner, perhaps profitably.

Dr. Gustav Le Bon has recently asserted, in his Evo¬
lution of Matter, that he has caused matter to vanish
without return. In the physical laboratory, he asserts,
he has experimentally demonstrated that, under certain
conditions, matter vanishes and disappears as matter —
being resolved into energy or a form of energy — hence
becoming invisible, or “ dematerializing ” in the true
sense of the word. The material atom, then — that
material basis of all science until so recently — has
been resolved back into some manifestation of the
ether. There is thus, it is asserted, a “ scientific
unity ” established “ than which it would be Impossible
to imagine anything more complete ” — matter and force
are finally identified, the one merging into the other, and,
in fact, actually becoming the other! And this has been
established by purely scientific means in the chemical
laboratory. This being so, we might well ask: “ What
has become of the older of the two laws forming
Haeckel’s Law of Substance — the persistence of mat¬
ter? ” We may well ask, but we shall be slow in getting
an answer. It seems to have gone completely by the
board.

38 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

And so we are pushed back In our search for substance
and unity to the ether — that omnipotent, omniscient
fluid-solid which Lord Kelvin (I believe It was) said no
man could believe in without believing in opposite and
paradoxical attributes. Is it not time that some one
should cry “ stop ” to these recent speculations about the
ether and its properties? Is not the ether made as great
a bugbear In physics as “ the subconscious ” Is fre¬
quently, in psychology? It seems to me that there should
be some line drawn in this matter, and that some attempt
should be made to bring people to rationality when con¬
sidering It. Dr. A. Rabagllatl in his essay on A New
Theory of Energy points out some of the present-day
absurdities, and attempts to throw some light upon this
field of speculation. He says In part: —

But what is this ether? M. Le Bon tells us, or at least sug¬
gests to us, that it is a solid, without density or weight. Some
scientists, indeed, suggest to us that the ether has density and no
weight, while others say that it has weight and no density. These
are the men, be it observed, who speak somewhat disparagingly
of purely metaphysical speculations. They deduce their conclu¬
sions from “ experiments.” But are not the definitions purely
metaphysical? And are they any less so because deduced from
experiments? It is a highly interesting state of mind that uses
metaphysical expressions and justifies them because they are al¬
leged to have been come to by experiments, and not from philo¬
sophical considerations. “ A solid without density or weight.”
What is such a body? Is it nothing? I suggest that it is —
nothing. But according to the thesis, it is the origin, and it is
again the grave of the atom! The atom, then, came from —
nothing, and it goes back to — nothing! But is this not the very
proposition which, when it has been stated by philosophic or re¬
ligious men, has been sneered at by the scientists? It is the very
proposition. But then it was made from metaphysical specula¬
tion ! But now that it is stated from physical speculation —
(is that it?) or from experiments — it is allowable; nay, we must

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

yield our consent to it! All I can say is, that never have I been
asked to believe anything more transcending reason by any phi¬
losopher. The scientific men and the physicists and the experi¬
mentalists seem certainly to have got themselves into a quagmire
regarding this solid without density or weight, and I wish them
well out of it.

Surely, it is high time that some such criticisms were
passed upon a few of these newer speculations. Matter
and the ether are thus shown to be far less stable and
certain things than we had been in the habit of supposing;
and it remains for us to consider the second of the two
great conceptions of modern science — the conservation
of energy.

This law, as it is universally held, is too well known
to need restatement. Only one branch of it may need
emphasizing, for the reason that it does not enter, as a
rule, into the theories or the experimental field of the
physicist and more closely concerns the physiologist — in
whose hands the physicist is usually contented to leave
the question. I refer to the application of the law of life
or the vital forces — it being contended that here also the
law is just as valid as in any other department of physics,
and just as demonstrable and conclusive. I shall first
of all state the position generally held, and then my rea¬
sons for thinking it invalid.

Prof. Robert Mayer, in his Organic Movement in its
Relations to the Mutations of Matter, thus states the
position : —

Plants receive a force — light, and from it produce another
chemical change. The physical force accumulated by the activity
of the plants comes to the service of another class of creatures who
make it their prey, and use it for their own benefit. These
creatures are the animals.

The living animal constantly takes from the vegetable kingdom

40 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

oxidizable foods to combine them afresh with oxygen from the
atmosphere. Parallel with this result is manifested the char¬
acteristic feature of animal life; the production of mechanical
work, the production of movement, the raising of weights.

The chemical force contained in the ingested foods and in the
inspired oxygen is the source of two manifestations of energy —
namely, movement and heat, and the sum of the physical energy
produced by an animal is equal to the corresponding and simul¬
taneous chemical processes.

Prof. Atwater, in his Principles of Nutrition and Nu¬
tritive Value of Food, p. ii, says: —

. . . Experiments have shown that the material which is ox¬
idized yields the same amount of energy as it would if burnt with
oxygen outside the body — e. g., in the bomb calorimeter.

The position, then, is plain. We ingest so much food
material into the body and burn it up (oxidize it), the
result being so much heat and energy — just as we should
supply and burn up so much fuel in a steam engine and
get so much heat and energy. The similarity, it is
claimed, is almost exact; in each case it is possible to
exactly estimate the amount of heat and energy that the
fuel will give off when burnt; and whether it be burnt
in the body or in the engine it is asserted that the theory
and the law hold good. Vital force, in short, is derived
from the food eaten, just as the energy of the engine is
derived from the fuel burnt. It is derived from chemi¬
cal combustion and is given off in muscular and mental
work — doing the work of the world. Thus the law of
the conservation of energy is said to apply, and life to
fall into line and receive a natural explanation — it being
essentially no more complicated or mysterious than any
other force whatever.

This is the position generally held, and is the one

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

I propose to attack. I have stated the arguments at
length in my Vitality, Fasting and Nutrition, and I can
only summarize them in the present paper, I shall allude
to the most important facts and arguments which would
seem to indicate that this position is incorrect, and that
the universally held position cannot be maintained when
certain facts are adduced, and when the theory is ana¬
lysed sufficiently far.

First of all let us consider the objections that can be
raised to this theory and the facts that may be ad¬
duced — apparently showing it to be erroneous. Later
we can consider those facts in favour of the opposite
theory. If it be true, then, as it is contended, that the
heat and the energy given off by the body exactly cor¬
respond to the potential energy of the food, then we
might at once raise this question: What of the opera¬
tions of consciousness? Do they consume no energy?
Are they outside the law of conservation? Certainly no
physiologist would contend that such is the case. If he
did there would be no need for further argument, for
life — or one aspect of it — would be found to lie outside
the law of conservation, and hence run counter to it. But
physiologists would be the very last men to believe such
a theory; they of all men would contend that thought and
consciousness do use up energy, and that this energy
comes ultimately from the food. This being so it is
obvious that we must add to the body’s total expenditure
of energy this amount used by consciousness — a very
large amount, too; of that there can be no question. We
know that a man can sit still all day and think and be tired
at the end of the day; and that brain workers require as
much sleep as manual workers, or even more; while Dr.
Thomson asserts that only those parts of the body that

42 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

consciousn-ess uses need rest and sleep at all, and that
other parts of the body can run on indefinitely without
such sleep and rest. All of which, if it does nothing
else, will at least impress us that thinking and the
operations of consciousness do use up a great deal of
energy — nervous or bodily. And this being granted
it is obvious that this amount of energy must be added
to the amount expended in other ways — in internal
work of the body, in voluntary muscular exertion,
etc. The result of which is that if the amount of the in¬
ternal and external muscular activities about equal the
amount of potential energy of the food — as it is claimed
— then the total energy of the body must more than equal
the energy derivable from the food — so that it cannot
be derived from it exclusively. Moreover, since we have
but the faintest idea of the amount of energy necessitated
by the internal muscular workings, and none at all of
the amount required by the operations of consciousness,
we are hardly in any position to state dogmatically
that the two correspond, as it is claimed in many
books on this subject. These facts would seem to indi¬
cate that all our energies are not derived from the
food we eat. I believe that we do not at any time
or under any circumstances derive any part of our
strength and energy from the food we eat, but from
another source entirely; and that, so far as life is con¬
cerned, it is quite independent of the law of conservation
of energy — the bodily energies not being derived from
the food at all. I shall state my own theory of the causa¬
tion of vital energy presently; meanwhile, I shall advance
further facts tending to show that the theories held today
are incorrect on this point.

I appeal first of all to the facts of every-day experience.

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

If the current theories of the causation of vital energy
by food were correct it would only be necessary for us to
retire first to the dining-room and then to the gymnasium,
in order to regain our strength and energies.

We should ingest more food, and then oxidize it off, and the
process of its internal combustion would add more energy to the
system ; and so on ad infinitum. A truly pretty theory, but un¬
fortunately (for it) we all know, from actual practical experi¬
ence, that we must, when weary, retire to bed, and not to the
dining-room, in order to recuperate our energies ; and there comes
a time when we must seek rest and sleep, or die; and this, no
matter how much food we may have eaten, or how industriously
we may have exercised and breathed in order to oxidize it off.
As a matter of fact, we know that it is exceedingly unhygienic
and unwholesome to eat at all when exhaused by the labours of
the day; and that exercise at such a time is most doubtfully
beneficial, and that no amount of deep breathing will succeed in
indefinitely postponing the oncoming fatigue, exhaustion and
sleep.^

These facts would seem to indicate clearly, therefore,
that we must seek rest and sleep, and not food, when we
are tired and need energy. And this fact alone dif¬
ferentiates the human body from the steam engine, and
characterizes the one as human and the other as a mere
machine.

. . . The human engine (the body) reaches a point where it
refuses to evolve energy, no matter how much fuel (food) is
forced into it, and no matter how full a “ draught ” is turned on
(exercise and deep breathing taken). The engine does not re¬
cuperate and restore itself, during its periods of rest, and the
body does; the engine continues to wear out, and can never re¬
place its own parts by new ones, and the body can. . . . The
main point is that the body does, in time, arrive at a condition in
which it cannot possibly evolve or give out more energy, no mat-

* Vitality, Fasting and Nutrition, pp. 244-5.

44 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

ter how much food is eaten, and the engine (being an engine) can.
Thus, the great difference between them is that one is self-re¬
cuperative and human, and needs sleep in order to effect this ; and
the other is not self-recuperative, and needs no rest, so long as it
works at all; and in spite of this obvious and all-important dif¬
ference . . . the scientific world has continued to ignore this
question of sleep altogether, and to treat this matter of the re¬
newal of vital force by food as a proved fact, instead of a mere
theory, open to these very objections, and a most monstrous ab¬
surdity because of them. . . .

These are some of the facts of every-day experience —
facts which only need observing in order to see their im¬
port and bearing. Now, there is another whole set of
facts which seem to disprove the current theory of the
causation of vital energy by food — the phenomena
presented by fasting cases. If we take away food from a
man for a number of days, he Is certainly going to expe¬
rience sensations, and phenomena will present themselves
hitherto unknown and undreamed of. The food being
(supposedly) the source of the bodily energy, it is obvious
that if wc were to take away this food the energies would
decrease and slowly wane until the patient collapsed from
nervous prostration. That is the generally held theory,
and Is what we read would happen were we to take away
food from a man for a number of days. The source of
the energies being withdrawn, they themselves must
necessarily wane. It would, at all events, be impossible
for the patient to get stronger during this period of
inanition; that would appear to be quite impossible. And
yet — In all diseased conditions, at any rate — this is
precisely what happens ! Contrary to our expectations
and to what Is generally taught In physiology, ever since
the doctrine of the conservation of energy was adopted,
it can be proved that this is precisely what occurs. The

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

patient is frequently stronger at the end of a ten or
twenty days’ fast than at its commencement. ! This,
I acknowledge, appears self-contradictory and even ab¬
surd at first sight, but it is the truth nevertheless. I have
seen patients so weak that they could not walk down
stairs at the commencement of a fast, and at the end of a
thirty-day fast they are so strong that they are walking
five miles a day. A number of such cases I have cited in
my book, and have therein given references to other
works in which similar cases are to be found. Such
cases are well known to those who have made a study
of fasting cases; they meet with them every day in their
practice. And every man, without exception, who has
had the opportunity of observing such cases has agreed
with me in my contention that the vital energy of the
body does not and cannot come from the daily food. His
clinical experience in every case coincides with my own,
and corroborates the theory I have advanced as to the
causation of vital energy. Perhaps I should state this
now, in order that the reader may be better enabled to
appreciate the argument and the facts upon which it rests.

I contend then, that the body does not nearly so much
resemble a steam engine in its workings as it does the
electric motor — at least so far as its energy is concerned.
The sole and only function of food is, I believe, to supply
the wastes of the body — the tissues that have been
broken down by exercise. The food never supplies any
energy to the body under any circumstances. It receives
its energy in another way entirely. Physiologists have
been misled by the superficial appearance of the facts,
and have drawn too hasty conclusions therefrom. The
human body, then, does not receive its energy from the
food consumed. This comes from rest and sleep alone.

46 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

During these periods of rest and sleep the human body
(its nervous mechanism) is recharged with energy ^ just in
the same manner as the motor of the electrician is re¬
charged with electric energy, from without. During the
hours of sleep the human body is put into a receptive
attitude, and its nervous mechanism is recharged
by some all-pervading cosmic energy, in which we
live and move and have our being. For this reason we
awake in the morning refreshed and invigorated; and we
can receive our strength and our energies in no other
way whatever. By sleep alone do we receive these ener¬
gies; and it will be seen at once that this gives us a new
theory of sleep. “ It is that physiological condition of
the organism in which the nervous system of the indi¬
vidual (in precisely the same manner as the electric
storage battery) is being recharged from without. . .
This theory would enable us to explain sleep, then, which
is certainly not possible on any theory held today.

The body, in short, is an energy -transforming machine,
and not an energy-creating machine. It receives its
energy during the hours of sleep and rest, and gives forth
that energy during the waking hours. It transmits en¬
ergy merely. And this being so, it is apparent that vital
energy, or the power of life, is not derived from any
process of food-combustion at all, but from another
source altogether. It will also be seen that it lies outside
the law of conservation. This will become more ap¬
parent as we proceed and as we follow this theory to its
logical conclusion.

Before proceeding further I must call attention to the
radical distinction between “ fasting ” and “ starving,”
as I conceive the two processes to be entirely different —
though they are the same thing to the public mind.

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

When this difference is understood much of what has pre¬
ceded will become intelligible enough. Say that a man,
as the result of years of living contrary to Nature’s laws,
is more or less diseased — he is choked and blocked-up
with mal-assimilated food material — effete material call¬
ing for elimination. Now this man enters upon a fast;
he commences going without food. He drinks water,
and thatj is all. His eliminating organs are kept con¬
stantly active and continue to dispose of refuse material
that had lodged within the system, with the result that
he “ cleans up ” in a few days; his temperature and pulse
go to normal, his tongue clears up, and his breath becomes
sweet. Also his hunger returns — his first natural
hunger since the fast began. He now eats food and
finds that he can retain it properly, and that he is cured.
Together with natural hunger his health has returned.
And, more than that, his energies have returned also, for
he finds himself stronger than he was before he began to
fast. This is due to the fact that more energy can now
manifest through his clean organism; it permits more to
flow through it. Up to the point of time when natural
hunger returns he is only benefited by a fast of this char¬
acter, whether it last one week or one month. This is
not the place to discuss this difficult question, of course; I
can only say that it will be found argued at considerable
length in my chapter on “ The Physiology of Fasting.”

But what happens after the return of natural hunger?
Do not the energies decline? And if they do how can
it be contended that energy is not derived from food?
That is the question we must now consider.

First, as to the question of starvation. The return of
natural hunger marks the point at which the one ceases
and the other begins. Starvation and fasting are two en-

48 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

tirely different things, and I have thus distinguished them
in my book:

Fasting is a scientific method of ridding the system of diseased
tissue and morbid matter, and is invariably accompanied by bene¬
ficial results. Starving is the deprivation of the tissues of the
nutriment which they require, and is as invariably followed by
disastrous consequences. The whole secret is this. Fasting com¬
mences with the omission of the first meal and ends with the re¬
turn of natural hunger, while starvation only begins with the
return of natural hunger and terminates with death. Where
one ends the other begins. Whereas the latter process wastes
the healthy tissues, emaciates the body, and depletes the vitality,
the former process merely expels corrupt matter and useless fatty
tissues — thereby elevating the vitality, increasing the energy, and
eventually restoring to the organism “ that just balance we term
health." As Dr. Dewey so truly and so pithily said: ‘‘Take
away food from a sick man’s stomach and you have begun — not
to starve the sick man, but the disease.” There is the whole
science and philosophy of fasting in a nut-shell.

It will thus be apparent that there is a radical distinc¬
tion between fasting and starvation, and whereas energy
Is unquestionably gained by the patient in the first class
of cases it is doubtless lost during starvation. Of course,
the whole point of my book is that fasting is beneficial,
and that it is useless to try and feed a patient with the
idea of “ keeping up his strength ” In time of sickness.
It was found that such a proceeding only made the patient
worse. But it may be contended that — if all this Is so,
if fasting benefits and starving weakens the patient — It
is proof that my theory is erroneous, and that the gen¬
erally held theory is correct. There is, however, another
interpretation of the observed facts which is quite pos¬
sible, and brings them all into harmony with the theory
advanced — that we do not derive our strength and
energy from the food eaten at all, but from another

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

source altogether. This interpretation of the facts
would be as follows :

The body is the transmitter or transformer of energy
or life — this merely manifesting through the body.
Life is a power separate, distinct, per $e, capable of ex¬
isting outside the body and independent of it. This life-
force merely uses the body for Its external expression or
manifestation — being transmitted or focussed through
the body just as light is transmitted through a glass prism.
A good analogy would be this. A burning glass receives
the sun’s rays and concentrates and focusses them at a
point; and In a similar manner the body receives the cos¬
mic energy and focusses and individualizes it. And just
as the burning glass would affect the rays, rendering them
less intense and active, according to the condition of the
glass, so does the condition of the body affect the amount
and character of the life-force manifesting through it.
If the glass be cracked or chipped or broken or blurred,
or in other ways rendered impure and befogged, the sun’s
rays passing through it would be affected, and the power
of the glass would be largely altered or nullified. And in
the same way we can conceive that the condition of the
body would affect and colour the character and amount of
the life-force manifesting through It. If the body were
choked and blocked with an excess of mal-assimllated
food material; if it were diseased, or If, on the other
hand, it were depleted through starvation, life could not
manifest through it so fully and so perfectly as it could
through a body whose health was perfect. In short, the
condition of the body would regulate the character and
amount of the vital Influx. Just as the burning glass
would affect the rays passing through it, so does the body
affect and regulate the energy flo\ving through it.

50 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Now, we can clearly see this in the human body. On
the one hand, when the body is diseased and choked with
effete material (as it is, generally speaking) it renders
impossible the transmission, through it, of the life-force.

It cannot find expression. And when, on the other
hand, the tissues are shrunk and wasted by starvation, the
life force cannot manifest either, — for the reason that
the vehicle for its transmission is not up to par, and is
diminished; the receptivity and power of expression of
the human machine is checked and lessened. Only when
the human machine is working at its best; when the nu¬
trition is properly managed, so that there is neither too
much nor too little food material in the body for its main¬
tenance and proper working, we get the best results and
the highest expression of bodily and vital energy.

This enables us to see clearly why it is that we get
stronger all the time we are fasting and weaker the mo¬
ment we begin to starve, and this, on the theory of en¬
ergy and its relation to the organism advanced, just as
readily as on the accepted view. Both of us can take the
same set of facts and interpret them differently; and the
choice would seem to be open to each to take which he
prefers, were it not demonstrable that there are certain
facts which are contradictory to the accepted views, and
are only explicable on the theory propounded. A
number of such facts I have advanced in my book, to
which I would refer the reader for a detailed exposition
of the view just advanced. There are also other con¬
siderations, such as the following: —

Whenever energy acts upon substance, e. g., substance
wastes. The body, being a self-regulating and self¬
repairing machine, sets about to repair this waste; and
this process of repair is what we perceive as the nutri-

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

tlonal changes going on within the body. The more the
waste the more the repair; so it is evident that there Is
a constant balance and equivalence between the amount of
work done and energy expended, and this would account
for all the facts observed — the fulfilment of the law of
conservation of energy (apparently), and the fact that
there Is always the coincidence between the O2 Intake and
the C02 output. . . .

To take an analogy, it seems to me it would be as pertinent to
argue that because the strings of the violin or piano or harp waste
in proportion to the quantity of the music evolved through or by
means of them, therefore the strings are the cause of the music,
while in fact it is the hand of the player and even the spirit be¬
hind the hand which is the real and efficient cause of the music.
So the form of the infinite and universal energy which we may
call erg-dynamic, is the cause of the waste of the body through
which it works; and this is at once made good by the increased
trophic metabolism which occurs to replace the waste, this in¬
creased trophic metabolism showing itself in increased Og intake
and coincidentally or correspondingly with increased CO2 output.
If the strings of a musical instrument were self-repairing, we
might, perhaps, be induced to think that the material which fed
the strings was the cause of the music, since in that case some
measure of the waste would probably be discoverable in the debris
emitted ; and we might imagine that the debris was the meas¬
ure of the music, while what it really was, was the measure
of the waste of the strings when they were made the instru¬
ment of music. If a spade is used in digging, the spade wastes
in proportion to every spadeful of earth it is made to lift. The
more it digs, the more it wastes. If we could arrange that
a stream of fine steel particles flowed into the spade to replace
the waste, caused by each act of digging, we might, perhaps, come
to think that these fine steel particles were the cause of the dig¬
ging — especially as the quantity of them required would always
be exactly proportional to the amount of work done. Neverthe¬
less this would be a very inconsequent assumption. So it would
be also if we were to infer, because the motors at the bottom of

52 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the electric tram-car waste as they are used by electric energy as
the means of doing work, and if we could arrange that this
waste should be made good by some self-acting mechanism —
as well might we imagine that the steel particles flowing in were
the cause of the work done as that the food is the cause of the
work done by the human body. Yet this is the assumption in¬
variably made by modern scientists.

In other words, food does not cause or create the bodily energy
— any more than the steel particles cause the digging or the power
contained in the electric motor. Food merely repairs the body —
through which tbe energy flows; and the more work done, the
greater the amount of food needed, to repair the loss. Hence the
equivalence; but not the causation.

The theory just advanced also enables us to understand
and interpret in another light the experiments in the
creation of life recently conducted in America, England,
and elsewhere. The experiments of Butler Burke, Bas-
tian, Loeb, and others have given a fresh impetus to this
interesting question, and have again raised the question of
the possibility of spontaneous generation. The newer
evidence that has been collected in its favour is certainly
stronger than any that has been advanced heretofore ; and
that certain objections have been surmounted there can
be no doubt. It remains to be seen if these newer ex¬
periments are evidence of the incorrectness of the theory
propounded.

In my Vitality, Fasting and Nutrition I advanced three
reasons for thinking that the results of these experiments
were inconclusive. These were : —

(1) That the organisms obtained as a result of the
experiments were doubtfully real micro-organisms at all,
but were quite possibly “ physiochemical compounds,
having many of the appearances of life.”

(2) It is next to impossible to say with certainty that
all the life present has been killed by the sterilizing and

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

heating, etc. However theoretically perfect the experi¬
ments they would always be open to this objection —
which, improbable as it is, must be measured against the
tremendous a priori improbability of spontaneous genera¬
tion. There would also be the objection of possible ul¬
tra-microscopic germs. However, I let these two objec¬
tions pass for the moment as possibly begging the ques¬
tion. I come therefore to the third objection, which is
really the valid one, and in which we shall see the possible
interpretation of the facts according to the theory of vi¬
tality propounded above. In this case we can accept the
facts and interpret them in another way, so as to show
that life may not have been created after all — and prob¬
ably was not.

(3) Even granting that the conditions of the experi¬
ment be theoretically perfect, then, and that no life was
really there, and that life appeared afterward, this does
not show that the life has been created. There is still
another interpretation of the facts open to us. That is
the following : — ■

I have . . . been contending that life is a thing per se, distinct
from every other physical force, which force it merely directs
during its connection with the organism, and that it utilizes dur¬
ing that period the natural body through which it manifests.
Now, for this manifestation, it requires a certain material body —
a certain arrangement, that is, of inorganic matter and physical
forces which are necessary for its manifestation ; and, without this
arrangement, there could be no manifestation, and consequently
no life. It must be distinctly understood that, in order for life
to manifest, it must have this certain very intricate and most
delicate arrangement of matter and force, and that unless this
arrangement is present, and absolutely perfect in every detail, life
cannot utilize such a combination of matter and force, or use it
to manifest through.

This much being granted, we can readily see that, in all ex-

54 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

periments so far conducted, with the object of creating life, this
exact combination and arrangement was not obtained — some lit¬
tle defect or flaw was present, sufficient to prevent the manifesta¬
tion of life through the material utilized for the experiment. But
now, suppose we meet with an experiment that has been success¬
ful; where life has, apparently, been created from the inorganic
matter used ; does this in reality prove that this life had actually
been made or brought into being by the inorganic matter, or any
particular combination of it? By no means! It simply shows
that the experimenters have at last succeeded in arranging their
material in exactly the right quantities, qualities and relations —
have, in fact, formed exactly the correct material body through
which the life force can manifest — i. e., they have finally suc¬
ceeded in so arranging their material basis as to render possible
the manifestation of life force through it. And for this reason
I do not see how such experiments as those now being conducted
can ever prove the generation of life from non-living matter, for
the very reason that this other alternative explanation of the
facts would always be open, and could be employed by any one
who cared to do so — thus rendering for ever impossible this
supposed proof of the creation of organic form from inorganic
m.atter — of life from no life. — {op. cit. pp. 288-9).

It thus becomes apparent to us that experiments such as these
cannot decide the question as to the nature or essence of life —
and further, that such experiments prove nothing to us one way
or the other as to its “ creation,” or its relation to matter.

But now, is the opposite position provable? Is it possible to
prove that life can exist apart from matter, — which it merely
utilizes for the purposes of its manifestation? By ordinary sci¬
entific methods one might be inclined to say “ No ” ; but certain
psychical phenomena apparently give us just this proof. Thus,
in cases of so-called “ exteriorization of motivity ” and “ ex¬
teriorization of sensitivity,” we apparently have examples of a
nervous current or power, not requiring the nerves for its trans¬
mission ; and this is still more exemplified in cases of “ astral
projection,” when another body is apparently detached from the
physical body altogether. Finally, in cases of “ materialization,”
we find the direct manifestations of life and energy, (to say

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

nothing of intelligence) quite distinct from the physical body,
such as that known to us — cases where life apparently mani¬
fests directly as a power, — separate from tne nervous mechanism
and the whole gross physical organism ! The separate exisience
of an energy or life-force is thus proved, by direct experiment —
thereby corroborating the theoretical argument elaborated above
in the completest possible manner.

Finally, I would say this: while it is not my purpose here to
touch upon the wider problems of world philosophy or meta¬
physics, I cannot refrain from adding one or two remarks upon
what I conceive to be the logical philosophic import of this theory.
For I can see in it far more than a mere scheme of vitality;
more than a mere speculation as to its nature and its relation to
the human organism and to the intake of food ; more than its revo¬
lutionary effect upon medical practice — important as these should
be. It is more than all these. It is an answer, if not an abso¬
lute refutation, of the present generally accepted materialistic
doctrine of the universe, and its influence upon our conceptions of
the origin and destiny of the human soul. Without further ado,
let me illustrate the great importance of the theory in its appli¬
cation to the phenomena of mind, and the world-old question of
the immortality of the soul.

I have endeavoured to show that the life or vital force is in
no way inter-related, transformable and transmutable into any
one or other of the physical forces known to us ; that it seems to
stand absolutely per se in this respect, and that, in fact, its laws
and actions are, apparently, totally different from — if not ac¬
tually opposed to — the other forces, in its action and laws ; it is
in no way related to them, and that the nervous or life energies
are different, toto calo, from all other forces or energies what¬
soever. But if this be the case, we must most certainly revise our
ideas and beliefs with regard to the supposed impossibility of the
soul’s immortality; for that problem at once assumes a different
and a new meaning in the light of these newer facts.

Let me better illustrate my meaning by first quoting from
Professor Shaler’s excellent book. The Individual (pp. 301-2), the
following paragraph, which tersely states the argument of the

S6 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

materialistic philosopher and well illustrates the position assumed
by the majority of physicians, psychologists, biologists, physicists,
and in fact by most scientific men today. It is this: —

“ . . . The functions of the body are but modes of expres¬
sion of the energy which it obtains through the appropriation of
food. As regards their origin, these functions may be com¬
pared to the force which drives the steam engine, being essenti¬
ally no more mysterious than other mechanical processes. Now,
the mind is but one of the functions of the body, a very specialized
work of the parts known as the nervous system. We can trace
the development of this mind in a tolerably continuous series
from the lowest stages of the nervous processes, such as we find in
the Monera or kindred Protozoa to man. Thus it is argued that,
though the mental work of our kind is indefinitely more ad¬
vanced than that of the primitive animals, there is no good reason
to believe that it is other than a function of the body; that it is
more than a peculiar manifestation of the same forces which
guide digestion, contract muscles, or repair a wound. Further¬
more, as is well known, at death all the functions of the or¬
ganic body fall away together in the same manner and at es¬
sentially the same time, so there is, in fine, no more reason to
believe that the functions of the brain persist than that a like
persistence occurs in the digestive function or in the blood-im¬
pelling power of the heart. All this, and much more, can be said
to show that the phenomenon of death appears to possess us al¬
together when we come to die.”

Now this position is, to my mind, perfectly logical. The con¬
clusion arrived at is, indeed, the only one to which we can
possibly come — is, in fact, the actual “ truth ” if the premises
were correct. Provided these premises be true, I can see no
possible loophole of escape for the logical mind; the conclusion is
inevitable. Professor Shaler’s attempts to abstract himself from
the position into which he had been led, and which he so well and
plainly stated, are to me pathetically futile; it is a hopeless
failure; his arguments Would, I think, prove quite inconclusive
to the critical, scientific thinker; and, in any case, philosophic
and metaphysical speculations have no place whatever in a purely
scientific argument of this kind — which should deal with facts
and facts only.

VITALITY AND CONSERVATION

No; provided that the premises are correct, the conclusion
stated by Professor Shaler is not only legitimate, but absolutely
incontrovertible, and the conclusion we are driven to adopt if
the premises of the argument are sound.

And now we perceive the great significance of my theory in its
relation to the problem of immortality and of its revolutionary
effects upon the present-world philosophy. It is not only anti-
materialistic or negative but pro-vital and positive in its attitude.
It is not destructive, but constructive; not devolutionary, but
evolutionary. For we now perceive that this great argument
against immortality crumbles to dust; it is worse than useless.
The premises are not correct; for, as we have seen, nervous or
vital force is not dependent upon food combustion at any time,
nor under any circumstances whatever; and consequently mental
energy — one form of nervous energy — is not dependent upon
this physiological process either; it is altogether independent of
it; mental energies together with all other bodily activities, are
quite separate and distinct from, and independent of, this process ;
so that when the process itself ceases, it is no proof whatever —
and there is not even a presumption in favour of the argument —
that mental life ceases at the death of the physical organism. In
fact, the presumption is all the other way. So that this main,
oft-quoted and central argument against survival is no valid ob¬
jection at all. Provided my theory be true, it proves to have no
foundation in fact. The possibility of conscious survival of death
is thus left quite an open question — capable of scientific investi¬
gation or of philosophic dispute; ^ but the grand, negative physio-

^ I would point out in this connection that if this theory of vitality be
true, there can be no valid objection to the actual existence — far less
the investigation of — psychic phenomena, because the objections to a fu¬
ture life would thus be cleared away, and the field left open for facts.
Such facts psychic phenomena apparently are; and at least there can
be no objection to their study any longer. I would also point out! that
the old, materialistic notion, which compared the body to a lamp, vital¬
ity and life to the flame, which simply ceased to exist with the extinction
of the lamp, is thus shown to be invalid, and based upon an incorrect
interpretation of the facts. Life is not the result of any process of
combustion or oxidation whatever, but on the contrary, the guiding, con¬
trolling principle — the real entity, for whose manifestation the body was
brought into being.

58 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

logical argument vanishes. And it is because of this fact that
I think my theory not only of practical importance to the phy¬
sician, but of theoretical importance in its bearing upon human
thought; upon current scientific and religious opinion; upon the
morals and the ethics of the race.

CHAPTER IV

The Origin of Evil; with a Discussion
AS TO ITS Nature

Doubtless, it is a rash undertaking to endeavour to
say anything new upon this world-old problem; “ Fools
rush in,” etc. — and it is quite possible that much that I
have to say has been said before, unknown to me, far
better than I can say it. Nevertheless, inasmuch as I
believe that I may be able to shed some light on this great
problem from a little different ” angle ” than has been
attempted in the past, I shall set forth, here, my theories
as to the nature and origin of sin and evil — advancing
these theories for what they may be worth.

The origin of evil, and the nature of evil, are usually
considered two separate problems; and in a certain sense
they are so — but in another sense they may be shown to
merge into one. On the current view, the nature of evil
must be settled prior to the question of its origin; St.
Augustine discussed the Quid est Malumf problem before
the Unde est Malemf In my view, on the contrary, the
problem of its nature is very largely solved by the dis¬
covery of its origin; the one is wrapped up in the other
to such an extent that they are inseparable. When we
discover the one, we shall, I think, also see the nature of
the other. This I hope to show as we proceed.

One or two fundamental misconceptions must be cleared
away, however, before we can proceed to the main theme
of our discussion. And the first one is that “ the problem
of evil is virtually meaningless unless we admit the reality

6o MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

of a personal God.” This is a position the validity of
which I wholly deny. Yet it is one very frequently held.
Thus, Marion LeRoy Burton, Ph.D., in his work on
The Problem of Evil (p. i), says: “The problem of
evil exists because mankind believes in a wise and benevo¬
lent Creator. . . . Abolish God and evil needs no expla¬
nation.” This is a statement, which is, it seems to me,
wholly opposed to fact and common sense. Assume that
there is no personal Creator, and the mystery of evil still
remains — in another form, it is true; but yet remains.
Crime, sin, wickedness, cruelty, would still exist in the
world as undoubted “ evils,” even though there might be
no personal God in Heaven at all. The tendency of
present-day science and philosophy is certainly to do away
with the older, anthropomorphic conception of God; and,
this being the case, we must discuss the problem without
seriously considering its relation to “ God ” in the sense
that St. Augustine and other older writers on this subject
conceived him.

My second contention (and this is far more important
than will at first sight appear) is that evil, in any ordinary
acceptation of the word, certainly did not exist in this
world before the advent upon it of animate existence.
No matter whether we adopt the older Laplacian or the
newer planetesimal theory of our world, it is at least
admitted that the presence of life upon its surface was at
one time in its past history impossible; it only arose (we
do not know how) at a later stage in the cosmic evolution;
with the appearance of life a series of complicated new
factors were introduced. And with life appeared the
psychological and philosophical implicates of life —
simple at first, more detailed and complicated as they
proceeded, in accordance with the general law of evolu-

THE ORIGIN OF EVIL

tion. Before life (in its crudest form) appeared upon
our globe, these complicated metaphysical problems were
non-existent. Just as there could be at that time no smell,
touch or taste — so likewise there could be no justice, no
injustice, no bravery, no cowardice, no sin, no good, no
bad, no evil — no anything of the kind, save only the play
of opposing cosmic forces, influencing inanimate matter in
a purely blind, impersonal, “ physical ” manner. Moral
qualities did not and could not have existed in such a
world. Only the great cosmic forces were engaged, and
these were as incapable of “ good ” or “ bad ” actions
as they were of altruistic or selfish ones.

It was only with the appearance of life upon the planet,
therefore, that the problem of evil was introduced; it was
coincident with animate existence that this metaphysical
question was, or could be raised. Coincidental with the
origin of life appeared at least the potentiality of the
origin of evil.

Now, in discussing this question of evil, many of us —
even moralists and philosophers — are apt to limit it to
the human race entirely — as though “evil” did not
exist in the animal or vegetable worlds. In the same
way that psychologists, until comparatively recently,
limited their discussions of “ Mind ” to that of mature
human consciousness, so moralists and philosophers are
inclined to limit this question of the origin and nature of
evil to the species homo — quite ignoring all the rest of
the world; but just as a study of the lower forms of life —
physical and mental — threw a flood of light upon our
psychology, and indeed even served to explain and In¬
terpret it to us very largely (in the light of evolution),
so likewise, I believe, will an evolutionary study of evil,
and kindred moral problems, serve to explain this to

62 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

us; and enable us to perceive the problem In its true light.
Viewed in this manner, I believe we shall find that the
problem, so far from being insoluble, or even difficult,
becomes very easy of comprehension and interpretation.

Now let us return to our main question, from this newly-
acquired standpoint. We must not then seek the origin
or the nature of evil in man alone, but far lower in the
scale of evolution — In some animal or possibly some
plant. Starting from this primary basis, we may per¬
haps see how this psycho-moral factor increased and
became psychologically more complex, as we rose In the
scale of evolution — just as all other factors did — until
we find, in man, their ultimate fulfilment and culmination,
as the higher moral factors find their culmination in him
also. The good and bad evolve and become increasingly
more complex — in exact proportion to the increasing
complexity of life.

Now, it is manifestly wrong to limit moral qualities to
man alone; animal experimentation has shown us that
many of the lower animals have a “ conscience ” in the
sense that man has; we say “ good dog ” or “ bad dog ”
in the full confidence that the animal’s good or bad con¬
science is active, in proportion to the relative degree of
the dog’s mental development to that of man. Cats,
horses, and other animals also show this sense of right
and wrong in an appreciable degree. But we should be
wrong In limiting our application to these cases of self-
conscious, highly-evolved sentient life. Good and evil
certainly exist, in one form or another, all the way down
the scale of animate existence. The bird which eats the
insect on the tree may look upon it as Its legitimate prey,
and believe. In Its bird-heart, that a wise and good Provi¬
dence put the insect there for its consumption; but we can

THE ORIGIN OF EVIL

hardly expect the insect to share this view! To it, the
Intelligence which “ runs ” this world must appear very
far from benevolent — malevolent to the last degree, in
fact. The same view would doubtless be taken by the
smaller fish which were eaten by the larger fish; and,
throughout the whole scheme of creation, this attitude
would apply in a greater or lesser degree. What is good
for the one is bad (evil) for the other. Viewed from
an external point of view, this is certainly so; and to the
extent that internal perception can take place in the lower
forms of life it would be true there also.

Even in the very lowest forms of life, the same laws
would apply. Though Binet’s Psychic Life of Micro¬
organisms may have been overdrawn, there is neverthe¬
less good evidence for thinking that these lowest forms
of animal life possess a mental life of some sort, and to
that extent their torture and destruction by other forms
of life, or by external conditions, would be the greatest
possible catastrophe and evil to them. Descending yet
lower, to the vegetable and plant world — we find still
the same upward-striving of life, the same destruction by
parasites, weeds, poisons and various external and in¬
ternal conditions which thwart life’s highest efforts, and
maliciously destroy its power to live. Must not all this
appear malevolent and evil to the plant — viewed in¬
ternally by its own plant-nature — and as viewed exter¬
nally by ourselves? Is not the destruction of crops and
forest trees an “ evil ” — which we are now trying to
lessen? And if the “ right to live ” is true for us, must
it not be true all the way down the scale of animate life
also — for if not, who can draw the line as to where this
ends, and where destruction of life becomes right and a
justifiable cosmic necessity?

64 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

All this may seem very wide of the mark and far¬
fetched to the reader; but to the psychologist it should
appear less so, because he has grown accustomed, of late
years, to see that even the noblest and highest of our men¬
tal and spiritual functions have the humblest origin —
they are merely complex evolutionary creations, resulting
from countless thousands of years’ combining, arranging,
synthesizing. Just as the fair lily springs from the slime
and mud, so man arises, from the primitive psycho¬
physical complex which constituted his original primordial
self. Just so have his moral qualities evolved also, and
their present highly developed character, in man, stands
in precisely the same relation to their first instinctive be¬
ginnings in the germ-plasm, as the mind of a Darwin or a
Kant or an Archimedes stands to the primitive reactions
of the amoeba. .The one is no more far-fetched than the
other.

Evil, therefore, appeared — potentially at least — in
the world simultaneously with the appearance upon it of
life. The origin of evil was practically simultaneous with
the origin of life, and is as much a mystery as — bu't no
greater a mystery than — it. We need not consider here
the innermost nature of life, but only its origin on this
planet (or some other — but then the problem would
only be removed from this world elsewhere). With this
preliminary statement, then, I think we are now in a posi¬
tion to perceive, quite clearly, the origin of evil, and also
its nature — to a very large extent.

Assuming that the mechanical play and inter-play of
forces was all that existed upon this world before the
appearance upon it of life, we should have to assume —
and in fact all biologists do assume — that the conditions
upon this planet (or at least that part of it whence life

THE ORIGIN OF EVIL

originated) were favourable to the formation and con¬
tinuance of life. If this were not so, life could not have
developed — so that this Is, in a sense, a self-evident
proposition. Very well! The environment was at that
time, and in that particular place, favourable for the pro¬
duction and manifestation of life.^

So long as these conditions lasted, life prospered; It
grew and increased and multiplied; everything favoured
its growth. This first living matter grew and finally split
up, or in some manner gave birth to other living matter,
and the procession of life had begun. But — mark this
— death had not yet appeared upon the earth; sickness
and decay had not yet made their presence felt — for if
they had, at the very origin of creation, life would have
become extinct as soon as it came Into being. Death,
therefore, must have appeared shortly after the origin of
life — how long after we cannot now tell. It could not
have been present at the very beginning of things as an
active factor. Sickness and decay must have been absent
for a time, for the same reason.

So long as life went on in an uninterrupted and peace¬
ful manner, just so long was “ everything in 'the garden
lovely.” Life increased and multiplied, and nothing had
come to destroy it. But one fine day the living substance
reacted wrongly — contrary to -the laws governing its en¬
vironment, and then the external forces of nature burst
forth, swept down and destroyed a portion of this living
substance, and Injured another portion, causing it to be¬
come “ diseased ” and decay. The uninjured portion

* For a discussion of the actual conditions, environment, etc., probably
present at the time of the creation of life ujKin its surface — see Hender¬
son’s remarkable book The Fitness of the Environment; also the works of
Bastian, Burke, Le Dantec, Loeb, Snyder, Gregory, Arrhenius, Moore,
Osborne, etc. — as to the origin of life on our planet.

66 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

continued to live and propagate: the Injured portions
died.

Now, on my theory, so long as life went on uninter¬
ruptedly in this universe of ours, good and only good
prevailed; but this first destruction of animate life marked
the first appearance of evil. In this sense, therefore, evil
is synonymous with disease and death — a curious con¬
firmation of the old Genesis legend as to the simultaneous
appearance of evil and death in the world. ^

For on my view, evil, in Its first primitive form, would
be merely divergence from the normal — departure from
those helpful cosmic laws which fostered and helped the
increase of life and the growth of living matter ; and good
would be merely conformity to those laws. The moment
that life departs from, or runs counter to, the play of
helpful forces, “ evil” (harm) results; as long as it re¬
mains in that channel, only “ good ” results.

It must be remembered. In all this, that I am speaking
only of the very lowest and most primitive form of life
possible — the very first life upon our planet, in fact —
and if one attempts to see in all this a solution of the
problem of evil, as presented by the highly developed and
complex human mind, he will of course be disappointed.
The trouble with those who think of “ mind ” only in
terms of the developed human intellect find difficulty in
appreciating the attempts of biologists to account for
the origin of mind by tracing it through the lower forms
of animate life, back to the primitive amoeba, and so
on back to the vegetable world. Only one who
has grasped the full significance of evolution In all
Its bearings can appreciate this. In the same way,

1 See, also, in this connection, Henry M. Alden’s interesting work: A
Study of Death.

THE ORIGIN OF EVIL

one who makes the attempt to account for any
complex and highly evolved quality of mind (such
as the conception of evil) must be prepared to
trace it backwards, through the ever-descending forms
of life, until its first primitive counterpart is discernible in
the lowest forms of animate life which exist.

This attempt of mine, therefore, is to trace the origin
of evil back and find its true source not in the psycho¬
logical field at all, but in the biological — in the primitive,
instinctive, simple reactionary sphere whence all our
highly evolved and complex mental and spiritual powers
have sprung. Evil has a biological origin. Its first ap¬
pearance was coincident with the first divergence from
normal of those forces and functions which constituted
life — in fact, actually resulted from that divergence.
Its nature is thus explained in its origin — it consists in
running counter to the laws of nature which govern and
foster the normal growth of life and living matter. Dis'^
obedience to cosmic law thus constituted the first evil —
protoplasmic disobedience — the penalties for which wer^
disease and death.

Starting from this primitive and humble standpoint, we
can trace, and readily perceive, -the gradually increasing
complexity and progress of “ evil ” throughout the ages.
It becomes more complex with the evolution of the living
being as it rises in the scale of evolution and complexity.
At length we arrive at man. Here, as in the simplest liv¬
ing organism, the same law holds good — disobedience
to cosmic law constitutes the essence of evil — conformity
to that law the highest good. Just as a living organism
conforms in all particulars to its environment, just so
long does health, harmony, and “ good ” result; hut the
instant it diverges even in the remotest degree from the

68 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

powerful forces which play all about it — that instant
disease, disharmony, death, and “evil” (for the organ¬
ism) result. In its lowest terms, then, good consists
essentially in the non-divergence — and evil in the diverg¬
ence — from the ordered and all-powerful forces of
Nature.

As we ascend the scale of evolution, the nature of evil
necessarily becomes more complex — just as the mental
life of the living being becomes more complex. Evil
would become relatively intricate — just as the mental
structure of our sensations, volitions, associations, etc.,
became more complex. Possible lines of divergence,
conscious and unconscious, would become more frequent;
and these would extend to the mental and spiritual worlds,
no less than to the material world. If a “ mental world ”
of any sort exists — as it certainly does, in one sense —
no matter what view of the mind we may hold — it is only
natural to suppose that it too has its set cosmic laws and
forces, and that divergence from these would result in
mental disaster, just as the bodily divergence results in the
destruction of the physical organism. As we gained
more and more self-consciousness, and the power of vol¬
untary choice was apparently given us — the right and
ability to decide which course of action to pursue would
result in this or that result being attained — “ good” or
“ bad ” as the case may be. Evil would still be diverg¬
ence from cosmic law, but in this case it would be volun¬
tarily and with full knowledge of the ultimate conse¬
quences. This, then. Is sin — conscious choice of evil.
That Is, we sin (psychologically or biologically) when we
voluntarily choose to follow a certain course of action
which both experience and science have shown to be ulti¬
mately detrimental. Sin is ^hus a subsidiary problem to

THE ORIGIN OF EVIL 69

the central problem of the nature and origin of evil.
Solve the one, and the other solves itself.

To this extent, then, man is responsible to himself for
the sin he commits; if he is Ignorant of the harm he does
(to himself or to others), then it is not sin, only evil —
evil in its broadest sense — meaning that which is not
good for the mental and physical life of the organism
performing the act. The degree to which one Is capable
of judging and choosing, the degree of the free-will and
free choice, determines the amount of “ sin ” In any given
act; Its absence removes the act from the sphere of sin
altogether, and places It In the broader field of evil. If
the act harms oneself, it is evil for oneself; If It harms
others. It Is evil for them. If one unknowingly and un¬
consciously performs an action, or a series of actions,
detrimental to the organism, one has to suffer just as
much as though one were In full possession of that
knowledge. “ Ignorance of the law Is no excuse.” The
mother who loses her sleep night after night, because of
her babies, suffers the ill-effects as surely as the one who
loses it in the vainest and most selfish of pleasures. The
body knows nothing of motives; poison Is poison, no mat¬
ter whether given with good or evil Intent. Psychology
alone takes motives Into account, and gives them a place
in the world as true realities of life.

What, then, of the motives that Inspire us? Some of
these are good ; others bad. Some urge us to good deeds ;
others to evil ones. Let us not be led astray here, how¬
ever, by those moralists who would say that the motive
is everything. We have just seen that they are all-
important as to the question of sin; but not that of evil!
There is just the difference here between the older psy¬
chology — which dealt only with the conscious mind in

70 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

human beings — and the broader evolutionary psy¬
chology of today, as there is between the older and this
newer conception of morals — of good and evil. We
must study the problem from the evolutionary standpoint,
just as we study any other psychological or physiological
question connected with our complex make-up; and
viewed In this light, it will be seen that “ evil ” has a far
wider range and significance than before attributed to It.

But, apart from man’s responsibility to himself, what
about his responsibility to others, and to God? These
are ethical questions which deserve the fullest considera¬
tion; but they can only be touched upon very briefly here,
and then only from the particular standpoint occupied by
the writer of this book. Obviously evil, so far as one’s
neighbour is concerned. Is Injury done to him in any way;
sin would be the voluntary choice of the commission of
that crime. As to man’s relation to God — so far as
evil and sin are concerned — this finds a comparatively
simple solution In the theory just advanced, as it is easy to
show.

For, on the basis of materialism (or monism) no God
enters into the problem at all; and the same is virtually
true of Pantheism. Only in the more orthodox systems
of dualism is it necessary for us to consider this problem
seriously. Of course. If we accept an all-wise, all-
benevolent Creator — a true anthropomorphic Deity —
then we should doubtless be faced with many of the prob¬
lems which so perplexed the good St. Augustine — “ If
God Is all-good, how came evil Into the world? ” etc.
But for modern scientists and philosophers it is hardly
necessary to consider, seriously, this primitive conception.
Even were we to admit a God, the modern view would be
that He works according to law : that there are certain

THE ORIGIN OF EVIL

fixed laws which govern the universe, and that these are
never transcended nor thwarted. This being so, we are
practically where we were before; for, no matter whether
the laws that govern the universe were made by God, or
originated themselves, or were the result of blind chance,
they nevertheless obtain; and it is the divergence from
these laws which constitutes evil — according to our view.
Therefore, no matter whether God exists or not, for our
purposes it makes no difference; the same definition of
evil holds good, and would continue to hold good both as
to man’s actual transgression and also as to man’s rela¬
tion to God — for man could do nothing higher or better
than obey implicitly the laws which are made here for his
strict observance.

This view of sin and evil, it will be observed, does
not at all agree with the doctrine, defended by Campbell
and many others, that evil is a mere nothing- — a sort of
vacuum — the “absence of good.’’ Mrs. Eddy’s doc¬
trine thus falls to the ground; for we see that evil is a
positive reality: it consists not so much in not doing what
we should as in doing something we should not. It is
a positive, not a negative thing. It is an actual force,
a factor, an entity. It is doing something we should not
do. And this view of the case enables us to include
in our conception meanness, cruelty, perversions, evil mo¬
tives and evil passions, and a thousand other manifes¬
tations of human depravity and sin which the “ vacuum
moralists ’’ find it hard to account for fully on their
theory. For it is certainly hard to see (if evil be merely
“ the absence of good,’’ as darkness is merely the absence
of light, as Campbell and others maintain) how cruelty
and premeditated vice and crime can find their place and
be fully accounted for, on this view of the facts. Surely

72 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the appearance, in such cases, is that the evil deed springs
from an evil motive ; and this evil motive is an entity —
a real “ thing ” as much as a good motive. If psycho¬
logical facts exist as facts at all in the universe, a bad
thought must be just as substantial a reality as a good
one ; and the deed committed — as the result of this
thought — would be its logical effect or consequence —
just as much as the good deed would be the effect or con¬
sequence of the good thought Otherwise, what becomes
of our doctrine of cause and effect?

But whence this evil thought — this evil motive? I
reply, it differs more or less in differing cases; but the
majority of them find their solution in the doctrine of evo¬
lution. Physiological evils — such as gluttony, drunken¬
ness, sex-impulses (morbid and excessive), etc. — find
their ready explanation in abnormal developments of the

original first instincts - the instinct of self-preservation

and the instinct of perpetuation of the race. The arti¬
ficiality of our lives, the desire for stimulation, false
physiological teachings, morbid restraints and licenses,
etc., would fully account for these evil desires. On the
other hand, cruelty, vice, revenge, blood-lust, and similar
perversions of the human mind and spirit are doubtless
the result of psycho-pathological conditions — actual
diseases — calling for treatment just as much as smallpox
or leprosy. All these evil motives, therefore, can be ac¬
counted for, either by the abnormal condition of the mind
of the person performing the evil act; or as resulting
from excessive gratification of normal cravings resident
in the bodily organism — which we are only gradually
learning to master as we ascend the scale of evolution.
Viewed from this standpoint, all the difficulties as to the

THE ORIGIN OF EVIL

“ temptations of the flesh,” etc., vanish. For we now
know that man was not originally ” perfect there was
no “ fall ” in the Biblical sense of that word; but rather
that we are constantly struggling upwards, against the
cravings and desires of the flesh — which thus constitute
a genuine source of evil. But — be it observed — these
bodily cravings only become evil as the result of their
abnormal development; they are normally good, our best
helpers and friends. Obedience to their voice all through
life would prevent much “ evil.” So long as the appe¬
tites remain unperverted, they are normal. Exercise Is
healthful; but If overdone, it becomes harmful. The
flow of the nervous current gives pleasure; but if unduly
prolonged. It gives rise to actual pain.

Then, again, we must be careful to distinguish appar¬
ent evil from real evil. Many of the things we suffer
from In life are for our own betterment or ultimate
benefit — as we subsequently find out. These “ hard-
knocks ” cannot be called evil. On the other hand, many
of the hardships we have to bear from the hands of oth¬
ers are entirely due to lack of imagination or insight on
their part. If they could see things as we do — look out
of our eyes, think our thoughts, imagine themselves In
our place — these things would not be done. Many of
the lesser ills of life — trials, “ crosses,” minor evils —
are doubtless due to this lack of sympathetic imagination.
Up to a certain point It is a pathologi-cal condition.
Prove this to a man, and he frequently changes his atti¬
tude and life-habits. The “ source ” of evil is removed.

In the above argument, I have endeavoured to outline
a theory as to the origin and nature of evil, from a
slightly different and more fundamental standpoint than

74 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

has been attempted In the past. I have tried to show
that the roots of evil lie, not in the psychological but
rather in the biological field — as do all our mental and
moral activities. Disobedience to Cosmic Law is the root
and essence of evil — protoplasmic disobedience first of
all, gradually becoming more and more mental and
conscious as we ascend the scale of evolution; until. In
man, we find sin possible — which Is the voluntary choice
of evil. Buried deep in the past lies the origin of evil —
in the primitive struggling “ bioplasm ” which first in¬
habited our globe. Evolution has developed this into
man. Coincident with this growth, man’s mind and mor¬
als evolved also — his conscience and his conception of
good and evil. The explanation of these problems is to
be found In the doctrine of Evolution, and there alone.

And now what of the bearing upon all this of Psychi¬
cal Research? I have shown, above, that Sin is the vol¬
untary choice of evil — hence dependent upon man’s
free will. If there were no Free Will, there could be no
free-choice, in the absolute sense of that term. Is the will
of man free? I have already endeavoured to prove, (in
The Problems of Psychical Research, pp. 198-203), that
the problem can be solved, affirmatively, by the proof of
the reality of psychic phenomena; also why it Is that. If
these be true. Free Will Is a possibility — nay, practically
proved. This being so, the problem of evil is seen to
depend upon the proof of free-will, and the proof of
free-will upon the validity and reality of psychic phe¬
nomena! We see, therefore, that on the proof of these
rests the whole case — the true solution — of the prob¬
lem of evil 1 With free will once proved, — and the real¬
ity of a spiritual world demonstrated, — our whole system

THE ORIGIN OF EVIL

of ethics is thereby affected, — our fundamental concep¬
tions concerning it altered. For this reason, therefore,
we may contend that upon the proof of the reality of psy¬
chical phenomena depend, not only an ethical conception
of the world, but also a true solution of the problem of
evil.

PART II. RECENT EXPERIMENTS AND
THEORIES

CHAPTER V

THE COMING SCIENCE ; PSYCHICAL RESEARCH ^

When one undertakes to speak or write upon the sub¬
ject of “ psychical research,” one is always in danger of
shipwreck — shipwreck to one’s reputation; and one has
to sail with all the skill and care that a natural level¬
headedness' and common-sense can avail, between the
rocks of Scylla and Charybdis — the Scylla of Credulity
and the Charybdis of Scepticism I One is as fatal as the
other; both are a block to further progress. We wish
really to sail between the Pillars of Hercules and on, into
the Unknown Sea, — until, perchance, we catch a glimpse
of the Isles of the Blest: of Immortality!

For if, on the one hand, we err on the side of credulity,
we immediately draw upon ourselves the charge of in¬
competence and even insinuations of being unbalanced
mentally; or else a poor observer, or finally of being in
league with the medium ! -On the other hand, if one is
unduly sceptical, — if one doubts and hesitates, and de¬
mands strict and stringent “ tests ” before he finally yields
consent to the reality of the phenomena he sees, then, for¬
sooth, he is blamed for obstinacy, stupidity, refusal to see
what is before his eyes, — conceit in setting up his opinion
in face of that of men and women his superiors, per¬
haps, who have in the past yielded consent to the reality
of the manifestations. But, as William James so aptly
said: “We all live on an inclined plane of credulity,

^ Part of the present chapter consists of an address delivered in New
York, in 1912, and published in my Problems of Psychical Research.
The title “The Coming Science” has no relation to my book, of the same
name.

8o MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

and let him whose plane tips neither in one direction nor
the other be the one to cast the first stone ! ”

Every science must have its beginnings, which seem at
the time weak, useless and ineffectual. Let us not forget
the experience of Galvani, who, when he was conducting
his first experiments upon frog’s legs, was laughed at by
learned and unlearned alike and derisively called the
“ frog’s dancing master.” “ Yet,” as he pathetically
said at the time, “ I know I have discovered one of the
greatest secrets of nature.” And today we know that his
experiments are classical, and have given us a knowledge
of the phenomena of Galvanism. Similarly, Galileo.
When he wished to prove the rotation of the earth, and
the fact that the sun, moon and stars were stationary, —
and did not revolve around the earth as taught at that
time, — he begged his contemporaries to place their eyes
to his telescope, and see for themselves. But they
would not look, “ for fear of being convinced.” Science
and theology of his day said that such facts were “ im¬
possible,” — and hence they could not possibly exist!
No matter what the evidence may be, if men do not want
to believe a thing true, we cannot force them to believe it.
We believe to be true that which we wish to believe true;
and we disbelieve what we do not wish to believe true.
This may sound paradoxical, even untrue; but, if put to
the test, it will be found to be true, nevertheless.

We witness the same mental attitude, the same scoffing
scepticism in our day — we have by no means outgrown
it. Were you to tell any one that it is possible to boil
water containing ice without melting the ice it contains,
he would probably laugh at you for a fool, or politely in¬
sinuate that you are lying; and yet this is a very simple lit¬
tle experiment in physics which any chemist would explain

THE COMING SCIENCE

to you in a moment. If we turn to the history of hypno¬
tism, we find that its early exponents of “ mesmerism ”
or “animal magnetism,” as it was then called — were
laughed at for their pains, and branded as “ frauds ”
and “ humbugs,” and their subjects as “ hardened
rogues”; yet, as we now know, hypnotic suggestion is
recognized as possessing tremendous therapeutic value
and power, rendering possible painless dental and sur¬
gical operations of all kinds; while as a means of explor¬
ing the human mind, and curing bad habits and vices, it
stands unsurpassed as a regenerative agent of the first
rank. Hypnotism is today utilized by the medical fra¬
ternity in many of our greatest Institutions and Hospitals;
and its value is well known. Here, then, we have an
example of a revolutionary truth suppressed and scoffed-
at as “ humbug,” whereas, as a matter of fact, it is of the
utmost value. I believe that the case is very similar with
psychic phenomena of all kinds. These too are true;
but they are discredited without a hearing and without in¬
vestigation just as hypnotism was but a few years ago.
Prof. Schiller, of Oxford University, called psychical re¬
search “ the Dreyfus Case of Science ”; it has never re¬
ceived a fair trial in an open court, before an impartial
tribunal. Let that be once granted, and we shall see
that here too is a great truth; that here too are phe¬
nomena of the utmost value and significance to science
and to mankind !

I have just said that every science appears petty and of
small account in its inception. During the early years of
its growth, progress is slow and indefinite; and many
false steps have to be taken before the final, glorious goal
is reached. We must remember that more than two
thousand years of work were necessary before the dis-

82 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

coverles of the past years in physics were possible; and
during all that period, and especially at the very begin¬
ning of the study, many false theories must have been
advanced, and many apparently ridiculous experiments
made in an attempt to unravel the mystery of this uni¬
verse. So we must not forget that this question — which
we are to discuss here — this science of “ psychical re¬
search,” is as yet in its veriest infancy — yet less than
forty years old — for it was not until the year 1882 that
the first organized and systematic attempt was made to
investigate these problems and ascertain how much of
truth there might be in any of them. In that year a
group of thoughtful men met in London and formed the
nucleus of the Society for Psychical Research, —
whose influence is ^today far-reaching, and to all
thinking men and women, of the greatest significance
and importance. I shall dwell upon these results very
shortly. For the moment I wish only to emphasize the
fact that we cannot, — in the present embryonic stage of
the investigation, — hope for more than crude and im¬
perfect results — for facts, alas ! too few and ill-ob¬
served to warrant our adhesion at all points; of theories
ill-digested and premature, — as must needs be the case
in the present state of our science.

But should such a state of things continue to exist?
Should we not rather band together and determine to
unravel this tangled skein — to ascertain what may be
true and what false in this obscure region, where so much
is asserted to occur? Perhaps I cannot do better than
to quote here the words of Professor Henry Sidgwick,
when he said, in his first presidential address before the
Societv for Psychical Research: —

“ We are all agreed that the present state of things is

THE COMING SCIENCE

a scandal to the enlightened age in which we live. That
the dispute as to the reality of these marvellous phe¬
nomena — of which it is quite impossible to exaggerate
the scientific importance, if only a tenth part of what has
been alleged by generally credible witnesses be true —

I say it is a scandal that the dispute as to the reality of
these phenomena should still be going on, — that so many
competent witnesses should have declared their belief in ,
them; that so many others should be profoundly in¬
terested in having the question determined, and yet that
the educated world as a body should still be simply in the
attitude of incredulity.”

These words were first spoken some thirty-five years
ago; but they are as true today as they were then! An
ever-growing host of investigators — otherwise sane and
sensible, apparently — are testifying to the reality of
these facts; the great mass of humanity feels the im¬
portance of the outcome of this investigation, — in the
present state of anarchy and schism within the Churches
— and yet, in spite of these facts; in spite of the enor¬
mous mass of evidence now accumulated, — in spite of the
rapidly increasing number of adherents to this cause —
there is still a state of utter incredulity and even bitter
opposition by the majority of persons, who either do not
or will not take the trouble to inquire into the actual
facts, — being so prejudiced against the subject that, —
like the theologians in the days of Galileo, — they will
not apply their eyes to the telescope of reason, “ for fear
of being convinced I ” At the present stage of the world’s
history, it is true, they are the majority and we the minor¬
ity; they are the giant Goliath and we the stripling David;
but even then, if you remember the tale, “ it was not
safe for the Goliath of Authority to stalk forth into the

84 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

field of Debate without a risk that a little pellet of reason
should pierce the thickness of his skull and put an end
to his pretensions.” Let us enter the field, then; and
boldly throw down the gauntlet to our opponents; and
see who is the better man !

There exists, I know, a bitter opposition to these sub¬
jects In many quarters, but it is often hard to see why. I
myself have known many such persons. These indi¬
viduals fairly froth at the mouth whenever the words
“ psychics ” or “ spiritualism ” are mentioned ! I have in
vain attempted to discover the real reason for their ani¬
mus. I cannot stop to analyse this mental attitude, or
reply to their criticisms at the present time; but I shall
merely say that they are altogether untenable and un¬
justified when analysed. Moreover, they are founded on
a misconception of the facts; It is just as easy to be sci¬
entific in the investigation of thought-transference or
trance-medlumship as it is In the analysis of table-salt or
the sounding of the ocean’s depths. In science, the at¬
titude, the method of Investigation is everything; the sub¬
ject-matter nothing. The facts of science are constantly
changing; the method never.

The object in this long preamble has not been in vain
if it has succeeded in impressing upon you the fact that
there is here a field for legitimate study; if I have In any
way shaped your minds into a sufficiently receptive at¬
titude to receive without constant subconscious antago¬
nism the facts I am about to lay before you. Those of
us who have spent a number of years in the Investigation
of these phenomena have encountered many strange
things; and unless they are led up to by a gradual series
of facts of greater credibility, they will probably be re-

THE COMING SCIENCE 85

jected as “ impossible ” or incredible at once, — and with¬
out further inquiry!

To mention a few of these : —

A number of striking experiments seem to indicate, in
the clearest manner possible, that, in addition to our
physical body, we possess another body of the same shape,
composed of a sort of etheric or semi-fluidic substance, —
which has given rise to the supposition that it is com¬
posed of matter of a different degree of density or solidity
than the matter we know. The nature of this etheric
body — the “ spiritual body ” of St. Paul, is now known;
and many experiments have been conducted in an attempt
to detach it from the physical body, and with some suc¬
cess. It is presumed that this body survives the shock of
death, and that it is the seat of consciousness, or at least
that consciousness somehow manifests through it. Now,
if such a theory were true, it would help us to explain
many difficult facts — cases of apparitions occurring at
the moment of death; cases of so-called spirit-pho¬
tography, cases of clairvoyance at a great distance; cases
in which the “ soul ” has apparently left the body and re¬
turned to re-animate it, — remembering its journey into
the other world — these and many equally strange mani¬
festations would find a ready explanation, were such a
body found to exist. For, in such a case, we should only
have to assume that the etheric and the physical bodies
became in some way disjointed and severed; and that this
etheric body was seen or photographed at a distance dur¬
ing its absence from the body. The figures seen in so-
called “ haunted houses ”; “ ghosts,” and even the super¬
normal knowledge so often imparted in dreams might
readily be explained on such a theory, — which is, as you

86 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

will see, not so very far removed from reason and physical
science after all.

Have we any proof that such a body exists other than
that afforded by the experiments themselves? We have
a number of facts; of which I shall enumerate a few.

In some experiments which I have conducted, I have
succeeded in partly dissociating the two organisms, by
means of hypnotic suggestion, while the subject was In
deep trance, and the independent existence of this astral
or etheric body has been proved by phenomena of sen¬
sibility and motivity. Thus, after the inner body has
been to some extent loosened,. I have pricked this body
with a needle; and, though the prick was some inches
distant from the surface of the real, material body, the
subject, nevertheless, felt this prick as If It were on her
“ real ” body. I pricked the surface of the etheric body,
that is, distant some six or eight inches from the ma¬
terial body, but, by a phenomenon known to psychical
students as “ repercussion,” it rebounded or re-acted
upon the material body in such a way that the subject felt
the pricks actually in the body itself. Experiments of
this character have been conducted on a large scale In
France, and are known as “ exteriorization of sensibility,”
or the sensation of pain and feeling. On the other hand,
we have the phenomena of “ exteriorization of mo¬
tivity,” — In which this etheric body moves solid objects
at a distance. In response to suggestion, or the request of
the sitters; and here we have cases of movements of ob¬
jects without contact, and other physical manifestations of
a supernormal character, such as those manifested by
Eusapla Palladino, and other mediums of a like nature.
And this brings me to the case of Eusapia.

As you will remember, this medium had been invest!-

THE COMING SCIENCE 87

gated for more than twenty years by noted men of science
in Europe; and all of them testified that, while this
medium would trick whenever the opportunity was given
her to do so, she nevertheless possessed remarkable pow¬
ers — powers which have never been explained. Year
after year went by; an ever-growing number of scientific
experts testified to the reality of these unheard-of mar¬
vels; but the case was never explained. In 1908, the So¬
ciety for Psychical Research delegated a Committee of
three of its most sceptical Investigators to study this
medium in Naples — men who were known to be thor¬
oughly familiar with the tricks of the professional
medium, and also amateur conjurors; men. In short, who
would be the most unlikely to be taken in by the tricks
of this medium, — whose methods of attempted trickery
were well-known to them, from past reports, and which
they were on the constant lookout to guard against. I
had the honor to be one of that Committee; the other
members being the Hon, Everard Feilding, and Mr. W.
W. Baggally, of England, In November and Decem¬
ber, 1908, we held a series of ten sittings in our own
rooms in the Hotel, under conditions of perfect control;
the result of which was to convince us all that genuine
phenomena of a remarkable character did occur, — phe¬
nomena which no system of trickery could account for;
and we published our Report in the Proceedings of
the English Society for Psychical Research. I may say
that my own conversion was contrary to what was gen¬
erally expected, and to what I myself expected.

On my return to America in 1909, I thought constantly
of our investigation; and the Importance of the facts. If
true; and I conceived the idea of bringing Eusapla to this
country, so that American men of science might have an

88 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

opportunity to see and test her powers, just as those of
England, France, Germany, Russia, Italy, and other
European countries had done. I believed that it would
be a burning shame to let so interesting a case as this slip
by without any serious attempt to investigate her claims
upon American shores; and it was because of this that I
brought her to this country and arranged a long series
of sittings which were attended by members of our So¬
ciety and by others; and finally by a small group of scien¬
tific men at Columbia University.

The results of a few of these seances you know —
Eusapia was discovered in fraud, and the report spread
broadcast that she was nothing more than a common
trickster. This is doubtless the report which the ma¬
jority believe today; but I want to say that it is an en¬
tirely false impression, and that I am today still as con¬
vinced of the reality of her remarkable powers as ever;
in fact far more convinced of them than when she came
to this country. In spite of her fraud, she can yet pro¬
duce genuine phenomena; and those who have seen them
do not for a moment doubt this. Only, when she is tired-
out, exhausted, and these phenomena fall to appear, she
will invariably endeavour to reproduce them by fraudu¬
lent means, — and herein lay her undoing. At many
seances given towards the end of her trip here, Eusapia
was so tired out from numerous previous seances that she
was unable to produce any genuine phenomena of note;
and those she did produce were largely fraudulent ! Nat¬
urally, the result was an unfavourable verdict; but this
does not preclude the fact that, under better conditions, she
can also produce genuine phenomena which have aston¬
ished everybody, and have never yet been explained. I
have seen many of these in good light, and when all pos-

THE COMING SCIENCE

sibillty of trickery was out of the question. I base my
belief upon these undoubted manifestations; and not at
all upon those dubious phenomena which occur in the
dark, and which might easily be duplicated by fraud, —
if only the medium had one hand free.

It would, of course, be useless on my part to attempt a
defense of this medium now; since the subject is so rid¬
dled with misconceptions and misrepresentations; and is,
moreover, so complicated. I shall only state that my be¬
lief in her powers remains unchanged; that I not only
think, but know, that these manifestations are genuine;
that all talk of collusion by myself or others is, of course,
nonsense — not only from the personal point-of-view,
which I am willing to excuse in a problem so irritating as
this — but because of the fact that these same phenomena
had been going on for eighteen years before I ever saw
Eusapia; while to attribute all she does to the few simple
and clumsy tricks which were discovered here, and which
had been discovered years before in Europe also is, of
course, merely an insult to the intelligence and good sense
of those eminent men of science, who have, during all
these years, worked over her case in Europe. Physical
phenomena of a supernormal character are undoubted!
I hold that this will be proved to the satisfaction of all,
before many years have passed. And then what will be
thought of Eusapia; and of the fact that she was allowed
to go hence, without adequate scientific investigation —
with only the most superficial inquiry accorded her in this
country? ^

But fortunately the case for the reality of these physical
phenomena does not rest upon Palladino alone. There

* See my Personal Experiences in Spiritualism for a full account of the
American sittings with Eusapia Palladino.

90 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

are many other mediums who are now attracting consid¬
erable attention among European men of science; and,
most interesting of all, perhaps, it has been proved that
a very large number of persons, — who are not at all
mediums in the common acceptation of the word, — pos¬
sess the power in a lesser degree to move physical objects
at a distance. Prof. Alrutz, of Sweden, a well-known
man of science, has invented a little instrument by means
of which it is possible to register this force, which eman¬
ates from certain individuals, where the “ will ” is exer¬
cised in the proper direction, — which force moves solid
objects placed at a distance from them.

These cases certainly throw a backward light upon the
phenomena obtained through the mediumship of Eusapia
Palladino and others, and tend to confirm, very strongly,
the authenticity of their manifestations. For we now see
that this power is resident in us all; and that it is only
more strongly developed in some than in others. We are
all mediums potentially ; we need only to cultivate these
powers to make them actual and manifest, though, of
course, the degree of psychic capacity differs widely in dif¬
ferent individuals.

Now the point I wish to make is this. If such pow¬
ers exist; if they are a part of humanity as created; then
surely their study becomes of the greatest importance; for
here we are on the threshold of the discovery of a new
force — a force just as new as electricity or magnetism;
and one that more vitally concerns us too, — since it deals
with the human body which we inhabit. The manifesta¬
tions of this force which we at present see may be feeble
and fugitive enough; but they are indications of some¬
thing beyond. The attraction and repulsion of the pith-
ball; or the rising of the hair on pussy’s back may be

THE COMING SCIENCE

trivial phenomena; but they are the manifestations of the
same power which wrecks houses and vessels in the light¬
ning-flash; which turns the wheels of thousands of manu¬
facturing plants in our land today. It is the same power ;
but in a different degree. Similarly, the sporadic and
capricious manifestations seen in the presence of me¬
diums, and persons similarly gifted are but the limited
manifestation of a power whose discovery will, I ven¬
ture to predict, be one of the next great advances of
science; and it will be marked as one of the leading and
most important discoveries of the age.

Now, there is no reason why we should not be the ones
to discover this force! The trouble in the past has been
that psychic investigation has been handicapped by the
lack of suitable means wherewith to work, — let alone
the scarcity of men to investigate ! What we need is a
laboratory, — devoted to the investigation of the super¬
normal — to the study of mediums and psychical phe¬
nomena. Years ago. Sir Oliver Lodge pointed out the
necessity for such a laboratory, and indicated what instru¬
ments would, in his estimation, be necessary for carrying
on this research as it should be conducted. Why should
we not inaugurate the first psychic laboratory in
America — the first laboratory dedicated to the study of
this science, — which is destined to become the science of
the present century? William James opened the first
psychological laboratory; why should not the honour
be ours of opening the first laboratory devoted entirely
to the scientific investigation of psychical phenomena?
Such an undertaking would arouse a considerable amount
of interest and of speculation; and the world would wait
in breathless anticipation for the results of the investiga¬
tions carried on within it, and for the reports of experi-

92 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

ments conducted under its direction. And such a labora¬
tory would redound to the glory and the reputation of
its founder — as the first man {or woman) possessing the
necessary tact, judgment and foresight to foresee the drift
of the times, and perceive that such a laboratory is one
of the prime needs of our day! Who is there who suf¬
ficiently appreciates the Importance of the cause to come
forward and assist in such good work? I earnestly hope
that this appeal will not fall upon deaf ears; that this re¬
quest will not be forgotten, but that some men and women
will consider this earnestly, with a view to founding such
a valuable scientific institution.

Hitherto, most of the work in this field has been con¬
ducted In the clinic. In the laboratory of the psychologist,
or in the dubious gloom of the seance room. We desire
to demonstrate the reality of psychic phenomena in a
more open and public fashion, so that every one may see
the manifestations, — and not only witness but actually
assist in their production himself. It is only natural that
the “ personal factor ” should enter into all that we do.
Every one wishes to see and be convinced for himself; —
here is the chance to do so! But we must have subjects;
we must find mediums for experiment; and all this takes
time and money to bring about. There are but few
good mediums In this country; It may be necessary to go
abroad in order to procure suitable subjects for study and
Investigation. The result Is that it is impossible for us
to undertake this colossal work unaided. We need sup¬
port and co-operation in this work — help and financial
backing — in order that these investigations may be car¬
ried on at all. Not a very great deal would be required;
but one would be astonished, nevertheless, to ascertain
how much it takes to manipulate such an undertaking

THE COMING SCIENCE

successfully. I have had my experience with Eusapia,
and I know ! This science should, of course, endow a
certain number of qualified men to investigate this
realm, — just as professors of physics and chemistry, and
botany and zoology, and anthropology and psychology
and philosophy and other ’ologies and ’isms are pro¬
vided with competent men to study and teach them!
Why not this subject? If any of these phenomena are
true, — if we are here on the borderline of a new world
of science, — then, surely, this investigation is as impor¬
tant as any other — yes, far more important, for do we
not deal here with phenomena which more intimately con¬
cern us than any other? If “ the proper study of man¬
kind is man,” — then, assuredly, we are here in a realm
which offers great possibilities, — in one of the most prom¬
ising of all the byways of science; on the threshold, in
fact, of what I believe to be a new and a “ coming
science.”

The phenomena which we desire to study are the fol¬
lowing:

Experiments in thought-transference; experiments in
clairvoyance, normal and induced; experiments upon the
human “ aura ” (should it be proved to exist) so as to
ascertain its structure, constitution, etc. ; the exterioriza¬
tion of motivity; the exteriorization of sensitivity; the so-
called “ polarity ” of the human body — tested by instru¬
ments and otherwise ; automatic-writing, crystal-gazing,
shell-hearing; the projection of the double; astral-pro¬
jection; exploration of the subconscious mind; experi¬
ments in magnetizing animals and inanimate objects; ex¬
perimentally induced dreams; experimental apparitions^
experiments in magnetic healing — the “laying-on of
hands,” etc.; study of “obsession” cases; experiments

94 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

with the so-called human “ Fluid study of the power of
the Will over inanimate matter; experiments in levitation;
experimental study of the Yogi exercises — breathing,
awakening of the so-called “ Chakras,” etc. ; thought-
photography; spirit-photography; materialization; study
of the “ cold breeze ” felt at seances; study of the action
of drugs on consciousness, and the influence of powders,
incense, perfumes, etc., on the senses; experiments in
duplicating spiritistic phenomena by physical and electrical
means; study of “dowsing” or water-finding; experi¬
ments with magnets — a la Reichenbach; experiments in
trance, ecstasy, etc.; study of the psychology of decep¬
tion; study of suggestion, normal and abnormal; experi¬
ments in the induction of illusions and hallucinations; ex¬
periments in the “passage of matter through matter”;
study of secondary personality cases; psycho-analysis; ex¬
periments in telepathic hypnotism; visions of the dying;
weighing and photographing the soul at the moment of
death, supernormal psychology and physiology, etc., etc.

My plea, then, is that there is here a field for experi¬
ment, — a field which offers untold rewards and a rich
harvest of facts. Progress in this direction can only be
accomplished by an organized and systematic attempt to
study the phenomena at first hand. A Club or a Society
can accomplish what no individuals can accomplish,
simply because the facilities and the backing are not forth¬
coming. Christ himself said: “When two or three are
gathered together in my name there am I ”; and in the
spirit of truth we come together in this inquiry as in none
other! “In unity there is strength.” This is true in
every field of human endeavour, — and it is certainly true
here also. The harvest to be reaped is laden with golden
grain; shall we not assist in its reaping — help to garner

THE COMING SCIENCE

such facts as, — rightly interpreted, — will help us not
only to understand the Universe aright, but will bestow
a spiritual significance upon all that we see? Life with¬
out love and hope is a desolate waste; and when the light
has gone out of our lives, in the form of some ideal, —
some spiritual interest, — we have left a nature hard and
barren : pure metal which has been rusted and blackened
by some corroding acid; a velvety peach, from which the
bloom has been brushed by some ruthless hand; a delicate
pink rose, whose petals have been crushed and bruised,
by some blighting, withering force ! Such is a life devoid
of spiritual hopes and ambitions ; and it is because these
phenomena furnish us with this hope, with these am¬
bitions, that I consider them so important and so valuable.
As the late Mr. Gladstone said; “ It is the most impor¬
tant work in the world today — by far the most impor¬
tant.” Let us, then, join hands in the will and determi¬
nation to investigate them !

CHAPTER VI

PERSONAL REMINISCENCES OF EUSAPIA PALLADINO

Well I remember the first day we called upon Eusapia
Palladino — the Hon. Everard Feilding and myself.
We had travelled to Naples, on behalf of the English So¬
ciety for Psychical Research, to hold a series of seances
there; and en route — to assist in our amicable recep¬
tion — I had procured courteous letters of introduction
to her from Dr. J. Maxwell, M. Flammarion, and M.
Courtier, of the General Psychological Institute, of Paris.
I had arrived in Naples one rainy day in November,
1908, and had been joined the next day by Mr. Feilding,
who had come on direct from England. (Mr. W. W.
Baggally, the third member of the Committee, only ar¬
rived several days later, after our fourth seance.) The
day following Mr. Feilding’s arrival, we journeyed to
Eusapia’s home, in order to make arrangements for the
sittings. We drove through a maze of back streets,
through an old courtyard, and finally reached her abode
by climbing up a number of steep flights of stairs. To
our disappointment, we learned that she had gone out,
but that she would soon be back. Would we not wait?
Her young and handsome husband admitted us into a
small and stuffy room, closely shuttered, the walls of
which were adorned with scores of signed photographs of
celebrities. Here were portraits of Lombroso, Morselli,
Schiaparelli, Botazzi, and other men of science who had
inquired into, and endorsed, her phenomena. Here were
also photographs of men and women famous throughout

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

the world in the realms of art, letters and politics. It
was truly an impressive collection. We waited, chatted
with Eusapia’s husband, drank the curaqao offered us,
until, after ten or fifteen minutes, steps resounded upon
the stairs. The great Eusapia herself stood in the door¬
way !

I shall never forget my first impressions of this re¬
markable woman. Her charm and magnetism were truly
extraordinary. Though unlettered (she could neither
read nor write, save her own name) she possessed a
keenness of mind, an alertness, a scintillation, a personal
charm and magnetism, quite unique and unrivalled.
Whenever Eusapia entered a room, she was sure at
once to be the centre of attraction and interest. Her
bright, flashing eyes seemed to emit streams of living
fire; her whole form radiated magnetism; her conversa¬
tion was so witty and so pungent that it often required
an intellect of no mean order to keep up with it. Her
conversation was animated and gay; she was in a good
humour. Arrangements were soon completed for a
series of sittings, to be held in our rooms at the Hotel
Victoria (Naples), and we left, well pleased with the
result of our Interview.

How different a picture was presented to us, now that
I look back upon it, by this same Eusapia, at the conclu¬
sion of our first seance: Weak, drawn, ill, nauseated,
hysterical, deeply lined about the face, physically and
mentally ill — such was the wreck of her former self
which we perceived at the conclusion of the first two-
hour seance. Hardly able to walk, she leaned heavily
upon us for support. All her energy had vanished.
Her -memory was gone; likewise her interest in every¬
thing — her magnetism, her vitality. She seemed to

98 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

have actually lost weight during the proceedings. (Ex¬
periments subsequently proved that she actually did so,
at times.) She descended the hotel stairs with dizzy
feeble steps, leaning heavily upon our arms. We saw
her drive off — a broken shrivelled old woman.

Yet the next day, when we again called upon her, she
was practically as vivacious and lively as ever: A night’s
rest and sleep seemed to have restored her completely.
From this we learned a valuable lesson — viz., that
Eusapla’s powers, vital in character, seemed to accumu¬
late as the days passed — and particularly at night —
and were expended during a seance with prodigious ra¬
pidity and extraordinary force. We later learned that
this expenditure was usually greatest with strangers —
when she was not feeling well or at ease; and that she
was relatively weak when she was unhappy, worried or
unwell. In other words, those conditions which would
normally prevent or hinder the manifestation of physi¬
cal, mental or moral force in any other channel, also in¬
hibit its manifestation in so far as psychic manifestations
are concerned. The same factors which would prevent
a musician from composing a masterpiece or a scien¬
tist from writing an article “ On Relativity,” would also
prevent a medium from giving a good seance.

It is hardly necessary, at this time, to remind the
reader of the general character of Eusapia Palladino’s
seances. They are well known to every student of
psychical science. They consisted, for the most part,
of purely physical manifestations — movements of ob¬
jects without contact, levitations of the seance table, cold
breezes, playing upon musical instruments without ap¬
parent cause, raps, materializations — partial or com¬
plete — Impressions In clay of hands, faces, etc. These

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

phenomena would often display a certain intelligence of
their own, however; as though some mind were behind
them, instigating and inspiring them; and it is an inter¬
esting and significant fact — which I have before
pointed out and commented upon — that the deeper the
trance of the medium, the more immobile she became,
the better and more striking were the phenomena, and
the greater the distance from her at which they occurred.
This is, of course, precisely what we should not expect,
were the manifestations the result of trickery pure and
simple. We repeatedly noticed that, when the medium
was restless and fidgety, constantly moving her hands
and feet, the phenomena were sporadic and flighty, un¬
dependable, and many of them suspiciously resembling
those which might have been produced by fraud. On
the contrary, when the medium allowed herself to be¬
come deeply entranced, when she trusted the sitters, felt
that they understood her trance, and that she could rely
upon them to look after her properly when in that
state — when she allowed herself to sink back, immobile
and passive, into the arms of her controllers, and re¬
main in that condition, hardly moving a muscle for an
hour or more at a time, the best and most striking
manifestations took place. Under these conditions —
when both hands and both feet were under perfect con¬
trol; when the head of the medium was resting upon my
shoulder, and every part of her body was passive and
adequately controlled — the most startling occurrences
were witnessed, sometimes at great distances from her;
where she could not possibly have reached, even were
her hands and feet free; and when there was a clearly
lighted space between her body and the object — in
which every one could see that nothing visible existed.

100 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

The ten seances which I shared with Messrs. Feilding
and Baggally, in Naples, were happily supplemented by
more than thirty others, in New York, during which I
had ample opportunity to judge the value of her phe¬
nomena judicially and impartially; and become thor¬
oughly accustomed to their general characteristics. I
emerged from them more than ever convinced of the
genuine nature of her phenomena; and, in spite of the
trickery which Eusapia unfortunately resorted to, at
times, and in which she was caught more than once, I
nevertheless base my belief upon those manifestations
which I have seen, and which could not possibly have
been accounted for by any of the methods detected or
suggested, which fail completely to account for the more
striking and convincing manifestations.

Let me state, just here, my own theory as to the nature
of the trickery which Eusapia was known to practise and
its relation to the apparently genuine phenomena; also,
why it was that Eusapia — granting that she had gen¬
uine power — resorted to trickery at all. I have many
times set forth my views in this connection; but I will
state them once again.

Eusapia Palladino depended, for the production of
her phenomena, upon a power over which she had no
control. At times, this energy would be strong, at other
times it would be weak. When it was strong, the phe¬
nomena would begin at once, and nothing we could do
would prevent them. We might tie her with ropes, en¬
case the legs of the table in wooden cones, etc. — nothing
mattered. The manifestations went on, very striking in
character, and continued almost without a break.
When, on the other hand, the power was weak, we
would wait for an hour or more before anything hap-

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

lOI

pened. Then, rather than send her sitters away, Eu-
sapia would endeavour to “ produce ” phenomena —
and It was at such times that she would resort to trickery.
If she had been a wise woman, she would have said to
her sitters: “I am sorry, ladies and gentlemen; I can
do nothing tonight. We will try tomorrow”; all
would have been well. But no ! She would not do this.
She was “the great Palladino ” — she must not fail!
Here lay her streak of vanity; herein lay her undoing.
For, every now and then, she would get caught in this
trickery, and then there would be a big fuss and wide
publicity, and her medlumship would receive a blow
from which it would take years to recover. This is
what happened at Cambridge, In 1895; ^hls is what
happened in America in 1910.

Of course the objection has been raised, that if a
medium is ever caught cheating, she must be discredited
In the future; and In the majority of cases, this may be a
solid enough rule to follow. But in such a case as
Eusapla’s, where scores of scientific men of the greatest
eminence have professed their belief In her powers,
while acknowledging her trickery, the case Is surely dif¬
ferent. William James has answered this objection with
his usual clarity of language. Speaking of this very sub¬
ject, he says (Memories and Studies, pp. 1 79-83 J:

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, once a cheat, always a cheat;
such has been the motto of the English psychical researchers in
dealing with mediums. I am disposed to think that, as a matter
of policy, it has been wise. . . . But, however wise as a policy
the S. P. R.’s maxim may have been, as a test of truth, I believe
it to be almost irrelevant. In most things human the accusation
of deliberate fraud and falsehood is grossly superficial. Man’s
character is too sophistically mixed for the alternative of ‘ honest
or dishonest ’ to be a sharp one. . . .

102 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Personally I base my belief not upon those mani¬
festations which might conceivably have been pro¬
duced by fraud, but upon those relatively rare ones
which could not possibly (or to my mind conceivably)
have been so produced. Let me cite two or three,
examples of these — chosen almost at haphaz¬
ard.

At the conclusion of our second Naples seance,
Eusapia standing up, about a foot in front of the cur¬
tains of the cabinet, which were closed behind her, the
strings of the mandolin were strummed, in exact syn¬
chronism with the movements of her fingers. Here
were the conditions. The mandolin was leaning
against the corner of the room. In front of it, lying
upon its side, within the cabinet, and forming as it were a
sort of “ fence,” was the small -table which had been
placed in the cabinet. In front of this were the cabinet
curtains. About a foot in front of these stood the
medium — a clearly lighted space being between her
body and the cabinet curtains. Her head and her hands
were completely visible. We repeatedly passed our
hands between the medium’s body and the cabinet, to
assure ourselves that no attachment of any kind existed
between the medium and any object in the cabinet. Un¬
der these conditions, Eusapia took one of our hands in
one of hers, holding it palm-up, “ picked ” the palm with
her finger (of the other hand), and in synchronism with
this movement, a string of the mandolin in the cabinet
would resound with a distinctly audible “ ting.” No one
was present except Mr. Feilding and myself; the seance
was held in our own rooms in the hotel; a moment after
the manifestation occurred, we parted the cabinet cur¬
tains, and assured ourselves that no one was in the cabi-

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

103

net, and that no connection of any kind existed between
the medium and the instrument.

On another occasion, in New York, Mr. S. S. Mc¬
Clure was forcibly pushed away from the cabinet, as he
tried to approach it, by what he described as “ two
hands, placed upon his chest,” when every one in the cir¬
cle could see that nothing visible touched him, and that
there was a clearly lighted space of about four or five
feet between his body and that of the medium.

On other occasions, Eusapia being securely held
hand and foot, outside the cabinet, I have gone into the
cabinet, during the height of a seance, and taken hold of
the small seance-table, upon which the musical instru¬
ments were placed. I could see across the table; see
that nothing visible was there; yet an invisible “being”
of some sort wrestled with me for the possession of the
table, and finally succeeded in throwing myself and the
table completely out of the cabinet — though I have al¬
ways been considered quite athletic, -and done much
boxing, etc., in my younger days. All this, be it re¬
membered, when nothing visible held the opposite side
of the table, and when the medium was held very se¬
curely hand and foot, by two sitters, outside the cabinet.
This happened on several occasions.

On still another occasion, the mandolin floated over
the seance table, outside the cabinet, and in the middle
of the circle of sitters, and continued floating about there,
playing all the time, for at least half a minute, while
every one could see that nothing visible was touching it.
We repeatedly assured ourselves, during this manifesta¬
tion, that no “ reaching rods,” threads, hairs, etc., were
present, and that nothing material supported the instru¬
ment in any way.

104 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

On yet another occasion, I assured myself most par¬
ticularly that both feet and both hands of the medium
were securely held; at my request, the sitters on either
side lifted up each one in turn, to show me that they
were actually holding separate hands and feet. Under
these conditions — and the medium’s head being vis¬
ible — I knelt upon the seance table, and stretching up
as high as I could reach, held the accordion against the
curtains of the cabinet. A “ hand ” grasped the other
end of the accordion, and played it with me, by moving
it back and forth, for fully half a minute — all this
about four feet above the medium’s head, while her
hands and feet were visible and securely held.

It is useless for any one to try and tell me that these
phenomena were produced by means of the medium’s
toe, which, slipped out of her shoe, she had cunningly
introduced under the leg of the seance table! I know
better, I have seen phenomena which such critics have
not seen; and it is upon these that I base my opinion and
my faith. These once accepted, however, I am pre¬
pared to accept, -as genuine, many of the lesser phe¬
nomena — since I feel that the phenomena are un¬
doubted; and if genuine in greater things, why not in
lesser ones also?

Every group of scientific men that ever experimented
with Eusapia knew very well that she would defraud
them, if the chance were given her to do so; and twenty
years ago these precise forms of trickery were described
by the French and Italian scientists, the same tricks
which were rediscovered with such pomp and ceremony
by her American investigators.

No new form of trickery was discovered during her
American visit, only the old tricks rediscovered. From

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

105

the accounts at the time, one would gain the Impression
that a complete system of trickery, hitherto unknown,
had been unearthed; whereas, as a matter of fact, the
American investigators had only discovered for them¬
selves what the European men had known all the time!
It will be seen then that the tremendous publicity given
to these “ exposures ” was not warranted; nor did they
give to the public a fair idea of what had really been
discovered, or what had been found at these sittings.

In order to convey to the reader a fair idea of the
Inadequacy of many of the explanations offered, let us
take a single Instance — table levitation. The explana¬
tion put forward and accepted as the true one by the vast
bulk of the American people is that contained In the
Jastrow-Miller exposure, and is as follows: During the
tiltings and oscillations of the table, Eusapia manages
to release one of her feet; then. Inserting the toe of this
foot under the table-leg nearest to her (and by pressing
down upon the surface of the table with her hands),
she is enabled to lift the table several inches off the floor.
This is the “ explanation ” usually accepted as the true
one.

Now let us consider the following facts: (i) During
the course of the seance, complete levitations have re¬
peatedly been obtained when both the medium’s hands
were held away from or clear of the table. Now, it
may be ascertained by any one that it is impossible to
lift a table completely off the floor by means of the feet
and knees alone. The utmost that can be done is to
tilt the table away from one — provided the hands do
not rest on the top. These levitations, therefore — and
there were many of them — can not be explained in the
manner postulated. (2) Table levitations have re-

io6 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

peatedly been obtained when both legs of the table near¬
est the medium were inserted in wooden tubes, which
effectually prevented the medium from reaching the
table legs with her feet. (See my article in October,
1909, McClure’s Magazine; and Eusapia Palladino
and Her Phenomena, pp. 66, etc.) (3) The nature of
some of the levitations quite negatived the idea that they
could have been done in the manner suggested. Thus,
if they were produced by the toes of her feet, it would
be possible only to produce levitations of six or eight
inches, or at most a foot, high. Now, some of our
levitations were more than two feet high, and the me¬
dium had to stand in order to keep her fingers on the
table-top. In this condition she walked seven or eight
feet across the seance-room, before the table fell with a
bang to the floor. In such a case, the explanation pro¬
posed completely fails. (4) Levitations have re¬
peatedly been obtained when both the medium’s feet
were held beneath the table, by some one kneeling be¬
neath it — as they were during the first seance by the
reporter from the New York Herald. We see, there¬
fore, that the proposed explanation is completely insuf¬
ficient to cover the more striking facts, and we must be¬
lieve one of two things: Either the American investi¬
gators did not see any of these more striking manifesta¬
tions — in which case they should have waited, before
publishing their verdict, and studied her further, as did
the European investigators; or they did — in which
case they must explain in detail how a medium can pro¬
duce levitations of a table by means of her feet, when
these feet are held beneath the table, or when the table-
legs are Inserted into protective wooden cones; or when
the table is lifted to a height of two feet or more from

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

107

the floor, and every one can see her walking about and
not touching it. The absurdity of the proposed explana¬
tion should be very apparent — and is so to any one who
has seen the more striking and convincing of her phe¬
nomena.^

I have dwelt thus at length upon the table-levitations
and the proposed “ explanations ” of them for two rea¬
sons. In the first place, we see that the proposed ex¬
planations do not. In reality, explain the facts; and in the
second place we see that the verdict arrived at by the
American investigators was superficial and based upon
an Inadequate knowledge of the phenomena. This ver¬
dict, it seems to me, applies to the whole of the Investiga¬
tion, and is not limited to the table-levitations alone.

In addition to the table levitations, which we have just
discussed, — there were other phenomena that took place
at every one of Eusapia’s seances, which deserve special
mention. Of these, the “ curtain phenomena,” or the
blowing out of the cabinet curtains as though impelled by
a strong breeze from within the cabinet; and the breeze
from a scar over Eusapia’s left temple — the famous cold
breeze of which so much has been heard, — are the most
common. This breeze from Eusapia’s forehead was no¬
ticed, in all, five or six times, and I have learned one
rather interesting thing in this connection. It Is this:
After a good seance this breeze is strong, and after a
poor seance It Is altogether lacking — or so feeble that
It can hardly be detected. On three occasions Eusapla
gave a sort of “ after-sitting ” to three or four of us who
had remained (after the other sitters had departed), and

^ The reader is referred to Dr. W. T. Crawford’s book, Tfie Reality
of Psychic Phenomena, for recent striking evidence regarding table levi¬
tations.

io8 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the most startling phenomena I have ever seen occurred
at these informal seances. A strong breeze was always
found to issue from E. P.’s scar, after these sittings —
though none had been noticed after the regular or formal
seances given earlier the same evening!

Apropos this breeze, it may be said that the supposed
“ explanations ” of it are as absurd and as unsatisfactory
as are the explanations of the table levitation. Profes¬
sor Munsterberg. e. g., in his article in the Metropolitan
Magazine, stated that it was produced by an apparatus
concealed under Eusapia’s clothing, and consisted of an
elaborate system of metal tubes, rubber bags, etc., con¬
cealed beneath her dress. Messrs. Jastrow, Miller, Kel¬
logg, Davis, etc., — who also have supposedly “ ex¬
posed ” this manifestation, — assert, on the contrary, that
she had nothing of the kind, but that she merely produced
this breeze by blowing with her mouth, and diverting the
air current upward by puckering the lips in a certain di¬
rection 1 Professor Miinsterberg’s explanation is of
course insulting to the intelligence of those eminent men
of science who have investigated her case for years in
Europe, and who have repeatedly witnessed this breeze
after a most careful search of the medium. On the
other hand, the later explanation completely fails when
we take into consideration the following facts: That this
breeze has been obtained when Eusapia’s mouth and nose
have been covered with the hands of the investigators;
and it has been felt when the medium, at our request, ex¬
haled as forcibly as possible during the occurrence of this
breeze. It did not increase or decrease during this
process, but continued in a perfectly even stream, — with¬
out check, hindrance, or augmentation. The inconclu¬
siveness of the supposed “ explanation ” is thus made

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

109

manifest — this characteristic extending also, it seems to
me, to the other theories which have been offered of
Eusapia’s phenomena during her visit to America.

At nearly every one of our seances, we had one or more
of the musical instruments played upon. The music-box
has been played upon for several seconds together — the
handle being turned twelve or fourteen times, to judge
by the sound. Ample time was afforded the controllers
to ascertain that they were holding separate hands. The
tambourine has been played upon for almost a minute —
it being seen to play over the medium’s head, then beyond
the left-hand curtain, again over the medium’s head, over
the head of the left-hand controller, again over the me¬
dium’s head, again beyond the left curtain, and finally it
was thrown to the floor of the cabinet. The small bell
has repeatedly been rung for several seconds together —
a hand being seen ringing it.

One of the most remarkable manifestations, however,
was the playing of the mandolin on at least two occasions.
The instrument sounded in the cabinet first of all — dis¬
tinct twangings of the strings being heard, in response
to pickings of Eusapia’s fingers on the hand of one of
her controllers. The mandolin then floated out of the
cabinet, onto the seance table, where, in full view of all,
nothing touching it, it continued to play for nearly a
minute — first one string and then another being played
upon. Eusapia was at the time in deep trance, and was
found to be cataleptic a few moments later. Her hands
were gripping the hands of her controllers so tightly that
each finger had to be opened in turn — by the aid of
passes and suggestion.

We also obtained an imprint on a photographic plate,
which had been wrapped in several thicknesses of black

no MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

paper, and placed in the cabinet. It will be remembered
that Professor Lombroso gave an example of this in his
book, After Death — What? p. 84 (Fig. 35). The
plate was provided by Dr. Frederick T. Simpson, of
Hartford, Conn., who placed it in the cabinet. It was
brought to New York wrapped, and taken out of Dr.
Simpson’s bag just before the seance. When developed,
the impression of three fingers was found on the plate.
There is no normal explanation of this fact, as every
precaution was taken. The photographer who wrapped
the plate took an impression of his own fingers, and they
were about three times the size of those on the plate.
Whatever their interpretation, they cannot be explained
by normal means.

Intelligent action has been shown on numerous occa¬
sions. Once a gentleman seated to the left of Eusapia
had his cigar case extracted from his pocket, placed on
the table in full view of all of us, opened, a cigar ex¬
tracted, and placed between his teeth. It was light
enough at the time to see that no one was touching the
case, which was lying on the table. . . .

It must clearly be borne in mind that these striking
manifestations did not always occur. They only took
place when the medium was in deep trance; and I have
only seen her in that state four or five times, in all the
seances I have held. When the trance was only light, or
when there was no trance, only minor manifestations took
place; and one who has only seen these phenomena is
not entitled to make up his mind regarding the value of
the case as a whole until he had seen both sets of phenom¬
ena. This the American investigators did not do; and
herein lay the fault of their investigation. They saw
only poor and inconclusive seances; and upon these they

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

1 1 1

were not justified in forming an opinion. They also
caught Eusapia in trickery of the character frequently
described before. But, in view of the mass of evidence
which had been accumulated in the past, and the eminence
of the men who had previously investigated her, it was
surely ill-advised to publish negative conclusions, based
only upon these poor seances — which, as I have tried
to show, differ radically from the conclusively “ good ”
ones.

On a number of occasions, also, curious things hap¬
pened which could not be accounted for, by any normal
means. Thus, during one seance, Eusapia said she felt
that Lombroso would materialize : As a matter-of-fact,
Lombroso did not materialize, nor did any one else; but,
directly over the seance-table, there formed what I can
only describe as a vortex of energy — a sort of psychic
whirlpool or waterspout, so apparent to all the circle of
sitters, that one or two of them had to leave the table —
it made them so dizzy. It could be felt, very plainly, for
a radius of about three feet; beyond this, it was insensible
in its effects. As soon as one came within this distance,
however, its power was very noticeable — though nothing
was visible, as I have said, and nothing formed. I re¬
member that, at the time, I was reminded of Algernon
Blackwood’s story Sand, which so vividly describes a
similar phenomenon in the Sahara Desert.

On several occasions Eusapia transferred her power to
me (seemingly) by placing her hand upon my shoulder —
in much the same way that D. D. Home transferred his
power of handling redhot coals to his sitters upon oc¬
casion. (I called attention to this fact in my communi¬
cation to the Second Psychological Congress, held In
Paris.) ^ I felt nothing, but Eusapia, placing her hand

^Report, pp. 135-38.

1 12 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

upon my shoulder, said to me, “Now, you do it!”
Whereupon, if I placed my hands in front of the cabinet
curtains, they would blow out, as though my hands at¬
tracted them; or I would place my hand over a small
stool, and that would follow wherever I moved it —
backwards and forwards — the stool moving about over
the floor during the process. During these experiments,
which were always made in fairly good light, we could all
see that nothing visible was attached to the moving object.

Aside from her seances, however, Eusapia seemed to
possess little or no mediumistic power. Experiments
conducted here in New York, in crystal gazing, automatic
writing, etc., yielded negative results; nor could I trace
any connection between her dreams and the seance memo¬
ries. (I undertook a series of tests, in this direction, to
see if any connection could be discovered between
“ John King,” her soi-disant “ control,” and her dreams.)
Aside from her seances, Eusapia presented no unusual
manifestations of any kind.^

Eusapia has now gone from us; she is no longer within
the reach of direct experimentation; and her interesting
personality — if it returns to us — must in turn manifest
itself through some other medium. Her case will as¬
suredly live for ever in the annals of psychical science as
one of the most baffling, the most interesting, the most
puzzling, and in a sense the most annoying, that it has
ever been the lot of investigators to explore. Undoubt¬
edly, she was a genuine and remarkable physical medium;
while at times independent intelligences seemed to mani¬
fest themselves through her. This was, however, but
rarely, and (quite naturally) more rarely with Anglo-

See my Personal Experiences in Spiritualism, 251-53, for details of the
experiments.

EUSAPIA PALLADINO

113

Saxons than with her own countrymen, or with the French
experimenters, with whom she felt more at ease and at
home. The majority of her manifestations seemed to
depend upon a peculiar form of energy, radiated from
her, which exuded from her body, and particularly from
her fingers, toes, and, in the form of a “ cold breeze ”
was particularly noticeable after good seances, issuing
from the scar in her head and from her left knee. This
last manifestation was very rare (I have only seen it
twice, in all), while the emanation from her forehead was
more frequently seen.

Had the genuine character of Eusapia’s phenomena
been recognized by the scientific world as a whole, in
1894, when Sir Oliver Lodge urged they should be, we
might by now have discovered some permanent and valu¬
able truths regarding them. As it is, we shall have to
await the advent of another Eusapia — or another
Home — before scientific research along these lines can
be continued. It is earnestly to be hoped that some
medium of the kind will make his, or her, appearance
after the present war; and that an adequate, impartial
and prolonged investigation of the phenomena presented
will then be possible. Eusapia was always willing to
submit to test conditions; always willing to sit with new
groups of sitters; she could nearly always produce ex¬
traordinary phenomena, more or less striking in char¬
acter; and I regard it as one of the cruellest things I
know that she was allowed to pass from us, without hav¬
ing had her marvellous and scientifically valuable phe¬
nomena accepted by orthodox science — and studied as
such phenomena surely deserve to be studied.

NOTE

Since the above was written, several remarkable documents

1 14 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

have appeared: Baron Schrenck-Notzing’s Materialization Phe¬
nomena; Mme. Bisson’s Phenomena of So-called Materializa¬
tion; and Dr. Geley’s Report on his experiments with Eva C., in
the Bulletin of the “General Psychological Institute” of Paris.
An excellent summary of these latter experiments is to be found in
the March-April, 1919, number of the Occult Review — by Stan¬
ley de Brath ; — “ Supernormal Physiology and Materialization.”
These experiments appear to be of the profoundest interest, value
and significance.

CHAPTER VII

WHAT ARE GHOSTS?

There is a deeper and more widespread belief in ghosts
at the present day than at any time since scientific meth¬
ods of thinking came into force, in spite of the opinion of
the man-in-the-street that such things are “ pure rubbish ”
and that “ medical science ” has shown them to be noth¬
ing more than “ popular superstitions.”

This you may readily prove by a preliminary census
among your friends. If you question them you will be
surprised to find how many of them have had some ex¬
perience of the kind, though they may not care to have
it known, especially if you are not sympathetic.

But nearly every one has had some sort of occult or
strange experience in his or her life, if you question him
deeply enough, and this fact was brought out by the
startling census taken some years ago in England, when
it was mathematically shown that about ten per cent of
the average population had had some experience of this
character. This is astonishing, but it is a fact. Ghosts
have, so to say, received the endorsement of science to
some extent.

But in thus saying that ghosts exist I must not be un¬
derstood as saying that the ghost of tradition is with us
still. Ghosts which were semi-material beings and pa¬
raded about in sheets, clanking chains behind them, are
no more. Their place has been taken by a more ethereal
being, by a creature which even our science can accept.
Thus, when I say that ghosts exist, or that such things

IIS

ii6 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

as haunted houses certainly exist, we must understand
what we mean by these terms and ask ourselves the ques¬
tion, “What is a Ghost?” and “What is a Haunted
House?”

I say that such things as haunted houses exist, but I
do not pretend that material phantoms walk about such
houses, tormenting the inmates and making their lives
miserable. But that there are certain peculiar influences
at work in some localities which cannot be accounted for,
no one would deny who has had much experience with
these phenomena or who has himself lived in a “ haunted
house ” for any length of time. ,

Before I can answer or define accurately and simply
the modern scientific conception of a “ ghost ” a few pre¬
liminary facts must be stated.

When the Society for Psychical Research began col¬
lecting its material it soon found this remarkable fact; —
That, of the ghost stories collected the great majority of
them seemed to hinge upon the moment of death. Most
of the apparitions which were seen were found to cor¬
respond, in poirit of time, with the death of the person
represented. Perhaps the seer might only have experi¬
enced a case of this character once in his lifetime, yet
that once was found to correspond, in a very remarkable
manner, with a distant and tragic event.

The question, of course, at once arose. Are these cases
due to chance? One might be, perhaps a dozen, a score,
but when the coincidental cases began to mount into the
hundreds the theory of coincidence had to be strained to
the utmost to make it work. In fact, when it was mathe¬
matically figured out it was found that the chances were
millions to one against this number of cases happening at
the supreme moment they did. Several hundred such

WHAT ARE GHOSTS?

117

cases were published In a book entitled Phantasms of
the Living, which made a great sensation at the time.

But the cry was at once raised; — “Too few cases!
Your point is not yet proved.” Some thirty thousand
replies of all kinds were then collected. These were put
to the test, and It was again proved mathematically that
the chances against possible coincidence were so huge as
to render that hypothesis all but inconceivable. Thus,
Professor Sidgwick’s committee was forced to the fol¬
lowing conclusion: —

“ Between deaths and apparitions of the dying person
a connection exists which is not due 'to chance alone.
This we hold as a proved fact.”

Now, coincidental cases of this type are called “ ap¬
paritions of the dying,” to distinguish them from the
“ apparitions of the living ” — i. e., figures or phantoms
of people still living, as occasionally happens; and “ ap¬
paritions of the dead ” — or phantasms which have ap¬
peared long after the death of the person symbolized.
There are thus these three broad classes of “ ghosts ” to
begin with.

The question arose, therefore, might not all these cases
be explained by some underlying cause which is the same
in all cases? We now believe that they can to a very
large extent. But to make plain what this cause is we
shall have to digress for a moment to explain another
factor involved in our problem.

This is telepathy, or 'thought transference. Most
people now believe that telepathy between living people
takes place on occasion, and, if they don’t believe it,
they are referred to the records, where proof Is to be
found (the Proceedings of the S. P. R.). If you think
of a playing card, for instance, the ace of hearts, the

ii8 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

recipient of the impression will see the ace of hearts if
the experiment is successful. It takes visual form in his
mind. It is a hallucination — a mental picture — yet it
owes its origin to another mind, external to itself. It is
subjective, yet at the same time objective. It is a real
thing, yet does not interfere with the mechanical laws of
our world.

We believe that much the same thing takes place in ap¬
paritions of the living, of the dying and of the dead. In
cases of apparitions of the living one mind influences an¬
other in sleep, trance, in ill health or, for reasons as yet
undetermined, and the percipient of the apparition sees
the figure of this person, as previously he saw the vision
of the playing card. In cases of apparitions of the dying,
some mental energy seems liberated, facilitating this tele¬
pathic impulse from mind to mind. And in cases of ap¬
paritions of the dead — ghosts, proper — this telepathic
impulse is supposed to emanate from the mind of the
“ dead ” person, still living and active, however, in an¬
other sphere, but yet able to influence the mind of a friend
or relative yet alive and cause him or her to see the vision
of the departed one. In all cases the apparitions are of
telepathic origin, on this theory.

In a similar way mysterious voices and touchings
are explained. Experimental thought transference has
shown us that a name, a sensation, an emotion, a sensory
impression of any kind, can be transferred from mind to
mind almost as easily as a visual Image. It all depends
upon the form the phantasmal impression takes. For in¬
stance, we can “will” the subject to hear the word
“mother” spoken, and he will hear it; or that he shall
feel a grasp on his right arm, and he will. Yet there was
no real, external sound — such as would be recorded by

WHAT ARE GHOSTS?

119

a phonograph — and no real material hand which
grasped his.

The reader may well inquire here how such a thing
is possible — how science explains the actual mechanism
at work in the production of phantasmal experiences of

How One «Seea a Ghost.”

this character. A diagram will help to make this clear.

When we “ see ” a thing what happens is something
like this: —

120 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Reflected light waves coming from the object strike the
eye (A) when they are transformed into nervous cur¬
rents, and in this form travel along the optic nerve to the
“ sight centres ” at the rear of the brain (B), where we
have the “ sensation ” of sight or “ seeing.” But that is
all! We do not reason about the object seen. We do
not think to ourselves ” This is a red apple,” “ I like
red apples,” &c. This is all done in the higher thought
or association centres in the cortex of the brain, at C.
Then we think about the object seen by the sight centres
through the ins^trumentality of the eye.

The usual path of the nerve current is thus from A to
B and from B to C.

Now, no matter how these sight centres at the rear of
the brain be stimulated, we Still have the sensation of
sight or “ seeing.” As I have just said, the usual way is
for nerve currents to travel along the optic nerve to this
centre. But if the brain be poisoned by alcohol or toxins
and the eye and nerves are unduly Stimulated in conse¬
quence, the sight centres may be stimulated too, and then
we have cases of hallucinations, as in delirium tremens,
illness, etc.

Another way in which these slight centres may possibly
be stimulated is by nerve currents travelling 'down the
nerves, from C to B. If you close your eyes and think
of the face of a friend you will probably see it more or
less clearly as a mind’s eye picture. This is probably
due to the fact that there is a slight downward current
of nervous fluid from C to B. If this downward current
were as great and powerful as an ordinary eye impulse
would be, we should have the sensation of seeing equally
well — that is, we should have a “ full blown hallucina¬
tion ” — of purely mental or psychological origin.

WHAT ARE GHOSTS?

I2I

Conceivably, one method by which these centres might
thus be stimulated is by means of a telepathic impulse.
This, influencing the mind and brain of the person seeing
the “ ghost,” has caused a tremendous downward rush
of nerve energy, with the result that the sensation of sight
is produced, and a figure seems to stand before us, in
space, as though real. Thus we have what we call a
“ telepathic hallucination.” This telepathic impulse may
originate in the living, the dying, or, if they persist, in the
dead. Similarly, if the impulse thus received stimulates
the auditory centres, instead of a picture, we have the
sensation of hearing a voice; or, if the tactile centres, of
being touched, etc. The origin is the same in all such
cases; but the manner in which the impulse is “ external¬
ized ” or made real and objective to the seer differs with
his habits and mental make-up.

All this is confirmed by the so called “ experimental
apparition ” cases — in which one person deliberately
wills to appear to another person at a distance, and suc¬
ceeds in doing so — the seer believing that he has seen
a ghost. Here again, we have evidence of telepathy —
causing a phantasmal appearance or figure.

So far as to ordinary run of cases, which may doubtless
be explained in this manner, rationally and scientifically.
There are cases, however, which seem hard to reconcile
with this hypothesis, and which seem to point very strongly
to the older view that ghosts may sometimes be real, out¬
standing, objective entities. Among such facts I may
mention : —

I. The fact that several people may see the figure at
one time. These are the so-called “ collective cases,” of
which there are a number on record. Explanations have
been offered, but they are all rather far-fetched.

122 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

2. The fact that these appearances have occasionally
been photographed. Apart from the ordinary cases of
fraudulent “ spirit-photography ” respective scientific evi¬
dence exists in favour of the view that an ethereal body
of some sort has been photographed in such cases.

3. The fact that animals often behave queerly when a
ghost is seen, or even felt. Aside from mere legend, this
has been observed at first hand on a number of occasions.

4. The fact that these phantasmal forms sometimes
move material objects — close the door, snuff the light,
etc. A hallucination, no matter how vivid, cannot do
this ! It rather points to the existence, in space, of a semi¬
solid body.

5. The fact that such figures have often given informa¬
tion unknown to any person present, but afterward found
to be correct. (This might conceivably be covered on the
telepathic theory.)

6. The fact that the person seeing the phantasmal
figure may afterward recognize the face on a photo¬
graph shown him — he never having known the person
in life. In so-called “ haunted houses ” this has often
been observed.

Many of these reasons might be urged against the view
that ghosts are mental in origin, and in favour of the
older view that they are material beings — having space-
occupying bodies. On such a view some sort of ethereal
or astral body is present, which is seen or perceived by
the seer. One is here reminded of the “ spiritual body ”
of St. Paul.

Many objections might be urged against this view,
however. The most obvious one is that of the clothes of
the ghost. If the figure seen be real and outstanding, if
it is a space-occupying form, how about its garments?

WHAT ARE GHOSTS?

123

Are they, too, Spiritual? Are they the ethereal
counterparts of the material garments as the body
is the ethereal counterpart of the physical body?
It is possible — but, we must admit, most im¬
probable. The mental picture hypothesis is far more
plausible, because here the clothes of the ghost would
be part of the picture — just as in our dreams the clothes
which the figures wear are part of the picture. We
imagine them, and they exist. The clothes of ghosts
have bulked large in the literature of the occult — chiefly
because of the apparently good evidence on occasion of
the objective reality of the phantom form (for example,
it moves objects, etc.) Still there is a possible explana¬
tion of “ the clothes of ghosts,” — even assuming that the
figure is objective and outstanding.

In the first place, if such things as “ thought-forms ”
exist — that is, phantasmal forms built-up by the thought
and will of the “ projector,” it would be possible to pro¬
ject or create the clothes of the form as easily as the form
itself. They would constitute merely a part of the built-
up image, and be “ created,” as a part of it. On this
theory, the clothes would be no more difficult to ac¬
count for than the phantom itself.

Secondly, assuming that genuine “ materialization ” be
a fact in nature, the clothes of the phantom would be
” materialized ” as well as the form, — as we often see in
so-called ” materializing seances.” On this theory, the
clothes would be ” manufactured ” in much the same way
as the phantom’s body is — and would form no greater
problem than it does. Personally, I am quite convinced
that genuine materialization is a fact in nature; so that
there is, for me, less difficulty in accepting this latter ex¬
tension of the belief than there would be for the majority

124 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

of people, — to whom materialization Itself would be In¬
conceivable.

Whatever the interpretation of the facts, however,
certain it is that there is a great deal of evidence to show
that at least some phantoms are objective; and, this being
the case, we must account for them as best we may.
Needless to say, these cases do not in the least deter us
from believing that the vast majority of “ ghosts ” are
subjective and hallucinatory, and can be accounted for by
known psychological and physical laws. But “ ghosts ” —
like most other things in life — when analysed, are found
to be more complex than originally supposed, — more so
than a mere superficial examination would seem to dis¬
close or intimate.

CHAPTER VIII

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

The question of psychic photography has perhaps been
the subject of more debates than any other in the whole
field of psychic investigation. Many thousands of photo¬
graphs have been taken, showing abnormal and unac¬
countable markings upon the plates; but unfortunately a
large part of these have been shown to be due either to
normal defects on the plates or films used or to premedi¬
tated fraud and trickery on the part of the medium.

The methods which have been resorted to, to obtain
these fraudulent pictures, are many and various, and a
number of these I have described in full in my Physical
Phenomena of Spiritualism, pp. 206-23. Substitution
and manipulation of the plates, double-printing, double
exposure, chemical screens, and a thousand and one other
devices have been resorted to, in the past; while Mumler,
Hudson, Parke, Buguet, and practically every profes¬
sional “ spirit photographer ” of note in the past has been
detected and exposed at one time or another in his career.
(See Mrs. H. Sidgwick’s paper on the subject in the Eng¬
lish Proceedings S. P. R., Vol. VII, pp. 268-89.)

Of late years, however, a mass of evidence has been
forthcoming tending to show that genuine psychic pho¬
tography is indeed a fact — this new evidence coming
from private sources, that is, from individuals who have
experimented by themselves, in the absence of any pro¬
fessional medium, and who have obtained very striking —
perhaps convincing — results in this manner.

Dr. Ochorowicz, late Professor in the Universities of

126 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Warsaw and Lemberg, conducted a series of very remark¬
able investigations in this field, and has published his
results in the French magazine Annales des Sciences
Psychiques, which includes on its editorial board Pro¬
fessor Charles Richet, Sir William Crookes, Professor
Camille Flammarion, Dr. Paul Joire, Dr. Joseph Max¬
well, Dr. Mangin, Professor Henry Morselli, Baron von
Schrenck-Notzing, and others.

Professor Richet has stated In his belief Dr. Ochoro-
wlcz Is an “ exceptionally careful and scientific investiga¬
tor.” Dr. Ochorowicz’s experiments were conducted in
the realm of “ thought photography ” — and photographs
of emanations Issuing from the human body. In these
experiments no camera was used; the plate, wrapped in
opaque paper, was placed either between the hands of the
medium or against the forehead or the “ solar plexus ”
and a definite thought was impressed upon the plate at
the will of the experimenter. In all these cases. Dr.
Ochorowicz supplied and developed his own plates, and
they were never under control of the medium except for
the few moments during which she placed her hands upon
them.

These experiments of Dr. Ochorowicz’s were con¬
ducted In the dark or in feeble red light; and, the subject
being in trance, was requested to project an astral form
or hand from her own and place this upon the plate, held
in the air by the experimenter at some distance from her
body. The results of some of these experiments are thus
described by Dr. Ochorowicz : —

“ I hold a plate at a distance of about one metre from
her right hand, which Is held in front of her. The red
light is turned slightly low; the somnambule sees a
shadowy hand detach itself from hers, which is at the

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

127

same time also attached to a very long, thin arm, which
approaches the plate. The hand is very large, she says,
and is a right hand. It places itself over the plate, which
I thereupon remove and develop. A large hand is dis¬
tinctly visible upon it. Finally I hold a plate two and a
half metres away from the medium’s hand. The som-
nambule shivers and feels cold in her lower limbs, despite
the fact that my laboratory is very warm. She again
holds out her right hand, and a left hand, attached to a
long thin arm, is seen by her to detach itself and place
itself over the plate held in my hand. Upon being de¬
veloped, the impression of a very large left hand was
found upon the plate — so large that only a portion of the
hand could be seen (the whole of the medium’s hand could
easily be placed upon the plate) . These are very similar
to the enormous hands frequently seen at the Palladino
seances, and said to be those of John King.”

“ From the above facts,” continues Dr. Ochorowicz,
“ I think we are justified in arriving at the following ten¬
tative conclusions : —

“ I. That the hand of the ‘ double ’ can be larger than
that of the medium.

“ 2. That a left hand can be projected from a right
arm, drawing its force from the entire body of the sub¬
ject — this being accompanied by a chilly feeling in the
extremities and by congestion in the head.

“ 3. That the arm of the double appears to shrink in
size according to its distance from the medium’s body.

“ 4. That it is easier for the fluidic hand to imprint
itself upon the photographic plate (negative) in white
than in black.

“ 5. That in the case of the large and shining thumb,
it is surrounded by a clear halo of light.

128 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

“ 6. The etheric body of the medium, the ‘ double,’ be¬
haves as though it were an independent spirit.” ^

These human radiations, coming from the body, have
been made the subject of minute study by French Investi¬
gators, notably the Durville brothers and Commandant
Darget of Paris — who termed these rays “ V-rays.”
By the aid of photographic plates, these Investigators
have, apparently, obtained direct proof that fluidic emana¬
tions issue from the body, and that they can impress photo¬
graphic plates. They apparently have no direct connec¬
tion with the nerves of the physical body. As a result of
a long series of experiments, in this connection. Dr. Imoda
came to the conclusion that “ the radiations of radium, the
cathodic radiations of the Crookes’ tube and mediumistic
radiations, are fundamentally the same.”

M. Darget placed a plate wrapped in paper against the
forehead of M. Hannion, who proceeded to play a piece
from Meyerbeer whose portrait stood before the piano.
On the plate was developed the portrait of the composer.

M. Darget placed a wrapped plate to the forehead of a
subject, entranced, and, upon the plate being developed,
the head of an American eagle was found upon it. The
subject had been dreaming of an eagle. (This interest¬
ing experiment suggests to us the possibility of using this
method for criminological Investigations.)

He placed a plate upon his own forehead, and looked
at a walking-stick for some minutes in a red light. On
the plate was found the image of the stick. This writer
in detailing some of his remarkable results says:

“ As regards photos of emotions, it is possible to show
that the brain emits fluid according to the strength of the

1 For a fuller account of these experiments, see tny Problems of Psy¬
chical Research, pp. 53-66.

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

129

sentiments present. Passion, anger, rage produce rays
emitted in a boiling state. . . . When a human being
emits a thought. It makes the brain vibrate and illuminates
the phosphorus therein contained. These rays are pro¬
jected outward. When thought is concentrated on a
mental form, this form is susceptible of reproduction upon
the sensitive film. A revolution in science will soon mani¬
fest itself, and the human rays (these newly discovered
V-rays) shine forth pure and luminous to the world.”

Dr. Baraduc, of Paris, also conducted a number of very
Interesting experiments In this connection, with specially
sensitized plates, and apparently succeeded in directly
photographing thoughts by the aid of a camera. In this
case, the swirls or vortices of the ether were directly
caught upon the plate and photographed. A number of
these have been reproduced in the past — illustrating
different types of thoughts or emotions emitted by the
sensitive subject — usually In hypnotic trance. Similar
experiments have been conducted by other continental
investigators.

Shortly before the war. Prof. Fukurai, of the Uni¬
versity of Tokio, published a large book, giving the results
of his experiments In psychic photography. (This is in
Japanese, and as yet has not been translated.) So far as
we can see, there was no possibility of fraud in connection
with these photographs. They were taken in the pres¬
ence of a number of scientific witnesses — from five to
seven, usually, and no professional medium was employed.
He first of all experimented upon two ladies, both of
whom are now dead. He afterwards experimented more
successfully with the wife of a fellow-professor in the
University. No camera was employed in any of these
experiments; but the plates, wrapped in opaque paper.

130 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

were held between the hands of the subject, and several
plates, as a rule, were piled one upon another. After the
pile had been arranged, the plate upon which the impres¬
sion was to be made was selected. For example, on one
occasion. Prof. Fukurai, after handing a plate to the
entranced psychic, said, “ I want you to impress upon that
plate, by an effort of your will, the words ' Myo Ho ' —
meaning ‘ marvellous processes.’ ” The subject then
stated that she saw the words before her — in the air as
it were — and that she was trying to impress the outlines
of these words upon the plate, in Japanese characters. A
few moments later she said, “ They are taken,” and
handed the plate to the Professor. Immediately upon
the plate being developed in the dark-room, it was ex¬
amined, and the words "Myo Ho’* were found upon it!

More difficult tests were then undertaken. A pile of a
dozen wrapped plates was placed upon the lap of the
psychic. She was asked to impress a plate several down
the pile — that is, not the top or 'the bottom plate. She
made an effort at will, and in a few minutes exclaimed,
“I have impressed the word ‘Ten’ (meaning
‘ Heaven ’) on the third plate. I will now try to impress
my three fingers of the left hand upon this plate. I will
impress the word ‘Kin’ (‘Gold’) upon the sixth plate
in the pile.” Soon she exclaimed that this had been done,
and the pile of plates was taken from her. Under de¬
velopment it was found that the word " Ten ” and the
faint outlines of three fingers were impressed upon the
third plate, and the word “ Kin ” upon the sixth plate.
All the rest were blank. (See Fig. i.)

Among the most interesting experiments in this field
are those which have been undertaken of late by Mrs.
Dupont Lee — of Dupont Powder fame — she herself

FIG. I

"thought photographs" ORTAIXFI) rv prof.

FUK.URAI

•• V,v

FIG. 2

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPH

FIG. 3

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPH

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

131

being the psychic, and no other person being present, on
many occasions, during-the taking and the development of
the pictures. In may cases, a well-known Washington
physician was also present; but he too affrms that so far as
he could see there was no possibility of trick in connection
with those pictures which he saw taken, and upon which
the psychic impressions were obtained. It is unfortunate
that a well-known professional photographer had a hand
in the development or manipulation of a large number
of these photographs — and their value is thus discounted
or altogether offset, from the scientific point of view.
But a large number remain which, Mrs. Dupont Lee
asserts, were taken and developed entirely by herself, or
in the presence of friends, and a few of these are repro¬
duced here.

Illustration No. 2 is very curious, showing us, ap¬
parently, a group of “ sylphs ” or nature-spirits flying
across the field of the camera, toward the head of an
elderly man, who has been dead some years but who, in
his lifetime, was well-known as a successful physician in
Washington. This picture is so curious that it certainly
deserves consideration upon any theory. Whether or not
these things can be taken seriously depends upon the mind
of the investigator; but here at least is the photograph,
which needs to be accounted for satisfactorily, whatever
it may actually represent.

Illustration No. 3 is also very curious — Inasmuch as
it represents a large group of people — many of them
quite disproportionate, being relatively too tall or too
short for others, yet overlapping each other in a singular
and interesting manner (and which I have been assured
by expert photographers would be extremely difficult
to reproduce photographically). It was taken and de-

132 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

veloped by Mrs. Dupont Lee herself. In this case, no
camera was used at all. The plate was bound to her
forehead and left there two hours. When developed,
the above was the result!

Illustration No. 4: this figure of a man, holding his
hat is the same man who appears in No. 3 as the tall
figure, slightly to the right of the centre of the picture.
He is the late Mr. Bocock — well known to Mrs. Lee in
life. This plate, we are told, was held in the hands of
Mrs. Lee and Dr. R., the well-known physician above
mentioned, and developed by them at once — with the
result that this figure was found upon the plate. It was
held in their hands in the dark for about half an hour —
of course, no camera being used. The so-called “ photo¬
graph ” looks strikingly like a drawing; but, whatever it
may be, we give the results as reported; and whatever we
may think of them, we canaot bring the charge of con¬
scious fraud in this case, without implicating the two prin¬
cipals themselves — which seems hardly possible under
the circumstances.

Illustration No. 5 shows a profile of Dr. R., the balance
of the plate being filled with faces, most of which are
strikingly biblical in character. They overlap and crowd
upon each other in a very odd manner. The girl in the
front, to the right, seems to be wearing a mid-Victorian
dress; and this it will be seen, falls over the hands and
legs of Dr. R., which are visible through the transparency
of the dress. For this photograph a camera was used;
but we understand it was taken and developed by Mrs.
Lee herself, as were the others.

Prof. James H. Hyslop, in the Proceedings of the
American Society for Psychical Research ^ has published
(1914) a long account of some of the earlier experiments

I’S^CMIC I’HOTOGRAPU

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

133

of Mrs. Dupont Lee in this connection, and travelled to
Washington to conduct personal investigations — and
obtained a number of photographs which had then been
taken. These were quite different in character from the
above, though on some of them the same figure of Mr.
Bocock is seen. On one in particular his phantasmal
form is seen walking down a road, brilliantly Illuminated
by the moonlight. Mrs. Lee, as before stated, is not a
professional medium, is a lady in private life of good
family connections, independently off, and has made psy¬
chic photography her pastime for the last five or six years,
during which time she states she has made more than ten
thousand psychic photographs !

The next series we come to is quite different in char¬
acter. Mr. E. P. Le Flohic and his wife — through a
series of sittings they attended with a local medium — be¬
came interested in psychic phenomena; and he was told
that he himself possessed mediumistic powers. Made
curious by this, he and his wife sat together in the dark
for a number of evenings, to see what they could obtain.
The method of procedure was as follows. One, two- or
three cameras were focused on themselves, seated on two
chairs at the far end of the room. The room was made
completely dark; then the caps removed, and Mr. Le
Flohic would find his way back to his chair in the dark¬
ness. A period of waiting — varying from fifteen to
thirty minutes — then intervened, during which various
semi-luminous phenomena presented themselves. When
impressed to do so, a string was pulled, which released the
“flash”; the cameras recorded what was taken in the
room; and then Mr. Le Flohic would grope his way back
to the cameras, place the caps over the lenses, remove
the plates, develop them and note the result. When

134 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

developed, these plates (many of them) showed curious
markings, as the accompanying illustrations will show.

Illustration No. 6 shows us Mr. and Mrs. Le Flohic
seated in their chairs — the former pulling the string
which released the flashlight; and upon the plate are a
number of twisted lines of light, largely centred about the
body of Mrs. Le Flohic, and seeming to emanate from
her.

This is still more marked in Illustration No. 7, where
the streaks of light are very pronounced and brilliant.

Illustrations Nos. 8 and 9 also show streaks of light or
markings upon the plate, of quite a different character
from those above noted. They seem to emanate from
some source outside of the plate ; and in one case (No. 8 ) ,
again passing out of the plate, while in No. 9 it seems to
shade off into a pointed “ tail,” which disappears into
darkness.

Illustration No. 10 presents many strange features.
Mrs. Le Flohic is shown pulling the string releasing the
flashlight, but her whole body, as well as that of her hus¬
band, is illuminated by a brilliant, fiery glow or “ aura ”
— which seems to emanate from their figures. This is
not due, as might be thought at first, to reverse printing,
for the reason that the collar appears white, the tie black,
etc. — which would naturally be the case; but behind the
head, where a shadow would usually form, a brilliant
luminous glow is seen, and this seems to emanate more
or less from the entire body, in both instances. How
this is to be explained, I do not venture to say, and merely
publish the illustration, allowing the reader to form his
own opinion thereon.

The question arises, of course, how far conscious or un¬
conscious manipulation of the plates might produce these

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPH

FIG. 6

'i<

, 1. '•.■•••; ■

'■■ Y ■ <■• '

»V V-fi

■;■> ■

. :*.

FIG. 7

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPH

■ <1

‘'t.

^ J< ,

'.A

V .

<: Vi »•

:V-

FIG. 8

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPH

■I

FIG. 9

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPH

FIG. TO

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPH

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

135

results? Both Mr. and Mrs. Le Flohlc are thoroughly
in earnest in their investigations — so much so, in fact,
that Mr. Le Flohic resigned his position in the city and
went to live alone in the country, by himself, so that he
could conduct these investigations calmly and at his
leisure. He resigned a good position in order to do so.
Most of the pictures were taken on films — and not the
usual plates. Two or three cameras were exposed at
one time, as a rule.

Some of these markings might certainly have been re¬
produced, if the attempt had been made to do so, by
moving a brilliant light about, in rapid sweeps, in front of
the exposed lens of the camera. Prof. Morselli, in his
book Psychology and Spiritism, reproduced two photo¬
graphs of this character, on which photographs of table-
levitations had been taken; and on these plates the same
luminous streaks had been observed — only very much
fainter than these — baffling the experimenters, for the
time being, as to their origin. It was afterwards proved,
however, that they were due to the light of a candle, which
had been moved about under the table, while exploring
for the mechanism of the table-levitation. In the present
case, however, I am positively assured by Mr. Le Flohic
that no light of any kind was moved about in the room,
or permitted, after the camera had once been exposed.

Whatever the solution of these pictures may ultimately
prove to be, they remain for the present a baffling mystery,
and are certainly some of the most Interesting psychic pho¬
tographs which have been taken of late.

I now propose to lay before the reader two recent
cases of “ spirit photography.” The former of the'se has
already appeared in part in an English publication, and

136 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

I have its author to thank for his kind permission to re¬
produce it here.

The photograph wa's taken, in this instance, by the
Rev. Chas. L. Tweedale, Vicar of Weston, Yorkshire,
England, in his own home, with his own plate and camera.
His wife, who is a clairvoyant, saw, first of all, a form
standing behind the dining table, and described it to her
husband. Rushing into the next room, he procured his
camera and photographed the spot which his wife said
the phantom’s head occupied.

Upon the plate being developed a faint and somewhat
curious misty and jagged “ head ” was found upon it.
Writing to me of the experience, the Rev. Tweedale said:

“. . . I have pleasure in giving you full information
re our wonderful experience here which constitutes an
absolute proof of the reality of clairvoyance. I enclose :

“ I. The account to the Gazette.

“ 2. Print from original negative.

“ 3. Print from enlarged negative, made from No. 2
print, showing the face on a large scale.

“ 4. Rough sketch (key.)

“ The figure is perfectly distinct to normal eyesight and
ordinary capacity for accurate observation, and, taken in
conjunction with the clairvoyance, is convincing proof.
The figure is that of a handsome elderly man with flowing
locks and a beard. The expression of the face is not
marked. No one can examine the negative and prints
and discuss the evidence, and then deny the evidential
nature of the experience, without being false either to his
conscience or his reason, or demonstrating his complete
incapacity for observation of any delicate phenomenon.

“ Yours faithfully,

“ May 5, 1916 Charles L. Tweedale.^’

PHOTOGRAPH OF A “GHOST

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

137

(We reproduce here the picture as taken from the
original negative and the print from the enlarged nega¬
tive.) (Figs. II and 12.)

The detailed account of the phenomena above referred
to is as follows :

It has been my privilege and good fortune recently to
have an experience which has scientifically proven the
reality of clairvoyance, as will be readily perceived by the
following particulars, set forth in the form of an affidavit
recently attested in the presence of a Commissioner for
Oaths, by myself and the other two witnesses.

In the matter of a remarkable photograph, produced
at Weston Vicarage, near Otley, in the county of York.

We, Charles Lakeman Tweedale, of Weston Vicarage,
Otley, in the county of York, Clerk in Holy Orders;
Margaret Eleanor Tweedale, the wife of Charles Lake-
man Tweedale; and Herschel Burnett Tweedale, the son
of Charles Lakeman Tweedale, both of Weston Vicarage
afore'said, jointly and severally make oath and say as fol¬
lows :

/. Firstly. I, the said Margaret Eleanor Tweedale,
for myself say that on the 20th December, 1915, about
one-thirty in the afternoon, my husband, my son, and my¬
self, were at lunch in the morning room, when suddenly I
saw the apparition of a man, with a full head of hair, and
a beard, standing on the left-hand side of my son, and in
close proximity to the piano in the said room. I im¬
mediately cried out to my husband and my son that the
figure was so standing. I directed their attention to the
figure, but they could not see it. My husband hastily
left the room and brought in his camera, and took a pho¬
tograph of the position where I still saw the semblance of

138 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

a man. I produce the exhibit marked A, which is a true
copy of the negative taken by my hu'sband, showing the
figure of the bearded man.

II. Secondly. I, the said Charles Lakeman Tweedale,
for myself say that on the 20th December, 1915, I was
present in the morning room of Weston Vicarage along
with my wife, and son Herschel, and that my wife drew
my attention to a figure, which she saw in the room stand¬
ing by my son’s side, and although I could not distingui'sh
it I immediately brought in my camera and took a photo¬
graph of the position where my wife still adhered that
she saw the figure. The photograph marked as the
exhibit A is a true copy of the resulting negative. I
swear that the negative, which I personally developed, was
in no way tampered with, nor did the plate leave my
posse’ssion until it was developed.

III. Thirdly. I, Herschel Burnett Tweedale, for my¬
self say that I was present in the morning room at Weston
Vicarage aforesaid, on the 20th December, 1915, about
1 :30 p. m., when my mother suddenly drew my father’s
and my attention to the figure of a man, which she saw
standing on my left-hand side. Along with my father
I was unable to see the figure which my mother said she
saw. My father immediately left the room and brought
in his camera, and exposed a plate on the position occu¬
pied by the figure as seen by my mother. The exhibit
marked A is a true copy of the resulting negative. No
other person was present in the room during the time the
picture was taken, except our three selves.

Charles Lakeman Tweedale,

Margaret E. Tweedale,

Herschel B. Tweedale.

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

139

Sworn this 27th day of February, 1916.
before me Jo'seph Wilson,

A Commissioner to administer oaths in the Su¬
preme Court of Judicature in England.

A print from the negative, signed by the three witnesses
and the solicitor, is attached to the affidavit, and is the
one referred to as “ the exhibit marked A.”

My wife described the man as a little man, and said
that the top of his head appeared to be about on a level
with my 'son’s shoulder. She saw the figure more during
the time I was fetching the camera. My wife and son
continued sitting at the table during the exposure. The
photograph shows my son seated, in addition to the figure
of the man.

The plate was developed almost immediately after the
exposure was made, and did not go out of my possession
meanwhile.

The plate was taken from a new box of quarter-plates,
and had not been previously exposed.

No person of similar appearance has ever been photo¬
graphed by me, or has ever entered Weston Vicarage dur¬
ing the time I have lived in it.

Neither I, my wife, nor son recognize the figure shown
in the photo.

The camera i's in perfect order and no image of this
kind shows up on plates exposed in the same camera
shortly before and after this remarkable photograph was
taken, conclusively proving that the figure is not formed
by a “ pinhole.”

No picture of a similar figure hangs on the walls, nor
do we possess one.

140 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

None of us were thinking of such a figure at the time
of its apparition.

The gelatine film of the negative is entirely free from
finger prints or any traces of melting or frilling and Is
perfectly homogeneous throughout, and was naturally
dried in the air. Nothing was accidentally interposed
during the exposure, nor did any of us interpose ourselve's
or move from our places during that time.

The ground being thus thoroughly cleared we are faced
with the fact that my wife clairvoyantly saw the figure of
a man, with a good head of hair and a beard, which
figure neither I nor my son could see.

On a camera being brought, and a sensitive plate ex¬
posed on the spot where the figure was seen by the clair¬
voyant, a photograph showing a man with abundant hair
and a flowing beard was obtained, which photograph was
recognized by my wife, the clairvoyant, as being like the
man she saw.

The camera is an optical and mechanical apparatus
devoid of Imagination, which cannot be hallucinated.
Thus the reality of clairvoyance Is photographically and
scientifically proved.

And now for the last; and not the least significant fact:
the man’s head in the photo completely hides that part of
the piano which lies behind it, conclusively proving that
the man had a definite objectivity, although invisible to the
normal vision of myself and my son.”

CHARLES L. TWEEDALE

This striking case — coming, as it does, from an emi¬
nently respectable source, and accompanied by such
formal legal documents, must perforce give us pause —
for here is a case where no professional medium was

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY 141

employed. Curiously enough, too, It prepares the way
for my second case, which Is also orthodox In Its Inception,
having been sent to me by none other than the Rev. J.
Godfrey Raupert, who came to America by direct au¬
thority from the Pope, — to lecture to Catholics on
Spiritualism and allied psychic phenomena. I need
hardly say that Dr. Raupert, like most men of his In¬
telligence, when pinned down, admits the facts of psychic
research — though they express their belief at the same
time that the phenomena are due to “ evil spirits ” who
Instigate and produce them. The “ evil spirit ” In this
case, however, seems to be (unfortunately) none other
than a venerable monk — so that we seem driven Into
the alternative of believing the monk to have been an
“ evil spirit ” or of accepting the fact of a genuine “ spirit
photograph ” ! Either proposition would be fatal to the
cause of true Catholicism — so that we seem led Into a
hopeless cul de sac. This Is only accentuated by the fact
that the Rev. Dr. Raupert, In writing and sending the
photograph to me, stated his belief In Its authenticity by
saying: “ I have as I told you every reason to believe In
Its genuineness.”

However, we have not time to go Into the ethics of the
case now. Suffice It to say that — a certain monk being
said to “ haunt ” a certain church, one daring Investigator
determined to put this belief to the very practical test of
the camera, with the result shown in the photograph (Fig.
13). It Is certainly a striking and suggestive one and
whatever theory we. may choose to hold as to Its Interpreta¬
tion and significance, the fact remains that an honest en¬
quirer here, too, obtained a clearly defined face and form
upon his own plate, when he was expecting nothing of the
kind, and when no professional medium was employed.

142 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Beyond saying that no fraud was involved, so far as we
can judge, we seem unable to go for the moment.

The final question remains: Are these faces, found
upon the above plates, the faces of spirits of the departed,
or are they psychoplastic forms created in some other
way? And if so, how account for them? Indeed, we
might as well say — how account for the spirit photo¬
graph in any case — since, as soon as we begin to consider
the optics and physics of the thing a little more closely,
it is not so simple as at first sight appears.

The objection has been raised that, once granted the
genuine character of these photographs, we should no
longer hesitate to class them as spiritistic — that is,
that they present undoubted evidence of spirit return,
since definite and recognizable forms have appeared upon
the plates. For, if these be not spirits of the departed,
what are they?

Our reason for hesitating, before accepting this view
of the matter, i’s that recent researches in “ metapsychics ”
have shown us that, while external entities may exist,
apart from the mind and body of the medium, these
entities are not necessarily what they purport to be, but
are rather experimentally formed or created phantasms,
and this has been demonstrated in a variety of ways.
Among these proofs, we may cite late experiments in the
projection of the astral body, the creation of thought
forms, etc., which have thrown an entirely new and un¬
suspected light upon these hidden powers of man.

These thought-images once created, the further and
logical attempt was to photograph them — apparently
with more or less success. Images of definite thoughts
were obtained upon photographic plates, in response to
the will of the subject or experimenter.

FIG. 14

“viTAI. radiations” ISSUING
FROM TIIK HUMAN BODY AND
IMPRESSING (DIRECTI.y) A
FHOTOGRAI'IIIC PLATE

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

143

Of course, the problem of accounting for thought-
photographs still remains ! How is it possible or con¬
ceivable for thought thus to impress a photographic
plate, leaving upon it the image in the mind? Are
thoughts more real, more objective things than we have
been in the habit of supposing? Are “ thoughts things,”
as the New Thoughters are always contending? These
new researches would indeed seem to prove it.

When we ” visualize,” or construct a mental picture in
thought, we form a mental image which is, so far as we
know, purely mental, and composed only of “ such stuff
as dreams are made of.” How can such a mental image
be projected outwards into space, and actually exist in the
material world? How can it affect a photographic
plate, or any other instrument which can usually be in¬
fluenced only by physical forces? This is, indeed, a
great and as yet a partially unsolved problem!

The only rational solution consists in believing that
thoughts are in a sense more real, more actual, more
material things than we have been in the habit of suppos¬
ing. Thoughts must possess mental energy; this mental
energy probably sets in motion certain vital, nervoUs cur¬
rents in the brain and nervous system, which in turn affect
the surrounding ether and thus create ether vibrations
and other disturbances in the environment of the medium
or psychic. These vital radiations, as we have seen, have
been photographed; and it also seems probable that the
mental image can directly affect the ether, setting-up in
it certain strains and swirls and modifications which are
direct thought photographs. (See Fig. 14.)

Doubtless each human brain is sending out every minute
countless etheric vibrations that radiate outward into
space. In telepathy these waves operate possibly some-

144 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

thing like wireless telegraphy. They Impress solid ob¬
jects. They can be reflected by a mirror — just as when
we “ see ” a solid object in a mirror we don’t really see
it, but only ether vibrations which have been reflected by
the glass, — the real object being a long distance away!
It is the same with thought. At times it can be made solid
and objective enough to reflect light. Then it can be
photographed. Profesisor Le Bon, in his laboratory, has
already shown us that it is possible, by purely physical
means, to stabilize electric currents so that they can be
photographed. For the time being he “ created ” matter
at the points of electric needles. Possibly thought photo¬
graphs are much on this same order; both depend upon a
slowing-down of the etheric vibrations, to the point when
they become solid and tangible — as they are said to do in
the case of so-called materializations.

We all know our childhood stories of fairies who
become visible and invisible at will. We are now begin¬
ning to see how such a thing can be made possible, scien¬
tifically. By creating thought-images, there is made or
created for the time a visible figure which instantly
vanishes if approached or attacked. On the other hand,
if the light waves coming from a solid object be interfered
with, if they be destroyed in space, as it were, then that
object at once becomes invisible. If the “ fairy ” under¬
stood this law, and could thus affect the light waves,
destroying them for the time, then invisibility would be at
once established.

It is possible we are on the eve of again discovering
how to effect this transformation by the occult use of the
will 1

The story was once related to me of a lady who
strongly objected to having her photograph taken. One

PSYCHIC PHOTOGRAPHY

145

day she died. She was laid to rest in her coffin, where
she remained two days. On the second day a photograph
of her was taken by the local photographer. Next day
she was buried. Two days later the photographer came
round in a great state of excitement, saying that, although
he had carefully developed his plate, not a mark — not
a trace of the face — was to be found on it! Where
the face should have been was a blank space ! Now the
possible explanation is that the still-active will of this per¬
son was being exercised in some occult manner, to the
end that she interfered with the light-rays coming from
her face sufficiently to prevent its image being recorded.
I do not for a moment advance either the case or the
theory as “ scientifically established I merely give it as
an example — illustrating a possibility which may one day
be demonstrated.

Whatever the interpretation of the facts, however, the
conclusion to be drawn from this mass of evidence is
that genuine supernormal photographs have been taken,
and that thought-forms have apparently been obtained,
as well as so-called “ spirit photographs.” This branch
of psychic investigation is one of the most interesting in
the whole field, and I earnestly hope that my readers,
and all those interested in occult and psychic studies, will
try experiments of this nature for themselves, and note
the results.

CHAPTER IX

PROJECTION OF THE “ ASTRAL ” BODY ^

A Description of the Method of Projecting the Hitman
^‘Double’* at Will

One of the latest achievements of “ psychical science ” —
which is constantly making new and important discov¬
eries — is the voluntary projection of the “ astral body ”
of man — the expulsion of the human “double” or
etheric counterpart of the physical body — by methods
under control of the human will. Occult science has long
since proved that — besides this physical body, which we
know — there is also a more subtle and refined en¬
velope — the “ spiritual body ” of St. Paul — and tha't
this body is capable of being detached, at times, and of
being “ projected ” — leaving the physical body entranced,
while the subtle body journeys and makes itself manifest
to others at considerable distances. The specific meth¬
ods to be employed, in order to ensure this, have only
lately been disclosed; and it has remained for Dr. Charles
Lancelin — a French scientist and occultist of note — to
describe the necessary practices in full.

Dr. Lancelin has been well-known in scientific and oc-

1 Regarding the use of the word “ astral,” I have not intended to restrict
its use, as in Theosophical literature; but have merely employed it as a
convenient term, well understood, to signify the astral or etheric or men¬
tal or spiritual or dream body, or “double,” of man. Theosophists dis¬
tinguish between these terms — perhaps rightly: psychical researchers, on
the other hand, have been content, so far, to prove the objective exist¬
ence of a “ body ” corresponding to any of these conceptions. Thus, the
term “astral body” is used in the present chapter, only in its ntost gen¬
eral sense and widest meaning. (See Figs. 15 and 16.)

146

s < ^

-L,

H J

? s

< fo

u c
o j

X g

VO ■

I ^ Ci

' r- H

Sr: <

c-*

tx5

Cfi

ti5

tx:

ii:

/?:

tii

U,'

(/J

LiJ [Jj

H ^

►J

lo <*
^ £

til w tu

S ^ c

c ^

5 • ^

“ C/D

^ H
G

tx: —
V 2i
^ W
< 1,
H X
az u

ti-

cti

G X
y. H
<

c/5

> <

^ a u: H Q

ti' < X X '-' CQ

CC u: c- h ^ <

PROJECTION OF THE “ ASTRAL ” BODY 147

cult circles in France for many years; he is the author of
a number of works — the most important of which are :
Fraud in the Production of Mediumistic Phenomena^
The Beyond and its Problems, My Experiences with
the Devil and Devil-Worship, Sorcery and Witch¬
craft, and a Study of a Hyperphysical Subject — all
in French. In his latest work, Methodes de Dedouble-
ment Personnel: Exteriorization de la Neuricite: Sorties
en Astral, a volume of more than 550 pages, Dr.
Lancelin has gone deeply into this subject of self-pro¬
jection, and given us a detailed scientific account of the
actual methods followed, in order to effect this apparent
miracle. This is the first time that this occult knowledge
has ever been divulged, and it has caused no little stir and
sensation in France. Experiments had been tried before,
it may be said, by M. Hector Durville, President of the
“ Magnetic Society ” of France and author of a number
of books upon psychic subjects; by Dr. Baraduc, well-
known for his work upon the nervous system and human
vitality; and by the late Colonel Albert de Rochas, of the
French Army, who was regarded by many as the fore¬
most scholar of psychic science in his day. All these ex¬
perimenters achieved success in this field of research; and
Dr. Lancelin has not only summarized their researches,
but also extended them in the minutest detail — in the
remarkable work which he has lately published. It is
this which I propose to summarize in the present chapter.

According to M. Lancelin, there is a real “ science and
art ” in this astral duplication, which consists, essentially,
in the ability to externalize the neuric (nervous) force,
composing the astral body, and the “ sensibility.” The
right or suitable temperament must be chosen for the
experiment; and if this is not found, the experiment is

148 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

liable to fail, or only to succeed partially. “ Tempera¬
ment ” must not be confused with “ character,” or men¬
tal make-up. Temperament is a physiological state pro¬
duced by the predominance of an element, organ or sys¬
tem in the human body. There are four chief types of
temperament — nervous, bilious, lymphatic and sanguine.
Of these, the nervous temperament is the best for psychic
experiments of all kinds; the bilious is the most receptive;
the sanguine iis liable to hallucinations, both subjective and
objective; while the lymphatic is the least suitable of all,
from every point of view. Of course, one’s temperament
is usually a compound of all of these, which are rarely
found in their ideal state; but the predominantly nervous
temperament is the one best suited for this test — als for
all other psychic experiments.

Now, there is at all times a certain out-flowing of
nervous force, or “ externalization of neuricity,” as it is
called, in all individuals, but this becomes very pro¬
nounced in certain types of individuals known as “ me¬
diums ” or “ psychics.” In them, this force which is thus
radiated can be measured by means of specially con¬
structed instruments, known as Biometers, Sthenometers,
etc. Several instruments of this kind have been devised
by French experimenters. They show that there is a re¬
pulsive force generated from one side of the human
body, and an attractive force from the other side. In
normal human beings these forces should be equal.
When they are not, odd things are likely to happen in
their immediate environment. Their relative power can
be tested by means of these instruments. (See Fig. 17.)

These energies depend upon the state of the health, the
emotions, the mind and also upon the will. For the ex¬
periment to succeed, as we shall see, the subject must be

FIG. 1 7

“vital radiations”

FIG. 1 8

ATOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE

“astral body”

EXPLANATION :

I MOLECULE OF CARDBOARD

C — MOLECULE OF OXYGEN

Q MOLECULE OF NITROGEN

MOLECULE OF W.ATER

MOLECULE OF ASTRAL BODY

PROJECTION OF THE “ ASTRAL ” BODY 149

in good health; the emotions calm; the mind placid; and
the will exceedingly strong. However, it is not the
conscious will which performs the miracle; but the sub¬
conscious will — the will which is active in sleep. It is
this which is difficult to train, and can only be reached
by psychic and occult methods. Once reached and
strengthened, however, it is capable of performing all
sorts of marvels, while the subject is asleep or entranced.

This subconscious will has its own psychology; it is said
to consist of four essential elements — possession, delib¬
eration, determination and action. The last three of
these are the so-called “ solid ” states of will. (The me¬
dium Eusapia Palladino was wont to say she could suc¬
ceed in moving objects at a distance if her will were suf¬
ficiently “ solid.”) Within this mystic citadel, a double
action takes place — (i) the will acts within itself, and
(2) it controls its environment. Upon the degree of
power which this subconscious will possesses depends the
success of the experiments.

The first thing to do, then, to ensure the success of
our “astral projection,” is to dynamize the will — to
hyperdynamize it, in fact, so that it is over-charged, and
capable of bursting out, like champagne, when the cork
is removed. There are various methods of doing this.
One of the simplest is to repeat to oneself many times
just before dropping off to sleep, “ I have will — I have
energy ! ” This must be kept up until sleep actually su¬
pervenes, and memory is lost. Then one may think of the
next day’s work clearly, in detail, and make up one’s mind
not to deviate therefrom, even under great pressure and
temptation. This will give the subconscious will a force
that nothing else can equal.

The subconscious will thus strengthened, the next step

150 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

is to create a “ division of self,” so as to loosen the astral
body from the physical body. The subject, to do this,
should go over his entire body in thought — while lying
in bed — covering every inch of its surface, and willing
that the astral body shall be detached from the physical
body at that point. Try to feel this body loose inside
you. Then focus all your mental energy upon the solar
plexus — at the spot where the ribs divide ^ — and, while
breathing quietly and deeply, will that you go out from
your physical body at that point. Project yourself out¬
wards into space. Imagine yourself going out; try to
transfer your consciousness to the body without you.

^ In this, Dr. Lancelin is at variance with many experienced Oc¬
cultists, who contend that the safest and easiest point of egress is a point
low down on the forehead, between the eyes. Some personal experiences
and experiments tend to confirm this view. Further, this method is dan¬
gerous, unless undertaken under wise guidance. At some future time I
hope to extend and amplify this question at considerable length — giving
more specific exercises, and instructions.

PROJECTION OF THE “ ASTRAL ” BODY 1 5 1

Try to look out of its eyes, hear with its ears, feel with
its body. You will suddenly find yourself enabled to do
so; then your first great step will have been taken.

When you have progressed thus far, says M. Lancelin,
look around you, in your newly acquired “ astral body,”
and notice the furniture in the room; notice everything in
detail. Then try to go out through the door of the room,
— down stairs, and out of the front door into the street.
Then walk along the street — into the door of your
friend’s house, to whom you wish to appear — and go
upstairs into his or her room. Notice everything as you
go. When there, try to make your presence felt or seen.
This is the second hardest step, and the one we know the
least about as yet, in its technical details.

The person to whom you are to appear must be more
or less ” clairvoyant ” or “ psychic.” He must be quiet
and receptive, in darkness or semi-darkness, and should,
if possible, aid you by drawing you by an effort of will —
so that his duty is not altogether passive, but active also.
One of the best states for the perception of the astral
body of another person is the hypnotic trance. The
French experiments were nearly all made in this con¬
dition — though it is not necessary.

Once by the side of the ” seer,” the astral phantom
should endeavour in every way possible to make its pres¬
ence felt. It may do this by becoming visible, by speak¬
ing (becoming audible) , or by touching the “ seer.” The
phantom may also be able to rap. If not, it has been
found by experience that the astral form may be enabled
to prove its presence by impressing photographic plates
(by placing its hands upon them) , by touching sulphide of
calcium screens, or by operating some delicate instrument,
such as a Biometer. Its objectivity is thus established.

152 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

As to the “ trip ” between one point and the other, the
necessary things for the phantasmal form to develop
are — ( i ) self-conscious will, and (2) sense of direction.

Various factors have been found to influence the results
advantageously, or the reverse. We may thus summar¬
ize the most important of these : —

Sex. This should preferably be male for the pro¬
jector, female for the recipient or seer of the phantom.

Humidity. The air should be dry and clear, baro¬
meter-high.

Atmospheric electricity. If high, this is prejudicial to
the experiment.

Temperature. This should be high — say 20° F. be¬
low the heat of the body when the experiment is taking
place.

Clothing. No restrictions of any kind can be allowed.

Light. Complete darkness is by far the best; a dim
twilight in any case is all that may be allowed.

PROJECTION OF THE “ ASTRAL ” BODY 1 53

Sitters- If possible, projector and seer should be
alone; if any one else is present, they must understand
what is happening, and be In sympathy with the experi¬
ment.

Silence must be preserved throughout, no noise must
disturb the sitter at either end of the “ line.”

Time. The best time is between 1 1 P. M. and 3
A. M. — that is, when natural sleep Is most likely to super¬
vene.

Position. The most comfortable — in an arm chair,
on a couch, or in bed. If lying down. It should be on
the right side. You must not He upon the front of the
body.

The Mind must be calm, and the emotions placid.

It is well to eat very little on the day of the experiment.

There are certain dangers attendant upon this experi¬
ment — especially if undertaken rashly, and by one un¬
accustomed to such trials, (i) There are material dan¬
gers — such as wiould accompany any dissociation experi¬
ments. A psychic expert would understand this. (2)
Intellectual and Moral Dangers. Those having weak
characters, weak wills, or uncontrolled lives are liable to
be influenced by outside, evil intelligences, and “ open the
door ” to possible ” obsession.” Sound advice by a mas¬
ter or adept Is advisable here. (3) Psycho-physical
dangers. These are dangers which happen In the astral
world, and react upon the mind and body of the subject.
(4) Hyper-physical dangers, which leave the door open
to dangerous principles.

To avoid these, one should have technical instruction
In this matter of self- or astral-projection, and, in any case,
care, sang froid, fearlessness, moral force and a strong
will are essential. If these are lacking, the subject had

154 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

best leave the experiment alone. But If he has them,
or can develop them, a road Is opened to him which Is one
of the most fascinating In the occult world; he will be
enabled to leave his physical body at will, and soar upon
the wings of the wind In the astral and ethereal worlds;
and he will see things there beyond words -to describe; he
will behold visions and hear that which “ It Is not lawful
to utter ” — for they pass the ordinary comprehension of
man. Such Is the testimony of M. Lancelln.

CHAPTER X

INSTRUMENTAL COMMUNICATION WITH THE
“ SPIRIT WORLD ”

An Account of a Series of Remarkable Experiments by
Two Dutch Physicists, by Which They Claim to
Have Established This Fact

Instrumental communication with the “ spirit world! ”
That has been the ambition of a certain group of occult
and psychical students since the very origin of their
Investigation. Improbable — nay, Impossible — as It
sounds, many have continued to believe. In spite of griev¬
ous disappointments, that this would one day be accom¬
plished; that the time would come when we should have
some sort of telephone by means of which direct com¬
munication with the “ spirit world ” would be rendered
possible; or that some sort of Instrument would be de¬
vised which would render this dream an actual reality.
It really seems that this vision Is at last becoming an es¬
tablished fact, — and that the day Is at hand when un¬
reliable or fraudulent mediums will be dispensed with, and
“ communication ” held directly with those who have gone
before. This, at least. Is the startling claim made by two
Dutch physicists whose researches I propose to summar¬
ize In this article; and, without actually endorsing their
conclusions. It may be said at once that they have adopted
a bold and original method of research, and that their
experiments will have to be “ explained away ” In some
satisfactory manner, if we are to refrain from accepting

iss

156 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the dramatic conclusions which they believe they have
reached.

The experimenters, whose work I summarize, are Dr.
J. L. W. P. Matla and Dr. G. J. Zaalberg van Zelst, of
The Hague, Holland. They are well-known in spiritistic
and occult circles there ; and also for their original work
in high-frequency currents of electricity, liquid air, and
the compression of gases. Scientifically, they were well
equipped for the task. More than twenty-two years of
labour had preceded their final conclusions, which were
given to the world In a voluminous v/ork, In Dutch, en¬
titled The Mystery of Death. (It is from this work that
the majority of the facts contained in this article are
drawn.)

Before outlining their experiments, however, one or
two remarks may be made as to the character of the task
they undertook, and the general nature of the problem.
Without these explanatory details, much of what follows
might not be clear to the reader.

What we know as a “ man ” consists, not in the clothes
he wears, nor in his body — flesh and bones; but In the
mental being, the “ ego,” within. This is always invisible
to us; so that it may in truth be said that we never see
a man in this life. We see only his externals. His real
“ self ” Is never known by us, — except indirectly. Let
this truth be fully grasped at the outset, as it is very es¬
sential.

This mental being consists of consciousness and mem¬
ory; together they constitute what we know as the “ per¬
sonal identity.” We say that this consciousness Is John
Smith, or Henry Wood, or whoever it may be. Even if
we do not see his body, but only hear his voice over the
telephone, we say the same thing. (There are many

INSTRUMENTAL COMMUNICATION 157

hair-splitting divisions which might be made here as to
the real nature and constitution of the self, — but the
psychological terms used are only broad and general, so
as to make the idea as clear as possible.)

Whenever we come into touch with mental life, then,
it is always associated with a living, physical organism.
No matter what animal it may be, its mind is always
known to us through its manifestations in the physical
body. It is the same with man. This being so, how
prove that this consciousness continues to exist after the
destruction of the physical body?

We can prove this in only one way. We must get
in touch with that consciousness — if it still exists — and
obtain from it proof of its continued existence. Just as
we proved the existence of argon in the atmosphere by
isolating it, so we must prove the existence of this sur¬
viving consciousness by isolating it; and getting it to prove
its “ personal identity ” to us by much the same means
that it did on earth — by telling us facts which only that
consciousness knew. This is proof of personal iden¬
tity — proof of some form of survival.

Now, there are two ways in which this can be done —
by mental manifestations, so-called — automatic writing
and speech, visions, “ messages,” and all the class of men¬
tal phenomena known to students of the occult. The
other way is by means of physical manifestations — by
materializations, photographic means, voices, raps, etc.,
indicating intelligence. Instrumental means — such as
the telegraph and telephone — are the latest methods
tried, and it is such a process which we will describe in
this article. The question, therefore, is this: Were the
instruments in question manipulated directly by some ex¬
ternal intelligence (a spirit), and if so. How? If we ex-

158 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

elude all normal methods of moving the instruments In
question, some other explanation must be forthcoming; if
spirit-identity be proven, we stand face to face with the
great possibility of direct instrumental communication
with the spiritual world! It Is a great — a tremendous
— thought 1 Let us see how far we have progressed
along this perilous road.

The first experiments were crude and primitive enough.
A small room was constructed, — with a solid concrete
floor, so as to shut off earth vibrations so far as pos¬
sible, — seven feet long, six feet broad and nine feet high.
It was connected with the outside passage by means of one
door, — all other doors and windows having been care¬
fully sealed with thick, black material. This door into
the passage contained a small window, guarded by blinds,
and the experimenters took up their position outside, in
the passage, — whence they watched the fluctuations of
the instruments during the experiments. (That is, they
were not in the room at the time at all.) Sometimes it
was necessary to employ opera-glasses to see the varia¬
tions in the recording instruments during the course of
the sittings. At other times, the shadow of a moving
index-pointer was cast upon a screen, upon which a gradu¬
ated scale had been drawn, — thus permitting an enlarged
image of the movement to be seen and registered.

In this room was placed, first of all, a cardboard cyl¬
inder about 20 inches high, lo inches broad, and having
a capacity of about 22 litres — that is, about two-fifths
the size of the solid human body. This cylinder was cov¬
ered with sheets of tinfoil — sealing it hermetically. A
small hole in the upper edge of the cylinder was made, and
a flexible rubber tube was Inserted here, connecting the

INSTRUMENTAL COMMUNICATION 159

interior of the cylinder with a “ manometer ” — a sort of
thermometer, placed sideways, and containing one drop
of alcohol, which, under normal conditions, occupied a
position in the centre of the glass tube (like a spirit-
level). If any solid object were introduced into the
cylinder, it would of course displace a portion of the con¬
tained air, and this drop of alcohol would indicate the
amount of air displaced by running along the graduated
scale until it stopped at the correct figure. The instru¬
ment was tested In various ways and found accurate.

The investigators then retired, and asked the “ man-
force ” — as they called the manifesting “ spirit ” — not
wishing to call it by that name — to enter the cylinder
and displace some of the contained air. Immediately the
bubble was seen to run along the scale of the manometer,
showing that part of the air had been displaced by some
solid or semi-solid body. The degree of displacement
was noted. At request the alcohol drop was caused to
run along the scale, back and forth, a number of times.
The fact of coincidence was thus quite excluded.

It was soon found that this first cylinder was too small.
Accordingly, other cylinders were constructed — 40, 50,
55 and 60 litres in capacity. From a number of observa¬
tions, Drs. Matla and van Zelst came to the conclusion
that the size of the body occupying the cylinder was ap¬
proximately 53 litres. The weight of this body was then
tested and calculated, and found to be about 69.5
grams — approximately 2.25 oz. These results were
checked by the employment of a second cylinder, which
was used as a “ control.” (Fig. 19.)

Experiments were then undertaken to ascertain the
precise physical constitution of this curious “ body.” As

i6o MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the result of a number of elaborate and laborious experi¬
ments, Drs. Matla and van ZeLt arrived at the following
conclusions : —

That this “ body ” is capable of contraction and ex¬
pansion, under the action of the will *of the “ man-
force,” — the expansion being 1.26 mm., or about one-
forty-millionth of its own volume; Its contraction being
much greater, viz., about 8mm., or one-six-and-a-quarter
millionth of its volume. Its specific weight Is about 12.24
mgs. lighter than hydrogen, and 176.5 times lighter than
air. The will acts upon this body mechanically, causing
it to expand (rise) or contract (descend) as the action
takes place. It is thus still subject to the law of gravita¬
tion. There is an X-force which holds the molecules of
this body together — as yet unknown. The atoms com¬
posing this body are small, widely separated, but heavy.
(See Fig. 18.) The internal density of the body is about
the same as that of the external air; if the pressure of
the air outside the body be increased, that inside the body
will increase in exact proportion. If, however, the body
rises too high. It disintegrates (like deep sea fishes
brought to the surface), and then we see the fearful
spectacle of a man going to pieces before our eyes!

These calculations are based upon the earlier experi¬
ments which, interesting and ingenious as they were,
nevertheless were crude compared with those undertaken
at a later stage of the Investigation. Partly as the re¬
sult of “ instructions ” imparted by the communicating
“spirit” (man-force), and partly upon their own initi¬
ative, Drs. Matla and van Zelst constructed a very elabo¬
rate and ingenious instrument termed by them a “ dyna-
mlstograph,” — complex in nature, yet sensitive, and ap¬
parently capable of being influenced by the communicat-

Fir,. 19

THE TWO AIRTIGHT CVI.IXUERS, COXXECTED TUBES
TO THE TWO SCALES OR " MAXOM ETERS,” WHICH
REGISTERED THE AMOUXT OF AIR DISFLACED IX THE
C^'LIXDERS BY AXV “bODv” OCCUI'YIXG EITHER OF
THEM

FIG. 20

A MORE DETAILED YIEW OF THE ESSEXTIAL DARTS OF
THE "DYXAMISTOGRADH.” (SEE TE.XT FOR EXPLAXA-
TIOX.)

“the DYNAMISTOCRAI'H.” the machine bv the
OPERATION OF WHICH DOCTORS MATLA AND ZAAL-
BERG VAN ZELST BELIEVE THEY HAVE BEEN 4BLE TO
vVEIGH, MEASURE AND OBTAIN DIRECT COMMUNICA¬
TIONS FROM THE SURVIVING SPIRIT OF MAN WITH¬
OUT THE AID OF ANY MEDIUM

'V ,

kjI*

■ ' *

,■•„■>■ ■ 1-

iv-

-N;;'

V-M'

INSTRUMENTAL COMMUNICATION i6i

ing intelligence through the medium of electricity. A de¬
scription of this instrument Is necessary, as being one of
the most elaborate devices ever constructed, in order to
talk to the “ spirit world ” direct.

The “ dynamistograph ” is an electro-mechanical in¬
strument, consisting of three principal parts: (i) the key;
(2) the indicator; and (3) the register, or recording
apparatus. (See Figs. 20 and 21.)

The indicator consisted of a wheel, upon which were
marked 28 equidistant spaces. In these were marked the
letters of the alphabet, a period or full-stop, and a blank
space. This wheel was driven by an independent motor,
so as to perform one-twenty-eighth of a revolution in five
seconds — that is, move forward one letter in that time.
This letter appeared at a small opening, as its turn came;
and at the moment of Its appearance — If the “key”
were pressed, this letter was printed by means of the
register or recording apparatus.

This register consisted of a small hammer, to which
was affixed a magnet. At the moment of closing the
electric current (the result of pressing the “key”) the
magnet was drawn up, the hammer struck an inked rib¬
bon, beneath which was a letter corresponding to the let¬
ter indicated on the large disk. In this way the same let¬
ter was instantly recorded on a strip of paper, slowly
wound out, like a stock-ticker ribbon.

The “ key ” was a very intricate piece of apparatus,
and It was this that the “ spirit ” or “ man-force ” was
asked to press at the moment the right letter appeared on
the large indicator. This key consisted of a sort of lever
or beam, to which were attached two rings, capable of
revolving freely; a membrance of fine material stretched
tightly over them; and a lever, to the opposite end of

1 62 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

which was attached a very fine hair, connected with a
delicately adjusted series of screws beneath. If the key
were pressed ever so little (that is, if the “ spirit ” stood
or pressed upon the membrane, and its weight were ever
so small, it would affect the apparatus, by this delicate
series of adjustments and relays, and thus close the con¬
tact. Electricity would then pass along the wires and
connexions, and the hammer record the letter exposed at
the moment the key was pressed.

The electric current was provided by a Wilmshurst
machine. The light used in the room during the experi¬
ments was acetylene gas, which the experimenters had
found the most efficacious. The membrane forming the
“key” was 38 cm. broad (about 15 in.). The whole
apparatus was placed in a cupboard, kept at a constant
temperature and barometric dryness. The experiments
or “ communications ” by means of the dynamistograph
covered a period of one year, in which daily messages
were received. The experimenters assert that the weight
of the “ spirit form ” gradually decreases, as the years
pass — a form 100 years old weighing only about one
quarter as much as one ten years old! Slow disintegra¬
tion is evidently taking place. The molecular intervals
in the body are said to be 176 times greater than that
of ordinary air. The entire body of this strange being
is full of air, and is not separated from the atmosphere
by any protective sheath or covering of an impervious
nature. The being is thought to pass through those solid
objects through which it can pass by a species of os¬
mosis — its molecules being small enough and far enough
apart to permit this.

It has been said that the energy which holds this body
together is a hypothetical X- force (akin to one which ex-

INSTRUMENTAL COMMUNICATION 163

ists in the physical body, and upon the departure of which
the body disintegrates and goes to pieces). What is the
nature of this X-force? Can it be augmented or in¬
creased? If so, would not communication by these means
become much clearer and surer? Is it akin to electricity,
and if so, what kind of electricity? These are some of
the questions our experimenters asked themselves, and
to which they advanced more or less tentative answers, —
based upon several hundred seances.

In the first place, then, it was found that the weather,
atmospheric conditions, played a large part in the char¬
acter of the manifestations; phenomena were better in
spring and summer, and weaker in autumn and winter —
which, we must remember, is in Holland largely a wet,
rainy season. This suggested some connexion with at¬
mospheric electricity, and the inference is further borne
out by the fact that, in high altitudes, and in dry climates,
psychic phenomena of all kinds have usually been better
and stronger.

Electricity, then, played some part in these manifesta¬
tions. How large a part, and what kind of electricity?
261 seances were devoted to answering this problem.

Natural induction was tried first of all; then artificial
Induction; frictional electricity; high and low-frequency
currents, etc. Metal plates were charged positively for
an hour by a Wilmshurst machine, and negative induction
thus obtained in other (copper) plates. After this in¬
duction, it was found tha-t the apparatus could be more
easily operated. The X-force thus seemed to be
strengthened by artificial Induttlon. High frequency cur¬
rents were then tried, with considerable success. From
twenty to twenty-five thousand volts were found efficacious
— though the current actually operating the machine had

1 64 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

to be weak. The theory of the experimenters was that
the X-force was probably electrical In nature, and that if
this could be fortified from “ this side ” mechanically, It
would stimulate the phenomena, and at the same time sup¬
ply the necessary force mediums expend, preventing the
“ vital drain ” upon them which is now so well known to
exist. For the purposes of its manifestation, the
“ spirit ” must obtain added energy somehow, and the
usual method of procedure (apparently) is to abstract
this power from the circle of sitters, and chiefly from the
“ medium,” who is in this manner and for this reason
exhausted. If a mechanical energy of any character
could be found which would add to the natural energy of
the manifesting entfty, and obviate the necessity of this
drain upon the medium, it would indeed be a great for¬
ward step in psychical research and a great benefit to
mediums all over the world. These experiments are as
yet in a relatively embryonic state.

And now a few words as to the theoretical import of
all this.

Bulwer Lytton, in his Haunters and the Haunted —
that greatest of all ghost-stories — said: “ In all that I
had witnessed, and indeed in all the wonders which the
amateurs of mystery in our age record as facts, a material
human agency is always required. On the continent, you
will still find magicians who assert that they can raise
spirits. Assume for a moment that they assert truly,
still the living, material form of the magician is present,
and he is the material agency by which, from some con¬
stitutional peculiarities, certain strange phenomena are
represented to our natural senses. ... In fine. In all
such marvels, supposing even that there is no imposture,
there must be a human being like ourselves by whom.

INSTRUMENTAL COMMUNICATION 165

or through whom, the effects presented to human beings
are produced.”

I myself went so far as to suppose that this energy —
common to two worlds, — which both can manipulate —
would be vitality — the living energy of the human body,
about which we know so little. (Problems of Psychical
Research, p. 48.) If the experiments that we have just
narrated prove true, however, we shall have seriously to
reconsider these statements, and ascertain whether mani¬
festations of this character might not be produced with¬
out the instrumentality of any human being, but by in¬
strumental means alone. If this proves to be the case,
then some form of electricity would seem feo be the inter¬
mediary between the two worlds. We may then have a
wireless direct to the spirit world !

Seriously, however, we seem on the verge of great
discoveries in this field, and I for one feel certain that
these could be made if only we had a properly equipped
Laboratory in which to conduct such experiments. What
we need, in such a Laboratory, one may safely predict,
would be : ( i ) suitable in-struments for recording these
phenomena; (2) men to conduct the experiments; and
(3) money enough to endow and conduct the Institution.
In a rich and progressive country such as this, it is ab¬
surd that such a Laboratory should not be founded and
maintained; and it is not too much to believe that from
it we should soon obtain facts of the greatest significance
and of the utmost importance. It is earnestly to be hoped
that such a Laboratory may one day be founded !

To return, however: It is quite conceivable that while
the spiritual and the material worlds cannot interact one
with another in any direct and continuous manner, they
might nevertheless do so in some more Indirect and round-

1 66 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

about way. We are here, of course, encountering one
special aspect of a very old problem — the connection of
mind and matter — how the brain, being a material thing,
and consciousness, being an immaterial thing, can touch
and interact with one another at all. It occurs to me
that this would only be possible provided that some
etheric, or vital intermediary were present, and that with¬
out this,- communication would never take place — any
more than could electricity travel without a medium. By
a series of intermediaries, one slightly more material than
the last, we might have a continuous series of connections,
from an immaterial to a material sphere. The Gnostics,
as we know, held this view — their “ Daemons ” corre¬
sponding to the Hierarchy or Ten Intelligences of the
East. Thus: the Gnostics held that matter and spirit
could have no intercourse — they were, as it were, in¬
commensurate. How then, granting this premise, was
Creation possible? Their answer was a kind of gradual
elimination. God, the A plus Purus, created an aeon; this
aeon created a second; and so on until the tenth aeon was
sufficiently material (as the ten were in continually de¬
scending series) to affect matter, and so cause the Cre¬
ation by giving to matter the spiritual form.

We have an analogy for this in our modern physics.
In electricity, e.g., what are known as “ relays ” beauti¬
fully illustrate the principle here outlined. In working
over long lines, or where there are a number of instru¬
ments in one circuit, the currents are often not strong
enough to work the recording instruments directly. In
such case there is interposed a “ relay ” or “ repeater.”
This instrument consists of an electro-magnet round which
the line-current flows, and whose delicately- poised arma¬
ture, when attracted, makes contact for a local circuit, in

INSTRUMENTAL COMMUNICATION 167

which a local battery and the receiving Morse Instrument
(sounder, writer, etc.) are Included. The principle of
a relay Is, then, that a current too weak to do the work
Itself may get a strong local current to do Its work for It.

If this be true. It Is certainly conceivable that spiritual
beings (granting that they exist at all, for the sake of
argument) might be enabled to manipulate a delicate
energy of some sort, which In turn would liberate a
stronger energy, and so on down the line until one Is
liberated capable of being recorded by our delicate physi¬
cal instruments. If, as now seems certain, the human
will is a dynamic energy, and thought can impress the
photographic plate, it is certainly but a step from this
to existing physical apparatus so delicate that it will regis¬
ter the heat of a candle at a distance of half a mile
(Langley’s bolometer), or measure the temperature of
stars distant from us many millions of miles In space, and
quite invisible to the naked eye. The step seems but a
short one Indeed!

The hope is certainly legitimate, then, that we shall one
day stumble upon a means of direct Instrumental com¬
munication between the two worlds — and that these pre¬
liminary experiments of Drs. Matla and van Zelst —
while they may not be conclusive in themselves — never¬
theless indicate to us the road we must travel, and hold
out hope for us that here Is at least an avenue of ap¬
proach worthy of our highest efforts and greatest hopes.
For surely, were such a method of communication es¬
tablished, by means of some Intermediary or some in¬
strument, it would revolutionize our science, our phi¬
losophy, our religion, our ethics, our outlook upon life as a
whole in a way nothing else possibly could. And the man
who discovers such an energy — common to the two

1 68 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

worlds — and learns how -to direct and utilize It for the
purpose of communication, will assuredly be hailed as
the greatest scientist of all time; one beside whom New¬
ton and Galileo and Darwin and Archimedes will shrink
Into insignificance, and their discoveries appear small and
trivial when compared with this great cosmic truth ! The
road is open, then, for the ardent and daring scientific
adventurer to take his fortune In his hands and fare forth
upon the highway, with the knowledge that his efforts
may succeed in bringing to light, and demonstrating to
us, not only the possibility of direct intracosmic communi¬
cation, but the very existence of a spiritual world — about
which there is, nowadays, so much doubt! Such a dis¬
covery would indeed revolutionize human thought; re¬
cast science; remould philosophy; and prove the “pre¬
amble to all Religions.”

CHAPTER XI

MATHEMATICAL PROOFS OF A “ SPIRIT WORLD ” ^

There are probably few countries in the world more
inaccessible, and more unknown to the traveller than
Transylvania, on the borderland of Rumania and Elun-
gary, — famous as “ the home of the vampire,” and also
as the native land of Bolyai — one of the most famous
mathematicians who ever lived, and who founded, —
jointly with Lobatchewsky and Gauss, — the so-called
“ non-Euclidian geometry.” He is also noted for his
work on “parallels” (parallel lines). Just what his
ideas were, which so revolutionized modern thought in
these directions, will be explained more fully later on; suf¬
fice it to say for the present that this Transylvanian
shares with Lobatchewsky, a Russian, and Gauss, a Ger¬
man, one of the most noted places in modern mathe¬
matical thought.

These three men differed from one another as widely
as men well could; their daily lives were totally different,
and they met only in the realms of higher abstract
thought. Gauss was a university professor — serene,
calm, peaceful, living an uneventful life devoted to his
studies; unselfish to the last degree, a scholar and a stu¬
dent. Bolyai was a wild soldier, a duellist, at odds with
the world and with himself. It is related of him that

1 Acknowledgement must be made here to the following books, from
which much of the argument that follows has been drawn; Hinton, The
Fourth Dimension ; Redgrove, A Mathematical Theory of Spirit; Miles,
Mathematical Law in the Spiritual World; also to various mathematical
and philosophical papers.

169

170 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

he was challenged by thirteen officers of his garrison —
a thing not unlikely to happen considering how differently
he thought from every one else. He fought them all in
succession — making it his only condition that he should
be allowed to play on his violin for an interval before
meeting each opponent. He disarmed and wounded all
his antagonists. He could get along with nobody; his
epochmaking discoveries aroused no interest at the time;
he passed his life in poverty and dissipation, and died in
i860, forgotten and unmourned.

Lobatchewsky, on the other hand, was a man of varied
and wonderful talents. He was born in 1793, but did
not gain distinction until 1867, when Houtel, the French
mathematician, drew attention to his work. He died at
an advanced age, honoured and surrounded by friends.
His youth was full of daring escapades, showing the
strong vitality which he was known to possess. He did
an incredible amount of work and teaching, as well as un¬
dertaking laborious official duties, and making important
contributions to science. His theory of parallels is per¬
haps best known. His name is usually associated with
Bolyai, as their thought ran along very similar lines, and
in many cases overlapped.

Johann Bolyai de Bolyai was born in Klausenburg,
Transylvania, December 15, 1802. His father was
Wolfgang Bolyai, a professor of the reformed college
of Maros Vasarhely, noted for his mathematical abilities.
His father relates that young Johann would spring before
him “like a devil” when he was teaching mathematics;
no sooner had he enunciated a problem than the child
would give the solution and command him to go further.
As a thirteen-year-old boy, his father sometimes sent him
to fill his place when incapacitated from taking his classes.

MATHEMATICAL PROOFS 17 1

His pupils listened to him with more attention than to his
father, for they found him clearer to understand.

In a letter to Gauss, Wolfgang Bolyai writes;

“ My son is first lieutenant of engineers, and will soon
be captain. He is a fine youth, a good violin player, a
skilful fencer, and brave, but has had many duels, and is
wild even for a soldier. Yet is he distinguished — light
in darkness and darkness in light! He is an impassioned
mathematician with extraordinary capacities . . . He
will think more of your judgment on his work than of
all Europe.”

Gauss replied, saying that the conclusions which
Bolyai had reached were so strikingly similar to his
own, — reached years before, — that he would not now
publish his — and in fact never did so, dying without
writing anything concerning his thoughts on these prob¬
lems.

It is now time that we turn our attention to the ac¬
tual work of Lobatchewsky and particularly Bolyai. It
will be Impossible for us to do more than mention briefly
some of their conclusions, and even then to deal with them
simply and more or less inadequately. At the same time,
these simple illustrations will serve to indicate the nature
of the work undertaken by these men, so little known.
We might say that they dealt in meta- or hyper-geometry.

To illustrate, very simply, some of their conclusions, let
us take a plane surface covered with dots, equi-distant
from one another, and so arranged that, by joining four
of them, a square is thereby formed. A number of
squares, adjacent to one another can be drawn, by con¬
tinuing the lines; the sides touch, and four squares meet
at a point. If a square be made by joining four points or
dots diagonally, this square will “ inclose ” one point,

172 modern psychical phenomena

which may be said to belong to it. On the other hand,
points at the corners of a square do not altogether “ he-
long to it, because three other squares can always be
drawn from this point, and they “ share ” this point with
the original square. Thus, a cornerpoint may be counted
always as Oite-quarter belonging to any given square
(see Diagram, Fig. i).

If the square be larger, and the line forming its side
run through one or more points, then these points on the
side lines belong half to this square, and half to the
adjacent square, — since half of each one of these points

MATHEMATICAL PROOFS

173

may be said to be shared equally by the adjoining square.
(Fig. 4-)

A “diagonal” square (Fig. 2) is equal In volume to
two regular squares, as may be shown In two ways.
First, the Forty-seventh Proposition in Euclid tells us
that “ The square described on the hypothenuse of a
right-angled triangle is equal to the sum of the squares
described on the other two sides.” And it will be seen
(Fig. 3) that ABC is a right-angled triangle. Secondly,
counting points, we reach the same conclusion. AEDC
enclosing one point, and having four at the corners, val¬
ued at one-quarter each, would be equal to two whole
points. The two small squares both contain four quarter-
points each, but neither of them “ Includes ” any whole
points. Total for the two small squares — two whole
points; total for the large square — two whole points.
According to this method of reckoning, therefore, their
area Is equal; and this may be shown to be the case with
any figures of this kind.

Now, suppose we wished to know the whereabouts of
the points, supposing that a large square containing a
number of points be revolved about one point as an axis.
We can find this very simply in a square whose side con¬
tains five unit-points. (Fig. 4.) Revolving the square
ACDE about the point A, and counting the points, we
find that It contains, in this position, 24 In the interior, 4
at the corners (counted as one-quarter each), giving 25
in all. The square on AB contains 9 In its interior, 4 at
the corners (equal i) and 4 sides, with 3 on each side,
counted as i ^ on each side, because shared equally by
two squares, (equal 6). This Is a total of 16 points for
this square. Counting In the same way, we obtain 9
points for the square on BC; or a total of 25 in all.

174 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Again, this is equal to the sum of points in the square
ACDE, so that again the square on the hypothenuse is
shown to be equal to the sum of the squares on the other
two sides of the right-angled triangle.

Again, taking the figure AFGH, it is shown by actual
count to yield 25 points — equal to the square ACDE.
But if two squares are equal, we conclude that their sides
are equal, so that AF would, if turned about the point A,
in time coincide with AC.

These facts should be borne in mind, as they arc very
important, and, simple as they are, will enable us to un¬
derstand precisely what follows later.

Now, there are two ways in which the contents or vol¬
ume of a body is not altered; one is when it is rotated
about a point (as in the case of the square just men¬
tioned) ; and the other is in what is called “ shear.” It
consists in exerting pressure along one diagonal, causing it
to be compressed, while allowing expansion in the oppo¬
site direction. It is equivalent to sliding, combined with
a turning movement of the figure. The figure thus be¬
comes elongated; but while it changes its shape, its in¬
ternal volume is not altered thereby.

Material bodies resist “ shear,” which tends to destroy
their internal structure. A fluid, on the other hand, will
shear as readily as it will rotate. Suppose that we could
reduce all bodies to a liquid state, and then make them
solid again, with the changed principle added that they
would shear instead of rotating. Then we should have
a body shear instead of rotating; and while rotation would
rend its structure, shear would not. Inasmuch as shear
does not alter the volume of a body, a being living in a
shear-world would look upon a body sheared as we would
upon a body simply rotated. He would think it the

MATHEMATICAL PROOFS

175

same shape, not simply turned round in space a little.

Now let us see whether this has in any way changed
our fundamental geometrical conceptions — whether
shear-world geometry would be the same as our Euclid’s
geometry. We will again use figures, counting the
points for the volume.

Fig. 5 illustrates an unsheared square. It contains i
point inside, 4 at the corners (equal i), and four at the
side (equal 2), or 3 in all. In Fig. 6 we have a square
of the same size drawn on AB (underneath the line AB) .
It also contains 3 points or dots. The square on CB
contains no dots, but the 4 at the corners equal one.
Hence these two squares together equal 5 points. Ac¬
cording to Euclid’s 47th proposition, the square on AC
should also contain 5 points, but if we count the dots in
the shear-square on this side, we find that it contains, not
5, but 3 points (2 inside, and 4 at the corners). Here
the shear “ square ” on the hypothenuse has not 5 points,
but 3 ; it is not the sum of the squares on the sides but the
difference! This relation always holds. Fig. 7 illus¬
trates this; if the reader will draw the necessary squares
for himself, and count the dots, he will find this to be
true. Here, then, is a complete reversal of Euclid’s 47th
proposition, which would take place in such a shear-world.
Yet the volumes of these bodies would remain the same,
and, to a being living in such a world, no change would
have taken place at all !

Fig. 8 gives an example of this, in which this relation
can be tested. The side of the ordinary square appears
to be turned into the side of the shear-square by simple
turning, for the side of the one becomes the side of the
other. Thus, in Fig. 9, the side AB becomes the side
AC, by simple turning about the point A, and the line AB

176 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

appears to be turned into the line AC, and hence be of
equal length to it. Yet the line AC is longer than the
line AB, as simple measurement will show. So by em¬
ploying shear instead of rotation, we get now properties
for figures — in which the older Euclidian geometry no
longer holds good. These were some of the earlier con¬
clusions reached by Lobatchewsky and Bolyai.

We come now to their work on “ Parallels,” which is
better known than that above mentioned, and is so per¬
plexing, dumbfounding and even annoying to the average
person — transcending common-sense, as it does — that it
is small wonder that few persons — outside professional
mathematicians — have cared to delve into it very deeply,
or puzzle over the paradoxes presented, which are as
puzzling and destined to be as famous, in all probability,
as the famous paradoxes of Zeno. Nevertheless, the
main problem raised can be very readily comprehended,
even by the non-mathematical reader, and will indicate the
degree of subtlety obtained by Lobatchewsky and the
Transylvanian, Bolyai.

Let us recall Euclid’s definition of parallel straight
lines: “Parallel straight lines are straight lines . . .
which do not meet, however far they are produced in
either direction.” Again, the 28th Theorem says that
“ If a straight line cuts two other straight lines and
makes . . . the two interior angles on the same side of
the line equal to two right angles, the two straight lines
will be parallel.” This originally stood in this form as
the nth Axiom. Its truth was always assumed, yet no
one found the means of actually proving it. At last an
Italian, Sacchieri, unable to find a proof, said, “ Let us
suppose it is not true ! ” He tried to prove that there
might be two straight lines drawn through a given point,

MATHEMATICAL PROOFS

177

parallel to a given line, but finding the waters here too
deep for him, he later tried to disprove what he had said
before !

It was at this point that Lobatchewsky and Bolyai en¬
tered the forbidden path. Their temerity beggars belief.
Take a line AB, and a point C. We say and feel that
we know that through C we can only draw one line
(CD) parallel to AB . . . (Fig. 10).

But Bolyai said: “ I will draw twol ” His argument
was as follows: “ Let CD be parallel to AB, that is, not
meet AB, however far produced, and let lines beyond CD
also not meet AB; let there be a certain region between
CD and CE, in which no line drawn meets AB. CE
and CD produced backwards through C will give a similar
region on the other side of C.” (Fig. 1 1.)

As Hinton says: “ Nothing so triumphantly, one may
almost say so insolently, ignoring sense had ever been
written before ... Men had struggled against the limi¬
tations of the body, fought them, despised them,
conquered them. But no one had ever thought simply as
if the body, the bodily eyes, the organs of vision, all this
vast experience of space had never existed. The age¬
long contest of the soul with the body, the struggle for
mastery, had come to a culmination. Bolyai and Lo¬
batchewsky simply thought as if the body were not. The
struggle for dominion, the strife and combat of the soul
were over; they had mastered, and the Hungarian drew
his line.”

Later, Beltrami showed that the geometry of Lo¬
batchewsky and Bolyai was the geometry of shortest
lines drawn on certain curved surfaces. (Fig. 12.)
Thus, let ABCD be the equator of a globe; AP, BP,
meridian lines drawn to the pole P. The lines AB, AP,

178 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

BP, would seem to be perfectly straight to a person mov¬
ing on the surface of the sphere, and unconscious of its
curvature. Now AP and BP both make right angles
with AB. Hence they satisfy the definition of parallels.
Yet they meet at P. Hence a being living on a spherical
surface, and unconscious of its curvature, would find that
parallel lines would meet. He would also find the angles
in a triangle were greater than two right angles. In the
triangle PAB, for instance, the angles A and B are right
angles, so that the three angles of the triangle PAB are
greater than two right angles!

Regarding “ parallels ” there is, of course, also the
paradox propounded by the famous Arabian mathema¬
tician. He said that, if you take lines not quite parallel,
they will meet if produced. They will meet, say, a mile
or a thousand or a billion miles away — but still meet.
Now, it is inconceivable, he said, that we can give one
final tilt to these lines, and that this final tilt will be suffi¬
cient to take them from the realm of the finite into that
of the infinite — from the point where they will meet
somewhere (no matter how far away) to the point where
they will meet nowhere. Yet this has been shown to be
possible in other directions. For example: —

“As far back as i88i. Professor Thompson pointed
out that a charge of electricity In motion sets up a drag
in the ether through which it moves — just as the arma¬
ture of a dynamo sets up a drag In its magnetic field,
which makes it increasingly difficult to turn. This drag,
or resistance to motion, makes the charge appear to pos¬
sess inertia, weight or mass, which is a characteristic of
matter. Subsequently, Sir Oliver Lodge calculated how
much this increase of inertia would be in a body of given
mass, and carrying a given electrical charge, at varying

MATHEMATICAL PROOFS

179

speeds. He found that, at half the speed of light, which
travels at the rate of 186,000 miles a second, this ap¬
parent increase in mass would be equal to .12 of the
body’s actual mass, when in a state of rest. At .9 the
speed of light, the body would behave as though it were
1.8 times as heavy, while at 99 per cent of the speed of
light, its mass would appear to be 3.28 times as great.
At 99.5 per cent, this number jumped suddenly to 5 ; and
between 99.5 per cent and the actual speed of light, it
jumped from 5 to — infinity !

“ From the foregoing, it is obvious that no particle
of matter can ever attain a speed greater than that of
light, for, though it were only the size of a corpuscle
when it started, if it be conceived of as attaining a speed
greater than that of light, it must be conceived of, also,
as having acquired a mass greater than that of the Uni¬
verse.” Stephen F. Austin, B. A. {The Principles of
Dramatherapy, p. 119.)

Let us now go back to mathematics — beginning with
very simple and well-known facts, so that every step may
be plain even to the non-mathematical reader. We will
begin by explaining what is meant by the so-called “ in¬
commensurable quantities.”

When we multiply a number by itself a certain number
of times we are said to raise it to a certain power of that
number. Thus, 4 X 4 is called the second power of 4;
4X4X4 is called the third power of 4, etc. The
power we usually signify by a small number at the right-
hand top corner of the number, so multiplied: 4.^ The
small number is called the Index. On the other hand,
the number which gives rise to a power — which is thus
multiplied — is called the root.

i8o MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

The sign V is used to denote the root of a number; a
small figure written in front of it, what root is ab¬
stracted; e. g. ® V is the fifth root.

Now, some numbers have an exact root; others have
not. Thus, the cube root of 27 is 3 ; the square root of
7569 = 87 exactly, etc. But some numbers have no exact
root, even when carried to an indefinite number of deci¬
mal points. The root cannot be expressed as a fraction,
that is. Such roots as these are called surds, or irrational
quantities.

When the relationship between two quantities cannot
be expressed in exact figures, these quantities are said
to be “ incommensurable ” with one another; they are
incommensurahles. The relation of the diameter to the
circumference of a circle is a good example of this. The
circumference Is a little more than three times the di¬
ameter; it is 3 + a number of decimals. For practical
purposes, however five decimal points are enough; we
usually express this relationship by the Greek letter
which stands for 3.14159. But these decimals could
be carried on for ever without ever arriving at an exact
answer. There is no end to the calculation; the sum
would never be finished. In 1873, Mr. Shanks carried
out the computation to over 700 decimal points. Thus
we see there Is here a known and certain relationship,
which cannot be exactly expressed. We know it exists;
but we cannot express it. (It is because of this fact —
because we cannot ever ascertain the exact numerical
value of, tt, that the circle can never be “ squared ” ; since
part of the problem consists In knowing the exact value
of tt.)

The reason why we cannot exactly represent certain
relationships mathematically is because, whereas length

MATHEMATICAL PROOFS

1 8 1

is continuous, number Is essentially discontinuous. As
Sir Oliver Lodge has expressed It : “ Numerical expression
is more like a staircase than a slope; it necessarily pro¬
ceeds by steps; it is discontinuous.” {Easy Mathematics,
p. 187.) But between each of these steps, further sub¬
divisions can theoretically be made, ad infinitum. Here
we run up against one of the greatest problems in meta¬
physics — the continuity of time and space. These two
problems remained for centuries unsolved; and it was
only the brilliant work of Georg Cantor which ultimately
brought about their (mathematical) solution.

This question of discontinuity crops up again in our
conception of the material world. Until a few years ago,
relatively, it was thought that solid matter was con¬
tinuous; but now it is known that the atoms move in
comparatively free space “ like specks of dust in the air,”
and that there is a medium — the ether — between them.
But what of the ether? Is it continuous? If so, how
does matter exist within it? and if not, is there still a
finqr ether, between the atoms of the ether we know?
Cannot we follow this path indefinitely — as in mathe¬
matics?

Similarly, matter Itself seems to shade-off Into the non-
material in a perfectly graduated system. Solid, liquid,
gas are the three states of matter known to us. Recent
researches have shown us that the atom itself is probably
only a point of force — a stress within the ether. It is
the expression of energy. But energy is non-material —
as we know it. Purely from the standpoint of physical
science, then, we are led Into an Immaterial world — of
which the material universe we see is merely the outward
expression.

We must now return to our mathematics, however (the

i82 modern psychical phenomena

bearing of all this will be apparent later on). Consider,
for a '■moment what is meant by a “negative quantity.”
It is one that is less than nothing! Strictly speaking, it
cannot exist; it is not an actuality. It is less than
nothing; and nothing is nothing! Yet we write — 7 with
the greatest ease ! Symbolically, it represents to us a
quantity as much below Zero as that number would be
above it, were the sign plus before it. It is a mere sym¬
bol. The actual number does not exist, save in the mind.
It is an imaginary quantity. This leads us naturally to a
discussion of the question of “ Imaginary quantities.”

Quantities having like signs (plus or minus) are always
positive; those having unlike signs are negative. We can
abstract the root of a positive number, but it is impossible,
arithmetically, to obtain the root of a negative quantity.
It cannot be done. (See Hall and Knight, Higher Alge¬
bra, p. 74.) It becomes meaningless, because we cannot
obtain the root of something which is less than nothing.
Hence, the symbol: — i, which frequently occurs in

mathematical investigations, expresses some new quantity
which cannot be regarded as either positive or negative.
It is neither less than, nor greater than, i. It is a purely
“ imaginary quantity,” — usually written i. Here then,
we have a quantity, which we know to exist, which ac¬
tually exists in thought, but which cannot be expressed
in the physical world. It remains purely ideal or mental.
Here, then, we have absolute proof that the mind of man
can deal satisfactorily and rationally with ideas which
transcend the physical realm; mentally man can employ
symbols which on the physical plane are nonsense. Yet
these imaginary quantities are real ! But if these imagi¬
nary quantities are real in the mental world, but unreal
here, it seems to prove to us that such a world actually

MATHEMATICAL PROOFS 183

exists — a world more real and more inclusive than the
physical world we know. If imaginary quantities are
real in a spiritual world, then such a spiritual world must
exist — for otherwise such quantities could not exist.
Hence, we arrive at our “ mathematical proof of spirit,”
which may be stated thus; Just as real numbers may be
used symbolically to express the various things of the
physical world, so, in a similar manner, imaginary quan¬
tities may be used symbolically, to express the various
things of the metaphysical or spiritual world. We are
enabled thereby to pass from the physical to the spiritual
realms — for employing mathematical methods for the
elucidation of this greatest of all problems. Further
implications to be drawn from this theory are also per¬
fectly clear. Thus :

“ Real numbers will only make real numbers, juggle
with them as we will. We can never create imaginary
numbers out of them. In fact, the very existence of
imaginary quantities — and the bridge from these quan¬
tities to real numbers — was only rendered possible by
men’s minds. On the other hand, we can pass very read¬
ily from an imaginary to a real number — since it can be
shown that the fourth power of any imaginary number is
a positive real number — showing that imaginary num¬
bers are ‘ real,’ in one sense — that is, existent in some
sphere. A real number cannot generate an imaginary
quantity; but an imaginary quantity can generate a real
number.” (Redgrove.)

Now this is a highly significant fact. For it seems to
show us that, while spirit is not caused by matter, yet
matter may find its origin in the spiritual world. Hence
“evolution” — the continual outpouring of the soiritual
into the material world as many ph’1oco'^l-«»rc h?v“ taught.

1 84 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

The relation of spirit to matter is causal, not the reverse.
The spiritual world is the “ real ” — behind, beyond, and
more inclusive than the physical. The existence of this
spiritual world is, moreover, subject to mathematical
demonstration — as I trust I have shown in the fore¬
going.

“ God geometrizes,” said Plato. In truth, number
seems to lie at the root of all things — material and
spiritual.

CHAPTER XII

THE SEXES HEREAFTER: DO THEY CONTINUE
TO EXIST?

Whether men or women continue to be such in the next
life — whether their relations to one another are the same
as they are now, or whether these relations are changed
— is a question which every thoughtful man puts to him¬
self, doubtless, at one time or another. If we accepted
the religion of the Turks, Heaven would be one large
harem — but then, women do not play any part in their
religion. On the other hand, we have the Christian be¬
lief, that “ there shall be neither marriage nor giving in
marriage ” in the next sphere; and if this be interpreted
in a certain manner, it would seem to indicate the cessa¬
tion of the present relationship between the sexes. As we
know, there was much dispute, a short time ago, as to the
sex of Angels — some contending that they are male, and
others that they must be female; while a third sect prefers
to believe that they are neither the one nor the other, but
rather a nondescript sort of being, which combines and
unifies the two sexual qualities in one. If that were true
universally, there would be, of course, an end to all rela¬
tions of the present kind between the sexes in any future
state of existence. In this question, every man and
woman is necessarily entitled to a hearing — to an
opinion.

To some minds it may appear “ sacrilegious ” to dis¬
cuss a question of this sort — whether or not beings in the
next sphere of life possess sex; but after all, why should
we not? If we are going to be one of them some day

185

1 86 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

ourselves, we naturally want to know what is “ coming to
us,” as well as we can, and what we are going to be!
Again, the worthy fathers of the Church discussed many
facts no more odd than this — for instance, how many
angels can dance upon the point of a needle — if they
occupy no space. (And if they occupy space, they must
be material, it was argued.) Disputes of this kind have
always arisen, and, in this age of free-thinking, it is not
to be wondered at that we should ask ourselves this vital
question — which so intimately concerns ourselves. Will
there be, then, sex in the next life, or shall we be bisexual
beings — having the qualities and attributes of both male
and female within ourselves?

Only recently. Dr. L. P. Jacks, editor of the Hibhert
Journal in his presidential address before the Society for
Psychical Research, said:

“We will assume then that communications, genuine
communications, are taking place; and, dismissing from
our minds the notion that they are coming from disem¬
bodied spirits or from another world, we will let the com¬
munications themselves tell us where they are coming
from, and what kind of beings they are who are making
them. . . . To begin with, these communicating beings,
wherever they are, and whoever they may be, quite ob¬
viously retain the distinction of sex. They make use of
the personal pronoun masculine and feminine; they speak
of one another as ‘ he ’ and ‘ she ’ ; they employ the dis¬
tinction with no discernible difference of meaning from
that with which we are all familiar. This suggests at
once that the communicating beings stand with ourselves on
a common biological ground; and since biological facts,
like all other facts, are not isolated, but form part of a
context in which the whole order of nature is involvedv

THE SEXES HEREAFTER

187

we could from this one fact alone build out a whole system
to correspond, just as the palaeontologist when he dis¬
covers the bone of an extinct animal can reconstruct the
whole animal to which it belonged. This, I say, we
could do; and the only thing that has prevented us doing
it hitherto is the notion that everything we are going to
discover must bear a ‘ spiritual ’ sense, must mean some¬
thing other than it would mean if it occurred in the known
order — that is, may mean anything we choose to make it
mean. Dismissing that notion, we find ourselves in the
presence of a fact enormously rich in implications.
These beings retain the distinction of sex.” {Hibbert
Journal July, 1917, pp. 619-20.)

The first question which arises within the mind, conse¬
quently, is this: There being no material or physical
bodies in the next life, how can sex be possible? The
male and female sexes, as we know, are represented and
symbolized — very largely at least — by the corporeal
peculiarities of the sexes; and, in addition to the mental
differences, these are so distinctive that many cannot think
of them as being otherwise than they are — and keep
the idea of male and female apart in their minds.

But there are two answers to this ! In the first place,
there are several schools which contend that, in the next
sphere of activity — whatever that may be — we have a
sort of astral body or etherlc body exactly resembling the
physical body in all its internal and external aspects, and
if this were true, of course the present status of the sexes
would remain. Even St. Paul, as we know, said that we
have a material body and a “ spiritual body ” and where
is the actual detail to end, if this be true? If every part
of the body has a symbolic, spiritual counterpart — as we
are told — then the strictly physical body of man and

1 88 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

woman must be duplicated In all Its detail In the next life;
and In that case, life there would be very much the same
as It is here — which a large number of religious and
psychic students believe to be the case.

In the second place, there Is a way of looking at the
facts which does not necessitate this view. According to
this theory, the essential polarity between the sexes would
still be maintained. In all essentials, but the physical coun¬
terparts would necessarily be lacking. To make this
clearer:

A woman is not only a female human being, she Is also
feminine In all her tastes, points of view, and in her atti¬
tude to life. She is a woman throughout, mentally and
spiritually no less than bodily. The same is true of a
man. He Is masculine throughout. No man can ever
look at the world as a woman does; and no woman can
see it in the same light as a man. This is the reason why
the sexes are fundamentally opposite, and do not under¬
stand each other better than they do. Women think that
men ought to see things as they do and vice versa. Only
when this fundamental distinction between the sexes is
recognized, will this be overcome.

Granting this extreme difference, then — this “ sexual
polarity ” — we can see why men and women are attracted
to one another — Independent of the actual physical mag¬
netism which may be present at the time. They admire
one another, because of their rnental and spiritual differ¬
ences. The love-nature of one flows toward the other
In a sort of stream; and this is likewise returned. Ac¬
companying this* interchange of vital, magnetic currents,
the feelings of love penetrate the very heart and soul of
the lover and the beloved; and the stronger these vital,
magnetic interchanges become, the greater the feelings

THE SEXES HEREAFTER

189

of love, the more rapturous the thrills that race through
the veins, at the proximity of the loved one. It is the
interchange of these life love-currents which does this.
Here, on the physical plane, where matter impedes the
outflow of the spirit, material contact may be necessary
to bring about this rapturous exchange of reciprocal emo¬
tion; but once this physical barricade be removed, then
all the rapture of the most perfect love may be exchanged,
without the tinge of animality which is here associated
with it.

Years ago, Swedenborg wrote words of wisdom upon
this subject, when he said: —

I also spake with the angels concerning conjugal love, or
that which exists between two conjugal partners who love one
another, that it is the innermost of all loves, and such that partner
sees partner in mind and spirit, — so that each partner has the
other in himself or herself, that is, that the image, nay, the like¬
ness of the husband is in the mind of the wife, and the image
and likeness of the wife in the mind of the husband, so that
one sees the other in himself, and thus they sexually come to¬
gether in their inmosts. . . . This was represented by angelic
ideas, which cannot be expressed by words. . . .

Dr. W. H. Holcombe, of London, who has written a
profound treatise on this subject of the relations of the
sexes hereafter, says, in emphasizing his views of the es¬
sential “ polarity ” between the sexes, and the form of its
expression : —

Sex, love and marriage are universal and eternal; and the ideal
universe is a universe perfectly married or equilibriated in its
male and female elements.

•The Lord infuses love or spiritual heat through the feminine
form, and wisdom and spiritual light through the masculine
form. Heat alone, or light alone, is powerless; combined or mar¬
ried, they produce all things. ...

190 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Every male form in the universe has a female form, its comple¬
ment, its eternal and necessary counterpart; and these forms,
having specific affinities, are ever striving for union.

The Lord has instituted the marriage of one man and one
woman as a means whereby the love of the sex into which we are
born shall be changed into the love of one of the sex only, and
the marriage of spiritual heat and light, of love and wisdom, be
effected in the soul. . . .

An unmarried man receives influx into his love principle from
the whole sphere of the female sex, which generates in him the
love of the sex. However sweet, tender and elevating this civi¬
lized sphere may be, it cannot have the effect, the power of the
concentrated love-current of some one woman, absorbing from
him his corresponding wisdom-element, and returning it to him —
through undlscoverable avenues — vivified and utilized for a
noble life. . . .

Marriage is an institution which brings new influences to bear,
which causes a direct and reciprocal and powerful spiritual cur¬
rent from one sex to the other, capable of producing incalculable
evil or incalculable good. If the parties discharge their duties
toward each other with conscientious fidelity, they enjoy Immense
advantages over those not married. For there is a constant in¬
terchange of properties, which tends continually to elevate them
and unite them together. They take on each others’ mental states.
The woman absorbs the interior will of the man and blends it
with her own ; and the man elevates her understanding into a
spiritual light into which his own mind has penetrated by loving.
. . . They grow more and more alike interiorly, increasing their
spiritual power and perception by the union. The man rises into
higher stages of wisdom, the woman into higher states of love;
and so, by mutual help and inspiration, they approach ever nearer
and nearer the Source, the Fountain of all love and all wisdom.

There are marriages in Heaven, then, we are assured
— not formal marriages, as we understand them, per¬
haps, but their spiritual counterparts. Two souls which
have a direct and powerful affinity for one another are
conjoined together in life and light; they come together;
theirs is a “ marriage of souls.” But it is more than

THE SEXES HEREAFTER

191

that! They also experience all the thrills, the pangs, the
emotions of love which we experience here upon the
physical plane, by reason of the vital, magnetic currents
which flow from one to the other, and which in turn
generate the feeling and the emotions associated with the
highest love. They are as truly “ married ” as any one
here can be — and as fully. They live together; they
love, they are happy!

Are there children in the spiritual world, then, as the
result of these marriages? Seers who have studied this
question most deeply tell us that there are no children
in our sense of the word — for these must be born in
the material world, according to its laws — but there
are “ spiritual prolifications,” or increments in love and
wisdom, and the delights that flow therefrom, as the re¬
sult of their love; and that these correspond — upon the
spiritual plane — to children in our earth life. Thus
the relation of the sexes is maintained, and they
become more blended and united to one another, through
the power and the bonds of true love — which exists as
truly hereafter as it does now !

CHAPTER XIII

PSYCHIC HEALING: SHELL SHOCK

The “ power of the mind over the body ” has been a
common expression in medical literature for the past fifty
years — ever since Dr. Hack-Tuke wrote his elaborate
work of that name. And yet, strictly speaking, it is not
the mind so much as the emotions which affect the body,
for good or ill. The emotions are the things which cause
the havoc — or effect the cure ! Anger, fear, worry, will
offset the best meal, and frequently cause indigestion —
given the best food and surroundings. On the other
hand, hope, love, faith, cheer — all the higher and more
aspiring emotions will stimulate the bodily functions and
arouse them into more active and forceful expression.

Taking the emotions and the mental life — the
thoughts — to mean the same thing, however, for the
time being, it is certainly true that the mental life does
affect the body and its functionings very much. In or¬
der that the reader may understand the principle upon
which mental cures depend, it will be necessary to say a
few words regarding the modern conception as to the
“ structure ” of the mind — the mental life — since, upon
this, much depends.

The older conception of the mind, then, was that it was
a sort of sphere — a thing which could be caught, and
which was not at all capable of division or multiplication.
The newer idea is that the mind of man is a complex
thing — a result, a product. It resembles — to employ
an analogy often used — a rope, composed of a number

192

PSYCHIC HEALING

193

of smaller “ strands.” Usually, and under normal,
healthy conditions, these “ strands ” are held together by
means of the will, and by attention. But under certain
abnormal and exceptional circumstances, the mind may
“ go to pieces,” disintegrate, and then we have a multi¬
tude of ills, mental and physical, ending in complete in¬
sanity.

Now, in order to keep the mind in a healthy condition,
it is only necessary to live a normal mental and physical
life — and to keep the mind “ objective,” as it were, and
interested in things of this world. As soon as it becomes
too “ introspective,” as soon as day-dreaming is allowed,
and the mind is not constantly and actively exercised, then
it tends to “ go to pieces,” and these harmful results fol¬
low. Emotional shocks will also have the same effect.

Now, as soon as the mind has “ gone to pieces ” in this
way (disintegration of the mind, as it is called) then
odd physical phenomena begin to manifest also. For as
the mind controls the body so various parts of the mind
control various parts of the body. So long as they all
work in unison, all goes well; but when they all begin
acting for themselves, then disharmony manifests in the
physical organism.

One part of the body in such a case, would be con¬
trolled by one part of the mind; another by another por¬
tion, and they might not act “ together ” or in unison.
If not, then trouble will have begun.

This is what happens in cases of so-called hysteria.
For many years, the nature of this odd disease was a mys¬
tery to the medical fraternity, and its true nature only
became manifest when the theory of disintegration of
the mind was proved correct. Then the complex and odd
phenomena, formerly observed, were seen to be true.

196 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

shown that the emotions have an actual effect upon the
vital chemistry of the body. Prof. Elmer Gates, of
Washington, D. C., made a number of very interesting
experiments some years ago, in which he proved that the
varying emotions produced different chemicals In the
blood stream; and these chemicals, if passed into a certain
solution, produced certain “ precipitates ” of different
colours. Thus, anger produced a shade of dirty red;
envy a dull green; fear a slate grey; love and hope a
bright yellowish gold, etc. There was, then, an actual
chemical change in the body and its blood, as the result of
these varying emotions. The blood was either poisoned
or the reverse, by these emotions, and this, of course,
reacted upon the whole body.

While our mental life — our stream of thought — is
more or less under the direct control of the mind and
will, the emotions are all unconscious, and are not under
this control. Thus, the phenomenon of blushing is con¬
trolled by an emotional state, which in turn expresses it¬
self in bodily form by dilating the blood vessels of the
face and neck, and a “ blush ” is the result. This is
doubtless done in order to relieve the congestion of blood
which results in the head as the result of the emotion in¬
duced; but whatever its ulterior cause may be, it is certain
that there is an effect which is involuntary, and is not
under the control of the mind and will. These “ vaso¬
motor reflexes ” are in some way unconsciously controlled
by the sub-conscious mind; and there is no way of telling
how far this influence and power may extend — for good
or evil !

For instance, it is on record that a man has read a
telegram containing some terrible news, and dropped
dead in consequence. This is an extreme case. Going

PSYCHIC HEALING

197

further down the scale, we have cases where the patient
has starved to death In a few days or a week when lost in
the jungle without food. Physiologically speaking, it
would have been impossible for that person to have
starved to death in so short a time. Physiologically im¬
possible! Yet it happened. The mental state was re¬
sponsible. And so on. It would be easy to cite scores
of cases, showing that the sub-conscious mind has a tre¬
mendous effect upon the body in this way, and that its
power either for good or harm is very potent and far-
reaching.

To what an extent the emotions influence the life, and
the actual physiological mechanism of the body, may be
seen from the recent experiments in so-called “ psycho¬
galvanic reflexes.” These reflexes have actually been
turned into a very useful purpose — to detect crime —
the principle resting upon the fact just quoted. It is
accomplished in this way:

If a weak electric current is passed through the human
body a certain “ resistance ” is recorded, which is reg¬
istered by a needle on a dial (galvanometer). If the
resistance of the body changes In any way, this is at once
shown by the needle, which fluctuates or varies as the
resistance of the body varies. This difference of resist¬
ance is probably created by the degree of moisture of
the hands (where the poles of the battery are attached),
etc. This sweat is brought out by the emotion excited.
The emotion thus causes a real change In the amount of
current passed and this is shown by the needle.

Now, If a series of questions be asked a criminal, some
of them containing words which (If innocent) should
arouse no emotion in him, but (if guilty) would create an
emotion of fear, etc., then he will react to these questions.

196 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

shown that the emotions have an actual effect upon the
vital chemistry of the body. Prof. Elmer Gates, of
Washington, D. C., made a number of very interesting
experiments some years ago, in which he proved that the
varying emotions produced different chemicals in the
blood stream; and these chemicals, if passed into a certain
solution, produced certain “ precipitates ” of different
colours. Thus, anger produced a shade of dirty red;
envy a dull green; fear a slate grey; love and hope a
bright yellowish gold, etc. There was, then, an actual
chemical change in the body and its blood, as the result of
these varying emotions. The blood was either poisoned
or the reverse, by these emotions, and this, of course,
reacted upon the whole body.

For instance, it is on record that a man has read a
telegram containing some terrible news, and dropped
dead in consequence. This is an extreme case. Going

PSYCHIC HEALING

197

further down the scale, we have cases where the patient
has starved to death in a few days or a week when lost in
the jungle without food. Physiologically speaking, it
would have been impossible for that person to have
starved to death in so short a time. Physiologically im¬
possible! Yet it happened. The mental state was re¬
sponsible. And so on. It would be easy to cite scores
of cases, showing that the sub-conscious mind has a tre¬
mendous effect upon the body in this way, and that its
power either for good or harm is very potent and far-
reaching.

If a weak electric current is passed through the human
body a certain “ resistance ” is recorded, which is reg¬
istered by a needle on a dial (galvanometer). If the
resistance of the body changes in any way, this is at once
shown by the needle, which fluctuates or varies as the
resistance of the body varies. This difference of resist¬
ance is probably created by the degree of moisture of
the hands (where the poles of the battery are attached),
etc. This sweat is brought out by the emotion excited.
The emotion thus causes a real change in the amount of
current passed and this is shown by the needle.

Now, if a series of questions be asked a criminal, some
of them containing words which (if innocent) should
arouse no emotion in him, but (if guilty) would create an
emotion of fear, etc., then he will react to these questions.

198 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

and show the absence or presence of fear through the
variations of the electric needle. The emotions may,
therefore, be used as a test for criminals, and have actu¬
ally been so employed, in some cases, in the courts.

SHELL SHOCK

Doubtless one of the greatest uses to which psychic
healing has been put of late years, however, is in curing
cases of so-called “ shell shock ” — that baffling malady,
of which the great world war has furnished us so many
examples. We know that hypnotism and other methods
of psychic treatment have benefited or cured many
hundreds of these cases; and we further know that, while
many cases consist in “ hysterical symptoms grafted onto
an organic basis,” as Dr. Arthur F. Hurst expressed It
{Medical Diseases of the War, p. 51), there are also
many cases of shell shock among soldiers who have never
been to the front at all — or seen an exploding shell.
(I myself have seen many such.) This being so, we are
forced to inquire further as to the origin and nature of
this curious malady. When the first cases returned from
the front, and were studied at the base hospitals in France
and England, they were not at all understood. Even ex¬
pert opinion seemed to be divided into two schools or
classes — both of which we now know to be wrong.

The first theory was to the effect that the subject of
shell shock was merely feigning illness; that he was cow¬
ardly, hysterical, malingering — in short, a slacker, who
was attempting to postpone the evil day of his return to
the front by pretending an illness which he did not ac¬
tually have. When we take into consideration the lack of
apparent injury, and the contradictory and bizarre nature
of many of the symptoms, we can perhaps hardly blame

PSYCHIC HEALING

199

the earlier investigators for their conclusions. We now
know, however, that they were far from the truth. The
unfortunate invalid is indeed a sick man — a very sick
man — and is by no means feigning his disability.
To be told to “ buck up,” under such circum¬
stances, is little less than cruelty. The man suffering
from shell shock is as legitimate a candidate for the hos¬
pital as one suffering from a broken leg or a deep, ex¬
posed wound.

The second theory, held by the opposite school, was
that the injury was indeed real, but that the bodily and
mental symptoms noted were due to internal injuries to
the brain and nervous system. Delicate, minute tears
and ruptures of the brain tissues were thought to exist.
Cure, therefore, would consist in curing them, or allowing
nature to cure them; and to this end rest, diet, and electric
or other treatments were prescribed.

We now know that this second theory is also erroneous.
During the present war there have doubtless been many
instances of shell shock due to nervous and spinal lesions,
rupture of the inner blood-vessels, and similar injuries.
The vast majority of cases, however, are not due to such
causes, but are purely psychic in origin.

This at first sight appears contradictory, and even ab¬
surd. When a shell bursts in the immediate vicinity of a
soldier, he is knocked unconscious; and when he revives,
perhaps hours later, to find himself mentally blank, with¬
out memory of the event, unable to perform the slightest
mental feat, crippled, paralysed, bent double, maimed,
unable to sit or to stand erect — to say that such condi¬
tions are psychic, or due to the mind, may seem ridicu¬
lous. Experience has shown it to be true, nevertheless.

Continued observation and experiments have enabled

200 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

physicians to understand with great exactitude how this
all conies about; and knowing how it comes about, to cure
it also. The great majority of shell-shock cases are now
cured. Indeed, many of them are not serious; that is
one of the great and blessed discoveries which has come
to light as the result of the present war.

In order to understand all this, and, further, how shell
shock can be cured, it will be necessary, first of all, to de¬
scribe the nature and manifestations of this curious and
distressing malady.

In addition to the well-known physical symptoms —
contracture, cramps, paralysis, and so forth — there are
also subjective disturbances, which are apt to go undis¬
covered in a cursory examination of the patient, but are
frequently more serious than the objective ones. They
are experienced by thousands of patients who to the cas¬
ual observer may present no more signs of abnormality
than a slight tremor, a stammer, or a depressed or ex¬
cited expression. Among these afflictions are loss of
memory, insomnia, terrifying dreams, pains, emotional
instability, diminution of self-confidence and self-control,
attacks of unconsciousness or of changed consciousness,
sometimes accompanied by convulsive movements re¬
sembling those characteristic of epileptic fits. Incapacity
to understand any but the simplest matters, obsessive
thoughts, usually of the gloomiest and most painful kind,
and in some cases even hallucinations and incipient de¬
lusions.

Such patients may show no outward Indications of the
terrible realities within and at first they were thought to
be pretending illness. Fortunately, we have learned bet¬
ter, and no soldiers in any future war will suffer from the

PSYCHIC HEALING

201

errors committed in this direction during the early months
of the war from which we have just emerged.

In a recent paper read before the Philadelphia Neu¬
rological Society, and printed In the Medical Record,
Dr. E. Murray Auer, who for some time was attached to
the Twenty-Second General Hospital of the British Expe¬
ditionary Force, drew attention to many cases of this
character. Speaking of the after-effects of shell shock,
and comparing them with such cases as those of men
buried by mine explosions and afterward rescued, he
stated that in his opinion these accidents or shocks often
leave more or less permanent effects upon the men who
undergo them. It may be said, however, that the greater
percentage of cases are now cured, under the latest
methods of treatment.

In practically all cases which were observed by Dr.
Auer, the patient had received no appreciable injury, the
effect being purely mental. One such instance was that
of a boy nineteen years old, who had been for three days
under a sustained and heavy shell-fire. At the end of
that time he was threatened by his sergeant with court-
martial for sleeping while on sentry-duty. This led to
an examination, and the sending of the boy to the hos¬
pital. He was In a stupor for ten days. The same was
true of another soldier who had seen his chum blown to
pieces.

During the period of coma, which in some cases lasted
more than a week, the soldiers gave the Impression that
they again were living through the experiences which had
brought on the stupor. This was evidenced by their ter¬
rified expression. They crouched, started, and stared
wildly when spoken to. One such man rose from his

202 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

bed In the middle of the night and recited in a one-sided
conversation his experience of a charge, and of being
buried by a mine explosion. Then he relapsed into his
state of coma.

Another result of shock is a continued shaking of the
entire body, accompanied by various pains and severe
headaches. In some cases this shaking has been ob¬
served to last several days, and even weeks, although
In most Instances its duration is only a few hours. One
patient had twice been buried in a mine explosion, had
been through an attack and under heavy bombardment
in a trench, and finally was hit by a piece of rock, which,
while not injuring him, knocked him down. In this case
the tremor of the head was marked, and lasted for some
time.

Temporary loss of memory Is a common thing with
men who have been through some extremely try¬
ing period or have suffered a sudden shock. The re¬
covery of the faculty Is generally as sudden as its loss.

One soldier, after being near a shell which exploded,
could remember nothing that happened to him until he
came to himself, walking along a road some time later.
Another man in the hospital thought himself in the
trenches and became violent, moving his cupboard about
as if it were a machine-gun, and pointing it at his enemies.
When he suddenly returned to a normal state, he could
remember nothing of his experience.

One of the most common, and at the same time most
pitiful, of the many mental phenomena of the war Is the
inability to sleep soundly, and the recurrence of so-called
“ trench dreams.” It is not uncommon to see soldiers
start from their beds in the middle of the night, crying
out and weeping, their bodies bathed In perspiration, as

PSYCHIC HEALING

203

they dream of being chased by Germans with bayonets,
or of being buried under debris by a mine explosion, or
of losing the trench in a fog and being unable to get
back.

The fear that is found is not the kind that the layman
might expect. The soldier does not, as a rule, fear in¬
jury to himself. He is afraid of doing something wrong,
of an emergency in which he may fail and lose the con¬
fidence of his comrades. His fear is the fear of being
a coward.

In one instance, the patient was afraid to go to sleep,
for fear he would not wake. One man who had no fear
of being wounded had a wild desire to get away from the
din of battle, and seemed really afraid of the noise.

Blindness and deafness are frequently found, but one
of the most unusual phenomena, in this connection, is the
presence of photophobia — the fear of looking. Many
men complain that they cannot see. In such instances,
when their eyes are opened for them, they can see without
difficulty.

One instance of this came as the result of a trench
dream, in which the soldier again lived through his burial
by a mine explosion four weeks before. When he awoke
he complained that he could not see, and imagined that
his sight had been lost as the result of the explosion.
When his eyelids were raised, however, he could see as
well as before.

The reader may think that all this is a long way from
the subject of shell shock, but as a matter of fact it is not
so. These very symptoms — dreams and all — in fact
enable us to understand the innermost nature of the
disease. They have afforded a key to the mystery, and
have enabled our doctors to effect thousands of cures

204 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

which would never have been made along the old lines of
pure pathology and materia medica.

Both the mental and physical symptoms of many such
“ shock ” cases are really mental, or rather emotional, at
basis. The outward manifestations are expressions of
injuries and lesions, not of the body, but of the psychic
life. To understand this, it is necessary to recount, very
briefly, a few of the more important findings of abnormal
psychology and psychiatry.

Plato’s main argument for the immortality of the soul
was that it was indivisible and therefore indestructible.
Modern psychology, however, has badly shattered this
conception of Plato’s. It has shown us that the human
mind, far from being a unit, a thing, is rather a product,
a resultant, a compound, made up of innumerable layers
or strata; and that as before said it more nearly resem¬
bles a rope, composed of innumerable strands, than a
sphere, as was formerly supposed.

These strands can be bound or held together by our
will, our attention, by all those integrating factors of our
education which compose our modern civilization. On
the other hand, under certain conditions, they may tend
to separate, to break away from the original sheaf, and
to form independent units. This may be due to a variety
of causes — disease, injury, and so forth; but the most
common cause, and the most potent, is doubtless some
form of emotional shock.

Professor Flournoy, In his Spiritism and Psy¬
chology, says:

As a crystal splits under the blow of a hammer when struck
according to certain definite lines of cleavage, in the same way
the human personality, under the shock of excessive emotions, is
sometimes broken along the lines of least resistance, or the great

PSYCHIC HEALING

205

structural lines of its temperament. A cleavage is produced be¬
tween the opposite selves.

Portions of the self become separated, as it were, and
around and about these split-off units gather and accrete
thoughts, emotions, and fears, more or less in common
with them. Each little group is technically known as a
“complex”; and if a complex is unhealthy, and grows
abnormally fast, we have trouble. As a tumour in the
body can press upon some organ, and derange its func¬
tioning, so, in much the same way, this unhealthy com¬
plex — this mental tumour — can press upon the mind
from beneath, as it were, causing it to become diseased
and to function abnormally. And as in the first case the
only radical method of cure is to remove the tumour by a
surgical operation, so in the latter instance the method of
treatment consists in discovering, exploring, and remov¬
ing the complex — the abnormal mental growth. This
is done by certain methods of mental or psychical treat¬
ment.

It has now been definitely established that if we try
to put anything out of the mind, we only succeed in put¬
ting it into the mind. If we repress, and do not express,
trouble is sure to follow. In our civilized and to a great
extent artificial and hypercritical age, repression is the
rule; and it seems probable that most of the nervousness,
neurasthenia, hysteria, and premature “ nervous break¬
downs,” of which we hear so much, are due to this cause.
Repression of the thoughts and the emotions is destructive
to mental and physical health. They should be ex¬
pressed — faced, thought out, felt out, and given vent,
in one form or another.

Many of these thoughts and emotions never rise to
consciousness at all. We never know that we have them.

2o6 modern psychical phenomena

They remain in the subconscious, or unconscious, mind.
And there they ferment, as it were. Among these emo¬
tions, fear is predominant. All of us are constantly in
a state of fear, worry, and anxiety — fear of bad health,
of poverty, of failure, of accident, of a thousand and one
misfortunes which, in the majority of cases, never come
to pass.

This repressed fear is extremely destructive. A man
may not show it by word of act; he may be totally ig¬
norant of the fact that he has it; but it is there, neverthe¬
less, and an analysis of the subconscious mind will reveal
its presence.

In view of these facts, then, let us seek to explain the
genesis of shell shock.

The following is quoted from the valuable treatise of
Smith and Pear:

The suppression of fear and other strong emotions is not de¬
manded only of men in the trenches. It is constantly expected
in ordinary society. But the experience of the war has brought
two facts prominently before us. First, before this epoch of
trench warfare, very few people have been called upon to sup¬
press fear continually for a very long period of time. Secondly,
men feel fear in different ways and in very various degrees.

The first fact accounts for the collapse, under the long-con¬
tinued strain of trench warfare, of men who have repeatedly
shown themselves to be brave and trustworthy. They may have
intense emotions, obviously not of fear alone, for a long time
without displaying any signs of them. But suppression of emo¬
tion is a very exhausting process. As Bacon says, “ We know dis¬
eases of stoppings and suffocations are the most dangerous in the
body; it is not much otherwise in the mind.”

Other emotional states, however, besides fear, arise and require
suppression. The tendency to feel sympathetic pain or distress
at harrowing sights or sounds, disgust or nausea at the happen¬
ings in the trenches, the “ jumpy ” tension in face of unknown
dangers such as mines — all these, like fear, are or have been

PSYCHIC HEALING

207

biologically useful under natural conditions, and, like it, are deeply
and innately rooted in man. But the unnatural conditions of
modern warfare make it necessary that they shall be held in check
for extraordinarily long periods of time.

Now let US see if we cannot trace the actual causes
which, residing in the structure of man, moral and physi¬
cal, lead ultimately to shell shock.

Under the unnatural methods of modern warfare, ‘
long periods of tension, of waiting, are required of the
men in the trenches, under fire, expecting an attack, never
knowing at what moment, and how, the enemy is about
to strike. The primitive vent to these feelings — fight,
attack — is forbidden the soldier. He must wait in a
trench for hours, days, and even weeks at a time, without
even seeing the enemy, yet always knowing that the
enemy is there. He is in the midst of extraordinary and
harrowing sights, sounds, smells, and scenes. He is
constantly repressing his fears, his emotions, all his
natural feelings. Day and night, for weeks together, he
gets insufficient sleep and rest, and perhaps an insufficient
supply of food and water.

A man’s anger cannot be Intensely directed, night and
day, against a trench full of unseen men in the same way
that it can be provoked by an attack upon him by an in¬
dividual. And frequently the assaults made upon him
are wholly Impersonal, undiscriminating, and unpredict¬
able, as in the case of heavy shelling. The one natural
way is forbidden him in which he might give vent to his
pent-up emotion — by rushing out and charging the
enemy. He is thus attacked from within and without.
The noise of the bursting shells, the premonitory sounds
of approaching missiles during exciting periods of wait¬
ing, and the sight of those injured in his vicinity when he

208 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

cannot help them — all these things assail him while at
the same time he may be fighting desperately with him¬
self.

Finally, he may collapse when a shell bursts near him,
though he need not necessarily have been injured by
actual contact with particles of the bursting missile, by
earth thrown up by Its impact, or by gases emanating
from its explosion. He may or may not be rendered un¬
conscious at the time. He is removed from the trenches
unconscious, or In a dazed or delirious condition, with
twitchings, tremblings, or absence of muscular power.

It will be seen that upon this view of the facts the
bursting shell is but the final straw which broke the
camel’s back. The predisposing causes which had been
running along in the Individual, gathering power with
their acceleration and accretion, like a mighty river, have
finally burst the dam; and prostration — utter and com¬
plete, mental, moral, and physical, and more or less dur¬
able — is the result.

To the reader unacquainted with the progress of
modern psychology, it may at first sight appear incredible
that the physical symptoms noted can be due to this sim¬
ple cause. Mental and moral effects — yes; but hardly
the physical! Let us see.

An idea, a thought, an Image In the mind, can almost
instantly make a man as strong as a lion or as weak as
a kitten, according to the nature of the stimulus. Men
have been known to drop dead from reading a telegram.
Fear has killed many a man — and many a woman! If
modern psychology has proved anything, it has proved
what is commonly known as the influence of the mind
over the body. It has also shown us, of late years, that
hysteria, psychasthenia, neurasthenia, and the like, are

PSYCHIC HEALING

209

all due to subconscious fears and emotions, repressed or
unperceived; and that the way to cure these states is to
uncover the unconscious, discover the cause, and remove
it. When this has been done, the patient is well.

Dr. Cannon has recently shown us, in his valuable
book. Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear, and
Rage, how great these influences are, and to what an
extraordinary extent the emotions affect the body. One
might almost say that there is no limit to their influence —
for evil, and possibly for good also.

The symptoms of shell shock have already been de¬
scribed. Many of its victims, when they come to and
realize their condition, think that they have become in¬
sane. Many doctors thought so, too, at the beginning
of the war; but now we know better. We have learned
that the majority of such cases are curable.

It is at this point that modern psychology steps in; and
it is here that some of the best work in the war has been
done. The diagnosis and cure of such cases is a remark¬
able achievement; but it has been successfully accom¬
plished in many thousands of instances. As I empha¬
sized in my Psychical Phenomena and the JVar: —

A gigantic psychological experiment is being undertaken in
Europe. As never before certain psychological and psychical phe¬
nomena present themselves for investigation and solution ; and
these should assuredly be studied with as much care and exactitude
as the wounds, injuries, and pathological disturbances due to bod¬
ily injury are being studied by physicians and surgeons now at
the front. For, in the present conflict, surgery of the soul is no
less a reality than surgery of the body; and such an opportunity
for gathering valuable psychological and psychical data may not
again present itself for many generations.

Fortunately, 'this opportunity has been seized, at least

210 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

In part; and our modern cure of shell shock is the result
of this painstaking and minute investigation.

We know now that in order to remove the troublesome
complexes which are disturbing the patient’s mind, it is
necessary to uncover them. When once they are uncov¬
ered, and when the patient can see for himself what is
troubling him — can see the facts as they really are — he
is already partially — in some cases totally — cured. It
is therefore the object of the practitioner to uncover the
offending complex, to explain to the patient the cause of
his suffering; and then to begin a rigid system of psycho¬
logical re-education, by which the patient’s mind is made
over in much the same way that his body Is made over
by surgical treatment and prolonged nursing.

One of the great curative agents which has been
utilized in this war to great practical advantage is hypno¬
tism. The value of hypnosis has now been fully demon¬
strated by practical experimentation; and it has been
shown to be of tremendous practical Importance as a
means for curing the mentally sick.

Psychoanalysis, also, has been of inestimable value,
as a means of exploring the subconscious mind and dis¬
covering the basic trouble; while psychological re-educa¬
tion has been found to be the best possible method of
cure — all other agencies, such as diet, exercise, elec¬
tricity, hydrotherapy, and so forth — proving but useful
adjuncts to this central and supremely important method.
It is hardly necessary to say that rest and sleep are of
the utmost importance in such cases, as In all others in¬
volving a disturbance of the central nervous system and
of the mind.

Describing the treatment in these shell-shock cases, a

PSYCHIC HEALING 21 1

physician at one of the London army hospitals stated
recently :

The patient is seated in a chair, and is brought by the operator
into a slight degree of hypnosis in the ordinary way. He is told to
clear his mind of all other thoughts and to concentrate on the
single subject of his cure. If, as often happens, his vision is af¬
fected, he is told quietly and firmly by the operator that the de¬
fect has been cured, and that once again he can see clearly. In
some cases a single seance is enough ; in others, the treatment may
have to be repeated several times. In practically all cases, how¬
ever, great improvement, if not a complete cure, has eventually
resulted.

It should be noted, however, that simple hypnosis has
now been supplemented, in the majority of cases, by
other methods. Psychoanalysis has revealed the under¬
lying factors at work, and psychological re-education has
given us the rational basis of cure. Further, we now
know that the susceptibility to shell shock differs greatly
in differing individuals; and that a lower degree of sus¬
ceptibility is due not to tougher bodies or steadier nerves,
but to emotional states and disturbances, latent in the
sufferer, and perhaps going back for years.

It was long ago pointed out that civilized men seemed
to withstand shell-fire better than natives of semi-civilized
countries; but the cause was not understood. We can
now sec why it should be so. We can also understand
the rationale of most of the so-called miraculous cures —
of which there have been many. All this is readily in¬
telligible in the light of the newer psychology.

It is unnecessary here to enter into the technique of the
processes involved in psychoanalysis and psychological
re-education. Scores of competent physicians and psy¬
chologists are now administering to the mental health of

212 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

our soldiers, and treating cases of shell shock as the
patients return from the front.

One practical side of this question should be brought
out, however, and emphasized very strongly — the
necessity of impressing the “ shocked ” soldier, when he
regains his consciousness, and finds himself physically and
mentally disabled, that he is not insane, and in no danger
of becoming so. If this fact is not constantly impressed
upon him, and the true nature of his case pointed out to
him — that he is merely a sick man, calling for treatment,
like any other — he is liable to become mentally affected.
Many cases are on record in which this unfortunate state
of affairs has come about through ignorance on the part
of the patient’s attendants and relatives.

Reasoning from false premises, the man suffering from
shell shock arrives at false conclusions; but it should be
pointed out and insisted upon that his reasoning is per¬
fectly logical and sound; only his premises are false.
Show this to him, and his own reasoning faculties will
lead him to correct and logical conclusions.

The important practical points to bear in mind are,
therefore, these:

That the soldier should understand the nature of shell
shock, to some extent, before entering battle, so that its
symptoms and manifestations may be more or less fa-
milar to him.

He should be made to realize that he is not insane, not
mad, or anything like it, when he recovers consciousness
in the hospital; that his troubles are all purely functional
in character, and therefore curable; that they are depend¬
ent upon his prior emotional stresses, and that the shock
itself is, as has already been said, merely the last straw
which broke the camel’s back.

PSYCHIC HEALING

213

He should be sympathetically treated, and re-educated,
from the psychological point of view, immediately upon
his return to consciousness; and special care should be
taken to remove from his mind all doubts, fears, and
worries. Sympathy, understanding, and reassurance
may be said to be the three graces required of the at¬
tendant In cases of shell shock.

One word more. Shell shock — or “war strain,”
which is virtually the same thing — has been shown to
involve no essentially new disorders. Every one of the
symptoms was known beforehand in civil life. If by any
stretch of the Imagination we could speak of a specific
variety of disease called shell shock, it would be new
only In its unusually great number of Ingredients; and
the most gratifying truth of all is that even this hydra¬
headed monster, if caught young, can be destroyed.

Shell shock, therefore. Is a curable illness; and In the
vast majority of cases, if properly treated, can be cured
readily and effectually. We should at least find great
consolation In that fact; and we may well marvel at the
penetrative Insight and scientific skill which have rendered
such treatment and such cures possible.

CHAPTER XIV

ON “ OBSESSION ”

The word “ obsession ” has a very different meaning for
the psychiatrist and for the spiritualist. For the former,
it means any persistent, dominating thought which in¬
vades and conquers the mind of the subject to such an
extent that he is no longer able to withstand it; It sub¬
jugates and masters him, and perhaps colours his whole
life. To the spiritualist, on the other hand, the word im¬
plies the usurpation of the subject’s body and brain by
a foreign intelligence — a “spirit” — which has tempo¬
rarily displaced the subject’s own spirit, and entered Into
the unfortunate individual, there to take up its posses¬
sion, until driven out, — like the demons in the swine,
in the New Testament narrative. (See Fig. 22.)

Which of these interpretations Is correct? There can
be no doubt whatever that, in the vast majority of cases,
the former is correct: The only question is. Are there
any cases which this explanation does not cover? Are
there any cases of genuine “ spirit obsession,” in the
spiritualist’s meaning of the term? The average student
of abnormal psychology would unhesitatingly reply in the
negative; for him there is no truth in the claims of the
spiritualist — such cases representing merely the wander¬
ings of an unbalanced mind, coloured by tradition and
belief, attributing to foreign entitles psychological phe¬
nomena which, in truth, reside In the Individual’s own
subconscious mind. To the extent to which the patient
believes in the truth of his “ obsessing spirit ” is he un-

214

ON “OBSESSION” 215

balanced — insane ! Such would be the attitude of the
average psychiatrist.

And yet the facts sometimes give us pause ! These
“ obsessing entities ” sometimes give us startling proof of
their own objective existence ; they tell us facts which the
subject himself did not know, but which are afterwards
verified. They give us signs of personal identity, of
having a character, a life, a personality of their own,
quite different from the subject himself, but which bear
all the ear-marks of belonging to some one else alto¬
gether. There is much actual evidence that. In some
cases, at least, — genuine “ obsession ” of the spiritual¬
ist’s variety is a fact; and this evidence so impressed a
thinker of Professor William James’s care and erudition,
that he was compelled to write, regarding it: —

“ The refusal of modern ‘ enlightenment ’ to treat
‘ possession ’ as a hypothesis to be spoken of as even pos¬
sible, in spite of the massive human tradition based on
concrete experience in Its favour, has always seemed to me
a curious example of the power of fashion In things scien¬
tific. That the demon-theory (not necessarily a devil-
theory) will have Its innings again Is to my mind abso¬
lutely certain. One has to be ‘ scientific ’ indeed, to be
blind and ignorant enough to suspect no such possibility.”
{Proceedings S. P. R., Vol. XXIII., p. 118.)

And more recently. Professor J. H. Hyslop, in his
Life After Death (pp. 305-6) says: —

“ I have asserted that the explanation of this case is
obsession, spirit or demoniac obsession, as it was called
in the New Testament. Before accepting such a doctrine,
I fought against it for ten years after I was convinced
that survival after death was proved. But the several
cases referred to »bove forced upon me the considera-

2i6 modern psychical phenomena

tion of the question, and the present instance only con¬
firms overwhelmingly the hypothesis suggested by other
experiences.”

The “ case ” referred to is the following, thus summed
up by Dr. Hyslop : —

“ . . . Here is a case of dissociation caused by a par¬
ent’s brutal act that results in a form of multiple per¬
sonality which the physicians regard as incurable and cer¬
tain to terminate in the insane asylum and death. It was
variously diagnosed as paranoia and dementia precox,
but under the patience and care of a clergyman was cured,
and the girl made a perfectly healthy person, capable of
carrying on a large poultry business, and serving as vice-
president of a poultry association in the county where
she lived, presiding over its meetings with intelligence and
coolness. Then when she was cured, experiments with a
psychic appear to show that it was a case of spirit obses¬
sion, with the identity of the parties affecting her proved.
Mediumship begins its development as a means of pre¬
venting the recurrence of the evil obsession. This me¬
diumship proceeds along with a normal and healthy life.”

And speaking of the consequencs of such a belief, this
author further says; — . ■

“ The chief interest in such cases is their revolutionary
effect in the field of medicine. It is probable that thou¬
sands of cases diagnosed as paranoia would yield to this
sort of investigation and treatment. It is high time for
the medical world to wake up and learn something.”
(P. 308.)

Some very striking cases of this character — in which
the obsessing entities gave remarkable evidence of their
own independent existence — are to be found in Mr. J.
Godfrey Raupert’s books: The Dangers of Spiritual

“OBSESSKD !’’

ON “OBSESSION”

217

ism, Modern Spiritism, and The Supreme Problem;
as well as in Dr. Peebles’ Spirit Obsessions : The De¬
monism of the Ages. A unique discussion of the sub¬
ject is to be found in Dr. C. H. Carson’s pamphlet on
“ Obsession while some very striking cases, presenting
all the external evidences of the historic phenomena,
have come under my own observation. Dr. Carl Wick-
land has an Institution, in Los Angeles, Cal., in which are
■cured scores of “obsessed” patients every year, — by
treating them along regular spiritualistic lines; while a
number of our modern writers and investigators are com¬
ing to the conclusion that genuine spiritual “ obsession ”
is Indeed a fact.

In the “ Course of Instruction in Psychic Develop¬
ment ” (Lesson 32) are to be found a number of valu¬
able suggestions as to methods for prevention and treat¬
ment of Obsession. One of the most useful of these,
doubtless, consists in inducing the patient to live ‘ outside
his head ’ — that is, never to be introspective, and to live
in the practical, objective things of life, without ever
turning the attention inwards, in order to listen to
“ voices,” or to attend to what is going on inside the
head. Another very important factor is to persuade the
patient to disregard and disbelieve what the “ voices ”
may tell him. Once he grasps the fact that only evil can
result from paying attention to, — or following the di¬
rections of, — these voices, he is on the high road to re¬
covery. In addition to all this, properly trained me¬
diums can often assist greatly in ridding the subject of
the obsessing influence, by methods well understood by
experienced spiritualists or advanced psychic students.

It is evident, from what has been said, therefore, that
spiritual “ obsession ” is at least a possibility which mod-

2 1 8, MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

ern science can no longer disregard; while there are many
striking facts in its support. This being so, its study be¬
comes imperative — not only from the academic view¬
point, but also because of the fact that hundreds and
perhaps thousands of individuals are at the present mo¬
ment suffering in this manner, and their relief demands
some immediate investigation and cure. Once grant the
theoretical possibility of actual obsession, and a whole
vast field of research and investigation is opened up be¬
fore us, which demands all the care, skill and patience
which modern enlightenment and psychological under¬
standing can furnish.

The whole theory becomes more intelligible to us if
we once grant that our brains are but instruments, uti¬
lized for the time being by our own life and conscious¬
ness, and that we merely manipulate this organism of
ours, through the exercise of some sort of telurgy
(psychic energy), which we employ to govern and control
the nervous mechanism of the brain and body. On such
a theory, we are all obsessing entities ! — for we thus take
“ possession ” of our own brains and bodies — and for¬
eign obsession would be no more difficult to understand
than how spirit affects matter at all. It would be simply
another aspect of the fundamental problem. Viewed in
this light, foreign obsession or possession becomes far
more understandable, and there would no longer be any
valid a priori objection to its possibility — the objection
being only valid if we regard consciousness from the
materialistic point of view — as being a product of the
functioning or activity of the brain.

The following treatise on obsession is a translation of
an obscure French pamphlet on the subject, and contains

219

' ON “ OBSESSION ”

much sound advice, which will be most appreciated by
those who have had some personal experience in this field.
It is the product of “ automatic writing,” and claims to
treat the subject of obsession from the “ spirit’s ” polnt-
of-view. That is, we have here a work by a “ spine,” on
the subject of spirit possession; and, from any standpoint,
can hardly fail to be of interest. While, then, I must
not be understood as endorsing all that is here said, I
present it as a valuable psychological document — and, in
view of the possibility of genuine obsession, it should, I
think, be taken seriously. (The advice it contains is at
least sound and wholesome. With this disclaimer, there¬
fore, I present it to the reader as originally published.
We might call it —

A TREATISE ON OBSESSION
(Translated from the French)

The following treatise on obsession, which we ^ are
about to offer to you, will serve to show you its different
degrees and its consequences. First, let us analyse its
beginning — Thought.

A certain particular and unceasing thought will strike
the brain of a person: he admits it without knowing what
it means and without even understanding it; he accustoms
his mind to this : he does not criticize or judge it, and he
does not even analyse it. This failure to do so, this fault,
is the open door to all obsession. The want of analysis
draws to you malevolent spirits of the past, who desire
again to assimilate themselves with your mind, and,
profiting by your ignorance, they find a means of aveng¬
ing themselves. They take you back to the very cradle.

^ tFe, i.e., the communicating “ spirits ” or entities.

220 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

for in the state of Infancy one Is weak and still without
judgment; they make you their toy, their prey; in a word
they become part of you through the very Inspiration
which you take as being your very own. Thus, your
judgn.^nt cannot guide you, for it Is deformed through
the wrong that you have done In the past, and through
the intuition of this same evil with which this spirit is
saturated, and with which they continue to saturate you.

But then you? What about the thought we had of re¬
pairing our past by reincarnating once more? Is that
not a safeguard for us? No! especially If our mind is
not sufficiently fortified through the search for good.

Your re-birth finds you weak in your power of willing;
you are accordingly not free because you are still en¬
chained to the past through evil, and your spirit is in¬
fluenced once more to yield and to fall, and it is here
we find the very first beginning of obsession.

The beings that are riveted to you through a common
wrong in the past, or yet again, through personal ven¬
geance, have created for you an obstacle, or obstacles,
for you may not have wronged a single being! You are
born today to be used by them later. They remain on
the other side with knowledge of the invisible forces and
powers. You are to them a little child, an easy prey
for them to devour, and. In consequence, easy to obsess,
to possess, to subjugate, to fascinate; in a word you are
born Into this world to a life of battle.

Obsession is a useful thing. It teaches one the road
that one should follow. Good will conduct you to joys,
which in the course of time will become eternal. Evil will
lead you to suffering, which will remind you that you
ought not to turn away from the road which was shown
to you.

ON “OBSESSION”

22 I

Today, if you are In agony and suffering, learn, my
brothers and sisters, to analyse yourselves better; you
can only better yourselves and your conditions by observ¬
ing yourselves.

When you have around you antagonistic spirits. It is
better to help and to love them; and In doing such an act
of charity and love, you prove to them that patience and
perseverance are real and living qualities.

What causes Obsession? You have been told many
times. It is the want of analysis of your thoughts, and
the want of observing your acts. It Is the ease with which
you receive, without seeking to discern, the utterances
which are contrary to Divine Will.

You carry out what you have heard or perceived with¬
out conceiving for a moment that these thoughts are not
your own. The assimilation being complete, you have in
a sense paralysed your spirit; one or the other of those
around you have annulled your thought; you act as it were
involuntarily, — under compulsion, — moved by an invis¬
ible force. What have you done with your spirit? You
have simply abandoned It to impressions and impulses
which it may receive ; your spirit has now lost Its free will ;
it will act henceforth mechanically.

We can recognize an “ Obsessed One ” by his or her
aberrations; his continual inveterate habits, or his con¬
tinual return to what he has done; in a word, by the repe¬
tition of his ideas. He will become fearful, sometimes
shamefully timid; he never knows whether he has done
right or wrong. His state of hesitation will make him
an object of ridicule without ceasing. You will see him
gay; soon he will be sad; his movements those of an
automatlst, he will be mechanical in all he does. He will
love society Intensely for one minute and then he will

222 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

hate it. Everything he has to do will seem painful to
him; he will be embarrassed; deprived of his good sense;
absurdities will be true to him; he will become exag¬
gerated in his acts; he will lose all caution and judgment;
and in a moment you will recognize him through his
foolish exaggeration as being a demented creature.

Why do we see so many disorders in one being? Be¬
cause this being has lost his uprightness and integrity in
thought and action. The result for him is mental aber¬
ration.

Unfortunately, obsession is often the cause of great
difficulties.

No one on earth can understand these difficulties, for
the world is Ignorant of many things.

We cannot hope either to learn or know, so long as
we do not study ourselves. To have a presentiment of
a thing, we must see the danger; the study of self will
show it to you, but study is very necessary.

I will not say, for fear of awakening the susceptibilities
of my readers, that upon many points they act like
beasts, — which are unconscious of what they become, —
because a beast Is a beast. It possesses no responsibility.
It Is not the same for you; you have a destiny which is
laid out for you ; it is that of evolving and evolving with¬
out ceasing; learning and knowing.

Such is the program for the spiritual life.

What are you doing on this earth? Oh! Nothing!
for the little you do Is mechanical and unconscious.
Nevertheless, you are submitted to a law which rules the
Universe, and this law regulates other laws Inferior to
It. There we enter Into the world of matter. Let us
begin with the law that directs and guides us. Do you
know it? No ! Nevertheless, everything around you re-

ON “OBSESSION”

223

volves and journeys on; all things evolve and strive to
follow the current. Are you choosing to remain in the
rear?

No, indeed! Let us learn and study. Let us take
man for a beginning; he studies principally all that is
useful to him in the material world, — although he knows
that it is not eternal in this world, he knows also that he
must leave it one day in order to rest — Where? He
does not know! Why does he not know and why does
he not ask? Because exactly here begins for him the
barriers laid across by his brothers, for they want him
to remain ignorant.

Let us learn, then, the method of overcoming what we
call a barrier of ignorance, by understanding that all
things must be retrieved, must be amended.

What are you doing each day to raise yourself? You
eat, you strengthen and comfort your body, without oc¬
cupying your mental or spiritual life, which is also
hungry, by finding suitable nourishment for its fluidic cle¬
ment.

What can you give your spirit for nourishment?
Prayer and study!

What study?

The knowledge of yourself ! What is it? What is it
called upon to become, and what ought it to do? Each
of us is able to observe that, in the environment of human
beings, there is always a this or a that, which calls a thing
into being. These things are prepared by the Spirits, —
even by those who wish to obsess you. They know your
tastes, and will even create what is contrary to themselves
in order to satisfy you. You will curse, you will storm
within yourself; but, at first silently, then openly, you
will premeditate cruelties in your heart against those who

224 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

restrain you, without ever dreaming how you were in¬
spired by them to do so. They will ripen these thoughts,
and they will make them take birth again, — suggesting
that they are the ones which overwhelm you.

Your soul will hate, you heart will be a disgrace to
bow down to.

Now, you will guard and carefully nourish these
thoughts, and in order for you to stoop to them by car¬
rying out their purpose, they will cause the necessary cir¬
cumstances to be born for that purpose. Your soul has
not acted of itself, but, indeed, it has been influenced by
other beings. Its wrong has been in accepting these
thoughts without analysing them. By its own fault, your
soul will grow enslaved; they will become its masters.
You will act like a veritable coward. You will think
every day, but you will never know whether it be you
who is thinking, or your obsessor, — for he will have taken
complete lodgement.

Nevertheless, we ought to tell you that a strange spirit
cannot completely take possession of you, — for he has
refused incarnation, and he cannot.

Oh! You say, we ought to know and recognize our¬
selves and know the difference between our thoughts and
theirs?

No ! My friends, they have made you do good, and
do evil. Good, so they will be fed by your thoughts;
they will have falsified them without you ever being aware
of it. It would not have been the same even if you had
done only good. Evil, for its own sake.

It is your turn now to know what causes others to
recognize obsession, with all its abominable cruelty. For
you also have been in the past an obsessor yourself!
Cases of obsession are light or firmly rooted in pro-

ON “ OBSESSION ”

225

portion to the time, and to the importance of the obses¬
sion. If you have for 20, 30 or 40 years yielded to this
spirit which has been able to penetrate you, you are its
object completely; you act through it, and in a word you
act under impulses, which, to you, are strange.

What have you done? I ask you, what have you done
with your thoughts? “ I don’t know,” you say.

Listen — I will tell you, my friends. You have let
them sleep an indefinite time. The proof for you is here ;
you will bear the pain in all its greatness; for the world,
you will be a maniac; for science even you are defective.
In a word, you are a living automaton in the body; but
your spirit will be dead for the material life; it will no
longer have healthy reason. What have you done? I
have told you before. You have absolutely never an¬
alysed your thoughts, — such has been your case and your
fault. Why have you accepted this so easily?

Why?

But according to you, you have done no wrong.

Ah! Well, my friends, you have been almost deaf to
good thoughts, — since they have ceased to penetrate your
inspirations. The Spirit of good never obsesses. It
gives thoughts of good deeds which can save you once,
twice, thrice, — and then they will fly by you, they will
leave you to your obstinacy.

That is what your soul has done. It has not been
strong enough to defend itself from passing evil; and in
this life you have deformed your judgment. The proof
is that you suffer and will suffer; but your spirit will
awaken more strong than it ever was, for suffering will
have drawn out of you this feebleness, and suffering will
have formed your judgment.

It is not the same when the spirit enters into its first

226 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

obsession, for in the case of simple obsession, the differ¬
ences in the effervescence of thoughts which have struck
your brain can be modified. You say, “Why?” Be¬
cause the thoughts which have been pounded into your
brain are there in a latent condition, and they wait for
a propitious moment to be fertilized. Here is the grain
to be germinated.

Also, with a refinement of malevolence, which they
take care to nourisTi, they cultivate these germs. But if
they have this power over you, it is because your
spirit is imperfect, and easily accepts all imperfect
thoughts. They revive in you failings so that
they can sink deeper into your being than ever
before. They will profit by the very first occa¬
sion possible to make you think you have executed
voluntarily an action which was prepared before¬
hand by them in your brain. They are very patient,
and when matters arrive at this point, then they are your
masters. There, the battle rages violently in your soul.
Sometimes it is almost rent asunder as when it feels
dragged along in spite of itself, towards a suicidal climax,
and there is the time when the conscience is awakened!

I said, “ In spite of itself.” Nevertheless, the soul it¬
self has greatly contributed thereto. Why does it feed
itself with thoughts contrary to divine law? It still had
the power to discern evil from good; all was not stifled
and smothered in it; it was born in a material world, and
it possessed all the spiritual force which it had gained
in the life of spirit. Its necessary resolves for reparation
were new and were imperative to be carried out. For
the evil which handles beings is simply the reflection of
their past lives.

Healthy thoughts, true thoughts, right thoughts, can

ON “OBSESSION”

227

alone guarantee you this return; but alas! reparation is
hell, and in spite of all you cannot pass from evil to
good without occasional stumbles. It is in these disas¬
trous downfalls and continuous uprisings that the soul
grows stronger. Regret wraps closely round it, and re¬
morse makes It realize the reality of its shortcomings.
Your soul Is again fed and nourished by these thoughts;
it realizes its littleness, indeed its baseness. Remorse
gives birth to regret and grief, and surely the sorrowful
regret of a brother on earth makes a powerful appeal In
space. It unconsciously reaches and draws to Itself be¬
ings who have power to sustain him. This call — pow¬
erful but unconscious — gives force to your soul. It will
be sustained by this support, but yet being feeble It will
fall again; it may become the prey of obsessors.

What harmful elements there are In the human be¬
ing! These elements are composed of all the vices which
we have let develop within us. Pride, — the most
dangerous principle of all, — draws to you the most hor¬
rible spirits. Why is one proud? Let us see what you
are. You are downf alien beings. In a condition of re¬
paration. Have you any right to set your haughtiness
up above your brothers who, like you, are in a state of
reparation? You will draw to yourself their hatred.
They will be dangerous to you one day, for you are the
kind to attract to you haughty spirits. They will close
your eyes to your own shortcomings, and will open them
to see too clearly those of your brethren. If evil has
reached the climax so long desired by these spirits, they
will again mirror the thought of Superiority upon your
mind, and from now on the aberration will follow Its
course. This continued thought entering your brain will
develop until it fascinates you. Absurdities will now

228 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

show themselves in word and in action. What will you
be now as a member of society? You will be a demented
being, progressing towards complete insanity. Your
thought of pride will no longer have any limits; ambi¬
tion will seize you, and you will henceforth be a poor
obsessed creature, no longer master over yourself.
When obsession has arrived at this stage, there is noth¬
ing left of personal suffering, humiliation and shame
of self, to bring you back to yourself. Pride is the fault
which furnishes spirits with the very means of overwhelm¬
ing you. They have found in it the point de repere in
which to develop in you a device which flatters you and
sets you up on high. And once in their clutches, they
make you a king or queen, and mental aberration is now
in its fulness.

But alas, though this fault is the cardinal sin, one must
add others:

Sensuality, beastliness, lead you, poor creature, to dis¬
aster, and destroy in you both the moral and physical
being. It is no longer you who act, it is the poor spirits
from the other side, which are going to give rise in you
once more to the vices of the past, with rejoicing at the
thought of utterly destroying in you all traces of morality.

It is the same with hate as with pride. All faults are
exaggerated by this kind of obsession. When the obses-
sor has permeated you with a vice, or whatever it may be,
he does not desire you to be isolated or to absorb it in si¬
lence; he wishes to satiate his hatred and make you an
accomplice in his wickedness, attaching himself more
grossly to you, so that the example of your disorder may
communicate to your brothers the vices with which he is
saturated. He knows quite well that he will have to
atone for all this, but in this manner he will have satiated

ON “OBSESSION”

229

himself with hate towards all humanity, even towards
God himself. He does not take into account the fact
that he himself is obsessed, in his spirit state, by a spirit
even more horrible than himself.

But if one has already done wrong, how is one to avoid
it in future? My friends, the knowledge and practice of
the laws of God can alone preserve you. Do good, and
avoid evil.

The aggravation of obsession increases from day to
day; more and more, just in proportion to the degree in
which the self, or will, has abandoned itself to the inspi¬
rations which have been given it, — foreign as they are
to the soul. Not suddenly, however, since it does them
consciously. If his spirit is truly perverted, he will feel
drawn of himself to the point of unconsciousness, through
the careless ease with which he defends an importunate
thought.

Arrived at this point, he truly suffers, his soul is op¬
pressed; the trial is in its maturity. What is the un-
foldment of all this? The yielding of the unfortunate
one. He does it oftener than not. He is like a little
child before a sin; he will play with it, as with a danger¬
ous weapon; he will laugh at his aberrations; he will be
full of courage; he will see no danger; he will play with
the appearances of foolishness, believing himself very
wise.

A moment ago we spoke of hate and pride; but all im¬
perfections, my brothers, carry with them their respon¬
sibilities, and your obsessions develop themselves in you
with a cruelty that none of you on earth can dream of,
for you do not know the importance and consequences
of the failure in obeying the law; and in consequence you
do not conceive of the extended penalty. You do not

230 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

know that they will cause sufferings without number, for
the development of your failings and actions are in each
life; and you have to destroy one by one the faults of
pride, hate, etc., before regaining the life of light and
reason. I have said, ” all faults lead to obsession.” I
have spoken of two principles, pride and hate. I will
speak now of a third, sensuality.

What is this sensuality? It is a need which is un¬
consciously born in the child. I said, unconsciously; for
It finds activity under an impulse which is as it were
strange, the touches of sex shown In little children. It
knows nothing of life, but It has once known a preceding
life. Hateful, malicious spirits, wishing to satisfy their
hatred, use all means to satisfy themselves; a horizon
opens before them. They know that one day the chil¬
dren will see and hear them, and receive impressions; for
they know the fluidic force of thought. . . .

You ask: What Is this spiritual force which Influences
little children, and the obsessed? This fluid Is thought,
good or bad, which moves as you do. In the direction of
good or ill. Yes, but It does not possess the same ele¬
ments of penetration, for it Is Ignorant, or better still, it
Is forgotten; and that is desired by God, for every one on
earth has possession of his free-will. But the very bad
spirits enveloped by spirits more bad than themselves In¬
spire them to work on their companions. Indicating the
means of so doing, helping them to conquer the difficulties
of matter which can only be penetrated by companions
having knowledge of the fluidic force of thought.

When a soul Is thus surrounded, it yields to the hor¬
rible; It yields to bestiality, to the development of this
vice, and then there is danger for reason and health.

When the case of obsession has arrived at the point of

ON “ OBSESSION ”

231

cruelty, so as to drive the poor being to the state of de¬
stroying himself, it would be wise to employ a clairvoy¬
ant, who could warn the family of any imminent danger,
or who will say that such a danger might In truth happen.
The obsessed being follows all impulses, whether good or
bad, wise or foolish — In a word, he no longer belongs to
himself. He will throw himself into the water, or under
a train, with the most perfect calmness and assurance; he
obeys what is told him, as though It came from his own
mind. He goes to the water, the river, the fire, any¬
where, where the Impulse directs him. Thus, he has lost
all reason, all prudence. He no longer belongs to him¬
self; charitable souls should save him from danger show¬
ing him clearly what he is ignorant of; namely, the force
of the invisible.

In order to recognize it, we must know it. Learn to
respect and love yourself. Learn to know the force of
the invisible; to know the responsibilities Incumbent upon
you, owing to your preceding lives, and believe that this
present life will be quickly past, and that you have the
weight and responsibility of all your acts and thoughts.

Do you know yourself? Analyse yourself! When
you make this effort, and take righteousness and truth for
your guide, you will lessen your sufferings In this life —
sufferings which nevertheless have taught you the way
to love and make perfect your own self.

CHAPTER XV

THE TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD ^

Some of the most remarkable and significant experi¬
ments ever conducted with animals are those which were
carried out some years ago in Germany, with various
horses, and serve to throw a flood of light upon the
whole much-disputed question of animal psychology.
Prof. Claparede, in fact, a well-known Swiss psycholo¬
gist of excellent standing — has declared that these ex¬
periments constitute “ the most sensational event which
has ever appeared in the field of animal psychology —
perhaps, indeed, in the whole realm of psychology.”

Prof. Ernst Haeckel, after an investigation of the facts
in the case, wrote to Mr. Krall, the owner of the horses
in question :

“ Your careful and critical researches show in a con¬
vincing manner the existence of reason in the animals —
which for me has never been a subject for doubt.”

While this may be very true on general principles —
while many would be willing to admit that the mind of
man and that of the horse differ in degree, not in kind;
still, there is a vast difference between admitting this, as a
theoretical possibility, and in admitting that horses can
learn to add, subtract, multiply and divide; to abstract
square and cube roots; to spell names, and even learn
to speak in a foreign language ! These are facts diffi-

1 The investigations described in this article were all made before the
outbreak of the European war — though the detailed reports were only
rendered later. Hence the references to French and Italian scientists,
etc., visiting German cities. The interest in the facts is still legitimate —
even though they were German horses!

232

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 233

cult to believe — yet they have been vouched for by a
number of eminent savants who have witnessed the facts,
who have travelled many hundreds of miles to see the
famous horses, and who, after seeing them, have come
away perfectly convinced of the reality of the manifesta¬
tions. Among those who testified to the reality of the
facts were Dr. Edinger, the eminent neurologist of Frank¬
fort; Dr. H. Kraemer and Dr. H. E. Zeigler, of Stutt¬
gart; Dr. Paul Sarasin, of Bale; Prof. Ostwald, of
Berlin; Prof. A. Beredka, of the Pasteur Institute,
Paris; Prof. E. Claparede, of the University of Geneva;
Prof. Schoeller and Dr. Gehrke, of Berlin; Prof. Gold¬
stein, of Darmstadt; Dr. William Mackenzie, of Ge¬
neva; Dr. R. Assagioli, of Florence; Dr. Hartkopf, of
Coin; Dr. Freudenburg, of Brussels; Dr. Ferrari, of the
University of Bologna — and many others. All these
gentlemen, after the most careful and scientific examina¬
tion of the facts, came away convinced of their reality,
and openly stated their belief in various quarters.

In brief, the history of this remarkable case is as
follows: In 1890, William von Osten, a retired mer¬
chant, being convinced that horses had more intelligence
than ordinarily attributed to them, began to train his
horse “ Hans.” The results were striking, though not
enough to make him famous — the horse dying a few
years later. He bought another horse, however, also
named Hans, and trained this horse to a remarkable de¬
gree of astuteness. The papers took up the case, and
three Committees, one after the other, investigated — all
of them testifying, in turn, to the reality of the facts.
Von Osten died in 1909, at the age of 61, and his horses
passed into the possession of Mr. Krall — also a rich
and retired merchant, having a good reputation in his

234 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

community. He is the promoter of the new Society for
Zoological experiments, and a man of scientific attain¬
ments. He not only continued the education of Hans,
but procured two more horses, “ Muhamed ” and
“ Zarif,” which he also trained in a remarkably short
time to perform even more wonderful feats than Hans.
Since then, he has taught several other horses, including
one totally blind horse — to perform elaborate calcula¬
tions — the period of training only lasting a few weeks.
Indeed, at the end of ten or twelve days, the animal had
learned to perform simple feats of addition and subtrac¬
tion, while at the end of six months he was extracting
square and cube roots ! The method of training the ani¬
mals was the following:

From one and one-half to two hours each day are taken
for the lessons. The animal is stood in front of a large
blackboard, on which the letters, figures, etc., are writ¬
ten. These are pointed to by means of a short rod. A
flat board is placed in front of the horse, on which he
stands with his two front hoofs, and on this board the
answers are rapped-out by means of blows of the hoof.
The figures from i to 9 are first learned; then the com¬
binations of two figures. These latter are struck with
the left foot, the right being reserved for units. In this
manner a long response can be given in a very short
space of time. On the 14th of November, 13 days after
the first lesson, Muhamed correctly executed a series of
simple additions, 1+3, 2 + 5, etc., and even subtrac¬
tions, 8 — 3, etc. (This is more rapid than the average
child learns to figure !)

On the 1 8th of November, four days later, he passed to
multiplication and division; and seven days later to frac-

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 235

tions and the addition of fractions. In December he
learned French and replied also to arithmetical ques¬
tions, given either in French or German. By the follow¬
ing May, five months later, Muhamed could abstract
square roots, cube roots and execute little sums such as
the following:

(3 X 4) + V 36 V 36 X V 64

- H -

3 4

In February, 1909, he commenced spelling. This
spelling is performed by means of a conventional alpha¬
bet, where each letter is represented by a number be¬
tween 1 1 and 66. The horse spells by rapping with hk
hoof the corresponding number of letters desired. This
procedure permitted Zarif, at the end of four months, to
spell out words which were pronounced in his presence,
and which he had never seen written. When such a
word is pronounced in his presence, he pricks his ears,
and then begins spelling out the word, usually phoneti¬
cally, trying to devise letters to suit the sound of the
name. Thus, when Prof. ClaparMe gave his name, the
horse spelled out Klapard — a very good imitation of
the true pronunciation, if said rapidly.

Another thing which shows that the horses spell pho¬
netically is that they often omit the vowels in words. In
some of these cases. It almost appeared that the horse
left out the missing letters purposely, in order to save
time; for, when the animal was asked to re-spell the
word, he did so, putting In the vowels in their proper
places 1

Before proceeding to the further marvels performed
with these horses, let me break off, just here, to reply to

236 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the criticism which is sure to be made, by certain omnis¬
cient critics; and that is that the whole performance is
doubtless the result of clever fraud; the animals are
taught to perform a few simple tricks — like the ani¬
mals we see upon the public stage — and, if they stop
rapping on the given cue, etc., that is all which is re¬
quired in order to explain the whole case ! A few such
simple methods are the following:

It might be possible to train the horse to reply by a
certain number of beats with its hoof when a certain
word was pronounced — a spoken code. Or the horse
might be trained to rap until it detected some slight
movement on the part of his master — a signal code.
Or the horse might be taught to rap-out certain numbers,
when his master stood a certain distance from him — a
distance code, etc. These and other explanations will
doubtless be forthcoming by the professional “ explain¬
ers ” of medlumistic phenomena, and it may be as well
to “ nip them in the bud.”

Needless to say, the scientific men who investigated
the case were alive to all these possibilities, and amply
guarded against them. In the first place, there is no
logical ground for suspecting Mr. Krall, who would have
nothing to gain by deceit. In the second place. In nearly
all the experiments, Mr. Krall absented himself, leaving
his horses entirely in the hands of the scientific committee,
who had everything their own way, and who certainly
had no code with the horse ! With conscious trickery of
any sort eliminated, the next theory was that the in¬
vestigators unconsciously gave the indications them¬
selves — but this explanation also was soon overcome.
Blinkers were put on the horse, and the investigators
stood so that it could not see them. Again, the experi-

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 237

ment was tried of placing the horse In a perfectly dark
room, In which It could see nothing — with equal suc¬
cess. On several occasions, also, ^he questions were
asked by means of a telephone — the receiver being at¬
tached to the horse’s ear — the only persons present be¬
ing those who did not know what was asked, and who
merely wrote down what the horse rapped out, without
any knowledge as to whether or not It was correct.
Finally, the experiments succeeded with a perfectly blind
horse. This eliminated all Idea of unconscious signals.
In most cases, the success was complete, and fully estab¬
lished the reality of the reasoning power of the animals.

Once convinced that no such simple explanation could
cover the facts, their study became a question of great
psychological Interest. It was because of this that com¬
mittee after committee visited Elberfeld — the home of
the horses — and studied them at length. The amount
of material which has appeared concerning these horses
In the German papers has been very great, and fully In¬
dicates the great Impression which they have made on the
minds of scientists throughout Europe.

To return, however, to our enumeration of the facts.

One day Mr. Krall noticed that the horses were rap¬
ping, outside the lesson, and thought he would take
down these raps, and see whether they would form con¬
nected sentences. To his great surprise he found that,
while these were almost unintelligible, still they repre¬
sented attempts at spelling, and greatly resembled the
trials children make in first learning to spell.

On one occasion, Mr. Krall asked Zarif whether he
would like some carrots. The horse replied funf —
“ five.” Soon after this he spelled out a phonetic sen¬
tence, which read, “ John, give me some oats! ” On an-

238 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

other occasion, when Zarif was idle at the lesson, Mu-
hamed was asked “ Why is not Zarif nice and good? ” to
which he responded, “ Because he is lazy! ”

Such statements appear almost incredible, and would
be quite so, were it not for the fact that these incidents
have been vouched for by the many illustrious names be¬
fore mentioned. For example Dr. Mackenzie writes:

“ In the absence of Mr. Krall, we proposed the follow¬
ing problem, which we wrote upon a slate:

“ We then placed this slate in front of Muhamed, and
withdrew, leaving him alone. We observed him by
means of small peepholes, and the horse gave the cor¬
rect answer (137) in a few moments. This was also
done during Prof. ClaparMe’s second sitting with the
horse. There is no doubt as to the facts.”

The following is Dr. ClaparMe’s account of the first
demonstration given before the commission:

The demonstration took place in a sort of carriage
house adjoining the lecture hall. Each horse was placed
in a small stall facing a blackboard. We were seated be¬
hind the horses a little to the right and Krall was allowed
to perform the exercises without any interruption what¬
ever.

The demonstration commenced with a lesson by
Amasis, one of the newer horses, who was at that time
“ in addition ” as the children say at school. It was his
fifth week of study.

There were placed before him three wooden pegs plus
three pegs, a card bearing the sign plus separating
the two groups of three. At the right of the ar-

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 239

rangement there was a card bearing a larger num¬
ber 6. Mr. Krall counted aloud six times while the horse
stamped his right foot with the counting.

Then the .exercise was repeated on the blackboard.
In place of the pegs bars were used (III + III = 6) and
after that the figures 3 + 3 = 6. Each time Krall
counted with the horse,' who had evidently been through
the exercise before for he showed no hesitation what¬
ever.

Multiplication was next taken up; twice three. Krall
explained, exactly as he would have to a class of children
at school, that each of the series of three might be con¬
sidered as a group, and that twice this group made six.
It seemed as if the horse began to comprehend more
and more for he pricked up his ears and seemed agi¬
tated.

It was then announced that the horse was to be taught
decimals. Krall placed before him at the right of nine
small red pegs, a blue peg larger than the others. Curi¬
ously enough, the pupil suddenly became quiet and gave
the greatest attention. Krall explained to him without
touching anything, that in order to express decimals he
should stamp, not with the right foot, as for units, but
with the left. The horse understood immediately and
executed the order correctly. He was taught to count
eleven and twelve, and to recognize these numbers in
French as well as in German.

Amasis was in the second stage of the training, that
of learning the control of movements adapted to expres¬
sion. The first stage, Krall explained, was merely to
tame the animal, to make him familiar with his master
and to gain his attention mainly through the devices of
caresses and carrots. The second stage was the most

240 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

difficult. Amasis was very attentive, but could not seem
to control his movements and appeared conscious of the
fact. The investigators present agreed that if the horse
had any conception of number, it was developed at this
stage and took the form of movement Images. Zarif,
who was next called for the demonstration, showed the
results of longer training.

Mr. Krall showed us that his pupil understood French.
He wrote on the board in phonetic spelling, fat sero
(make zero). The horse immediately made with his
head the sign of negation which signifies zero in his
language. Then: kompte dis (count ten), and the
horse stamped once with the left foot; correct.

Having written 34 on the board, Krall asked Zarif
to read the number both ways; 34, 43 replied the horse.
Then: multiply the two figures; 12 was the next answer;
correct. Finally he asked the horse to square the larger
of the two figures. This time Zarif made a mistake and
replied 15 instead of 16.

Zwei und zwanzig (twenty-two) was then written on
the board. Krall wrote, adire zu elf (add eleven to it) ;
reply correct, 33. Add to that 31; reply correct, 53.
Add 23 to the original figure; this time reply incorrect;
44 instead of 45. Told to correct, Zarif gave the re¬
verse of 45, 54, and told to correct again, gave 45.

(Zarif is temperamentally somewhat different from the
other horses and his strong point is not arithmetic. He
had trouble with square root, says Dr. Claparede, and
seemed conscious of his shortcomings.)

V 25 + V 49 = was written on the board. The
horses replied 24. Krall told him that it was not correct.
He repeated 24. Again he was told that the answer was
wrong. He showed signs of great embarrassment. He

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 241

lowered his head like a guilty schoolboy. Krall called his
attention to all the people who were present and pointed
out that professor — myself — who was taking down all
his mistakes in a note book.

Then the horse began spontaneously to stamp. Krall
noted on the blackboard the figures given, 14, 26, 23, 54,
135 I3> 32- Consulting the conventional alphabet, the
corresponding word was found to be “ schlprrd.” What
could that mean ?

Krall declared that he did not understand. But it was
not difficult to perceive an analogy between these letters
and my name — Claparede — taking into account the
principles of phonetic spelling w'hich the horses had been
taught to follow.

Mr. Krall assured me, however, that it was Impossible
for Zarif to have been able to spell my name for he did
not know it. But on the afternoon of that same day, he
told me that he remembered pronouncing my name on the
morning before my arrival, to a third person before Zarif.

While there is no possible way of proving this fact, it
impressed me as being extremely possible that the horse
had attempted, quite spontaneously, to pronounce my
name, wishing to indicate that it was I who, by taking
notes, had embarrassed him.

To terminate this demonstration, which lasted about
twenty minutes, Zarif went back to his problem in the
multiplication of square roots and this time gave the cor¬
rect reply, 35.

Mr. Krall declares that he does not go beyond the ex¬
planation of simple problems. He allows the horses to
work out the more complex ones themselves without indi¬
cating the correct answers, so that the solving of problems
is actual computation and not merely a matter of memory

242 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

and keen association. Krall says that he does not know
by what methods the horses are able to extract roots be¬
yond 144, the highest square which he has taught them.

The horse Muhamed is the mathematical genius of the
troupe, says Dr. ClaparMe: —

He was much more active, much more wide awake, than
Zarif. He might well be compared to those exception¬
ally bright children who are continually interrupted in
their studies by caprices, by desire to play, to make jokes,
to do just the opposite of what they are told to do. At
times it seemed as if he gave the wrong answer, just for
the fun of it, to vex his master.

After having politely presented the horse to me, Krall
commenced immediately exercises in the extraction of
roots, which is Muhamed’s specialty. He wrote on the
board: V 3^ X V 49 — Muhamed replied at first with
52 ; then, being told that it was incorrect, he gave the cor¬
rect answer, 42. Krall then wrote the sign + Instead
of X> and asked the horse to add the two roots. He re¬
plied immediately with the correct answer, 13.

Dr. Claparede went to this demonstration, as all other
members of the commission did with the remembrance of
the Von Osten demonstration, convinced that the horses
responded in this case as they did in Von Osten’s, to
some slight bodily movements, of which, perhaps,
the trainer was quite unaware, but which gave the
signal. This supposition was entirely shattered by
the fact that for a great number of the exercises
Krall left the room, a fact which greatly impressed the
members of the commission.

For instance, Krall placed the following problem on the
board;

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 243

V 1,296 — V 81 X V 144 — V 49 =

and went out of the room. Muhamed gave one glance
at the board, and replied instantly, 115, which is wrong.
Mr. Krall called to him from without to try again. He
then stamped 25, then 125, the correct answer being 135.

When an answer is wrong, Mr. Krall does not insist,
but changes the problem. I selected some squares from
a list of which Muhamed was to extract the root. He
did so correctly. Then we went back to the problem
which was still written on the board, and without any
hesitation Muhamed gave the correct answer, 135.

To show that the horse actually could calculate, prob¬
lems were proposed by members of the audience. Mr.
Krall wrote them on the board without saying a word and
left the room.

The cube root: ^ V 5832 was proposed by one of the
ladies present, written on the board for the horse and the
answer, 18, given correctly in a few seconds. V 15376
and ^ V 456976 were likewise given correctly — 124 and
26 in about ten seconds. Mr. Krall and the attendant
groom had left the hall immediately after the exercise was
written on the board in each case.

The exercises in spelling were especially Interesting.
The horses had been taught to spell with the aid of a sim¬
plified spelling table, where each letter or diphthong is
represented by a number between 1 1 and 66, thus :

I I 2 3

10 I e n r

20 I a h 1

30 1 i d g

The association between letters and numbers once

244 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

formed, the spelling of words on the blackboard was
merely a matter of memory.

Mr. Krall attempted to teach the horses the German
orthography, but finally had to leave them to their own
devices, which were very ingenious. They spelled
“ essen,” to eat, “ sn,” and “ gehen,” to go, “gn.”

Here are some of the ways In which Muhamed and
Zarif attempted to spell the German word for horse,
“ pfferd,” pronounced to them several times.

Muhamed: Bfert, bfrt, fard, fert, frt, faert, fpferd,
frrt, ppverd, pferd, pfer.

Zarif: Bferd, fferwt, pfrde, fdaerp.

Dr. Claparede found the spelling demonstrations sig¬
nificant. He says:

Muhamed spelled my name Klapard, after It was pro¬
nounced to him.

“ Something is lacking,” observed Mr. Krall, and the
horse immediately answered with the letter e.

A newspaper editor who was present had brought to the
seance a young stranger whom he presented to Mr. Krall,
and asked that Muhamed spell his name, Tauski, which of
course, he had never heard before. The name was re¬
peated to him twice. The horse spelled out “ Tausj.”

“ There’s a letter missing, isn’t there? ” asked Krall.

“ C,” stamped the horse.

“ No,” said Krall, “ it’s k. Which letter is It? ”

“ Fourth ” stamped the horse, this reply being correct
for in his alphabet the diphthong “ au ” counts for a single
letter.

“ And what letter comes after k? ”

“ I,” replied the horse immediately.

For the name of M. Tauski, Zarif spelled Teauski,

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 245

after It had been pronounced for him three times. This
test was especially satisfactory. Krall was a considerable
distance from the horse, who, while stamping, kept his
head turned to the wall opposite the one where Krall was
standing. The certainty with which Zarif acted, the
regularity with which he went from one letter to the next
without any hesitation and without looking around to
Krall at all. Impressed me very much.

For my part, I cannot possibly Imagine what trick could
be employed In these remarkable feats. While many of
them were performed under conditions such that no
opinion could be given, still. In certain cases, replies were
given under circumstances which seemed to me absolutely
to exclude the hypothesis that signals were given to the
horses.

The demonstrations, which lasted several days, varied
greatly with the varying moods of the horses, Muhamed
being especially refractory.

The Saturday morning seance was for the most part
very bad. Muhamed replied badly, and seemed greatly
distracted. But there was one act which impressed me
especially in this demonstration.

A lady having asked that the animal spell her name,
Ellse, Muhamed obeyed, but after stamping each letter
he stopped and looked at Krall as If to ask If it were cor¬
rect. I noticed that while the horse was spelling he stood
with head half bent, without seeming to look at anything,
and it was only after he had stamped out the last letter
that he raised his head and turned to Krall. The word as
first spelled was “ elja,” which the horse corrected when
it was repeated to him, giving the German form for Ellse,
“ Eljsa.”

246 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Among several remarkable mathematical operations,
the following are worthy of mention. I chose the num¬
bers myself.

The root of ^ V 614,656. Correct reply in a few
seconds: 28. The horse was then alone in the room.
All the spectators had also gone outside.

The root of: ^ V 4,879,681. Reply after 30 seconds:
1 17. Wrong. The horse corrected it himself to 144,
but finally gave up rather despairingly.

Zarif seemed less temperamental than Muhamed, who
occasionally responded with correct answers after receiv¬
ing a good crack of the whip.

Zarif, among other exercises, gave one exhibition which
I noted as excellent. Krall having placed before him
various cards, bearing numbers of different colours (7, i,
6? 5> 4) 3)5 asked him to add the blue figures (6 and 4).
Zarif gave the correct answer immediately, likewise to
similar questions involving combinations of coloured fig¬
ures. Krall was at least forty feet away from him, and
said nothing except to give the commands.

He had difficulty at this seance in spelling my name,
which was called out to him from behind the door. He
managed it this way: “ chlabrt.”

The corrections which he gave in response to Krall’s
commands were most satisfactory.

“ What letter comes after b? ” called Mr. Krall.

“A.”

“ And after the r ? ”

“A.”

“ Ch is not right. What should it be ? ”

“ K.”

“ And where should this k be? ”

One stamp indicated the correct answer.

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 247

The horses could actually carry on a conversation, ac¬
cording to Dr. Claparede’s report. For example: —

Several questions were put to Zarif.

“ Was wiinschst du? ” (What do you wish?)

The reply was: “ Miidselnjg.” Mud sein Ich — I am
tired.

“ Wie heist du? ” added Mr. Krall, always behind the
door. (What is your name?)

“ Zarif.”

“ What other letter could you use instead of f? ”

“ V.” Correct, for in German, v is pronounced f.

“ Qui est Zarif? ” (Who is Zarif?)

Reply: “lig.” (Ich.)

Having assured themselves on this point, the question
of the possible interpretation of the facts presented itself.
Several scientific men who attended the sittings were in
favour of a telepathic hypothesis — that is, they believed
that the answer to the question was subconsciously worked-
out by those present, and conveyed to the horse, by means
of telepathy, who then rapped it out, as an “ automatism.”
But then this theory seems to be disproved by several cir¬
cumstances — the fact that the horses gave answers to
questions which were unknown to any person present; etc.
Further, if telepathy be the true explanation, there seems
no reason why the horse should not give any response
given him in this manner — whereas, as a matter of fact,
he does not. Thus, Zarif, who has never learned cube-
roots, refuses to answer when a sum of this character is
presented to him, while Muhamed reolies with ea'-e.
This certainly shows us that their ability to answer de¬
pends altogether upon the ability of the horse to figure out
the sums proposed to him, and not upon any Information

248 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

supplied him by the sitters, unconsciously or otherwise.

The great question remains: How does the horse
figure out the problems presented to him? Does he do
this consciously — by very much the same means that a
human being obtains the same results? or is it by some
more instinctive process, by means of which he is enabled
to arrive at the result without himself actually knowing
how he obtains it?

While the majority of savants who have studied the
horses appear to lean towards the former solution; it
seems probable that the latter is the correct explana¬
tion; and that the horse does not consciously and intelli¬
gently extract the cube-root, in the same way that a human
being would. With him it is more instinctive, more
subconscious. His operations resemble, in many ways,
the performances of “ mathematical prodigies ” — who
have startled the world from time to time, and whose
mental operations have never been fully explained.
Here, as we know, while they may be totally unable to
execute complicated mathematical problems in their
normal condition, they have been enabled to work
them out in their peculiar trance-like state far more
rapidly than expert mathematicians — who have, more¬
over, pencil and paper to aid them! Very little
children have had this gift, which has generally
disappeared in later life. The mind must be trained,
to a certain extent, in nearly all these cases, it is
true; the “soil” must be prepared; but the fact
remains that, normally, the mathematical genius is totally
incapable of performing the feats he does actually per¬
form in his trance condition.

Probably it is much the same in the case of the horses
before us. That vast store-house of the subconscious

TALKING HORSES OF ELBERFELD 249

mind of which so much has been written and of which we
know so little ! is apparently capable of performing feats
incapable of being equalled by the conscious mind; and
this mind is shared by the animals as well as by man. It
is in the deeps of this mind that the calculations take
place; the answers are the products of its reasonings —
“ bubbles ” which break upon its surface from the depths
below. Wonderful vistas open up before us, when once
this fact is appreciated. Not only the nature and extent
of the subconscious mind is called into question, but the
very fundamental unity of life seems to receive a new im¬
petus and a new proof, by reason of these facts. As
William James once expressed it, the leaves of the trees
whisper and talk' to one another; and the trees them¬
selves seem to be separate and independent enough; but
their roots are planted in a common soil, and they fre¬
quently touch and interlace in a region hidden from mortal
eye. It may be the same with man. Beneath the appar¬
ent separateness there may be a fundamental unity, a life
and mind which binds all together into one great whole.
The “ thinking horses of Elberfeld ” seem to have done
much to give this idea a solid foundation, and afford it a
firm support.

But, whatever the interpretation of the facts, they at
least are undoubted, and are interesing and remarkable
enough, on any theory.

CHAPTER XVI

HAVE PLANTS SOULS?

Modern scientific research has placed another stum¬
bling block in the way of our acceptance of “ survival ” in
any form, by showing us that all life is graded — that the
animal and plant worlds melt into one another, with no
clearly defined lines of demarcation. It is indeed often
difficult to tell where the one ends and the other begins.
This being so, the question may properly be raised: If
man is entitled to immortality, why not the animals also?
and if the animals, why not the insects, plants, metals,
minerals — in fact every form of existence — since all
have been shown to be inter-related and similar to a re¬
markable degree? This fact has struck one of our
modern thinkers so forcibly, indeed, that he himself has
said:

“ For my own part, then, so far as logic goes, I am
willing that every leaf that ever grew in this world’s
forests and rustled in the breeze should become immortal.
It is purely a question of fact: are the leaves so, or not? ”
{Human Immortality, by William James, pp. 43—44.)

The problem is a very proper one, once we grant the
similarity between plants and animals. The fact, hov/-
ever, may be doubted. Recent researches undertaken by
Prof. Chunder Bose, M. A., D. Sc., of the University of
Calcutta, however, seem to have settled this question in
the affirmative; and have shown us that plants in very
truth live and react in much the same manner as the sim¬
pler forms of life, as we know it in animal organisms.

250

HAVE PLANTS SOULS?

251

This being so, the question calls for solution, and it may
be interesting to give here a resume of the more important
facts, seeming to show that plants do, in fact, possess a
form of life-energy so closely akin to that of animals that
it is hard to distinguish between the two. Plants eat,
sleep, drink, rest, become fatigued, react to stimuli, be¬
come drunk or anaesthetized, notice light and darkness —
in fact live and die in much the same way as do all the
rest of the living things upon this globe; their life history
is apparently made up of physical, electrical and vito-
chemical activities very similar to those in the higher
animals.

These astounding reactions, and many more of like
nature, have been not only proved to exist but actually
measured by Professor Bose, by means of the delicate in¬
strument about to be described — an instrument so deli¬
cate that it will record the growth of a leaf “ in the single
beat of a pendulum ! ” We can see it growing before us !
Professor Bose is well known in the scientific world for
his original work on the fatigue of metals and other so-
called inanimate bodies, and for his experiments upon the
shortest electric waves so far obtained (millionths of a
centimeter long, whereas the Marconi wireless waves are
hundreds of feet in length). The experiments upon
plants have been in progress for a number of years past
and are so extraordinary, as he himself says, that unless
he were to give the precise details of his work it might be
considered incredible by the sceptic.

A brief description of the instrument by which these
results were obtained will prove essential for a correct
understanding of the facts themselves. Several types of
Instruments were devised and used by Professor Bose —
the later and more delicate ones being perfections or de-

252 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

velopments of the earlier instruments. I will describe
the first one, however, as being the simplest and most
readily understood, before touching upon its final improve¬
ments.

(tcant K.ECO'KPE'K)

The leaf of the plant to be experimented upon (the
Mimosa was selected for the majority of these experi¬
ments as being the most suitable) still attached to its stalk.

HAVE PLANTS SOULS?

253

was connected on the one hand to the arm of the record¬
ing apparatus, V, and, just below this, two wires were
wound round the stem of the plant, these being connected
with the “ secondary ” of an induction coil. The strength
of the stimulating current was carefully calculated, and
so regulated that it could be applied at regular intervals
(by a clockwork arrangement) so as to eliminate all possi¬
bility of human error. Attached to the long arm of the
pendulum, V, was a pointer, W, which was so adjusted as
to mark upon a smoked plate-glass, G, making a fine line
in much the same manner as all “ graphic ” tracings are
produced.

It was soon found, however, that this instrument was
not delicate enough to arrive at any definite results. The
friction offered by the scratch of the needle point on the
smoked surface offset, very largely, the response of the
plant — “ a weight so small as four-hundredths of a gram
is enough to arrest the pulsation of the leaflets.” Still
more sensitive apparatus was therefore necessary, and to
obtain this sensitivity Professor Bose Invented his “ reso¬
nant recorder ” — a marvel of mechanical skill.

It Is founded upon the well-known principle of reso¬
nance. If one strikes a note on a piano, a corresponding
note on another piano will vibrate, if they are tuned in
unison. If we play a note on a violin a similar note will
be emitted by another instrument, on which a similar
string will vibrate in unison. It Is the principle of “ sym¬
pathetic vibration.” This was utilized by Prof. Bose in
his improved instrument.

In this new apparatus a delicate reed was made to vi¬
brate at a definite rate. Pulsations In the leaf affected the
uniformity of these vibrations. Exactly attuned to this
vibrating reed was the reedlike writer, whose arm reached

254 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

to the smoked slate and traced upon It the plant-record.
But, It will be observed, this recording arm now no longer
traced an outline In an unbroken line; it vibrated in unison
with the reed; hence the record was in dots. This over¬
came much of the natural resistance of the tracing; and it
will be seen that, in this delicate device, there was no
actual physical connection between leaf and record. The
dots made on the smoked plate were regulated to one-one-
hundredth part of a second. By shortening the time in¬
terval between dots a time Interval as short as the
thousandth part of the duration of a single beat of the
heart can be recorded.

The next thing to do was to ascertain some method of
stimulation which would not cause a mechanical disturb¬
ance of the plant. Very weak electric currents were
found to have this effect — as In the case of animals.
The Mimosa plant, upon which the majority of these ex¬
periments were made, was found to be about ten times as
sensitive as the human body. If an electric stimulus be
applied to the plant at perfectly regular Intervals It will
respond in much the same way as a human being will —
it will react, go through a period of rest or recovery and
again respond to the next stimulus, and so on until “ fa¬
tigued.” The method of Its response Is as follows:

The leaf-stalk of the plant. A, being stimulated, will
pass on this excitation to the responding “ pulvinus,” B,
which reacts something like a nerve-cell, causing a fall of
the leaf. After a definite period the leaf recovers from
this shock and responds to the next stimulus. The leaf
is re-erected. Of course the period of this response is
infinitely small, and the variations in the leaf are infinitely
small; that Is why an electric current and so delicate an
instrument as this are needed to record the effects.

HAVE PLANTS SOULS?

255

Now let us see what some of the results are, obtained
by means of this instrument. We may first mention sleep.
Although it is probably not true that plants “ sleep ” in
the same sense that animals do, they nevertheless show a
lessened response to stimulation which indicates something
akin to it. According to popular belief and tradition flow¬
ers and plants of all kinds go to sleep with the setting sun
and get up with the first break of day. But this is not at
all the case; the results obtained are very surprising here,
as the tracing below will show. Those who like to lie

abed late in the morning and “ turn night into day ” may
console themselves with the fact that they are in good
company; the moral plant-world keeps them company!
For we see that, so far from popular tradition being true,
the plant does not go to sleep until after midnight and
does not wake up again until ten or eleven the next morn¬
ing. This is a very unexpected result; and, while it can
be accounted for, the fact nevertheless remains.

Plants are very sensitive to darkness or -to excessive
light, and react quickly to either. The tracing (p. 256)
will show the effect of a passing cloud. As soon as the
cloud passes normal sensibility is again restored.

The living plant is very sensitive to the variations of
air, food and drugs. It can get drunk or become

256 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

^ " *

CIOUD

anaesthetized by ether or chloroform very much in the
same way as a human being does. Professor Bose says:

“ The plant is intensely susceptible to the impurities
present in the air. The vitiated air of the town has a very
depressing effect. According to popular science what is
death for the animal is supposed to be life for the plant,
for does it not flourish in the deadly atmosphere of car¬
bonic acid gas? The record (below) shows that, instead

of flourishing, the plant gets suffocated just like a human

HAVE PLANTS SOULS?

257

being. Note the gasp of relief when fresh air is Intro¬
duced. Only in the presence of sunlight is the effect
modified by photosynthesis. In contrast to the effect of
carbonic acid, ozone renders the plant highly excitable.
Sulphuretted hydrogen, even In small quantities. Is fatal to
the plant. Chloroform acts as a strong narcotic, inducing
a rapid abolition of excitability. The ludicrously un¬
steady gait of the response of the plant under alcohol
(below) could be effectively exploited in a temperance
lecture.

“ It Is a very interesting and suggestive fact that I have
been able to restore the conducting power quickly by sub¬
jecting a paralysed portion to a measured and moderate
dose of electric shock. ... It has been shown that the
various conditions which accelerate, retard or block the
impulse in the animal also enhance, retard or block the
impulse In the plant in a manner which is Identical. I
have, moreover, from my investigations on the plant
nerve, been led to the discovery of certain hitherto un¬
known characteristics of the animal nerve. The investi¬
gation of the simplest type of plant nerve Is expected to
cast a flood of light on the obscure phenomenon of nervous

258 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

impulse in general and the causes operative in bringing
about the degeneration of the normal function of the
nerve. . . .

When, for convenience of experiment, we cut off a
leaflet, its spontaneous movements, like those of the heart,
come to a stop. But if we now subject the isolated leaflet
by means of a fine tube to an added internal hydrostatic
pressure, its pulsations are renewed, and continue unin¬
terrupted for a long time. It is found again that the
pulsation frequently is increased under the action of
warmth and lessened under cold — increased frequency
being attended by diminution of amplitude, and vice versa.
Under ether there is a temporary arrest, revival being pos¬
sible when the vapour is blown off. More fatal is the ef¬
fect of chloroform. The most extraordinary parallelism,
however, lies in the fact that those poisons which arrest
the beat of the heart in a particular way arrest the plant
pulsation also in a corresponding manner — the arrest
produced being either as systole or diastole, depending on
the characteristic reaction of the poison. Taking ad¬
vantage of the antagonistic reactions of specific poisons, I
have been able to revive a poisoned leaflet by the applica¬
tion of another counteracting poison. . . .

“ What we call automatic movement is simply the over¬
flow of previously stored-up and unspent energy. When
this accumulated energy is exhausted, if there is none to re¬
place it, then there is also an end of spontaneous move¬
ments. But a fresh acceleration from outside renews
these pulsations. . . .

“ A time comes when, after an answer to a supreme
shock, there is a sudden end of the plant’s power to give
any further response. This supreme shock is the shock
of death. Even in this crisis, there is no immediate

HAVE PLANTS SOULS?

259

change in the placid appearance of the plant. Drooping
and withering are events which occur long after death it¬
self. How does the plant, then, give this last answer?
In man, at the critical moment, a spasm passes through
the whole body, and similarly in the plant I find that a
great contractile spasm takes place. This is accompanied
by an electrical spasm also. In the script of the death-
recorder the line, that up to this point was being drawn,
becomes suddenly reversed and then ends. This is the
last answer of the plant.

“ These, our mute companions, silently growing beside
our door, have now told us the tale of their life-tremulous-
ness and their death-spasm in script that is as inarticulate
as they. May it not be said that this, their story, has a
pathos of its own beyond any that we have conceived? ”
(“ Lecture before the Royal Institution of Great Britain,”
May 29, 1914.)

The rate of this reaction of the plant to the electric
stimulus occupied Professor Bose for a long period of
time, and occasioned some of his very best work. For a
long time, it was thought by many scientific men (and is
still believed by the public) that the nervous currents were
electrical, or closely akin to electricity; but it is now
thought that they are chemical in character — a wave of
communication passing along the nerve-tract when a “ cur¬
rent ” is passed. This conclusion is based very largely
upon the reaction-times of human beings and large ani¬
mals. Thus electricity, travelling at the rate of light,
186,000 miles a second, would travel to and fro, from a
nerve-cell to the surface of the body with incredible ra¬
pidity; but we know that, as a matter-of-fact, an appreci¬
able time is involved in all such reactions. Nervous im¬
pulses travel at the rate of only a few feet a second !

26o modern psychical phenomena

They cannot therefore be electrical. The same is true of
the plant. Professor Bose, in measuring the rate of
nervous transmission (which he was careful to distinguish
from purely “ mechanical ” transmission) in the plant,
showed that there is a current to and from a centre, and
also a period of “ latency,” before the response to the
stimulus is given. This latent period was found to be
about one-tenth of a second. The whole period of time,
between stimulus and response, was i.6 seconds. (This
for a distance of 30 millimeters of travel.) In this case,
then, the velocity was about 20 millimeters per second.
Temperature was found to accelerate the rate of this
transmission, up to a certain point (as in man) while
poisons delayed it. Various other factors which are
known to affect the higher animals, in their reactions,
were also found to affect the plant in a very similar man¬
ner.

Perhaps the most marvellous achievement of Professor
Bose, however, is his instantaneous record of the growth
of a plant. As he himself says “ the rate of growth is
so exceedingly slow that even the proverbial pace of the
snail is two thousand times quicker. It would take an
average plant 200 years to cover the short distance of a
mile. This extreme slowness is a serious drawback in
the investigation of growth.” Indeed, one would think
so ! And yet, by means of his high-magnification “ cresco-
graph,” -the absolute rate of growth of a plant can be reg¬
istered in a period of time “ as short as in the single beat
of a pendulum! ” The various magnifications available
are a thousand or ten thousand times. For demonstration
purposes, a magnification of one million times has been
shown I “ The infinitesimal growth thus becomes mag¬
nified so as to appear rushing forward as if in a race.

HAVE PLANTS SOULS?

261

The actual rate of growth and its variations under the
action of drugs, of food materials, of various electrical
and other forms of stimuli, are thus recorded in the course
of a few minutes. The great importance of this method
of investigation in agriculture is sufficiently obvious.”

This is the great work being done by Professor Bose.
And, once again, it will be seen, the purely “ theoretical ”
side of science is shown to have an actual, practical bear¬
ing upon every-day life. Let those who are inclined to
scoff at impractical, “ theoretical ” knowledge remember
this and remember also that the last thing we learn about
any science is what it is all about! For two thousand
years, men worked over conic sections without knowing or
believing that they would ever be more than a purely intel¬
lectual pastime; yet now the engineer employs them in the
most practical manner. All science — all knowledge —
is good; no matter how apparently “remote” from
daily life. Even these remarkable experiments of Prof.
Bose on plant reactions show this.

CHAPTER' XVII

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF “ ALICE IN WONDERLAND ”
AND “ THROUGH THE LOOKING-GLASS ”

The wonderful insight of Lewis Carroll and the scien¬
tific accuracy of his study of dream life from the point
of view of modern psychology has rarely been men¬
tioned or even thought of. We are accustomed to
■think of Alice in W onderlan^ and Alice Through the
Looking-Glass as being written solely to entertain chil¬
dren — as stories filled with humour and wit but very
little seriousness. And yet — strange as it may ap¬
pear — these books, if analysed, will be found to contain
a mine of valuable psychological material of the greatest
interest, and it is strange that practically no psychologist
has taken it upon himself to study these stories from
that point of view. The following brief analysis of
some of the main points of interest may therefore prove
suggestive, as tending to throw new light on these juve¬
nile “ classics.”

To begin with, then, it will be seen at a glance that
Lewis Carroll utilized, as the fundamental data for
these dreams, the material with which a child’s mind
would be stocked — thereby conforming to the orthodox
conception that “ one cannot dream anything one has not
experienced, known or sensed.” Cards, chessmen, the
kitten, sheep, flowers, a dormouse, a caterpillar, the
lion, the unicorn and the mockturtle (;, these last two
probably believed in as realities by most children), the
little shop, etc., all figure prominently. If we were to
make a list of the various objects, scenes, and so forth,

262

“ ALICE IN WONDERLAND ” 263

contained in the first chapter of Alice, we should have:
A meadow, a hedge, a rabbit-hole, a. straight tunnel, a
long shaft, a heap of sticks and leaves, a long passage,
a long low hall, doors all round the hall, a small pas¬
sage, a beautiful garden, a hot day, etc. — all such
things, in short, as present the customary “ stage set¬
ting,” structural arrangement, etc., of the ordinary
dream. As usual, also, Alice herself is the central and
most important personage — the heroine — who ob¬
serves and enacts all the principal events, and around
whom all the chief characters revolve.

In addition to this dream material, Lewis Carroll also
introduced a number of imaginary characters and ob¬
jects — extensions of nursery rhymes and supersti¬
tions — which every child would naturally know.
Thus, Humpty Dumpty, the Mad Hatter, the March
Hare, Tweedledum and Tweedledee (with their ” nice
new rattle ”) are all examples of this’. Such well-known
stories as “ the lion and the unicorn fighting for the
crown,” the knave of hearts stealing the tarts, and vari¬
ous similar rhymes and verses, are also turned to ac¬
count. The influence of school life — “lessons” — is
also very manifest. All through both books, the char¬
acters are constantly setting one another sums to figure
out, problems and riddles to solve, questions to answer,
etc., all of which we might expect to find in a child’s
mind, in which lessons occupy so prominent a place.

The manner in which the scenes change and glide one
into another is also very characteristic of the dream
world. Thus, the little shop is transformed into the
boat on the river, and the knitting needles in Alice’s
hands into oars, only to be retransposed into needles
again later, at the time the river insensibly changes

264 modern psychical PHENOMENA

back again to the little dark shop. The egg changes, as
she approaches it, to Humpty Dumpty. The heads of
the red and the white queens vanish from her lap with¬
out her knowing it — they are just “gone.” The
rushes which Alice picked in the stream began to fade
and vanish In her hands as soon as she had picked
them — “ these, being dream-rushes, melted away almost
like snow, as they lay in heaps at her feet, but Alice
hardly noticed this, there were so many other curious
things to think about.” Even the looking-glass thinned
and admitted her passage — when she tried to push her
way through It. In this way she entered the looking-
glass world.

Nearly everything in the whole book Is, of course, en¬
dowed with life and speech — they are made human —
are “ personalized.” Savages attributed intelligence to
the powers of Nature, and children do much the same
thing. The animals, the cards, the chessmen, birds,
beasts, insects, all are endowed with human speech and
carry on long conversations. Even the flowers talk.
This is very common in dreams, and, as we know, very
many fairy-stories are founded upon this central theme.
Even Time is personified : “ If you knew Time as well as
I do, you wouldn’t talk about wasting it. It’s him.”
Similarly, the leg of mutton Is introduced to Alice, and
gets up and bows.

These, however, are but the more obvious and com¬
monplace factors which must have been more or less ap¬
parent to every interested reader of the adventures of
Alice. Besides these, there are a number of other factors
which may well be noted, and which lead us further
afield raising, as they do, philosophical and psychologi-

“ALICE IN WONDERLAND” 265

cal questions of the greatest Interest and importance.
Let us take, for instance, the following passage.

When Alice was in the little dark shop, she noticed
that —

the shop seemed full of all manner of curious things — but the
oddest part of it all was, that whenever she looked hard at any
shelf, . . . that particular shelf was always quite empty; though
the others round it were crowded as full as they could hold.

“ Things flow about so here,” she said at last, in a plaintive
tone, after she had spent a minute or so in vainly pursuing a
large bright thing, that looked sometimes like a doll and some¬
times like a work-box, and was always on the shelf next above
the one she was looking at. “ And this one is the most provok¬
ing of all, but I’ll tell you what,” she added, as a sudden thought
struck her, ‘‘ I’ll follow it up to the very top shelf of all. It’ll
puzzle it to go through the ceiling, I expect! ”

But even this plan failed ; the thing went through the ceiling as
quietly as possible, as if it were quite used to it!

This “ seeing a thing out of the corner of the eye ” is
a very common experience; the little specks of light
which form before the closed eyelids when dropping off
to sleep, and which always vanish or change their places
when looked at squarely, are good examples of this.
Then, too, many “ apparitions ” are seen in this man¬
ner; yet as soon as looked at fully, they disappear —
sometimes to come again elsewhere. The item of van¬
ishing through the ceiling is of interest in view of the
fact that, at spiritualistic seances, objects are occasion¬
ally said to vanish in this mysterious fashion, sometimes
indeed even the medium himself {Proceedings, S. P. R.,
vol. Iv., p. 483). Thus a psychological cause is sug¬
gested for many of these records, rather than a physical
miracle.

266 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

On various occasions, reference is made to Alice fall¬
ing, floating, flying or running with incredible speed
through the air. These are all but examples of the com¬
mon falling or flying dreams, to which we are all more
or less subject. They are among the seven common
dreams which practically every one is said to experience
at one time or another in his life. Usually, the subject
arrives at the bottom of his fall unhurt — as Alice did,
when she fell gently upon the pile of sticks — or he fails
to reach the bottom at all. The old superstition that a
person will die If he reaches the ground in a fall of this
kind is the purest superstition. There are many cases
on record In which the subject has reached the bottom,
and received more or less of a jolt thereby. In one
case, at least, the subject saw himself dashed to bits;
but somehow managed to pick himself up, and stick
the pieces together again! (Hutchinson, Dreams and
Their Meanings.) The example which Is given of
Alice running through the air at a terrific pace, with the
red queen, and finding herself in the same place at the
end, is but an example of the common dream in which
we find ourselves unable to get away from some in¬
jurious person or thing which Is pursuing us. Try as we
will, we cannot make progress! These falling and fly¬
ing dreams have been made the subject of lengthy dis¬
cussion.

Another Interesting point touched upon by Lewis Car-
roll In Alice is the matter of mirror-writing — Spiegel-
schrift — which Is found so often in automatic or
“ spirit ” messages. Here the tendency Is often very
pronounced — this question being the topic of a lengthy
discussion by Mr. F. W. H. Myers, in an article upon
Jhe subject of automatic writing In Vol. Ill of the

“ ALICE IN WONDERLAND ” 267

Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research. He
there pointed out that many persons, when they try to
write with their left hands, often produce mirror-writing
at first; that left-handed persons often write, at times, in
this manner — until consciously corrected; and that, in
certain odd diseases — ataxia and the like — spiegel-
schrift is occasionally produced. All of which led Mr.
Myers to the belief that the right hemisphere is chiefly
involved in the production of this writing (instead of
the left, which right-handed persons usually employ)
and that the functioning of this hemisphere is chiefly
accountable for mirror-writing. There being many
psychological analogies between the abstracted state
often necessary for obtaining automatic writing and the
dream state, the connection is too evident to need more
than a mere mention. Here, again, however, Lewis
Carroll unwittingly opened up a question of the greatest
psychological importance.

I have reserved for final discussion the most In¬
teresting problem of all, raised by a careful study of
'‘Alice*’ — since it raises for our consideration one of
the greatest metaphysical questions ever propounded —
and there is reason to believe that Lewis Carroll raised
it knowingly. It refers to the possibly dream-like char¬
acter of our existence, here on earth; and rarely has
the problem been more tersely put. Here Is the passage
in which Carroll stated the case, with rare penetration
and skill —

“ It’s only the red king snoring,” said Tweedledee.

“ Come and look at him,” the brothers cried, and they each
took one of Alice’s hands, and led her up to where the king was
sleeping. . . .

“He’s dreaming now,” said Tweedledee; “and what do you
think he is dreaming about ? ”

268 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Alice said : “ Nobody can guess that.”

“ Why, about you,” Tweedledee exclaimed, clapping his hands
triumphantly. “ And if he left off dreaming about you, where do
j'ou suppose you’d be? ”

” Where I am now, of course,” said Alice.

“ Not you,” Tweedledee retorted contemptuously. “ You’d be
nowhere. Why, you’re only a sort of thing in his dream.”

“ If that there king was to wake,” added Tweedledum,
“you’d go out — bang — just like a candle.”

“I shouldn’t,” Alice , exclaimed indignantly. “Besides, if I’m
only a sort of thing in his dream, what are you, I should like to
know? ”

“ Ditto,” said Tweedledum. “ Ditto, ditto,” said Tweedledee.

He shouted so loud that Alice couldn’t help saying, “ Hush,
you’ll be waking him, I’m afraid, if you make so much noise.”

“ Well, it’s no use your talking about waking him,” said
Tweedledum, “ when you’re only one of the things in his dream.
You know very well you’re not real.”

“ I am real,” said Alice, and began to cry.

“ You won’t make yourself a bit realler by crying,” Tweedledee
remarked ; “ there’s nothing to cry about.”

“ If I wasn’t real,” Alice said, half-laughing through her tears,
it all seemed so ridiculous, “ I shouldn’t be able to cry.”

“ I hope you don’t suppose those are real tears? ” Tweedledum
interrupted in a tone of great contempt.

“ I know they’re talking nonsense,” Alice thought to her¬
self. . . .

Veiled in this simple language, Lewis Carroll, who
was, as we know, a scholar and student, stated one of
the most profound and insoluble paradoxes in phi¬
losophy — and incidentally, no doubt, poked fun at the
apparently paradoxical conclusion — from the view¬
point of “ common-sense.” For the point raised is no
less than the world-old problem: How do we know that
life is not all a dream — that we are but thoughts in
some gigantic mind — and that we shall one day wake
up and find ourselves obliterated — if we be allowed

“ALICE IN WONDERLAND” 269

this Irish bull — or (to employ the analogy used by
Plato) find that this life may be a dream, and the true
life, the life of living, waking realities. Is the life of the
spirit, to which we wake only after death?

The analogy employed by Plato, to illustrate this
point, is well known, but may stand restatement in con¬
cise form. In his Seventh Book of the Republic, a de¬
scription is given of a cave in which are prisoners, fet¬
tered from earliest childhood, so that they cannot move,
and look only straight before them. Behind and above
them Is a fire, blazing at a distance, and between the fire
and the prisoners are men passing along with various
kinds of vessels, statues, figures of animals, etc., casting
their shadows on the wall of the cave. The prisoners
have no knowledge save of the shadows, which to them
are the reality. In our application of this the objects
we perceive in the physical universe may be like these
shadows, and the things to which they correspond are
in reality composed of mind.

Every one, at one time or another in his life, has
probably experienced this wonder, this thought: Is life,
then, all a dream? And If not, how prove that fact?
It is assuredly most difficult, and subject to much hair¬
splitting sophistry. The problem is fairly stated by
Lewis Carroll in the passage quoted.

W. K. Clifford saw this difficulty very clearly, and he,
too, asked himself the question: What hinders us from
saying that life Is all a dream? His philosophical ar¬
gument ran about as follows : —

How does a dream differ from waking life? In a
fairly coherent dream, everything seems quite real, and
it is true that many people know In a dream that they are
dreaming. If a dream is sufficiently vivid and coherent.

270 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

all physical inferences are just as valid in it as they are
in waking life. In a hazy or imperfect dream, it is true,
things melt one into another, unexpectedly and unac¬
countably; we fly, remove mountains, and stop runaway
horses with a finger. But there is nothing in the mere
nature of a dream to hinder it from being an exact
copy of waking experience. If I find a stone heavy in
one part of my dream, and infer that it is heavy at some
subsequent part, the inference will be verified if the
dream is coherent enough; I shall go to the stone, lift it
up, and find it as heavy as before. And the same thing
is true of all inferences from phenomena. For physical
purposes, a dream is just as good as real life; the only
difference, usually, is in vividness and coherence.

But if the phenomena we dream of are just as good
and real to us then as the real phenomena we see and
feel when we are awake, what right have we to say that
the material universe has any more existence apart from
our minds than the things we see and feel in our dreams?
The answer which Berkeley gave to that question was:
No right at all. The physical universe which I see and
feel, and infer, is just my dream and nothing else; that
which you see is your dream; only it so happens that all
our dreams agree in many respects. This doctrine of
Berkeley’s has now been so far confirmed by the physi¬
ology of the senses that it is no longer a metaphysical
speculation, but a scientifically established fact.

When I see a man in my dream, then, he seems to
possess a physical body just as much as when I am
awake; if only the dream be coherent enough — no
physical test can establish the fact that it is a dream. In
dream, as in waking, I seem to see the same thing. In
both cases I assume the existence of more than I can

“ ALICE IN WONDERLAND ”

271

see and feel — namely, the consciousness of the other
man. “ But,” says Clifford, “ here is the great dif¬
ference and the only difference — in a dream this as¬
sumption is wrong, in waking life it is right.” The man
I see in my dream is a mere machine, a bundle of phe¬
nomena with no underlying reality; there is no conscious¬
ness involved except my consciousness, no feeling in the
case except my feelings. The man I see in my waking
life is more than a bundle of phenomena; his body and
his actions are phenomena, but these phenomena are
merely the symbols and representatives in my mind of a
reality which is outside my mind, namely, the conscious¬
ness of the man himself, which is represented by the
working of his brain, and the simpler quasi-mental facts,
not woven into his consciousness, which are represented
by the working of the rest of his body. “ What makes
life not a dream is the existence of those facts which
we arrive at by the process of inference; the conscious¬
ness of man and the higher animals, the sub-conscious¬
ness of lower organisms, and the quasi-mental facts
which go along with the motions of inanimate matter.”

If we wanted to split hairs, we might at this point
raise the question; How do we know that the mental
figures seen in dreams are not real — do not have self-
consciousness — just as much as the living beings we
know in this life? It must be admitted that the negative
of this cannot be proved, since the negative of any argu¬
ment cannot be proved. We can only go by assump¬
tion — and commonsense. The consensus of opinion
says that it is not true. That is why Alice says, “ I know
they’re talking nonsense,” though she couldn’t prove it
successfully to herself. That is why she was right, in a
sense, in regarding this logic as unphilosophical. The

272 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

fact that she could see, think, and feel was proof posi¬
tive that she was not “ a sort of thing ” in anybody’s
dream. Hence the inner meaning of that great saying of
Descrates, Cogito, ergo sum. That is the root of all
philosophy — of all sane thought. We must begin
somewhere. Descartes said that this was the beginning
of all thought; the hope of all future argument. So
Alice did not melt away, like the dream lilies she
gathered in her hands, but lived on. In her dream; and
finally woke up at the end Into real life again.

Viewed psychologically, therefore. It can be seen that
Alice presents matter of the greatest scientific interest, as
well as remaining the most charming child’s story of
all time.

PART III. RECENT RESEARCHES IN
CRYSTAL VISION AND CRYSTAL
GAZING

CHAPTER XVIII

RECENT RESEARCHES IN CRYSTAL VISION AND CRYSTAL

GAZING

By Hereward Carrington, Ph.D., and
W. H. Bates, M.D.

A NUMBER of able and interesting articles have ap¬
peared in the Proceedings of the S. P. R., from time to
time in the pa '■ discussing both the historical and psy¬
chological aspects of crystal gazing — and furnishing
many valuable — indeed classical — experiments. The
present paper is an attempt to study these visions from
a somewhat different point-of-view than any so far as¬
sumed; we have endeavoured to study the actual physio¬
logical changes taking place within the eye during the
production or perception of these visions; and this, we
believe, is a side of the question hitherto neglected by
both medical men and by “ psychical researchers.” It
is, indeed, a most intricate and difficult one; but it is
certainly true that the physiology of hallucinations is a
subject as important as it is ill-understood; and we can
only hope that the present paper may add some grain to
our knowledge of these obscure facts, and stimulate
others to experiment along similar or somewhat divergent
lines.

It is not without some misgivings that we approach a
subject which has been so ably handled in the past by
Mr. Myers, Mr. Lang, “ Miss X,” Mrs. Verrall, and
others. Their researches, indeed, cover a far wider field
than can be attempted in this paper; for, in addition to

276 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the mass of material presented, apparently supernormal
information was obtained, and this our researches can
hardly be said to supply. It is true, also, that “ Miss
X ” made some valuable physical and optical experi¬
ments, in connection with her visions; but, at the
conclusion of her article on crystal gazing, in the Pro¬
ceedings (Vol. V, p. 520) she says that her paper “ did
not profess to be in any sense an inquiry into its physio¬
logical explanation, or psychical significance.” It is pre¬
cisely these questions which we have studied in the pres¬
ent paper; and while, of course, such changes as could be
observed, during the visions, must necessarily be limited
to the eye — and the gross changes at that — still a
suggestion is here made which may lead to further work
and investigation along this line.

The history of crystal gazing has already been covered
in a very full and lucid manner by ” Miss X.,” in her ar¬
ticle before referred to (Proceedings^ Vol. V, pp. 486-
504) ; and also in the following books and references,
among others: Crystal Gazing, by N. W. Thomas (with
an Introduction by Andrew Lang) ; Crystal Gazing and
Clairvoyance, by John Melville; The Curious Lore of
Precious Stones, by George F. Kunz, D. Sc.; and The
Magic of Jewels and Charms, by the same author; The
Enigmas of Psychical Research, by James H. Hyslop
(Chapter 3); The Book of Talismans, Amidels and
Zodiacal Gems, by William Thomas and Kate Pavitt;
The Making of Religion, by Andrew Lang; The Golden
Bough, by Fraser (Vol. I) ; The Crystal and the Seer, by
Sepharial; Practical Psychomancy and Crystal Gazing,
by W. W. Atkinson; Essays in Psychical Research, by
“ Miss X.” — (Chapter 3) — this last being an ampli¬
fication of an article of hers previously appearing in

CRYSTAL VISION

277

Borderland. The interested reader will find ample ma¬
terial in these books, and the references they contain,
to supply him with a full history of the subject, as well as
the numerous mediaeval and modern “ quack ” views re¬
garding the uses and powers of the crystal ball. The
writings of Kunz, particularly, are filled with useful
scientific material bearing upon the physical and chemical
properties of crystals, — as well as upon their mysteries
and uses. The historical summaries by Thomas and
Miss X. are all that could be desired; while the older,
“ magical ” aspects and ceremonies connected with the
practice are well epitomized in Melville’s book, before
referred to.

Perhaps a brief mention of these earlier views may not
be out of place here, — before passing on to the scientific
point-of-view involved in the later psychological concep¬
tions. According to these views, then, the crystal itself
was supposed to possessv^magical properties and virtues
of its own; it was the centre of a species of “ magnetism,”
“ the connecting link between the crystal and the spiritual
world is magnetism, attracted to and accumulated in or
round the crystal by the iron infused throughout its con¬
stitution, and the greater the increase of the moon the
greater subsequently is the supply and accumulation of
the Lunar Magnetism in the crystal.” Accordingly,
Astrology played a large part in successful crystal read¬
ings; special times both of the month and of the day
were set apart, under certain Zodiacal influences; and
there were special ” spirits ” invoked — according to the
time of day or of the month, as the case might be.
“ Vessago ” was said to be the special genius of the crys¬
tal, and was formerly invoked whenever the crystal was
read for special and particular purposes. A regular

278 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

magical ceremony was also undertaken, — In which the
table, the seer, and the ball Itself were consecrated to the
occasion. Sacred names of the Deity and of friendly
spirits were Inscribed upon the cloth supporting the ball,
and the whole process much resembled a seance devoted
to ceremonial magic.

Regarding the doctrine that a certain property of
magnetism resided In the crystal Itself, — this Is of
greater Interest and Importance, Inasmuch as many still
believe In this, and Inasmuch as It bears a curious resem¬
blance to certain odd facts connected with “ psychometry,”
the Influence of objects presented to mediums, etc. It
was held, then, that the great desideratum. In the manu¬
facture of magic mirrors, was to retain the accumulated
“ magnetism ” upon their surface, “ and It Is the difficulty
of achieving this which renders the production of genuine
mirrors so costly.” Concentration of the eyes, and of
the gaze, upon the crystal was essential, for the reason
that It established a magnetic rapport between the ball
and the cerebellum of the gazer, which was said to be
the “ reservoir ” of this vital magnetism. Fasting was
thought to Increase the amount of this magnetism in the
human body. Those who were endowed by nature with
quantities of this magnetism could be distinguished by
the fact that their eyes were set widely apart. Holding
the ball in the hand before gazing was said to add to
its magnetic properties. “ When gazing, it becomes
charged with the magnetism exuding from the eyes of
the gazer.” After this occurs, visions begin to form.
Sunrise, mid-day and sunset were said to be the best times
Tor crystal gazing; ten p. M. to two A. M. the worst.
The motive of the gazer should be pure, “ since space Is
filled with good and evil spirits,” and the gazer would

CRYSTAL VISION

279

surely “ attract to himself those like unto the thought
within himself,” at the time. White clouds were said to
indicate good or affirmative answers, black clouds the re¬
verse. Violet, green and blue clouds were regarded as
excellent omens. Red, orange and yellow, on the other
hand, were held to be indicative of danger and trouble.
Ascending clouds gave affirmative replies; descending
clouds, negative ones. Whatever appeared on the left
hand side of the crystal was actual or real; what ap¬
peared on the right hand side was symbolical. Moon¬
light was said to benefit the crystal; sunlight, on the con¬
trary, was injurious. Extremes of heat and cold were
likewise harmful. Clouds or shadows moving toward
the gazer’s right hand indicated the presence of spiritual
beings; those moving toward the left hand indicated that
“ the seance is ended for the present time.” (Melville.)
From which it will be apparent that crystal gazing was
regarded, in those days, as a serious business and a
sacred ceremony, rather than as a sport, which is too
often the case at the present day.

The majority of educated persons, now-a-days, would
not believe that spiritual beings actually inhabit the ball,
during a crystal-gazing seance; but rather that the seer
has cultivated a certain degree of clairvoyant or visualiz¬
ing power, enabling him to perceive, as in the ball, cer¬
tain forms or images which are in reality within his own
mind. Perhaps it is necessary to emphasize this point
more strongly, as the distinction is not as fully ap¬
preciated as it should be, by those who are inclined
to believe there is “ something in crystal-gazing.” The
figures or images do not exist in the ball, but
in the mind of the seer who perceives them —
even when they are “ veridical ” or truth-telling.

28o modern psychical phenomena

This is, of course, so obvious to the psychical
researcher as to need no comment; and all psychologists
would agree upon this point; but there is a school
of “ occultists ” which contends that the figures
seen are real or objective — that they are actually
created by the mind of the seer, and projected into the
ball, where they act out their given role or part. In this
case, they are held to be examples of “ thought-forms ”
created in space, — much in the same manner as other
“thought-forms” are; and that they have actual ob¬
jective existence for the time being.

It seems hardly necessary to combat such a belief in
this age; we need only say that — whatever proof there
may be for the existence of “ thought-forms ” in other
instances — there is no reason to suppose, and no evi¬
dence to prove, that the images seen in the crystal are in
themselves objective. All the tests which are supposed
to prove the objective reality of the images (such as mag¬
nification, reflection, etc.) may be shown to be equally
valid, were the images subjective, — as we shall presently
show. Further, in certain experiments, the results, —
when the subject did not know what they were supposed
to be, and hence “suggestion” was eliminated, — were
other than they would have been, had the image been
really “ there.” {Proceedings S. P. R., Vol. X, p.
io8: Borderland, January, 1894.) Again, hallucina¬
tory objects conjured up in the ball, by an effort of
will, gave complementary after-images, — as real images
would have done, — though in this case they were demon¬
strably hallucinatory. {Loc. cit. VIII., p. 484; X, p.
147.) Finally, it will be shown later on in this paper
that the images are undoubtedly subjective for the simple
reason that we have proved that, in the majority of in-

CRYSTAL VISION

28 1

stances, at least, the seer was not looking at or into the
ball at all during the production of the vision, but into
space — some inches distant from the ball, either on the
near or far side of it, as the case might be. The eyes,
that is, were focussed not upon the ball, but upon empty
space at the moment of the vision — though the seer
was quite ignorant of this fact, and under the impression
that he was looking right into or at the ball all the time !

A second point must here be considered. “ If the
images are all hallucinatory,” some critic may say, “ why
bother with them at all? Surely, in that case, they are
not worthy of study, from the point-of-view of the psychi¬
cal researcher! ”

The answer to this objection is two-fold. In the first
place, they are of great interest from the purely psycho¬
logical and physiological points-of-view — as hallucina¬
tions quite apart from their veridical character alto¬
gether. In the second place, the supernormal character
of many of these visions has often been adequately
proved — telepathic, clairvoyant and prophetic visions of
the character having been recorded in the past, in the
Proceedings and elsewhere, and form part and parcel of
the general problem before us. It must always be re¬
membered, in such cases, that the supernormal character
of the communication depends not upon the miraculous
manner of the delivery of the message, but upon the
content of the message itself. It does not matter
whether the sensitive pushes the ouija board or
moves the dowsing-rod by unconscious muscular ac¬
tion; he doubtless does so. The problem before
us is: How did he know when to exert this pressure,
and cause the board or the rod to move, in pre¬
cisely the right manner, so as to convey informa-

282 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

tion unknown to himself or to others? As “ Miss X.”
has clearly stated the problem in her Essays in Psychical
Research (p. 163) :

“ It does not matter how the rod is turned. The
dowser probably does it himself without knowing it.
But how did he subconsciously get the information which
led to the turning of the rod? . . . The point is not,
How does the picture get into the crystal? which is
easily answered. The seer puts it there. It is, as his
critics say, hoping to be unkind, but succeeding only in
being veracious, merely his fancy. The point is. How
did it get into his head? ”

Dr. Hyslop, in his paper on “ Some Experiments in
Crystal-Vision ” {Proceedings S. P. R. Vol. XII, pp.
259-276), states that in the subject experimented upon

(Mrs. D - ) “ sometimes the vision appears on the

surface of the crystal and sometimes at the centre of it.”
This experience coincides with that of numerous other
crystal-gazers. Randolph, in his Seership (p. 74),
states that the images seen by him in the crystal were
often “ about the size of a silver dime ” (sixpenny piece).
On the other hand, in a case reported to us (Miss
d’Orsay) the subject saw images practically life-size upon
a white sheet, which she hung up in her room, and even
cattle and horses “ as large as life ” ! The images
seemed to be actually upon the sheet. This, however, is
very rare, and closely akin to the hallucinations of de-
lirum and similar states. A friend of Mr. Andrew Lang
stated that, on one occasion, he saw a face in the ball,
and, on turning the glass, saw the face in profile.
{Journal, S. P. R., Vol. VIII, p. 222.) Mrs. A. W.
Verrall, in writing of her crystal visions, says: “ The dif¬
ference between a picture in the crystal and a mental pic-

CRYSTAL VISION 283

ture Is quite marked but difficult to describe; it will per¬
haps enable me to show what I mean if I say that the
recalled image of what I have seen in the crystal differs
as much from the actual image as the mental image of a
person differs from the actual person. ... It has oc¬
casionally happened that I have been able to see more
on a closer investigation than on the first glance, but if I
try to interpose a magnifying glass between my eye and
the crystal the picture instantly goes and only the recol¬
lection remains. . . . Movement occurs not infrequently
in the picture and so does change. I use the word move¬
ment when I see in the crystal a picture within which oc¬
curs an alteration, and the word change when the whole
picture undergoes alteration and is succeeded by an¬
other. ... I find it very difficult to say what size the
pictures appear to me to be, as I have nothing to compare
them with. They seem to me, however, not to be
bounded by the size of the crystal, and they vary in the
impression produced. But though the things certainly
appear to me sometimes to be ‘ large ’ and sometimes
‘ small ’ I am quite unable to determine how such an im¬
pression is produced. . .” {Proceedings, Vol. VIII
pp. 473-78.) Mr. Myers states that “ of the four crys¬
tal seers whose cases I give at length, two good visual-
izers believe that they do see complementary colours of
phantasmal images, while the third good visualizer, Mrs.
Verrall, with Miss A., who is a bad visualizer, can see no
such colours” (pp. 479-80).

” Miss X’s ” experiments, recorded in Proceedings
Vol. VIII, p. 484-92, are classical, and the most detailed
and painstaking with which we are familiar, devoted to
the study of the optical and physical laws underlying
these visions, as well as their psychological significance.

284 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

To summarize very briefly: “Miss X.” found that: If
she looked into the bowl or hollow of a spoon, the image
seemed distorted as it would, had the image been objec¬
tive or real; that images seen reflected in a mirror were
seen to be properly reversed; that a magnifying glass
magnified the vision; that a piece of Iceland spar re¬
fracted the image, producing two images, — as it would,
were the image objective; that complementary colours
were usuafly seen; that the pictures seemed usually to fit
into the crystal, — that is, to be the size of the ball; that
the images lasted several minutes, — as many as eight on
one occasion, — without disappearing; that the images
sometimes came suddenly, and were sometimes built up
by degrees. “ Miss X “ traces the origin of many of her
visions, in a scientific and ingenious manner.

In the case of Miss A., on the other hand, {op. cit. pp.
498-515), we learn that she tried the magnifying glass
on several occasions, and that “ the results are just the
same as without it; only the glass being on the top I sup¬
pose I see in it instead of in the crystal. ... I cannot tell
when people ask me whether the figures which I see are
big or small; for I see as if I were in some way close to
them; so I cannot define their size. . , If I move my
eyes from the crystal, or if I close my eyes, the picture
disappears. If I move the crystal about I seem to shake
the picture out of it. When the picture is once lost I can
seldom see it again. Once or twice I have succeeded in
doing so, but there have always been other pictures be¬
tween. . . .”

Mr. Stephen F. Austin, B.A., in his interesting book
Dramatherapy, writes, regarding crystal visions :

“ For instance, so far as the subject is concerned, it

CRYSTAL VISION

285

(the crystal vision) will obey all the laws of optics. An
opera glass will approach or distance the image accord¬
ing to the end through which it is viewed, while the glasses
themselves must be variously adjusted for the near-sighted
and the far-sighted to enable both to see it. A magni¬
fying glass, moreover, will enlarge the hallucination, and
a refracting prism will double it — the amount of dis¬
placement corresponding always to the prism’s index of
refraction. Furthermore, the proximity of a magnet
has been observed to have the effect of displacing, or of
dispersing, the illusory object, although it has not yet been
determined whether this phenomenon is due to some sug¬
gestive influence exercised by the operator upon the sub¬
ject, or to actual torsion exerted by the magnet upon the
image itself. . . .” (See Binet and Fere: Animal Mag¬
netism.)

Bjornstrom even says (in his Hypnotism) : —

“ Although an optical illusion seems to be fixed only in
the brain of the one who sees it, yet it seems as though
the hallucinator possesses a certain power of giving the
image some kind of physical fixation in reality;” — that
is, of objectifying it. Into this we cannot enter at pres¬
ent, however.

Parish, in his Hallucinations and Illusions, merely
summarizes the above-mentioned material, without add¬
ing anything original either in the optical, physiological
or psychological fields. Prince tells us (The Dissocia¬
tion of a Personality, p. 79) that “when Miss Beau¬
champ looks into a glass globe she does not see the details
of her vision as small objects reflected in the glass, but,
after a moment or two the globe and her surroundings

286 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

disappear from her consciousness, and she sees before
her a scene in which she herself is present as a spectator.”
This seems to indicate the presence of a more or less
dream-like state or condition, unknown to her — upon
the existence of which Parish so strenuously insisted.
Dr. Paul Joire, in his Psychical and Supernormal Phe¬
nomena, (p. 157) says that:

“The pictures (seen in crystals) are sometimes of a
uniform tone, similar to a photograph; at other times
they are coloured and present the natural tints. Some
pictures are fixed and motionless, like a painting; others
are constantly changing, and show the persons animated,
as in a cinematograph. The first pictures are often
simple — a portrait, bust, plant, animal or house. Then
they become most complicated — a complete moving
scene, as in a theatre; a room, a street, a public thorough¬
fare filled with various people, who walk about, come in
and go out, just as in real life. . . .”

Maxwell, in his Metapsychical Phenomena, (p. 185)
tells us that “ the gaze should not be directed on the
surface of the crystal, but in the crystal itself. The
knack of gazing inside the crystal is speedily acquired.”
(We believe that Dr. Maxwell means by this that the
eyes should not be focussed too consciously on the ball,
but allowed to relax and become “ subjective,” as it were,
as the hand and arm do in automatic writing; and that
when this is accomplished, by means of the effort to see
into the interior of the ball, the required state of the
eyes is thereby induced. This would agree with our con¬
clusions, — if this is what is meant.)

Myers, in his Human Personality , has summed up or
quoted at length the most important researches and con¬
clusions up to the time of the publication of his book

CRYSTAL VISION

287

(1903) ; and his words may fittingly be quoted by way
of concluding our epitome of what important experiments
we have been able to find, regarding crystal-gazing.

He says (p. 229) :

“ Ocular vision is the perception of material objects,
in accordance with optical laws, from a definite point in
space. Our review of hallucinations has already re¬
moved two of these limitations. If I see a hallucinatory
figure — and figures seen in dreams come under this cate¬
gory — I see something which is not a material object,
and I see it in a manner not determined by optical laws.
A dream figure may indeed seem to conform to optical
laws; but that will be the result of self-suggestion, or of
organized memories, and will vary according to the
dreamer’s visualizing power. While a portrait painter
may see a face in dream which he can paint from mem¬
ory when he wakes, the ordinary man’s dream-percept
will be vague, shifting, and unrememberable.

“ Similarly, if I see a subjective hallucinatory figure
‘ out in the room,’ its aspect is not determined by optical
laws (it may even seem to stand behind the observer, or
otherwise outside his visual field), but it will more or
less conform by my mere self-suggestion, if by nothing
else — to optical laws; and, moreover, it will still seem to
be seen from a fixed point in space, — namely, from the
stationary observer’s eyes or brain.”

All this, of course, applies also to crystal visions. It
should be noted however that Mr. H. Dennis Taylor, in
two articles contributed to the Annals of Psychical
Science, (Nos. 52 and 53) asserts that “expectation”
and “ suggestion ” will not account for the facts, — and
brings forward a number of striking and interesting
statements in support of his belief. (“ The Physiological

288 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

Limits of Visual Hallucination.”) This, however, is
not the place to question the validity of generally ac¬
cepted conclusions, — especially in view of the fact
that we ourselves shall have occasion, in this paper,
to question certain generally accepted facts regarding
the theory of vision! (The reader may also he re¬
ferred to a short article of interest, in the same
magazine, by Dr. G. Lindsay Johnson, on “ The
Projection of Psychic Visuahzed Impressions,” which
deals with suggested after-images, seen by the sub¬
ject, upon sheets of white paper half an hour or more
after the original (hallucinatory) image had been re¬
moved 1 Many similar cases are to be found in the litera¬
ture of hypnotism.) ^

Crystal gazing experiments are subject to, and go
through, the same stages of investigation as all other
branches of psychical phenomena. We may roughly di¬
vide them into three steps or stages: ( i ) the statistical or
“ legal ” aspect of the subject, so to say, in which an at¬
tempt is made to show that these phenomena occur more
often than chance would account for, or under conditions
which insure their objective reality and verity, and ap¬
parently their unusual source, as opposed to mere super¬
stition and belief; (2) the study of the phenomena them¬
selves, from the point-of-view of the supernormal,
in an endeavour to establish them as genuine super¬
normal facts, and to study the laws under which
they operate; (3) the study of the psychological,
physiological, physical, electrical, chemical, etc., con¬
ditions under which the phenomena occur, and an

1 Dr. Bates has demonstrated that an after-image is never perfect in
size, form or colour; further, that an after-image is never formed unless
there has been strain to see. The nature of this strain is shown further
on in this paper.

CRYSTAL VISION 289

endeavour to correlate these phenomena with others better
understood, and to ascertain, by means of analogy, or
otherwise, the points of contact between these manifesta¬
tions and others occurring in our world around us, and
subject to scientific scrutiny. We may add that, up to
the present, the efforts of psychical researchers have nec¬
essarily been directed mainly toward the first of these ob¬
jectives; and only relatively lately has the second one been
approached; while the third is, as yet, a field all but un¬
touched. Yet it is surely here that the greatest and most
solid and scientific gains should and must be made, in
order to facilitate or render possible our understanding
of these phenomena; and it is partly because of this fact
that we feel strongly that a properly equipped and en¬
dowed laboratory, devoted to the systematic study of
psychic phenomena, is one of the prime needs of our time,
and that great forward progress cannot be made, at least
in certain fields of research, until this has actually been
established. However, a beginning must be made some¬
where, and it is the object of the present paper to study
the phenomena of crystal-gazing from the third of these
standpoints, assuming that their genuine nature be
granted, and-that their psychological value also be granted
as a subject for serious debate.

Hallucinations, such as those seen in the crystal, must
be distinguished from illusions, which are only partial
hallucinations.^ Gurney’s famous definition of a hal¬
lucination as “ a percept which lacks, but which can only
by distinct reflection be recognized as lacking, the objec¬
tive basis which it suggests ” {Proceedings, S. P. R. Vol.

An illusion is a real object misinterpreted, as when a white coat is
mistaken for a figure; a full-blown “hallucination” is a fully-external¬
ized mental picture, having no basis in reality, as when a figure is seen
in an empty room.

290 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

III, p. 154) should be remembered here. Brierrc de
Boismont, in his work on hallucinations, thus defines it:
“We define a hallucination as the perception of the
sensible signs of the idea; and illusion as the false ap¬
preciation of real sensations” (p. 28). This is not
very clear, with regard to the former phenomenon.
Parish, in his work on Hallucinations and Illusions, offers
no clear definition of his own, but quotes Ball, in saying
that “ Hallucination is perception without an object,” and
William James in saying that “ a hallucination is a sense
perception like any other, only there happens to be no
object there; that is the whole difference.” {Principles
of Psychology, Vol. II, p. 115.) The subject of hal¬
lucinations has been fully discussed by Gurney in his ar¬
ticle on “ Hallucinations ” in Proceedings, Vol. Ill, in
Phantasms of the Living; by Myers, in Human Person¬
ality, and in the “ Census of Hallucinations, in Proceed¬
ings S. P. R., Vol. X.

The whole subject of the nature and origin of hallucina¬
tions has been extensively discussed; but while much has
been said upon the subject, not many positive conclusions
have actually been reached. We can merely say, in this
connection, that the theory of the centrifugal origin of
many hallucinations (which both Myers and Gurney so
ably defendeef) has never, to our minds, been adequately
met — far less disposed of; while it is the one most cap¬
able of explaining, in a satisfactory manner, many veridi¬
cal hallucinations and kindred supernormal states. The
arguments of Parish and others have always seemed to
the writers unconvincing. The theory, according to our
view, stands upon its own merits, and is quite as defen¬
sible as any other theory so far advanced.

According to this view, the mental picture, or hallucina-

CRYSTAL VISION

291

tion, originates in the mind (or higher brain-centres, ac¬
cording to whether we prefer to use psychological or
physiological language), and Is projected “ downwards,”
as It were, to the affected sensory-centre, inducing in it the
sensation of sight (or of hearing, etc., as the case may
be). The probable actual mechanism of the psycho-
physiological process involved In such a phenomenon has
been set forth at length by Gurney and Myers, in their
paper entitled “ A Theory of Apparitions,” in Proceed¬
ings S. P. R., Vol. II., 168-70 (and popularly presented
In H. Carrington’s True Ghost Stories pp. 32-35). Cer¬
tain It Is that the centrally initiated theory of hallucina¬
tions accounts in a satisfactory manner for crystal visions,
while it appeals to us more in conformity with the facts
set forth in this paper than any other theory so far ad¬
vanced.

The study of crystal visions which follows does not
deal so much with their supernormal character (which Is,
indeed, dubious enough) as with the psycho-physiology
of the visions themselves — with the mental and ocular
and nervous and muscular changes which accompany the
occurrence of the hallucinatory pictures. In order to un¬
derstand our experiments aright, however, it will be neces¬
sary, first of all, to give a rapid resume of the theory of
vision ordinarily held, and also of the view held by Dr.
Bates, contradicting this view in many respects, and then
to see how our experiments fall into place, and also tend
to confirm the latter theory. Accordingly, we shall first
of all state the ordinary theory of vision and of accommo¬
dation of the eye; and we cannot do better, perhaps, for
the sake of simplicity and clearness, than to quote the de-
criptlon given by George Black, M. D., in his work on
Eyesight. He says : —

292 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

“To understand anything of the physiology of vision,
it Is necessary to have a general Idea of the way In which
Images of objects are formed by refracting surfaces.
Light emitted from luminous bodies, or reflected from the
surface of nonluminous bodies, moves in straight lines,
and the smallest conceivable line of light is called a ray.
Rays of light, then, are merely supposititious lines used by
opticians to enable them to bring the effects of an intangi¬
ble force within the range of mathematical calculations,
and to study its exact and unalterable laws.

“ A ray of light is always in a straight line while it re¬
mains in the same medium, or passes through another
medium of the same density; but when it passes to a
medium of different density, as from air to water
or glass. Its direction is at once changed. . . The
rays of light are bent, or refracted. . . Refraction
of light is the change of direction which Its rays undergo
in passing from one medium through another of different
density. . . .

“ A bundle of divergent rays, or pencil of light, pro¬
ceeds from every point on the surface of a visible object,
and each one of these pencils may be brought to a focus
by a convex lens. The combination of all the focii of all
the points on the surface of the object will optically re¬
produce the object, or form an Image of it. . . . In this
way the picture is formed in the camera, which in Its
simplest form, consists of a box with its inner surface
blackened, a hole in the front in which a convex lens is
placed, and a white surface on the back to receive the
Image that the lens forms of an object towards which it
may be directed. In the eye, the sides of the box are
represented by the sclerotic, the blackened inner surface
by the pigment of the choroid, the opening by the pupil,

CRYSTAL VISION

293

the convex lens by the cornea and crystalline lens and the
surface to receive the images by the retina ” (pp. 31-35).

So far all is plain sailing. But the rays of light com¬
ing from different objects are different. Those coming
from a distance of more than twenty feet are practically
parallel. Those coming from nearer objects are more
or less divergent in proportion to the distance of these
objects from the eye. If the eye were absolutely rigid,
and could not adapt, or, as we say, accommodate itself
to this state of affairs, we should see only distant ob¬
jects, for rays coming from points nearer than twenty
feet would be focussed behind the retina instead of
upon it.

In practically every book which has been published
upon this subject it is stated that accommodation is ef¬
fected by a change in the shape of the crystalline lens, —
which becomes more or less convex, as the case requires,
thereby bringing the light-rays nearer or focussing them
further away, as the case may be. Thus, Dr. Gibbons, in
his elaborate work on The Eye: its Refraction and Dis¬
eases, Vol. I, p. 86, says:

“ Accommodation is the change in the refraction of the
eye, due to an increased convexity, and hence an increase
in the strength of the crystalline lens, due to the action of
the ciliary muscle.” Dr. Roosa, in his Defective Eye¬
sight, (p. 31) states that: “The ciliary muscle acting
upon the crystalline lens is the agent of accommodation.”
Black says (pp. 41-42) : “The ciliary muscle does for
the eye what the adjusting screw does for the opera
glass. . . . This faculty of adapting itself to various
distances is called the “ accommodation ” of the
eye, and is brought into requisition whenever there is

294 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

the slightest change in the distance of any near object that
we look at.” Similar quotations could be multiplied
ad nauseam; in fact, as before stated, this is the generally
accepted view of the mechanism of accommodation.

It is also generally believed that the failure of the eye
to adjust itself properly for vision at different distances is
due to a permanent change in the shape of the eyeball.
A myopic or short-sighted eye is one that is too long
from the front backward. In such an eye light rays com¬
ing from a distance are focussed not upon the retina but
in front of it, producing either a complete failure of
vision, or the formation of a blurred image. A hyper¬
metropic or far-sighted eye is too short, and all rays of
light would be focussed, if they could be continued, be¬
hind the retina, instead of upon It. As the distant or
parallel rays are focussed more nearly upon the retina
than those coming from a distance, such eyes see better
at the distance than at the near-point, but do not see dis¬
tinctly at any point. An astigmatic eye Is one in which
there has been an unequal deviation from the normal In
the curvature of the cornea — more rarely of the lens —
so that light rays come to a focus at different points, some
behind, perhaps, and others In front of or upon the retina.
According to the accepted theory the only remedy for
these conditions Is to be found in glasses which so change
the refraction of the light rays that they are brought to
a focus upon the retina, In spite of the wrong shape of
the eyeball.

Now, It is these theories which the experiments con¬
ducted by Dr. Bates refute, and which, as we shall see,
tend to be further refuted by our researches in crystal
vision. To render this newer view of the facts intelligl-

CRYSTAL VISION

295

ble to the reader, we may, perhaps, be permitted to quote
from an article by Dr. Bates, in the New York Medical
Journal, May 8, 1915, entitled “The Radical Cure of
Errors of Refraction: by means of Central Fixation,”
Dr. Bates says : —

“ I have been engaged during the past three years in
the physiological laboratory of the College of Physicians
and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, in a
series of experiments on the eyes of animals, which show,
I believe, that the prevalent ideas concerning the causes of
errors of refraction are not correct. . , , Those ideas
ascribe such errors to permanent, innate, and acquired de¬
formations of the eyeball. My experiments seem to dem¬
onstrate that we can go further back and find such de¬
formations in abnormal strain of the extrinsic muscles of
the eye. In animals, myopic refraction is produced by
excessive contraction or strain of the oblique muscles;
hypermetropic refraction by an excessive contraction or
strain of the recti muscles; and astigmatism by a modifica¬
tion of the action of the extrinsic muscles. . . .

“ The sole cause of all uncomplicated or functional er¬
rors of refraction is a conscious or an unconscious effort or
strain to see. The only remedy for this strain is relaxa¬
tion. Relaxation or rest of the eyes is accomplished only
by central fixation. ... By central fixation is meant the
ability of the eye to look directly at a point, and while
doing so to see best with the centre of the fovea or the
centre of sight of the retina. . . .

“ The lens is not a factor in the production of accom¬
modation, . . .

“ Hypermetropic refraction is always produced by a
strain of two or more of the recti by electrical stimulation

296 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

or advancement, and is always prevented by relaxation
of these muscles by tenotomy.

“ Myopic refraction is always produced by a strain of
two obliques and is always prevented by relaxation of
these muscles by tenotomy.

“ The cause of all errors of refraction is a strain to
see. The cure is accomplished by relaxation. Relaxa¬
tion is secured by central fixation.”

To state the facts in simple, non-medical language for
the lay reader: When we look at a near-by object, we see
nearly all parts of it clearly. If, now, we move this ob¬
ject across the room, and we are inclined to be myopic or
short-sighted, we unconsciously strain — when looking at
the now-distant object — in an endeavour to see it as
clearly as we did before. This unconscious strain causes
a contraction of the oblique muscles which form an al¬
most complete belt around the eyeball and it is thereby
elongated, just as a rubber ball would be elongated if
one squeezed it in the middle. The eye thus becomes
myopic, or near-sighted, for the time being. The more
we strain to see, the more near-sighted we become. The
more near-sighted we are, the less clearly do we see the
distant object, and the more we strain. We are thus in a
vicious circle. The only means of egress is by learning to
use the eyes properly; to look without strain, with relaxed
muscles, and this is accomplished by learning central fixa¬
tion — f. e., how to look at the distant object and see one
part of it best. When this is once learned, the eyes are
normal, the vision is perfect. (Of course, the reverse of
all this is true in the case of far-sighted persons; in their
case the strain is to see a near-by object clearly; but the

CRYSTAL VISION

297

same laws are at work, and the method of cure Is also the
same.)

Dr. Bates made these startling discoveries as the re¬
sult of an elaborate series of experiments upon the eyes
of dogs, cats, rabbits, fish, etc., and of extensive clinical
observations upon human eyes. After removing the
lens from the eyes of fish and rabbits, or pushing it out
of the line of vision, he found that accommodation took
place precisely as if nothing had happened. By elec¬
trical stimulation of the oblique muscles he was always
able to produce accommodation, but after one or both
of these muscles had been cut across, or after they had
been paralysed by atropine, accommodation could not be
produced by electrical stimulation. After the effects of
the atropine had passed away, however, or after a di¬
vided muscle had been sewed together, accommodation
took place as usual. Again when one oblique muscle
I. was absent, as was found to be the case in all cats ob¬
served, a few fish and an occasional rabbit, accommoda¬
tion could not be produced by electrical stimulation; but
when the rudimentary muscle was strengthened by ad¬
vancement, or the absent one was replaced by a suture
which supplied the necessary counteraction, accommoda¬
tion could always be produced by electrical stimulation.
By operations upon the oblique muscles of the various
animals studied, myopia was produced at will, and by cor¬
responding operations upon the recti muscles, hyper-
metropla was produced at will — astigmatism being
usually produced in connection with these two conditions.
In human subjects whose lenses had been removed for
cataract, accommodation was often observed to take
place normally: that is, these subjects were able to read

298 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

diamond type at six inches, and to read the small letters
on the card used for testing the vision at twenty feet,
without any change of glasses. Myopia and hyperme-
tropia were produced at will in human subjects simply
by inducing them to strain their eyes to see at the dis¬
tance, or at the near-point.^

These experiments conclusively proved (i) that the
lens has nothing whatever to do with accommodation; (2)
that the shape of the eyeball is not permanent, and that,
therefore, the vision may fluctuate from moment to mo¬
ment as the strains and relaxations of the muscles on the
outside of the eyeball are brought about. A person may
be myopic one instant, normal-sighted the next and hyper¬
metropic the next. This should follow from the facts;
and this we actually found to be the case in studying the
eyes while crystal visions were being produced. These
experiments may, therefore, be said to offer a new and
indirect proof of the correctness of Dr. Bates’ conclu¬
sions, and to confirm his observations in a striking man¬
ner.

These various changes which take place in the eye may
readily be detected by means of the retinoscope. To
make clear what happens, the following details should,
perhaps, he understood.

The pupil of the eye is not really black, as most persons
suppose, but transparent. It appears to us to be black,
simply because ordinarily no light is reflected from the
interior of an observed eye into that of the observer.
In the early part of the nineteenth century, a French
physiologist, while holding a cat under water in the per¬
mit a patient strains to see a distant object, myopia is produced; if a
near-by object, hypermetropia results. This is true, not only for human
beings, but also for dogs, cats, rabbits, fish, etc.

CRYSTAL VISION

299

formance of some experiment, was surprised by seeing
the blood-vessels of the retina. This showed that the in-
terior of the eye was not necessarily invisible at all times;
and culminated in the invention of the ophthalmoscope
by Helmholtz, in 1851.

When we speak of “ seeing ” anything, we mean that
rays of light proceeding from it reach our retina; and the
pupil ordinarily appears black, because the eye of the
observer is not placed in a position to receive the rays of
light coming from the interior of the observed eye. If,
for instance, we hold a candle in front of an eye to il¬
luminate the pupil, the light thrown back from the
bottom of the eye through the pupil, and towards
us, will be intercepted by the flame; and, of course,
we cannot place our eye in the course of the rays,
between the flame and the observed eye, without
shutting off the light altogether. In either case,
the pupil of the eye examined will appear black,
simply because no light passing out through it can reach
our retina. This part of the problem is solved by using,
instead of a candle, a small mirror, usually concave, with
a hole in the centre. Light is thrown by the mirror
through the pupil, and the observer, by placing his own
eye behind the central opening, has it directly in the line
of the rays reflected from the interior of the eye examined,
— a bright red reflection from the blood in the vessels of
the choroid immediately takes the place of the usual black¬
ness of the pupil.

In our own experiments, we used an improved ap¬
paratus, in which this mirror was connected with a power¬
ful, though small, electric light.

Our object in making these experiments was not,
however, to observe the condition of the retina, but to

300 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

note the changes of the shadow which passes to and fro
across the pupil when the eye is not focussed at the same
distance at which the eye of the observer is placed. If
you are examining an eye focussed, say, at a spot one
metre away, your own distance from the eye being the
same, there will be no shadow when the light is moved
to and fro across the pupil. If, however, the eye has
been elongated by the contraction of the oblique mus¬
cles and cannot focus at one metre, a shadow will be
seen to travel across the pupil in a direction opposite to
the movement of the light. If, on the other hand, the
eyeball has been squeezed into a shortened (hyperme¬
tropic) condition, and cannot focus at any distance, the
shadow will be seen to move in 'the same direction as
the light. The movement of this shadow, therefore,
is a sure and immediate index to the condition of the
eye — whether it be short or long-sighted, or normal,
at any given moment. If the shadow changes in Its di¬
rection, or disappears altogether, during the observa¬
tion, it is a certain proof that the eye is constantly becom¬
ing either short- or long-sighted, or returning to a normal
condition, which is what we should expect from the facts
cited above — for we can readily imagine that the deli¬
cate muscles on the outside of the eye would constantly
change in their tension, as the eyes were being employed
in looking into the ball. And this is precisely what we
found to be happening in our crystal-gazing experiments.
The subject being requested to look into or at the ball,
and visions having begun to appear, the beam of light
was thrown into the interior of the eye, — and the move¬
ment of the “ shadow ” was very evident. In this way,
the frequent changes of refraction could be observed, —
while the crystal-visions were actually going on.

CRYSTAL VISION

301

The majority of these experiments were undertaken in
June, 1916, — the chief “ scryer ” being Mrs. John G.
Peppier, a professional business woman, who kindly con¬
sented to submit to the experkments, on the condition that
her eyes would not be injured thereby. Mrs. Peppier is
in no sense a professional psychic; these experiments are
the only ones of the kind she has ever tried, — though
she has also conducted a number of valuable experiments
herself, with the crystal and otherwise, as her Reports will
show. She has also been the recipient of a number of
interesting spontaneous experiences. It is hardly neces¬
sary to say that Mrs. Peppier received no remuneration
for her services, which were given gratuitously, and that
we have every confidence in her veracity and strict sin¬
cerity of purpose. She and her husband later conducted
a number of researches at their own home, which are
reported in their letters. We wish to express our thanks
and appreciation, in this place, to Mrs. Peppier, for her
whole-hearted interest and support, and for the time and
patience with which she afterwards carried out a number
of independent experiments herself. To Mr. John Pep¬
pier we also owe much for his collaboration with his wife,
in their investigations conducted at home.

The second scryer was Mr. William de Kerlor, who
kindly consented to “ scry ” for us on one occasion, and
whose eyes when examined, showed precisely the same
changes as did those of Mrs. Peppier. Mr. de Kerlor is
well-known in psychical and occult circles, and has lately
made an excellent translation and abridgement of Boir-
ac’s La Psychologic Inconnue under the English title Our
Hidden Forces.^ While Mrs. Peppier was our chief
scryer, therefore, the experiments with Mr. de Kerlor con-

1 Also Boirac’s later work, The Psychology of the Future.

302 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

firmed them in a very interesting and conclusive manner.

Our first experiments were conducted on the evening of
June 8, 1916, — Mrs. Peppier scrying. She sat at one
side of the dining table, the ball in front of her, shaded
from all high-lights by a large black silk handkerchief.
The two investigators sat on the opposite side of the table,
so that the beam of light thrown into the eye would be
practically horizontal. The room was partially dark¬
ened, save for one shaded light, but the subject could
clearly see the surface of the crystal at all times. The
subject was requested to relax, first of all; and then gaze
at the surface of the ball, without blinking if possible, and
without strain. Under these conditions, the experiments
began.

After about one minute, the pupil of the eye appeared
dilated, the Interior of the eye being normal. So far,
no visions had appeared in the ball. At this point, how¬
ever, a tiny luminous spot of light was observed, which
became light and then dark. (The following extracts are
from notes, taken at the time.) The first vision was that
of a large fist, closed, on a big arm, supporting it. The
fist becomes a lotus flower, with five points “ hollow
inside.” This faded. A tooth-brush was then seen.
An examination of the eyes at this point showed them to
be normal. While the examination was being made,
however, they became myopic (short-sighted). Mrs.
Peppier then said: “ I see my own eye, very large; now a
brilliant spot all down the side of the globe. ... A big
nose flat at the bottom. . . . The outline of a face. . . .
Huge brow, large orbits, the upper lip shaved, concave
nostrils with hairs in them, large head, a regular
dome. . . .” (Eyes normal.) “ A steeple, a flag

CRYSTAL VISION

303

thereon, a standard ” (eyes myopic; then changed to nor¬
mal). “A pyramid with four sides. . . . sands. . . .
a palm tree. . . .” (eyes hypermetropic,) “ and a
horse, with purple and blue trimmings. ... A river
which curves, a bend in the river; on it is a boat with a
beautiful sail” (eyes normal) “a triangular sail, going
up-stream, against the current rapidly” (eyes myopic).
“There are three men in it; now it is going beyond the
horizon. . . . upwards” (Eyes hypermetropic). . . .
“ There is some one signalling as it were with a red flag.
The one who signals is a woman with the face of a
man; the eyes are round, dark, nose curved, the eyes
not prominent. ... A nice curve to the eye. The
hair is parted low and going to the side — tall,
not masculine” (during this vision the eyes showed
mixed astigmatism — both eyes). “She is making
her mouth round; her hand is being put to her mouth
as iT shouting a message. ... A huge head of an owl ”
(refraction normal, followed by mixed astigmatism).
“ The owl has a big beak, with round eyes. Feathers
like hedgehog quills. Now it is bigger and yet further
away. ... I don’t understand that” (eyes myopic).
“ It is standing on its legs. It has three claws; it is stand¬
ing on a piece of oak tree. It is saying ‘ I am he of the
wisdom’” (apparently an auditory hallucination, heard
simultaneously) . “ That same sentence is written on a

piece of paper under its claws. There is a phosphor¬
escent light on one side. The sign Pisces; a big capital
NP (Eyes normal; pupils not changed, convergence
slight.) “ I see the sky at night, with stars. No moun¬
tains, but smoke as if houses were in flames blown in the
night, as it were. The smoke is rampant. The houses
are burning. There are woods. Letter B. Letter E.

304 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

A sudden burst of reddish light; a great flash at the base
of the crystal; at the top the letter Z.” (Eyes normal.)
“Three women; a triangle. The one on the right is
white; the one in front is blue, the one to the right is
dark, perhaps red. A crown of iron; a ridge on the top
and bottom ” (mixed astigmatism) “ square stones, right
and left, the right one red, the other yellow” (eyes
myopic; then normal). . . .

After a period of rest, the experiments were resumed:

“ A little girl walking across, she seems lost, she is
wandering. . . . (Dr. Bates, who was making the ob¬
servation at this time : “ Only once in a while she
focusses on the ball; she is looking way beyond the ball:
now she has myopia — more than two diopters”). . . .
“ The tail of a peacock; a convent, a procession of white-
robed figures.” (Myopia; “The left eye more near¬
sighted than the right.”) “ There is a big gate through
which they are walking. There are men all in white.
A ship; a battleship; there are men moving about its
deck ” (mixed astigmatism — there is no proper focus in
mixed astigmatism). The experiment was tried of mag¬
nifying the battleship by means of a magnifying glass.
This made the whole scene clear, and seemed to bring it
nearer. It changed to a painted picture (whether or not
of the same scene was not noted). “The bust of a
musician” (myopia, i D). “Looks like Handel. A
tumbler” (mixed astigmatism; changed to simple my¬
opia). “A plain man; a landscape at dusk. ... A
stream running through it; a beautiful woodland” (eyes
normal) ; “ now there are clouds in the sky; now we are
at a circus; I see the clown and all the people ” (myopic

CRYSTAL VISION

305

astigmatism). “Clouds . . . clouds. ... I can’t see
any more. . . .”

Later, the following was obtained: —

“ I see a woman in the crystal — tall, fair, beautiful;
she is impatient and has quick actions. She is very sen¬
sitive ” (apparently “ sensed ’’ by the subject). “ She is
looking at Dr. Carrington. She is lifting her right hand;
the fingers are exquisite. ... A woman in an old-fash¬
ioned bed; sitting up in bed; there are curtains at the sides
of the bed.” (Myopia, more in the left than in the right
eye; pupil moderately dilated; myopia less at times; it
is one diopter for the right eye; now mixed astigmatism
in both eyes.”) “Skulls. ... I see skulls! This pic¬
ture of a skull lasts a long time. . . . Now, I see a rab¬
bit hanging up. . . . There is some one in a ham¬
mock. . . .”

Another gentleman who was present then picked up the
ball, and looked into it. This gentleman is usually near¬
sighted. He at once saw a big crowd of men shouting
and fighting. “ A mountain. . . . Blood. ... a lan¬
tern; the crowd is going away; they are poor people, dark
clothes. . . .” (Myopia revealed.) “ I can’t see any
more. . . .”

On the evening of June 13, we again tried experiments
in examining the interior of the eye, this time Mr. de
Kerlor scrying. The eyes before scrying were found to
be normal. Experiments begun :

“I see a table, with a white tablecloth; the things on
the table seem flat.” (“ Eyes not focussed on the ball,

3o6 modern psychical PHENOMENA

but far beyond it.”) “ A woman, dressed in white; fair

hair, blue eyes. A friend comes from a great distance to
greet her; there is a meeting of three friends. ... A
bouquet of flowers — roses” (pupils dilated; eyes nor¬
mal). “I see corn flowers, narcissus” (myopia; astig¬
matism). ” A train — some one going on a journey to
the northwest. . . . Black; there is some one who is ill,
near the water; it is by the sea. A square patch of red¬
dish light — danger. A swastica. . . Some one is in the
midst of danger” (eyes normal) ”. . . there is some
one with a moustache, slim, big eyes — beautiful, tall,
pale-faced.” (Some one present recognized this as a de¬
scription of his nephew. Mr. de Kerlor is very psychic.)
“A hall — a door — an old palace — I open the door;
there is a church inside; candles burning; it is a
Catholic church; things are burning” (mixed as¬
tigmatism) ‘‘it is damp — the ground outside is
cultivated. ... A tree, not very tall; an orange or
olive tree. . . . Peace, peace. Fertility” (uttered by
the subject, no known reason) ‘‘ Blue water” (myopia)
‘‘ There is no living thing in it — calm — blue sky —
sun shining from behind — it is morning — dawn”
(myopia) ‘‘Waves on the sea” (eyes normal). . .

‘‘ I see a man with a dark moustache ” (mixed
astigmatism) ‘‘ about five feet, ten inches tall;
well built, dark, he has on a dark tie; he has the manner¬
isms of a professional man. . . . Shakespeare. . . .
Wilson. . . . Some one is giving a devilish laugh” (ap¬
parently heard) . . . . ‘‘ A man of gross skin, big teeth,

tall, yellow” (mixed astigmatism) ‘‘he turns his face;
he takes things calmly” (eyes normal) Three stars; be¬
hind a red sun; from each star comes a hand, and coming
down are streaks of magnetism or light. ... It looks

CRYSTAL VISION

307

like rain; it is dark. . . . Reflection of three lights. . . .
Flowers. ... I see the words ‘ I will ascend ’ ” ;
(myopia) “ there is the beat of a drum; the impression
of a ferocious man ” (eyes normal) “Lilies. . . . Clouds
. . . Everything has gone; I can’t see any more. . . .”

These extracts will probably be sufficient to give the
reader a fair idea of the kind of visions usually seen by
our “ scryers,” and also the method of making the investi¬
gations regarding the condition of the eyes at the time
the visions were actually seen. It will be observed at
once how rapidly the refraction of the eyes changed.
It is idle to believe that these rapid changes could have
been brought about by any alterations in the shape of the
lens of the eye, — quite apart from the anatomical demon¬
strations before mentioned; but they become quite intelli¬
gible if we conceive the eye as a delicate, plastic sphere,
constantly subject to spasmodic pressures and squeezings
from the muscles on the outside of the ball. While in¬
directly proving the correctness of Dr. Bates’ view of ac¬
commodation, therefore, — -these experiments have also
furnished us with an interesting series of facts regarding
the condition of the eye, during the production of crystal
visions. These, so far as we know, have never been ob¬
served before.

One or two remarks may be made regarding this series
of observations. In the first place, it is to be noted that,
in many instances, the subject was not looking at the ball
at all while seeing the visions; his eyes were focussed in
space either beyond or on the near-side of the crystal,
while he actually thought he was looking into It steadily
and with great care! As soon as the subject began to
strain, to see objects more clearly, myopia or astigma-

3o8 modern psychical PHENOMENA

tism was produced; on one occasion hypermetropia was
noted when the subject was trying to see something which
appeared to be moving at a great distance. These phe¬
nomena are what we might expect, were the figures seen
‘ objective ’ ; but they are doubtless the result of sugges¬
tion, and are to be explained as are those formerly
quoted In this paper, noted by “ Miss X ” and others.
The rapidity with which the eyes changed was very strik¬
ing, — and unexpected also. Dr. Bates has frequently
observed such changes, however, in the eyes of patients
who were looking at distant objects.

Following these initial experiments, Mrs. Peppier
kindly undertook to conduct a number of researches of
her own, in conjunction with her husband, — who Is a man
of good scientific training, — and report the results. The
extracts are from Mrs. Peppler’s Reports, with an oc¬
casional Report by Mr. Peppier. The interest and value
of some of these experiments seem to us to be very great.^
(The first letters were written, it will be noted, before
our experiments, described above; the later letters after¬
wards, in order to undertake the various optical tests
suggested.) With this, we leave the Reports to speak
for themselves.

1 The Reports are 'verbatim, save that certain portions of the letters,
not bearing directly upon the experiments, have been omitted. Other¬
wise — save for a few verbal alterations — the accounts are exactly as
received.

REPORTS

(Extracts from letters, from Mr. and Mrs. Peppier)

June I, igi6.

My dear Dr. Carrington:

If you will remember, a little more than a week ago, I tele¬
phoned you for information as to where I could purchase globes
for Crystal Gazing, and you kindly asked me to report to you
any results I might have.

My husband, Mr. Peppier, who is interested in psychical re¬
search, to some extent, being very anxious to get one of the
globes, I called you up in order to obtain the information for him.
He has tried off and on, for the past few years, to see visions in
glass marbles, balls, ink-wells, magnetized spirit cups, mirrors,
etc., etc., without result, and being from the “ Missouri ” kind,
he discredited most of the veracity of the literature on that sub¬
ject. However, recent published experiments caused him to look
’round for something to be used for gazing to see if I could see
anything that he could not see. The evening of the day that I
called you up, my husband and I, upon looking around the house
for something resembling a gazing globe, discovered a cut-glass
pitcher, having a hemispherical bulge at the handle, of smooth
curved glass, which we decided to use until we got the regulation
globe. As per your directions, we placed a black cloth on the
bottom and around the entire glass pitcher, leaving only the
hemispherical glass exposed. It was becoming dusk and my hus¬
band started in gazing for ten minutes without any result what¬
soever. Afterwards he asked me to try my luck. After gazing
for a minute or so, I saw what seemed to me a pulpit with a
preacher in it. A minute or so later I saw what seemed to
me to be a coffin, draped with a black cloth, and a woman with
outstretched hands kneeling beside it. The nature of the pic¬
ture caused me to discontinue my experiments for the time being.
Later on in the evening, my husband asked me to gaze once more,
after he had again tried unsuccessfully, there being no light in the
room, except the glow of a gas heater on the floor. What I

309

310 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

saw is as listed below, jotted down by my husband while I
spouted out;

1. A stage with a curtain.

2. A fellow with whiskers, with a slab or some kind of a ban¬
ner hanging downward from the elbow to his knees, like a sign.
(Sign too small to be able to read contents.)

3. A little dog, (or some small animal) running around the
stage.

4. A box-seat at the side of a curtain, like in a theatre, also
a chandelier, also footlights at the bottom of stage and around
the curtain.

5. A beautiful scene of trees, scene like sunset, with strong
sunlight in the distance, beautiful scene of some tropical country,
apparently a warm place, plants like stickers or cacti, growing
evenly together.

6. A mining district scene, people walking, a mountainous dis¬
trict, people walking one by one behind each other, also a man
and a woman walking and bowing and talking to each other,
as though just introduced.

7. A beautiful plant, shaped something like a pyramid, a tropi¬
cal country, very beautiful skies, something like Golden Gate on
the Pacific Coast, or a very hot place near the Equator.

8. A King like Franz Joseph, or a General like Carranza; side
whiskers; old gentleman, military bearing, like a soldier; crowd
after him, he is standing by himself. — It’s an army after him,
he is trying to duck. He is thinking seriously. They want to
kill him; the country looks very mountainous; looks like a gold
region, something like Mexico; pictures are running one after
the other, almost like a moving picture show. If the globular
glass were bigger I am sure the pictures would be bigger in pro¬
portion to the size of the ball. . . .

My husband took down everything with pencil and paper, as
I described one picture after the other, as above.

The next day my husband succeeded in purchasing a globe at
Martinka’s, and, in the evening, after another unsuccessful at¬
tempt on his part to see anything, he asked me to continue where
I left off the night before. We placed the crystal ball on its
black enamelled wooden pedestal on the black cloth, covering the

REPORTS

311

rear of the ball, again using the glow from the gas heater in the
rear of my chair as the only light. I immediately saw the fol¬
lowing:

1. An Eagle.

2. A man’s face looking something like Bryon’s, looking down
at a manuscript, in the background a suspension bridge with
water underneath ; a girl’s face like my sister Lulu’s, her mouth
open, flesh very plain, — just as plain as day; — same suspension
bridge.

4. A ship — battleship — plain as day — and it is not very
far away from the Statue of Liberty; Liberty looks small against
the ship. Ship is far away from the Liberty Statue but moving
toward it; it looks like night; Liberty is illuminated more than
the battleship.

5. Same battleship again. Statue of Liberty is gone; battle¬
ship very large, — something right near it — something peculiar
but I cannot distinguish it; think it is a boat; if it is, it is a
funny one. Little object is chasing the battleship ; not sure big
ship is a battleship; has three tremendous smoke stacks; cannot
see Statue of Liberty now. Am making drawing of small object.
See Exhibit i.

Now I see a balloon ; it is lighted ; it hovers above the ship and
the small object. Perhaps the latter is a submarine. Balloon
is getting ready to throw a bomb on the boat, but is going to miss
it. Bomb will fall on the side of the boat, as the ship is scooting
off to one side. The ship is moving; it is not a Zeppelin, rather
looks like one of the Curtiss-American machines. It is not directly
over the boat, only on one side between the ship and small object.
Am drawing picture of airship, see Exhibit 2.

After returning from the Theatre at 10:15 p. m., upon looking
at the glass ball, I saw a polar bear. Being interrupted by com¬
pany I was unable to gaze any further. One of my guests gazed
at the ball for five minutes without seeing anything; another one
of the gazers saw an eagle, after gazing for about three minutes.

For the next few days I had no time to devote to this subject.

On May 23rd, 1916, at 6:35 p. M. I saw the following:

I. Sapphire ice, shade between blue and purple; looks like polar
region.

312 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

2. A planet in the sky. — Two big stars colliding, one has a
little tail, like sapphire ice; it is on the ground. One star has

REPORTS

313

a terrible lot of fire in it, the other has not so much. It is
smaller, — looks like a scene at the North Pole, all kinds of ice¬
bergs in the water, — not a living creature to be seen.

A cold desolated country. A long stream of planets. Seven
planets, one a very tiny one; they are scooting in and out playing
tag with each other, but something seems to be drawing them to¬
gether, — some magnetic attraction, perhaps. The country is
quite dark; no sign of life there.

May 25th, g p. M.

1. Gazing into the glass ball, I see three stars, something in the
distance of duller light, very, very large.

2. A tremendous monster, composed of brownish substance,
with crab-legs, — hazy, dry and dead looking. Am drawing out¬
line of same, see Exhibit No. 3.

3. Figure of a person wearing a bathrobe, walking with back
turned. Glass ball somewhat unsatisfactory tonight, so am re¬
turning to the glass pitcher.

I. I see the figure of a nude woman sitting with one arm
down. It’s her left arm held downward. She has dark hair.

I am gazing under difficulties tonight, nursing my baby while
gazing into the crystal. Am now gazing again into the crystal
ball. I see the same crab-like figure. A fiery object diamond¬
shaped. Have put my baby into the cradle; am gazing now
again into the pitcher.

I. I see a black cat staring at me. Cat has wild shiny eyes;
cat is sitting up on its haunches; — am again gazing into the
ball. I see a house on fire, not a very big fire but a very large
house, one window all aflame. It is a very large window.

My husband tells me to disregard all mention of the stars,
sapphires, etc., and the crab-like monster, as they are probably
due to bubbles and flaws in the crystal. I find the cut-glass
pitcher more satisfactory than the ball tonight, apparently for
this reason.

My sister called on me the other night and I asked her to
gaze into the crystal, but she was unable to see anything, al¬
though I saw a polar bear immediately upon looking into it.
My husband is unable to see anything, no matter how many

314 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

times or how often he tries, but is convinced that I really see
the things I describe, although they may be the products of my
imagination. To me they are very real, but the ball and the
pitcher-surface being so very small, the objects naturally are very
small, and I am quite sure that if I had a very large ball, I
could distinguish faces more definitely. To me these pictures
are very, very real, with natural colours. Sometimes they stay for
a long time and sometimes they remain for an instant and other
pictures take their places.

If you wish to have me report any further pictures or scenes,
which I may discover in the ball or pitcher, I shall be more than
pleased to do so.

Of course, I do not know the meaning or significance of these
pictures. They appear and disappear in the glass, and if you
know more about the significance of these things, I should be
very thankful to you if you will advise me.

Sincerely yours,

Daisy T. Peppler.
June Sihj igi6.

My dear Dr. Carrington : —

I have received your letter of the and inst.

Since writing you, my husband succeeded in purchasing a hollow
glass ball, eight inches in diameter, which when filled with water,
serves the purposes of a crystal better than anything I have used,
so far, as the pictures appear larger and more distinctly. I have
written a report of my experiments on a separate sheet enclosed.

As to scrying at your residence, my husband believes I ought
to try to contribute my share to science, and I shall, therefore, call
at your address some evening this week, providing you will as¬
sure me absolutely and positively that the proposed examination of
my eyes by means of a beam of light, will be absolutely harmless.

EXPERIMENT WITH WATER GLOBE

June 8th, igi6.

1. Empty launch, — empty seat in stern.

2. Wash hanging on a line, — a man’s night-gown and a man’s
under-shirt, not far from the launch, on shore. I see a little
sea-shore, but no people.

REPORTS

315

3. A tin pail in the boat.

4. It is night time, — I see something in the water like an eeling
light; the water is quiet and there is white sand on shore.

5. On the other side of ball I see somebody kneeling down
and crying, — looks like a woman’s figure, face buried in her
hands. Now I see two women, — one standing up, — there is a
lightish gown on kneeling woman; she has a very nice figure;
the other woman has on a kimono and she is standing next a
dresser; her hair is made kind of high and fluffy and the room
seems to be in disorder, especially the table with various papers
on it. The one standing up is a young woman. She is slightly
lifting her dress and I see one bare leg. There is an oval shaped
mirror standing on the dresser.

My sister, upon gazing into the ball, suddenly saw a fast
moving train racing across the prairie, then, a second later a
mountainous country full of sheep. She was startled at what
she saw, as only a few moments before she had been ridiculing
my crystal gazing “ stunts.”

WATER GLOBE

June 9th, 1916 — 6:30 P. M.

I see an object in the water. It is night time. It is moving.
It is dark on both ends and has lights in the centre, and I am
drawing sketch of same as I see it.

3i'6 modern psychical PHENOMENA

It looks like a battleship. It is still moving. It is going into
port.

Adjourned till a little later in the evening.

WATER GLOBE

June gth, iqi6 — g p. m.

1. I see a man having on a uniform, a military cape, helmet
with plume — he has a long moustache, ends hang down about
half a foot, although his features resemble those of the German
Kaiser. He is standing in front of a building, resembling an
arsenal. Now he is walking toward it. I can just see his head
now, and the back of his neck. I am using the magnifying glass
now, and the picture is greatly enlarged.

2. Now I see a tremendous steel battleship. It is a very light
grey colour or perhaps nearer tan. I am looking toward the bow.
Now I see the deck. Now I see the same military man with the
long moustache, walking around on the deck. I have turned the
glass ball around, and now I see the other side of the battleship.
Now I see a life-boat attached to the front deck of the vessel. I
am turning the globe around again and the long-moustached man
is still there. I have been looking for over half an hour and the
battleship with the man walking on deck is still there, and the
picture will not fade, although I have left the globe, every now
and then, but every time I return to the globe the same picture
is still there. Ship looks as though it were in port.

When I focus the magnifying glass on the picture, I still see
it very much enlarged. I must now adjourn my gazing experi¬
ment.

WATER GLOBE

8:30 P. M.,

June 17th, igi6.

I see a moving train, a locomotive with a big headlight coming
toward me. In the distance, I see somebody like a bandit, putting
a log in front of track, — a large beam like a stripped oak tree.
Trees on side of track, — see the setting of the sun.

10 minutes later (after taking walk around the room). I
still see the same scene, smoke coming out of the locomotive. I

REPORTS

317

see figures in front of it. More than one man fussing with
the beam ; looks as if they were going to put it across the rail.
I also see round ball of light — too large to be the moon, more
like the sun but without rays around it. It lies on the side of
the track, on the ground, not far from the men.

Now I see a fellow with a mask on. — Above the train, in
the sky, I see a beautiful crown, such as that worn by kings or
the nobility. I will draw a picture of the crown I see.

Sunday, 8 P. M., June i8ih.

My husband calls me onto the verandah to look at something
beautiful in the sky. — It is the moon, greatly enlarged, with fire
in it EXACTLY AS I SAW IT IN THE CRYSTAL, or rather
the WATER GLOBE, last night.

P. S. I have good results with the magnifying glass, but not,
as yet with mirror. Maybe I haven’t the right style of mirror.
Also by pressing eyeball I see the object double. The small
amount of light used in crystal gazing makes the mirror a difficult
proposition.

Eleven p. M.

June 20th, IQ16.

I see a man sitting on a rock — sort of a golden-shaped, three-
cornered thing about two to three feet under him, slightly to his
left. The water looks like a pool or a small river. It is a
country scene.

(About 15 minutes later.) I still see the same thing. Once
in a while the man stands up, but he is always on the brink.
He is unaware of the three-cornered, golden-shaped thing under¬
neath him. The rock is a large one, but one that can easily be
climbed upon, from the pool to the top.

3i8 modern psychical PHENOMENA

I will draw a rough sketch of what I see.

I saw the Kaiser on the upper deck of a battleship, painted
quite light, with a number of military men, about a dozen in all.
Each one of these men had a revolver, including the Kaiser.
All of a sudden this boat made a dash toward a fleet, — looked
like our fleet in Southern waters.

I don’t remember just where I was when viewing this whole
performance, but I must have been either floating through the
air over the sea, or else on some observation tower in the sea.
Then I remember walking through woodlands to a house, a small
bungalow, or arsenal, with one room where powder and shot
were kept, and there I met a little slip of a girl, with her hair
hanging carelessly and loosely down the back of her head.
The girl was not sixteen years of age. I never saw her face
before but I would recognize it if I saw it again. She was a
blonde but her hair was bleached, and no one seemed to detect
this except myself. The soldiers were joking with her and
treated her courteously and kindly. She had a very humble po¬
sition among them dealing out things.

All of a sudden somebody discovered that this little slip of a
girl was a spy of the German Emperor, and after the discovery
much confusion prevailed. I do not remember what they did
with her for at this point I woke up.

REPORTS

319

The following Report is by Mr. Peppier: —

July 12, igi6.

My dear Dr. Carrington:

On July 5th we (my wife and I), put the large water globe
in the centre of the table, using the black cloth under and around
the ball. Immediately she saw an office building (skyscraper),
and a river in front of it, and an object like a tug-boat or a peculiar
looking submarine in the river, in front of the building, — it
looked to her like a downtown East River scene. Now I move
a black japanned tray in front of my wife’s eyes, while she is
seeing the building. She cannot see the picture in the tray. I
remove the tray, — she again sees the building in the globe. I
remove the cloth, — she still sees the picture, but slightly fainter.
I hand her the magnifying glass, — she sees the picture enlarged.
Then I tell her to press her eye-ball, — she does so, and she says
she sees the building doubled. I ask her in which part of the
globe the building is, and she says in the back or rear of the ball.
I turn the ball around, gradually, — the front entrance of the
building is still visible to her, the picture has not changed, — I
turn the ball around in the opposite direction, — the scene is the
same unchanged. I tell her to close her eyes, — she does, — now
she cannot see the picture, but she can imagine how it looked, but
it isn’t there. She opens her eyes at my request, and she sees the
same picture in the ball.

Now I tell her to walk around the table to the opposite side
of the globe. She gazes into the ball from the opposite side, —
the building is still there, but she can’t see the submarine! She
goes back to her original position, — the building, river and sub¬
marine are there. I give her a mirror, — holding the mirror in
all conceivable positions, she cannot see the reflection of the pic¬
ture in it. She goes back to the opposite side of the ball, — the
building, river and submarine are there now : — naturally she has
not walked around to the opposite side of the miniature building.
I have her repeat the performance, back and forth, making her
gaze into the ball from various directions, — the building, river
and submarine are there, although, in some positions, the sub¬
marine seems to be almost blotted out by the light falling on it,
as viewed from this and that position, — that accounts for the
absence of the submarine in the first test above stated. . . .

320 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

This was a good test opportunity, for the picture was practically
a stationary or inanimate one, and I proved that the same picture
was seen by her, no matter from which direction she looked into
the crystal. Sometimes the pictures are moving pictures and
the scenes keep changing continually. As in the case of the
battleship, — one time she sees the bow, another time the deck,
another time the opposite side of the vessel, without changing her
own position or point of gazing. For the purpose of the above
tests, such moving scenes are useless. . . .

John G. Peppler.

July i8th, igi6.

My dear Dr. Carrington:

Answering the various questions contained in your last letter I
would state:

1. Q. “ Look into a spoon-bowl, and see whether or not the
image is bent or curved, as an ordinary reflection would be.”

A. I haven’t a smooth rounded out spoon-bowl at hand, but in
similar rounded out or curved things, — bottles, etc., — I don’t
seem to see bent or curved images; or, rather, I pay no attention
to such pictures when I see them, as those pictures are generally
objects on walls of the room reflected up-side-down. Yes, — these
things do form perfect images and pictures of things, at times,
but I disregard them for the reason that I can locate the source
from which they originate. (Note. — Pictures seen by her in con¬
cave bottles etc., are natural and not bent or deformed. J. G. P.)

2. Q. “ See whether reflected in mirror.”

A. I have had no success with mirrors at all, as yet.

3. Q. “ See whether seen from opposite side of ball (when
turned round).”

A. If ball is turned around while I do not change my sitting
position, or standing position, I see the same picture, but if I walk
around to the other side of the globe, or ball, I see the picture
from another viewpoint, — on an angle, side or back, while some
pictures I do not see at all on the opposite side of the ball.
(Note. — These were probably slowly moving pictures. My tests
with a stationary scene proved different conclusions, as per a former
report. J. G. P.)

4. Q. “ See whether magnified under a magnifying glass.”

REPORTS

321

A. Yes, — all pictures are magnified under a magnifying glass.

5. Q. “ Study the colours of the images, and see whether com¬
plementary colours are induced afterwards, while closing the eyes,
or looking again into the ball.”

A. With me, complementary colours are not induced by closing
the eyes. But after closing and resting my eyes for a few minutes,
I see the picture in the crystal, much clearer than before. I do,
however, see beautiful colours of skies, and other magnificent col¬
ours in peculiar objects, unknown to me, just as I do see very
crazy pictures at times, which seem to tell no story whatsoever,
nor do they seem to have a head or a tail.

6. Q. “ How big do the pictures look to you? ”

A. Like ordinary snap-shot photographs, — say 3-^x5, or
4 X 6. — Sometimes they are small and sometimes very large and
plain, though never larger than the crystal or water-globe used.

7. Q. “ How long do they last? ”

A. The moving pictures go rapidly before my eyes, at times
so rapidly that I cannot talk fast enough to describe what I see.
Some pictures move more slowly, changing position, as for in¬
stance, a profile will change to a full face, and vice versa, with
the speed a person uses in turning the head. I often see what
I call “ Stationary pictures,” which usually last a long time, as
long as 10 to 20 minutes, — even longer than half an hour at
times.

8. Q. “Are they opaque? — Do they shut out things behind
them? ”

A. Yes — usually they do shut out things behind them; while
some pictures are dull, others are quite brilliant and beautiful, as
for instance, a few evenings ago, upon looking at the concave
water bottle, I saw a Chinaman, plain as day, preaching in what
looked like a public thoroughfare. He had a white kimono on,
and his queue was long and beautiful, reaching the ground, with a
tassel at the end. He was talking from a platform, and a number
of Chinese men and women were applauding him, waving their
hands. The whole scene was coloured in the natural, beautiful
colours, with the sun appearing in the sky, to the right.

This scene was to my extreme left in the water bottle as though
to indicate that the scene hailed from the Far East.

Some time after that (a half hour or more), I placed the globe

322 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

on the mantel, and without expecting to see anything in it, and
looking at it carelessly from where I was seated, I saw in the
centre of the globe, a lot of ordinary large fish, with their heads
bobbing out of the water, standing erect, but not floating around.
There wasn’t much colouring in this scene.

I had been reading the day before about a man-eating shark, —
and this might have had something to do with this picture, —
but the fish I saw in the globe, while large, did not tally with the
pictures of the shark I saw in the newspapers; what I saw was
more like this.

9. Q. “ Does the state of your health seem to affect
the visions, one way or the other? ”

A. My health is generally considered good. I have, however,
a highly artistic temperament, — easily offended. My health does
not seem to affect the pictures one way or the other. But I might
say my “ whims ” do. By that I mean that, if I do not feel like
“ scrying ” or interesting myself in the globe, say because of an
argument with my husband about it, then, in that event, I seem
not to see very much ; but if I put my heart and soul into it,
feel happy, ambitious and in good humour, what I see is really
wonderful, — to me !

10. Q. “ Try telepathic experiments with a friend.”

A. I cannot FORCE mental telepathy on another. But my
husband and I have made a few experiments on each other, viz:
he would write down a number on a piece of paper, holding it
in his hand and repeating it mentally, while I would try to guess
the number, and I succeeded in doing so, in one instance, the very
first time, while in some cases I did it in some three to six guesses,
other cases not at all, and vice versa. My husband did the guess¬
ing in about as successful a fashion as I did.

11. Q. ‘‘Try shell-hearing, with a big shell held to the ear,
for voices.”

A. Sorry I haven’t had a chance to do anything with this, as
yet, as I haven’t a shell at hand, but I held the small open end of
a lamp-globe to my ear and was surprised at the peculiar noises.

I purposely refrained from gazing much lately, or ‘‘ scrying,”
owing to the Mexican situation, in which I am deeply interested
because I have so many friends who have gone to the Border, —

REPORTS

323

members of the 69th, 71st, 7th and other regiments, — not wish¬
ing to see unpleasant scenes.

I do not think of anything further to say at the moment.

Thank you for your kind interest in me, and believe me.

Sincerely,

D. T. Peppler.

October i6th, igi6.

Dear Dr. Carrington:

The enclosed reports are like a “ drop in the ocean ” of the
many scenes visible to me, — as for instance, one morning last
week, between 8 and 9 A. M., I saw a beautiful palace, shrubbery,
fine grounds, magnificently laid out, and an air-ship hovered
over it, directly east. I lost sight of it, (the air-ship) in the
shrubbery, and after that I saw an underground passageway in
the palace grounds. Then the scene passed away and a marine
picture took its place, — that of a tramp steamer, with no less than
three small undersea boats after it, but something happened in
my household that prevented my jotting down these data, — as has
been the case in many other instances.

Really, there is so much to look at in these globes that, if I
even attempted to report everything, I would not, truthfully
speaking, know where to begin nor how to end. But you, no
doubt, by this time, have a general idea of the different things I
see from time to time ; — all sorts of scenes, — beautiful land¬
scapes, thrilling marine pictures, as well as pictures of beautiful
objects, — and freakish ones, too!

Sincerely,

D. T. Peppler.

October 15th, igi6.

My dear Dr. Carrington: —

Replying to yours of recent date, wherein you request details
regarding my wife’s veridical visions in the water globe, while I
was away, I desire to state that they are correct miniature repro¬
ductions of scenes that took place in Chicago, — the company I
was in and the little odd things that took place while in said
company. I cannot regard this as co-incidental guesswork, as
my wife didn’t know what company I was going to meet, much
less could she know what was going to happen while in the com-

324 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

pany of these persons. If I tried to give details in a short letter,
they would sound strange and peculiar, as the happenings are the
result of several years of peculiar combinations of circumstances.

My wife has become quite proficient at crystal gazing and,
while she sees her own visions continuously, if I ask her to see
some certain person far away, and tell me what he is doing, she
will usually see him in a few seconds in another part of the globe,
but her own vision will remain where she first saw it, even after
the second or induced vision has vanished.

During the early part of the summer, I procured a ruby water
globe, and my wife claimed, that after she had gazed into it in¬
tently for a few minutes without seeing much of anything, the
visions in the clear glass water globe were clearer and more dis¬
tinct. But my experiments in that direction were meagre, for
the reason that my wife took a sudden, violent dislike to the
red ball, and it was very seldom I could induce her to look
into the ruby globe, and she threatened to throw it out of the
window every time I mentioned it. Her favourite is the large
clear water globe, and, when she saw a picture, I also experi¬
mented with amber glasses or spectacles. She would still see the
vision, but less distinctly.

Finally I decided to find out what effect dicyanin would have
on her vision. I have since purchased a set of “ aura ” screens, and
I experimented with them alone by myself, until my wife begged
me for the loan of them. She claims she can see my “ etheric
double,” and she also claims, that after she has gazed into the
dark blue dicyanin screen for a minute, she can see the visions
clearer in the clear water globe through the red screen, but, our
experiments, in this direction, have been far from exhaustive.
However, she now gazes into the red or ruby water globe, of her
own volition, and actually sees things in it. Tonight, she saw
a long distance vision in the ruby globe, which I am almost posi¬
tive is veridical, because I and not she knew anything about it,
and because she couldn’t have gotten it from me, telepathically, as
I was busy writing at the time and not thinking about it at all.
[i.e. by direct, conscious telepathy]. ...

Sincerely,

John G. Peppler.

REPORTS 325

December i8th, 1916.

My dear Dr. Carrington:

I have reported a number of times, to Mr. Peppier, verbally
and in writing, since last I wrote you, but whether or not he has
had time to transmit the same to you, I do not know.

However, one very interesting incident occurred the other night,
and I decided to write you directly about it, myself.

Evenings, Mr. P. has lately had the habit of saying to me:
“ Look into the Crystal (or Water Globe) and see what So and
So is doing this very minute ! ” — Sometimes I balk like a donkey,
as I prefer to “ gaze ” at random and see anything I happen to
see without effort, rather than pin myself down to the strain of
trying to see “ what So and So is doing this very minute.” — No
doubt a great deal of practice is needed in this special way of
scrying before the desired result is obtained, but the fact that
much can be accomplished, in time, is beyond doubt, provided a
person does not over-do this sort of thing.

But what I am driving at now is simply this : Saturday night,
December i6th, Mr. Peppier asked me to look into the water
globe and see what So and So was doing. I looked, and to the
right of the crystal (or water globe) I saw beautiful mixed colours
and a Loving Cup, — such as are usually given out as prizes in
yacht races. I immediately told my husband I saw this Loving
Cup, and he immediately retorted: “Now cut out the symboli¬
cal stuff. What 1 want is the veridical material! ” And he
would hear nothing further from me about the Loving Cup, and
I was obliged to turn my thoughts to what “ So and So is doing
this very minute.”

But, Sunday afternoon, about 3:30, I was asked by a member
of one of the Clubs we have in our house ( we now have two
Clubs there) whether or not I had seen the cup their Club
won in a prize dancing contest. 1 was amazed, and without
saying anything, went at once downstairs to look at the cup, and
behold, I saw the same shaped cup I saw the night before in the
water globe.

I saw this cup about 9:30 Saturday evening and the boys won
the cup 12:30 A. M. following morning. Mr. P. attributes the
affair to “telepathy” for, at 9:30, when I saw the cup in the
crystal, he (Mr. P.) claims the boys had their minds concentrated

326 MODERN PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA

on winning it, and I caught the wave, — thought wave, — which
threw the reflection of the cup into the crystal. At any rate, I
did not see it at the very time they won it, but 3 or 4 hours
before, and I recall that the cup I saw in the crystal, while iden¬
tically the same shape, was composed of brilliant, opaque, vapoury
substance, beautiful colours, while the real cup is of solid
silver. . . .

Sincerely,

D. T. Peppler.

These extracts will furnish the reader with sufficient
material to enable him to see the character of the experi¬
ments, as well as their general psychological character¬
istics. Mrs. Peppier has continued crystal gazing experi¬
ments, on and off, since these Reports were written, but
not systematically, and has written no detailed reports of
the results obtained. Domestic duties interfered with
her continuing the experiments systematically, and she
probably lost her initial interest, — being disappointed
that nothing of a strikingly supernormal character was
obtained, — which she had hoped would be the case.
We must therefore, accept the case as it stands, for the
present, — and probably enough has been furnished to
satisfy the most painstaking and patient reader! The
reports of Mrs. Peppier we regard as interesting and
valuable, and worthy of ranking with those of ‘ Miss
X.,’ Mrs. Verrall and ‘ Miss A.’ Supernormal material
is almost entirely lacking, though It will be observed that
this was possibly- beginning to appear at the end of the
series, when the experiments ceased. It Is a pity that
further systematic investigations along these lines could
not be carried on; and we can only hope that, at some
future time, 'this opportunity will present itself, — in
which case a further Report upon such experiments will
be made.

REPORTS

327

The chief object of this paper, however, Is to draw
attention to the remarkable and hitherto unknown
changes which take place within the eye, during the pro¬
duction or perception of crystal-visions, and the series
of optical tests which rendered these changes apparent.
It is earnestly hoped that these initial, and in many ways
crude, experiments will serve to stimulate others to ex¬
periment along somewhat similar lines, — or to study
other psychic phenomena from this physiological point-of-
view. We shall feel that this paper has served its pur¬
pose if It has succeeded in calling the attention of serious
students to a hitherto neglected field of psychical research,
and has set them upon the road to making analogous
experiments themselves.

INDEX TO NAMES

A., Miss., 283, 284, 326.

Alden, H. M., 66.

Alrutz, Prof. Sidney, 90.
Archimedes, 64, 168.

Assagioli, Dr. R., 233.

Atkinson, W. W., 276.

Atwater, Prof., 40.

Auer, Dr. E. Murray, 201.
Augustine, St., 59, 60, 70.

Austin, Stephen F., 178-79, 284-85.

Baggally, W. W., 87, 96, 100.
Baraduc, Dr., 129, 147.

Bastian, Dr. Charlton, 36, 52, 65.
Bates, Dr. W. H., 275-308 passim.
Beltrami, 177.

Beredka, Prof. A., 233.

Berkeley, 270.

Binet, A., 63, 284-85.

Bisson, Mme., 114.

Bjornstrom, 31, 285.

Black, Dr. George, 291-93, 293-94.
Boirac, Emile, 301.

Boismont, Brierre de, 290.

Bolyai, 169-79 passim.

Bose, Prof. Chunder, 250-61
passim.

deBrath, Stanley, 114.

Burke, Dr. Butler, 36, 52, 65.
Burton, Dr. M. LeRoy, 60.

Campbell, Rev. R. J., 71.

Cantor, Georg, 181.

Cannon, Dr., 209.

Carson, Dr. C. H., 217.

Carroll, Lewis, 262, 263, 266, 267,
268, 269.

Charcot, Dr., 16.

Claparede, Prof., 232-49 passim.
Clifford, W. K., 269, 271.

Courtier, Jules, 96.

Crawford, Dr. W. T., 107.

Crookes, Sir William, 126, 128.

Darget, Commandant, 128.

Darwin, Charles, 64, 168.
Descartes, 271.

Dewey, Dr. E. H., 48.

Durville, Dr. Hector, 128, 147.

Eddy, Mrs. Baker, 71.

Edinger, Dr., 233.

Eeden, van, F., 33-34.

Euclid, 175, 176.

Fancher, Molly, 15-16.

Feilding, Hon. Everard, 87, 96,
too, 102.

Fere, Dr. Ch., 284-85.

Ferrari, Dr., 233.

Flammarion, Camille, 96, 126.
Flournoy, Prof. Th., 14, 18, 204-5.
Fraser, Prof., 276.

Freulenburg, Dr., 233.

Freud, Sigmund, 20, 22, 23.
Fukurai, Prof., 129-30.

Gates, Elmer, 196.

Gauss, 169, 171.

Gahrke, Dr., 233.

Geley, Dr., 114.

Gibbons, Dr., 293.

Gladstone, William E., 95.
Goldstein, Prof., 233.

Gurney, Edmund, 20, 289, 290, 291.

Hack-Tuke, Dr., 192.

Haeckel, Ernst, 36, 37, 232.
Hastkopf, Dr., 233.

Helmholtz, 299.

Henderson, J. L., 65.

Hinton, Charles, 169, 177.

Hodgson Dr. Richard, 17, 21.
Holcombe, Dr. W. H., 189-90.

330

INDEX

Home, D. D., in.

Hude, Mrs. Anna, i8.

Hurst, Dr. A. F., 198.

Hutchinson, H. G., 266.

Hyslop, Dr. J. H., 16, 132-33. 215-
16, 276, 282.

Jacks, Dr. L. P., 186-87.

James, Prof. William, 79-80, 91,
loi, 215, 249, 250, 290.

Joire, Dr. Paul, 286.

Johnson, Dr. G. Lindsay, 288.

Kant, 64.

Kelvin, Lord, 38.

de Kerlor, William, 301-2, 305-7.

Krall, W., 232-49 passim.

Kroemer, Dr. H., 233.

Kunz, Dr. F., 276, 277.

Lancelin, Charles, 146-54 passim.
Lang, Andrew, 275, 276, 282.
LeBon, Gustav, 37, 38, 144.

Lee, Mrs. Dupont, 130-33.

LeFlohic, E. P., 133-35.
Lobatchewsky, 169-79 passim.
Lodge, Sir Oliver, 22, 91, 113, 178,
181.

Loeb, J., 36, 52, 65.

Lombroso, C., 16, no.

Lytton, Bulwer, 164.

Mackenzie, Dr. William, 233.
McClure, S. S., 103, 106.

Mangin, Dr., 126.

Matla, J. L. W. P., 156-68 passim.
Maunder, E. Walter, 12.

Mayer, Prof. Robert, 39-40.

Mayo, Dr. Herbert, 31.

Maxwell, Dr. J., 96, 126, 286.
Melville, John, 276, 277, 279.
Miles, Eustace, 169.

Morselli, Prof. Henry, 126, 135.
Munsterberg, Prof. Hugo, 108.
Myers, F. W. H., 32, 266, 267, 275,
283, 286-87, 290, 291.

Ochorowicz, Dr. J., 125-28 passim.
Osten, von, Wm., 233, 242.
Ostwald, Prof., 233.

Palladino, Eusapia, 15, 16, 86-89;

90, 96-113 passim; 127, 149.
Parish, H., 285, 286, 290.

Pear, Dr., 206-7.

Peebles, Dr., 217.

Peppier, Mr. and Mrs. John G.,
301-26 passim.

Piddington, J. G., 32-33-
Piper, Mrs. L. E., 22.

Plato, 184, 204, 269.

Poincare, Henri, 4.

Prince, Dr. Morton, 285.

Rabagliati, Dr. A., 38-39.
Randolph, P. B., 282.

Raupert, J. G., 141, 216-17.
Redgrove, H. S., 169, 183.
Reichenbach, 94.

Richet, Prof. Charles, 126.
deRochas, Albert, 147.

Roosa, Dr., 293.

Royce, Prof. J., 20, 21.

Sacchieri, 176.

Sarasin, Dr. Paul, 233.

Schiller, Dr. F. C. S., 81.

Schoeller, Prof., 233.
Schrenck-Notzing, Dr., 114, 126.
Sepharial, 276.

Shaler, Prof. N., 55-56.

Shanks, Mr., 180.

Sidgwick, Prof. Henry, 82-83, 117.
Sidgwick, Mrs. Henry, 125.
Simpson, Dr. F. T., no.

Smith, Dr., 206-7.

Steiner, Dr. Rudolph, 34-35.
Swedenborg, 189.

Taylor, H. Dennis, 287.

Thomas, N. W., 276, 277.

Thomas, Wm. and Pavitt, Kate,
276.

Thompson, Prof., 178.

INDEX 331

Thompson, Mrs., 33-34.

Troland, Dr. Leonard T., 17-23
passim.

Tweedale, Rev. Charles L., 136-40.

Verrall Mrs. A. W. 275, 282-83,
326.

Wickland, Dr. Carl, 217.

X., Miss, 27s, 276, 277, 282, 283-84,
308, 326.

Zaalberg, van Zelst, G. J., 156-68
passim.

Zeigler, Dr. H. E., 233.

Zeno, 176.

Zola, £., 23.

'V,

I ^

}

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Texts

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "Modern Psychical Phenomena"

See other formats